Quality of recovery and safety of deep intravenous sedation compared to general anesthesia in facial plastic surgery: A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Facial plastic surgical procedures are performed under either general anesthesia (GA) or sedation. GA is often associated with post-operative nausea and longer recovery, while deep sedation is thought to greatly facilitate perioperative patient comfort and expedite recovery. The objective of this study was to compare these two anesthetic techniques in a relatively healthy patient population undergoing facial plastic surgery and to discuss optimizing patient safety with a deep sedation technique. METHODS: A non-randomized, prospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate patients undergoing facial plastic surgery with a focus on rhinoplasty under either deep intravenous sedation (DIVS) in an ambulatory surgery center or under GA in a community hospital. Patients were between ages 18-65 and agreed to participate in the study and complete a quality of recovery (QoR-40) survey. Two-tailed Student's t-test was done for numerical data and Chi-squared test for categorical data. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients and 16 patients had surgery under DIVS and GA, respectively. Compared to the GA group, the DIVS group had less post-operative nausea and vomiting (21.7% vs 50%, P = 0.04; 4.3% vs 37.5%; P = 0.004, respectively), shorter emergence time (4 vs 13 min, P < 0.001), and higher QoR-40 scores for almost all the categories except for physical independence. There were no post-operative medical or surgical complications. CONCLUSION: DIVS appeared to be safe in the office-based setting and provided a higher quality recovery after a predominantly rhinoplasty-based practice compared to the GA group. Vigilant monitoring of the patient is crucial for careful titration of sedation to avoid respiratory depression and possible compromise of the surgical result from having to rescue the airway.

Preoperative incidence of olfactory dysfunction in nasal surgery patients.

OBJECTIVE: Learn the incidence of olfactory dysfunction in preoperative patients prior to nasal surgery and compare with a control group of patients who are not going to have such surgery. Assess the usefulness of the coffee/tea differentiation test in assessing preoperative dysosmia. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective controlled cohort study. SETTING: Urban medical center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty-one adult patients (aged 18-65 years) whose olfactory function was tested using the Pocket Smell Test and a coffee/tea differentiation test. A failed test required missing at least 1 item on the card or failure to report a difference between tea and coffee. The statistical analysis using the t test and the Fisher exact test were calculated using MINITAB. RESULTS: The study group (n = 55) had 38% men and 62% women compared with 58% men and 42% women in the control group (n = 96). The incidence of dysosmia was 32% in the study group and 14% in the control group. In the study group, 34.5% of patients failed the Pocket Smell Test and 12.4% failed the coffee/tea differentiation test as compared with 12.4% and 0%, respectively, in the control group. CONCLUSION: Patients who are scheduled for nasal surgery for medical or cosmetic indications are more likely to suffer from olfactory dysfunction before surgical intervention. This should be taken into consideration when counseling patients regarding possible postoperative complications.

Prediction of hypocalcemia after using 1- to 6-hour postoperative parathyroid hormone and calcium levels: an analysis of pooled individual patient data from 3 observational studies.

BACKGROUND: Parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels up to 6 hours postthyroidectomy have been shown to have excellent predictive power in determining hypocalcemia. In this study, we investigate the usefulness of combining calcium and PTH to increase the predictive power. METHODS: Individual patient data were obtained from 3 studies (152 patients) that fulfilled our criteria (using PTH assay within hours postthyroidectomy to predict symptomatic hypocalcemia). RESULTS: Changes in combined PTH and calcium threshold levels checked 1 to 6 hours after thyroidectomy were excellent in predicting postoperative hypocalcemia. A decrease in PTH of 60%, coupled with a simultaneous decrease in calcium of 10%, 5 to 6 hours postoperatively resulted in a sensitivity and specificity of 100%. However, combined PTH and calcium threshold changes were not significantly better than using PTH threshold changes alone. CONCLUSIONS: Threshold changes in serum calcium and PTH, checked hours after surgery, can be used together to accurately predict whether a patient will become hypocalcemic after thyroidectomy.