Impact of COVID-19 on immunocompromised populations during the Omicron era: insights from the observational population-based INFORM study.

Background: Immunocompromised individuals are not optimally protected by COVID-19 vaccines and potentially require additional preventive interventions to mitigate the risk of severe COVID-19. We aimed to characterise and describe the risk of severe COVID-19 across immunocompromised groups as the pandemic began to transition to an endemic phase. Methods: COVID-19-related hospitalisations, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, and deaths (01/01/2022-31/12/2022) were compared among different groups of immunocompromised individuals vs the general population, using a retrospective cohort design and electronic health data from a random 25% sample of the English population aged ≥12 years (Registration number: ISRCTN53375662). Findings: Overall, immunocompromised individuals accounted for 3.9% of the study population, but 22% (4585/20,910) of COVID-19 hospitalisations, 28% (125/440) of COVID-19 ICU admissions, and 24% (1145/4810) of COVID-19 deaths in 2022. Restricting to those vaccinated with ≥3 doses of COVID-19 vaccine (∼84% of immunocompromised and 51% of the general population), all immunocompromised groups remained at increased risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes, with adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRR) for hospitalisation ranging from 1.3 to 13.1. At highest risk for COVID-19 hospitalisation were individuals with: solid organ transplant (aIRR 13.1, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 11.2-15.3), moderate to severe primary immunodeficiency (aIRR 9.7, 95% CI 6.3-14.9), stem cell transplant (aIRR 11.0, 95% CI 6.8-17.6), and recent treatment for haematological malignancy (aIRR 10.6, 95% CI 9.5-11.9). Results were similar for COVID-19 ICU admissions and deaths. Interpretation: Immunocompromised individuals continue to be impacted disproportionately by COVID-19 and have an urgent need for additional preventive measures beyond current vaccination programmes. These data can help determine the immunocompromised groups for which targeted prevention strategies may have the highest impact. Funding: This study was funded by AstraZeneca UK.

Estimating the Product Lifecycle Value of Trastuzumab Based on Registry Data in Sweden.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Trastuzumab was introduced in Sweden in 2000 for treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and later expanded to early breast cancer (EBC). The potential value of this innovative therapy was explored in economic evaluations; however, the extent to which these benefits were realised remains unknown. This study aims to estimate the lifecycle value of trastuzumab by combining randomised trial data with Swedish routine-care data. METHODS: Trastuzumab impact on costs and health outcomes was estimated with Markov models for MBC and EBC. Model inputs included progression/recurrence and breast cancer-related mortality data from international randomised clinical trials, and Sweden-specific non-breast cancer-related mortality, numbers treated, and costs and utilities based on data from National Registries and literature. Model predictions were validated by observed survival rates from the National Breast Cancer Registry. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2021, 3936 and 11,134 patients with HER2-positive MBC and EBC, respectively, were treated with trastuzumab, resulting in 25,844 life years and 13,436 per quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gained. Cost per QALY gained was lower in EBC (Swedish krona [SEK] 285,000/QALY) than MBC (SEK 554,000/QALY). The net-monetary value delivered (excluding drug costs) was SEK 13.714 billion, and society retained 62% of this. The modelled survival in trastuzumab-treated patients with EBC matched closely with actually observed survival in registry data. CONCLUSION: Trastuzumab provided substantial population-level health benefits for patients and society, with favourable cost effectiveness in MBC and EBC. There is some uncertainty around the magnitude of these benefits, mainly due to missing data on health outcomes and number of treated patients with MBC.

Retrospective observational cohort study on innovation in oncology and progress in survival: How far have we gotten in the two decades of treating patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer as a single population?

We assessed the impact of new antineoplastic agents on the overall survival (OS) of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) patients followed up until 2012. Multivariate regression models were run for OS (outcome) and four proxies for innovation (exposure): Index (InnovInd, for SEER-Research data 1973-2012) and three levels of aggregation of Mean Medication Vintage, i.e. Overall (MMVOverall), using data aggregated at the State Level (MMVState), and using patient-level data (MMVPatient) using data from the US captured in SEER-Medicare 1991-2012. We derived Hazard ratios (HR) from Royston-Parmar models and odds ratios (OR) from a logistic regression on 1-year OS. Including 164,704 patients (median age 72 years, 56.8% stage IV, 61.8% with no comorbidities, 37.8% with adenocarcinoma, 22.9% with squamous-cell, 6.1% were censored). One-year OS improved from 0.22 in 1973 to 0.39 in 2012, in correlation with InnovInd (r = 0.97). Ten new NSCLC drugs were approved and 28 more used off-label. Regression-models results indicate that therapeutic innovation only marginally reduced the risk of dying (HROverall = 0.98 [0.98-0.98], HRMMV-Patient = 0.98 [0.97-0.98], and HRMMV-State = 0.98 [0.98-0.98], and slightly improved 1-year survival (ORMMV-Overall = 1.05 95%CI [1.04-1.05]). These results were validated with data from the Swedish National Health Data registers. Until 2013, aNSCLC patients were treated undifferentiated and the introduction of innovative therapies had statistically significant, albeit modest, effects on survival. Most treatments used off-guidelines highlight the high unmet need; however new advancements in treatment may further improve survival.

Comorbidities and relevant outcomes, commonly associated with cancer, of patients newly diagnosed with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Sweden.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to describe the prevalence of baseline comorbidities in patients with advanced NSCLC and the incidence rate of relevant outcomes commonly associated with NSCLC, and its treatments, in the year after diagnosis. METHODS: A non-interventional cohort study compared adult patients newly diagnosed with advanced NSCLC during 2006-2013 with the general population. The prevalence of comorbidities one year before and incidence of relevant outcomes one year after NSCLC diagnosis were informed by data on all healthcare visits from two large regional registers. Main summary measures were prevalence, median survival, odds ratios (ORs), incidence rate (IR) and mortality rate (MR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: A total of 3,834 NSCLC patients were matched to 15,332 comparators. The prevalence of analysed comorbidities was significantly higher for NSCLC patients compared to the general population, with an OR of 2.44 (95% CI 2.27-2.63). Overall, the majority of IRs were higher for NSCLC patients, compared to the general population. The all-cause MR for the NSCLC cohort was significantly higher leading to an IR ratio of 32.5 (95% CI 31.0-34.2). CONCLUSIONS: Advanced NSCLC patients presented with significantly more comorbidities in the year before diagnosis and relevant outcomes of interest in the year after.

Real-world treatment persistence of golimumab in the management of immune-mediated rheumatic diseases in Europe: a systematic literature review.

OBJECTIVES: To summarise real-world data from studies reporting golimumab persistence in European immune-mediated rheumatic disease (IMRD) populations and to report pooled estimates. DESIGN: Systematic literature review. DATA SOURCES: Relevant literature was identified through searching Medline and Embase via Ovid as well as the conference databases of European League Against Rheumatism and American College of Rheumatology-Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We screened records using predefined patients, interventions, comparators, outcomes and study design criteria. Eligible studies included reports of persistence among adult IMRD patients in Europe receiving treatment with subcutaneous golimumab. Clinical trials, randomised controlled trials, literature reviews, editorials, guidelines and studies with <20 patients receiving golimumab were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Following double screening by two independent reviewers, 27 studies out of 578 identified records were selected for inclusion and subsequent data extraction. Persistence was most commonly reported at 12and 24 months; hence, pooled persistence estimates were calculated for these two time points and reported according to indication. RESULTS: Persistence ranged between 58.1% (psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients regardless of treatment line) and 75.7% (biological-naïve rheumatoid arthritis patients) at 12 months; at 24 months, the range was 43% (axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA) patients regardless of treatment line) and 69.6% (biological-naïve PsA patients). On the basis of data from 12 studies, persistence with golimumab treatment was either significantly higher or not significantly different from other tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). CONCLUSIONS: Golimumab persistence at 24 months approximates 50%, with a lower persistence among AxSpA (43%) patients. However, as the number of studies in these populations was low, they warrant further research. In 12 studies comparing various TNFi treatments, golimumab was shown to have significantly better or equal persistence to its comparators.

Cost evaluation of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of colorectal-cancer metastasis in the liver: Results from the VALUE Trial.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the costs of diagnostic workup and surgery of three strategies for patients with colorectal cancer liver-metastases (CRCLM): gadoxetic-acid-enhanced MRI (Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI), MRI with extracellular contrast-media (ECCM-MRI) or contrast-enhanced MDCT (CE-MDCT). METHODS: The within-trial cost evaluation was modelled as a decision-tree to calculate the cost of diagnosis and surgery. The model used clinical outcomes and resource utilization data from a prospective randomized multicentre study. Analyses were performed for the 354-patient safety population from eight participating countries. RESULTS: The diagnostic workup cost using Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI upfront resulted in savings compared to ECCM-MRI in all countries except Thailand (difference <2 %). Compared to CE-MDCT, initial imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI was less costly in all countries except Korea and Spain (differences 4 and 8 %, respectively). Significantly more patients in the Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI group were eligible for surgery (39.3 % (48/122) vs. 31.0 % (36/116) and 26.7 % (31/116) for ECCM-MRI and CE-MDCT, respectively), allowing more patients to undergo potentially curative surgery, but resulting in higher treatment costs for the strategy starting with Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI. CONCLUSIONS: The benefits of Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI due to less additional imaging and similar diagnostic workup costs in the three groups suggest that Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI should be the preferred initial imaging procedure to evaluate hepatic resectability in patients with CRCLM. KEY POINTS: • Diagnostic imaging cost to evaluate resectability was similar among the groups • Cost for imaging was rather small compared to the cost of surgery • Significantly more patients in the Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI arm were eligible for surgery • Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI is recommended for evaluating hepatic resectability in patients with CRCLM.

End of life or end of the road? Are rising cancer costs sustainable? Is it time to consider alternative incentive and funding schemes?

The number of cancer therapies is increasing. Treatment costs, largely reflecting increasing prices, are also increasing. The regulatory process is increasing in intensity. Countries have initiated risk sharing agreements and/or special cancer funds to accommodate this expenditure growth. Given increasing pressures elsewhere on healthcare budgets, even this response is not sustainable. With many more cancer drugs in the pipeline and the prospects of combination therapy, it is unlikely that the existing policies being applied by payers can maintain budget constraints. Unless payers increase reimbursement and/or extend flexible reimbursement schemes, solutions will be required to ensure access to new cancer therapies - this includes looking at ways of reducing R&D costs. This perspective outlines the problems faced and suggests some solutions.

Treatment patterns, health care utilization, and costs of ovarian cancer in Central and Eastern Europe using a Delphi panel based on a retrospective chart review.

OBJECTIVE: Despite the considerable disease burden of ovarian cancer, there were no cost studies in Central and Eastern Europe. This study aimed to describe treatment patterns, health care utilization, and costs associated with treating ovarian cancer in Hungary, Poland, Serbia, and Slovakia. METHOD: Overall clinical practice for management of epithelial ovarian cancer was investigated through a 3-round Delphi panel. Experts completed a survey based on the chart review (n = 1542). The survey was developed based on clinical guidelines and the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Annual Report. Means, ranges, and outlier values were discussed with the experts during a telephone interview. Finally, consensus estimates were obtained in face-to-face workshops. Based on these results, overall cost of ovarian cancer was estimated using a Markov model. RESULTS: The patients included in the chart review were followed up from presurgical diagnosis and in each phase of treatment, that is, surgical staging and primary surgery, chemotherapy and chemotherapy monitoring, follow-up, and palliative care. The 5-year overall cost per patient was €14,100 to €16,300 in Hungary, €14,600 to €15,800 in Poland, €7600 to €8100 in Serbia, and €12,400 to €14,500 in Slovakia. The main components were chemotherapy-associated costs (68%-74% of the total cost), followed by cost of primary treatment with surgery (15%-21%) and palliative care (3%-10%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ovarian cancer consume considerable health care resources and incur substantial costs in Central and Eastern Europe. These findings may prove useful for clinicians and decision makers in understanding the economic implications of managing ovarian cancer in Central and Eastern Europe and the need for innovative therapies.

A review of breast cancer care and outcomes in Latin America.

This review presents an overview of breast cancer care, burden, and outcomes in Latin America, as well as the challenges and opportunities for improvement. Information was gleaned through a review of the literature, public databases, and conference presentations, in addition to a survey of clinical experts and patient organizations from the region. Breast cancer annual incidence (114,900 cases) and mortality (37,000 deaths) are the highest of all women's cancers in Latin America, and they are increasing. Twice as many breast cancer deaths are expected by 2030. In Peru, Mexico, Colombia, and Brazil, diagnosis and death at younger ages deprives society of numerous productive years, as does high disease occurrence in Argentina and Uruguay. Approximately 30%-40% of diagnoses are metastatic disease. High mortality-to-incidence ratios (MIRs) in Latin America indicate poor survival, partly because of the late stage at diagnosis and poorer access to treatment. Between 2002 and 2008, MIRs decreased in all countries, albeit unevenly. Costa Rica's change in MIR outpaced incidence growth, indicating impressive progress in breast cancer survival. The situation is similar, although to a lesser extent, in Colombia and Ecuador. The marginal drops of MIRs in Brazil and Mexico mainly reflect incidence growth rather than progress in outcomes. Panama's MIR is still high. Epidemiological data are scattered and of varying quality in Latin America. However, one could ascertain that the burden of breast cancer in the region is considerable and growing due to demographic changes, particularly the aging population, and socioeconomic development. Early diagnosis and population-wide access to evidence-based treatment remain unresolved problems, despite progress achieved by some countries.