Predictive factors of non-operative management failure in 494 blunt liver injuries: a multicenter retrospective study.

Non-operative management (NOM) has become the major treatment of blunt liver trauma (BLT) with a NOM failure rate of 3-15% due to liver-related complications. The aim of the study was to determine the predictive factors and a risk-stratified score of NOM failure. From 2013 to 2021, all patients with BLT in three trauma centers were included; clinical, biological, radiological and outcome data were retrospectively analyzed. Predictive factors and a risk-stratified score associated with NOM failure were identified. Four hundred and ninety-four patients with BLT were included. Among them, 80 (16.2%) had isolated BLT. Fifty-nine patients (11.9%) underwent emergent operative management (OM) on the day of admission and 435 (88.1%) had a NOM. NOM failure rate was 11.5%. Patients with a NOM failure more frequently had a hemoperitoneum (p < 0.001), liver bleeding (p < 0.001), blood transfusion (p < 0.001) and angioembolization (p < 0.001) compared to patient with a successful NOM. In multivariate analysis, the presence of hemoperitoneum (OR = 5.71; 95 CI [1.29-25.45]), angioembolization (OR = 8.73; 95 CI [2.04-38.44] and severe liver injury (AAST IV or V) (OR = 8.97; 95 CI [3.36-23.99]) were independent predictive factors of NOM failure. When these three factors were associated, NOM failure rate was 83.3%. The AAST grade, the presence of hemoperitoneum and the realization of liver angioembolization on the day of admission are three independent predictive factors of NOM failure. Our risk-score based on these three factors stratify the risk of NOM failure in BLT and could be used for a more appropriate level of medical survey adapted to each patient. Level of evidence: prospective observational cohort study, Level III.

Emergency Cranial Surgeries Without the Support of a Neurosurgeon: Experience of the French Military Surgeons.

INTRODUCTION: Unlike orthopedic or visceral surgeons, French military neurosurgeons are not permanently deployed on the conflict zone. Thus, craniocerebral war casualties are often managed by general surgeons in the mobile field surgical team. The objective of the study was to provide the feedback of French military surgeons who operated on craniocerebral injuries during their deployment in a role 2 surgical hospital without a neurosurgeon. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted by phone in March 2020, involving every military surgeon currently working in the French Military Training Hospitals, with an experience of cranial surgery without the support of a neurosurgeon during deployment. We strived to obtain contextual, clinical, radiological, and surgical data. RESULTS: A total of 33 cranial procedures involving 64 surgeons were reported from 1993 to 2018. A preoperative CT scan was not available in 18 patients (55%). Half of the procedures consisted in debridement of craniocerebral wounds (52%, n = 17), followed by decompressive craniectomies (30%, n = 10), craniotomy with hematoma evacuation (15%, n = 5), and finally one (3%) surgery with exploratory burr holes were performed. The 30-day survival rate was 52% (n = 17) and 50% (n = 10/20) among the patients who sustained severe traumatic brain injury. CONCLUSIONS: This survey demonstrates the feasibility and the plus-value of a neurosurgical damage control procedure performed on the field by a surgeon nonspecialized in cranial surgery. The stereotyped neurosurgical techniques used by the in-theater surgeon were learned during a specific predeployment training course. However, the use of a live telemedicine neurosurgical support seems indispensable and could benefit the general surgeon in strained resources setting.

Impact of the Ileal Microbiota on Surgical Site Infections in Crohn's Disease: A Nationwide Prospective Cohort.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Surgery is performed in 50-70% of Crohn's disease [CD] patients, and its main risk is surgical site infection [SSI]. The microbiota has been extensively assessed in CD but not as a potential risk factor for septic morbidity. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of the gut microbiota on SSI in CD. METHODS: We used the multicentric REMIND prospective cohort to identify all patients who experienced SSI after ileocolonic resection for CD, defined as any postoperative local septic complication within 90 days after surgery: wound abscess, intra-abdominal collection, anastomotic leakage or enterocutaneous fistula. The mucosa-associated microbiota of the ileal resection specimen was analysed by 16S gene sequencing in 149 patients. The variable selection and prediction were performed with random forests [R package VSURF] on clinical and microbiotal data. The criterion of performance that we considered was the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic [ROC] curve [AUC]. RESULTS: SSI occurred in 24 patients [16.1%], including 15 patients [10.1%] with major morbidity. There were no significant differences between patients with or without SSI regarding alpha and beta diversity. The top selected variables for the prediction of SSI were all microbiota-related. The maximum AUC [0.796] was obtained with a model including 14 genera, but an AUC of 0.78 had already been obtained with a model including only six genera [Hungatella, Epulopiscium, Fusobacterium, Ruminococcaceae_ucg_009, Actinomyces and Ralstonia]. CONCLUSION: The gut microbiota has the potential to predict SSI after ileocolonic resection for CD. It might play a role in this frequent postoperative complication.

Is routine gleno-humeral exploration a risk factor for adhesive capsulitis after arthroscopic removal of rotator cuff calcifications? A comparative retrospective study in 340 cases.

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic surgery has earned its place as the reference standard treatment for rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy refractory to conservative medical treatment. Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder is the most common complication (12%). Standard practice involves routine gleno-humeral exploration before calcification removal. The objective of this study was to identify risk factors for adhesive capsulitis. HYPOTHESIS: The development of adhesive capsulitis is associated with gleno-humeral exploration. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, multi-surgeon, retrospective cohort study of 340 consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic removal of rotator cuff calcifications between 1 January 2012 and 1 January 2018. We collected epidemiological data (age, sex, work-related physical activity), the history of previous treatments (local injections, needling), the type and location of the calcifications as assessed radiologically, the clinical findings (Constant score before and 6 months after surgery, diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis defined as shoulder pain with motion range limitation in all directions), and the surgical details (type of anaesthesia, gleno-humeral exploration). RESULTS: Of the 340 patients, 251 underwent routine gleno-humeral exploration and 89 did not. Adhesive capsulitis developed in 40 (12%) patients. By multivariate analysis, gleno-humeral exploration was an independent risk factor for adhesive capsulitis (p=0.022; odds ratio, 5.60). Of the 251 gleno-humeral explorations, 8% identified concomitant lesions and only 4% led to a curative procedure. CONCLUSION: Given our results and the data in the literature, we believe that routine gleno-humeral exploration during the arthroscopic treatment of rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy is inadvisable. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; case-control study.

French survey on a cohort of emergency general surgery modifications induced by lockdown of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

PURPOSE: The brutal COVID-19 pandemic has majorly impacted populations and health systems, and surgeons have observed dramatic changes in their daily clinical activities. A survey of French digestive surgeons was conducted to assess these changes. METHODS: An electronic survey was sent to French digestive and general surgeons in the Societe Francaise de Chirurgie Digestive (SFCD) to assess the surgeons' daily activity during the pandemic and investigate changes in patients' management. The care deviations were classified as delay of management, modification of strategy, or modification of organization, and the impact of these changes on patients was evaluated by the surgeon's estimation of loss of chance. RESULTS: A major reduction in surgical elective activity was observed in 50 (75%) of the 67 hospitals that responded. Of these, 48 hospitals (71.6%) reported receiving SARS-CoV-2 patients. A deviation from usual care was observed in 10% of patients admitted for emergency general surgery. Among 140 patients presenting a deviation from usual care, 74 (52.9%) had delayed management, 53 (37.9%) had a modification of strategy, and 64 (45.7%) had a modification of organization. Medical treatment instead of surgical treatment was decided for 37 (26.4%) patients, resulting in a high loss of chance for 6 patients. Delays (p < 0.001) and a switch from surgical to medical treatment (p = 0.002) were independently correlated with overall loss of chance based on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: This study highlighted the deviations in general emergency surgery patients and provided implications for the solutions that should be implemented during a new health crisis.

Early versus delayed cholecystectomy for cholecystitis at high risk of operative difficulties: A propensity score-matching analysis.

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have demonstrated the superiority of early (EC) over delayed (DC) cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (AC). However, none have assessed the effect of operative difficulty when reporting on treatment outcomes. METHODS: Outcomes of patients who underwent EC or DC between 2010 and 2019 were compared taking into account the operative difficulty evaluated by the Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy score (DiLC). For each patient, the DiLC score was retrospectively calculated and corresponded to the foreseeable operative difficulty measured on admission for AC. A propensity score was used to account for confounders. Primary endpoints were the length of stay (LOS) and the occurrence of a serious operative/post-operative event (SOE). RESULTS: DC in patients with DiLC≥10 reduced the risk of SOE without increasing the LOS. Conversely, DC in patients with DiLC<10 increased the LOS without improving outcomes. Multivariate analysis found EC in patients with DiLC≥10 as the main independent predictor of SOE. CONCLUSIONS: Provided prospective validation, DC for AC in patients with DiLC≥10 seems safer than EC and is not hospital-stay consuming.

Closed Cyst Resection for Liver Hydatid Disease: a New Standard.

BACKGROUND: Although radical resections are recommended for the surgical management of liver hydatid disease (LHD), whether closed (CCR) or opened (OCR) cyst resections should be performed remains unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative and long-term outcomes of CCR and OCR for primary and recurrent LHD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical charts of patients who underwent surgery at a single centre were retrospectively reviewed and compared with respect to major postoperative complications and recurrence rates. RESULTS: Seventy-nine CCRs and 37 OCRs were included. The major morbidity rates were 19% and 5% in the OCR and CCR groups, respectively (P = 0.036). In multivariate analysis, OCR (P = 0.030, OR = 5.37) and the operative time (P < 0.001, OR = 18.88) were the only independent predictors of major complications. The 5-year and 10-year recurrence rates were both 0% in the CCR group compared to 18% and 27%, respectively, in the OCR group (P < 0.001). The mean time to recurrence was 10.5 (± 8) years. DISCUSSION: Closed cyst resection for LHD is a safe and effective approach with a low risk of recurrence. Considering that recurrence could appear more than 10 years after surgery, follow-up of patients should be adapted.