Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Med Virol ; 96(6): e29709, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38828947

RESUMO

This study evaluated the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of human metapneumovirus (hMPV) infection among hospitalized patients with acute respiratory infections during 2015-2021 and assessed the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on hMPV infection. A single-center, retrospective cohort study was performed, including pediatric and adult patients with laboratory-confirmed hMPV. Of a total of 990 patients, 253 (25.6%), 105 (10.6%), 121 (12.2%), and 511 (51.6%) belonged to age groups 0-2, 3-17, 18-59, and ≥60 years, respectively. The highest percentage (23.0%) of patients were hospitalized during 2019 and the lowest (4.7%) during 2020. Patients < 18 years experienced high rates of comorbidities (immunodeficiencies: 14.4% and malignancies: 29.9%). Here, 37/39 (94.9%) of all bronchiolitis cases were diagnosed in patients < 2 years, whereas more patients in older age groups were diagnosed with pneumonia. A greater proportion of hMPV patients diagnosed with viral coinfection (mostly respiratory syncytial virus and adenovirus) were <18 years. The highest percentages of intensive care unit admissions were recorded among patients < 18 years. Our findings demonstrate that hMPV is an important cause of morbidity in young children and a possibly underestimated cause of morbidity among older adults.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Coinfecção , Hospitalização , Metapneumovirus , Infecções por Paramyxoviridae , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Metapneumovirus/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Paramyxoviridae/epidemiologia , Infecções por Paramyxoviridae/virologia , Israel/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Criança , Masculino , Adulto , Feminino , Lactente , Adolescente , Pré-Escolar , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/virologia , Idoso , Coinfecção/epidemiologia , Coinfecção/virologia , Recém-Nascido , Infecções Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Infecções Respiratórias/virologia , Comorbidade , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Eur J Cancer ; 168: 51-55, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35439660

RESUMO

AIM: Patients with cancer are at an increased risk for severe coronavirus disease of 2019. We previously reported initial findings from a single centre prospective study evaluating antibody response after BNT162b2 vaccine, showing that adequate antibody response was achieved after two doses, but not after one, in patients with cancer vaccinated during anticancer therapy. Herein, we report a follow-up study, evaluating antibody response six months after the second vaccine dose. METHODS: The study included patients with solid tumours undergoing anticancer treatment, and immunocompetent health-care workers serving as controls. Serum titres of the receptor-binding domain (RBD) IgG and neutralising antibodies (Nabs) were measured approximately six months after the second vaccine dose. Complete blood count values were collected and evaluated as predictors for antibody response. RESULTS: The analysis included 93 patients with cancer (66.7% metastatic). Six months after the second vaccine dose (mean 176 ± 20 days), seropositivity rate among patients and controls was 83.9% versus 96.3% (p = 0.0001), respectively. Median RBD-IgG titre was lower among patients compared with controls (2.3 versus 3.2, p = 0.0002). Among seropositive individuals, median Nabs titre was similar between patients with cancer and controls (p = 0.566). Among patients with cancer, lymphocyte and neutrophil counts were not correlated with either RBD-IgG or Nabs titres. CONCLUSIONS: Seropositivity rates and RBD-IgG titre at six months after second BNT162b2 vaccine dose are lower among patients with cancer compared with healthy controls. However, Nabs titre is similar, suggesting a comparable protection among seropositive individuals. Lymphocyte count is not predictive of antibody response.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Neoplasias , Vacinas , Anticorpos Neutralizantes , Anticorpos Antivirais , Vacina BNT162 , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Seguimentos , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G , Estudos Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação
4.
Eur J Cancer ; 157: 124-131, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34508994

RESUMO

AIM: Patients with cancer are at an increased risk for severe coronavirus disease of 2019, thus data on the safety and efficacy of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines are essential. We conducted this prospective study of patients with cancer vaccinated with BNT162b2 and monitored for antibody response and safety. The aim was to evaluate the rate of seropositivity and define predictors for non-reactive immune response. Furthermore, we evaluated the frequency and the severity of adverse events. METHODS: The study included patients with solid tumours undergoing anticancer treatment and immunocompetent health-care workers serving as controls. Serum titres of the receptor-binding domain (RBD) immunoglobulin G (IgG) and neutralising antibodies were measured 2-4 weeks after each vaccine dose. RESULTS: The analysis included 129 patients, of which 70.5% patients were metastatic. Patients were treated with chemotherapy (55%), immunotherapy (34.1%), biological agents (24.8%), hormonal treatment (8.5%) and radiotherapy (4.6%), that were given either alone or in combinations. The seropositivity rate among patients with cancer and controls was 32.4% versus 59.8% (p < 0.0001) after the first dose and 84.1% versus 98.9% (p < 0.0001) after the second dose, respectively. Median RBD-IgG titre was lower among patients than controls (p < 0.0001). Patients who were seronegative after the second dose had significantly more comorbidities than that with patients with seropositivity (77.8% vs 41.1%, respectively, p = 0.0042). CONCLUSION: Adequate antibody response after BNT162b2 vaccination was achieved after two doses but not after one dose, in patients with cancer vaccinated during anticancer therapy.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19/imunologia , COVID-19/imunologia , Neoplasias/imunologia , Neoplasias/virologia , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Vacina BNT162 , Feminino , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Imunogenicidade da Vacina/imunologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/dietoterapia , Estudos Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Vacinação/métodos
5.
Sci Adv ; 6(40)2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33008904

RESUMO

Proteomic profiling of circulating small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) represents a promising, noninvasive approach for early detection and therapeutic monitoring of breast cancer (BC). We describe a relatively low-cost, fast, and reliable method to isolate sEVs from plasma of BC patients and analyze their protein content by semiquantitative proteomics. sEV-enriched fractions were isolated from plasma of healthy controls and BC patients at different disease stages before and after surgery. Proteomic analysis of sEV-enriched fractions using reverse phase protein array revealed a signature of seven proteins that differentiated BC patients from healthy individuals, of which FAK and fibronectin displayed high diagnostic accuracy. The size of sEVs was significantly reduced in advanced disease stage, concomitant with a stage-specific protein signature. Furthermore, we observed protein-based distinct clusters of healthy controls, chemotherapy-treated and untreated postsurgery samples, as well as a predictor of high risk of cancer relapse, suggesting that the applied methods warrant development for advanced diagnostics.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Vesículas Extracelulares , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Mama/metabolismo , Vesículas Extracelulares/metabolismo , Feminino , Humanos , Proteômica
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA