Thyroid Dysfunction under Amiodarone in Patients with and without Congenital Heart Disease: Results of a Nationwide Analysis.

Background: Amiodarone has a profound adverse toxicity profile. Large population-based analyses quantifying the risk of thyroid dysfunction (TD) in adults with and without congenital heart disease (ACHD) are lacking. Methods: All adults registered with a major German health insurer (≈9.2 million members) with amiodarone prescriptions were analyzed. Occurrence of amiodarone-associated TD was assessed. Results: Overall, 48,891 non-ACHD (37% female; median 73 years) and 886 ACHD (34% female; median 66 years) received amiodarone. Over 184,787 patient-years, 10,875 cases of TD occurred. The 10-year risk for TD was 38% in non-ACHD (35% ACHD). Within ACHD, compared to amiodarone-naïve patients, the hazard ratio (HR) for TD was 3.9 at 4 years after any amiodarone exposure. TD was associated with female gender (HR 1.42, p < 0.001) and younger age (HR 0.97 per 10 years, p = 0.009). Patients with congenital heart disease were not at increased risk (HR 0.98, p = 0.80). Diagnosis of complex congenital heart disease, however, was a predictor for TD (HR 1.56, p = 0.02). Amiodarone was continued in 47% of non-ACHD (38% ACHD), and 2.3% of non-ACHD (3.5% ACHD) underwent thyroid surgery/radiotherapy. Conclusions: Amiodarone-associated TD is common and comparable in non-ACHD and ACHD. While female gender and younger age are predictors for TD, congenital heart disease is not necessarily associated with an elevated risk.

Ablation of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation in the very elderly real-world data on safety and efficacy.

BACKGROUND: The role and technique of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) in the elderly is unclear. While in young patients pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has evolved as first option, in older patients decision is often made in favor of drugs as higher complication rates and less benefit are suspected. Therefore, data on PVI of paroxysmal and persistent AF in these patients is still sparse but of eminent importance. HYPOTHESIS: PVI is comparably safe in the very elderly with similar recurrence and complication rates. METHODS: We enrolled all patients (n = 146) aged >75 years who underwent a first PVI over a period of 10 years (2009-2019) from our prospective single-center ablation registry. Mean follow-up time was 231 ± 399 days. RESULTS: Acute ablation success defined as complete PVI and sinus rhythm at the end of the ablation procedure was high (99%). Severe periprocedural complications occurred in 3.3% (stroke/TIA n = 2; 1.3%; pericardial effusion n = 3; 2%). In 4.6% of patients symptomatic sick-sinus-syndrome was unmasked after PVI resulting in pacemaker implantation. There were no deaths related to PVI. Recurrence rate of symptomatic AF was 37.3% resulting in a Re-PVI and/or substrate ablation in 32 pts (20.9%). During follow-up pacemaker implantation plus atrioventricular node ablation was performed in 10 pts (6.8%). There was a trend toward lower recurrence rates with single-shot devices (cryoballoon, multielectrode phased-radiofrequency ablation catheter) than with point-by-point radiofrequency while complication rates did not differ. CONCLUSION: PVI for AF is a feasible treatment option also in patients >75 years with a reasonable success and safety profile. Higher success rates occurred in patients treated with a single-shot device as compared to point-by-point ablation.

Outcome of catheter ablation of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias in cardiac sarcoidosis.

BACKGROUND: Sarcoidosis is a multisystem granulomatous disease of not sufficiently understood origin. Some patients develop cardiac involvement in course of the disease which is mostly responsible for adverse outcome. In addition to complications like high degree atrioventricular (AV) block or ventricular tachyarrhythmias, there is a certain percentage of patients developing atrial tachyarrhythmias. Data is limited and the role of catheter ablation uncertain. Therefore, we studied sarcoid patients who presented with supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. HYPOTHESIS: Treatment and ablation of supraventricular tachycardia could be hampered by inflammation in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis. METHODS: We enrolled 37 consecutive patients with cardiac sarcoidosis who presented with atrial tachyarrhythmias and underwent an electrophysiologic study over a period of 6 years (03/2013-04/2019). In total, 16 catheter ablations for atrial tachyarrhythmias were performed. Mean follow-up duration was 2.5 years. RESULTS: Most common ablation performed was cavo-tricuspid isthmus ablation for typical atrial flutter in seven patients (54%). Pulmonary vein isolation for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) was performed in five patients (38%). Two patients received slow-pathway modulation for treatment of recurrent atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT). All but two patients with AF had no clinical recurrence during follow-up. Two patients had recurrence of AF but still reported markedly improved european heart rhythm association (EHRA) class. Periprocedural safety was very high. There were no adverse events related to the ablation procedure. One patient died during follow-up in the presence of electrical storm. CONCLUSION: Catheter ablations of supraventricular tachycardias seem to be safe and effective in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis. Outcome is comparable to patients without inflammatory heart disease, although data from larger patient collectives are mandatory to make recommendations in this special entity.

Short Communication: Viral Genetic Linkage Analysis Among Black Men Who Have Sex With Men (HIV Prevention Trials Network 061).

Analysis of viral genetic linkage can reveal generalized transmission patterns within a population. The HIV Prevention Trials Network 061 study evaluated HIV incidence among black men who have sex with men. HIV genotypes from 169 men who were HIV infected at enrollment and 23 men who seroconverted during the study were analyzed for genetic linkage. This analysis showed some associations of viral linkage with income, study site, and timing of infection.

Direct comparison of the novel automated screening tool (AST) versus the manual screening tool (MST) in patients with already implanted subcutaneous ICD.

BACKGROUND: The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) has evolved as a valuable alternative to the transvenous ICD, especially in young patients. Unfortunately, some of these patients are ineligible for S-ICD implantation due to specific electrocardiographic features. So far, these patients were identified by mandatory pre-implantation screening using the manual screening tool (MST), which lacks objective value. Therefore, a novel automated screening tool (AST) has been introduced recently for objective screening, which has not been evaluated yet. METHODS/RESULTS: We here first investigate the novel AST, in direct comparison to MST, in 33 consecutive patients with already implanted S-ICD system to compare predicted eligibility by screening tools with true sensing of the S-ICD system. Both screening tools reliably predicted true ineligible single vectors, but also suggested overall ineligibility in a similar fraction of patients (MST: 3.0%; AST: 6.1%), albeit the implanted S-ICD worked flawlessly in these patients. AST did not predict the finally selected sensing vector better than MST. There was a surprising mismatch between AST and MST for the predicted eligibility of single vectors; only in 49% of patients did both screening tools predict eligibility for the same vectors. CONCLUSIONS: The novel AST predicted overall eligibility approximately similar to MST. Both tools predicted ineligibility in a few patients, who were actually eligible. There was a striking mismatch between both screening tools when eligibility of single vectors was predicted. Thus, the AST seems to be a valuable advance, due to its standardized and objective process, but it still lacks specificity.

[Management of inappropriate shocks/T-wave-oversensing in S-ICD®-patients]. / Management von inadäquaten Schocks/T-Wellen-Oversensing bei S-ICD®-Patienten.

Inappropriate shocks are a feared complication after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation and have a tremendous impact on quality of life. Inappropriate shocks in patients with subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD®, Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) have various underlying causes. This review summarizes the current literature on this topic and lists possible treatment options.

Incidence and management of inadvertent puncture and sheath placement in the aorta during attempted transseptal puncture.

AIMS: Transseptal punctures (TSP) are routinely performed in cardiac interventions requiring access to the left heart. While pericardial effusion/tamponade are well-recognized complications, few data exist on accidental puncture of the aorta and its management and outcome. We therefore analysed our single centre database for this complication. METHODS AND RESULTS: We assessed frequency and outcome of inadvertent aortic puncture during TSP in consecutive patients undergoing ablation procedures between January 2005 and December 2014. During the 10-year period, two inadvertent aortic punctures occurred among 2936 consecutive patients undergoing 4305 TSP (0.07% of patients, 0.05% of TSP) and in one Mustard patient during attempted baffle puncture. The first two patients required left ventricular access for catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia. In both cases, an 11.5F steerable sheath (inner diameter 8.5F) was accidentally placed in the ascending aorta just above the aortic valve. In the presence of surgical standby, the sheaths were pulled back with a wire left in the aorta. Under careful haemodynamic and echocardiographic observation, this wire was also pulled back 30 min later. None of the patients required a closing device or open heart surgery. None of the patients suffered complications from the accidental aortic puncture and sheath placement. CONCLUSION: Inadvertent aortic puncture and sheath placement are rare complications in patients undergoing TSP for interventional procedures. Leaving a guidewire in place during the observation period may allow introduction of sheaths or other tools in order to control haemodynamic deterioration.

[Arrhythmia in adults with congenital heart defects : Incidence, substrates, and mechanisms]. / Arrhythmien bei Erwachsenen mit angeborenen Herzfehlern : Inzidenz, Substrate und Mechanismen.

Arrhythmia management is one of the main challenges in the treatment of adult patients with congenital heart disease (ACHD). Apart from heart failure, arrhythmias are mainly responsible for morbidity and mortality in these patients. Supraventricular tachycardia is more frequent than ventricular arrhythmias and is not only associated with debilitating symptoms, but is often as threatening as ventricular tachycardia. The incidence depends on the underlying defect, type, and time of repair. For the overall ACHD population the incidence of supraventricular tachycardia is up to 50 % and increases with age and time since surgery. Arrhythmia substrate relates to structural abnormalities due to the congenital defect and most importantly to the amount of incisions and material used for repair. In addition, poor hemodynamic conditions influence substrate through dilatation, hypertrophy, and fibrosis. Both supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias are due to a macroreentrant mechanism in the vast majority of patients, but focal arrhythmias occasionally occur as well.

Pulmonary vein reconnection and arrhythmia progression after antral linear catheter ablation of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Assumption of different substrates is the basis for different ablation strategies in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to investigate pulmonary vein reconnection and influence on progression of initial paroxysmal (pAF) versus persistent atrial fibrillation (perAF). METHODS: Between January 2010 and November 2012, 149 patients (117 men, mean age 59 ± 11 years, range 27-80 years) underwent at least one redo antral pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using NavX-guided irrigated-tip radiofrequency catheter ablation. We analyzed whether and where reconnection of pulmonary veins was detected, and whether there were differences between patients with pAF and perAF. RESULTS: Of the 149 patients who underwent a redo antral PVI, 80 patients had pAF and 69 had perAF. One, two and three redo PVIs were performed in 149, 26 and 6 patients, respectively. Reconnection of at least one PV was detected in all patients at the second PVI, in 19 of 26 patients (73 %) at the third PVI and 5 of 6 patients (83 %) at the fourth PVI. 20 (29 %) patients with perAF prior to the first PVI had pAF at the second PVI, whereas 15 (19 %) patients with initial pAF had persistent AF at the time of the first redo procedure. From the second to the third PVI, four patients had developed perAF after previous pAF and two with per AF now had pAF. PV reconnection was observed independent of underlying AF type. At the second redo procedure, of those with reconnected veins 12 had pAF and 13 perAF. At the third redo procedure, four patients had pAF and four perAF. CONCLUSION: Most patients with recurrent AF after PVI showed at least one reconnected vein during redo procedures. Reconnection was identified irrespective of the underlying AF type. Progression from pAF to perAF and vice versa was observed irrespective of the initial AF type.

Isthmus-dependent right atrial flutter as the leading cause of atrial tachycardias after surgical atrial septal defect repair.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical and electrophysiologic characteristics of AT in patients after surgical ASD repair as well as outcome after ablation. BACKGROUND: Atrial tachycardias (AT) are a common complication after surgical closure of an atrial septal defect (ASD). METHODS: From a prospective ablation database we analyzed data of patients with a history of ASD repair who presented to our institution for AT ablation. We investigated ECG characteristics and the electrophysiologic mechanism of AT in this collective and analyzed follow-up data. RESULTS: Data of 54 patients (47.3 ± 14.5 years, 35 females) were included. In 30 patients (55.6%) ASD had been closed by direct suture, 24 patients (44.4%) had a patch for ASD repair without significant difference in terms of gender and age at the time of the procedure (p=0.234, p=0.231). In 42 patients (77.8%), electrophysiological studies were performed in AT. All patients had right atrial macro-reentrant AT. The leading mechanism was isthmus-dependent right atrial flutter in 29 patients (69.0%) with clockwise atrial activation in 41%. The mechanism of AT (typical atrial flutter (n=29), atriotomy-dependent flutter (n=7), and double loop flutter (n=5)) did not differ with regard to type of surgery. Only 70.6% of patients with proven isthmus dependent counter-clockwise atrial flutter presented with an ECG morphology typical for this mechanism. However, all clockwise typical atrial flutter patients showed the characteristic positive P-waves in the inferior leads. Of note, 83.3% of clockwise typical flutter ECGs had long isoelectric lines (mean 74.5 ms). Follow-up was complete in 45 of 54 patients. During a mean follow-up of 7.7 ± 3.7 years, 27 patients (60%) remained free of any arrhythmia, two patients had AT recurrence with different mechanisms compared to the first procedure and underwent successful ablation. Five patients (11%) developed atrial fibrillation. CONCLUSION: Isthmus dependent right atrial flutter is the leading AT mechanism in patients with a history of ASD repair. The mechanism of atrial flutter did not differ in relation to the mode of ASD closure (direct suture versus patch closure). ECG characteristics of the tachycardia may be misleading as they are more often atypical in patients after ASD repair.

Electrophysiological characteristics of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in cardiac sarcoidosis versus arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests that cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) can manifest very similarly. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether there are significant demographic and electrophysiological differences between patients with CS and ARVC. METHODS: We prospectively compared patients with proven CS or ARVC who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardias by using 3-dimensional electroanatomical mapping. Furthermore, we evaluated whether the diagnostic criteria for ARVC would have excluded ARVC in patients with CS. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (13 men; mean age 44.9 years) were included. All 18 patients had mild to moderately reduced right ventricular ejection fraction. Patients with cardiac sarcoidosis (n = 8) had a significantly lower mean left ventricular ejection fraction (35.6±19.3 vs 60.6±9.4; P = .002). Patients with CS had a significantly wider QRS (0.146 vs 0.110s; P = .004). Five of 8 (63%) patients with CS fulfilled the diagnostic ARVC criteria. Ventricular tachycardias (VTs) with a left bundle branch block pattern were documented in all but one patient (with CS). Programmed ventricular stimulation induced an average of 3.7 different monomorphic VTs in patients with CS vs 1.8 in patients with ARVC (P = .01). VT significantly more often originated in the apical region of the right ventricle in CS vs ARVC (P = .001), with no other predilection sites. Ablation success and other electrophysiological parameters were not different. CONCLUSIONS: The current diagnostic ARVC guidelines do not reliably exclude patients with CS. Clinical and electrophysiological parameters that were characteristic of CS in our patients include reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, a significantly wider QRS, right-sided apical VT, and more inducible forms of monomorphic VT.

Atrial flutter in a patient with postoperative AV block and right infero-septal accessory pathway: how to preserve AV conduction.

We report a case of postoperative acquired atrioventricular (AV) block and successful ablation of isthmus-dependent atrial flutter using "cryomapping" in combination with a mapping system preserving AV conduction via right infero-septal accessory pathway.

[Restrictions for ICD patients in daily life]. / Was darf ein ICD-Träger und was nicht?

Patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) may experience loss of consciousness. Electromagnetic interference (EMI) may trigger undesired or inhibit necessary therapy in patients with an ICD. Therefore, questions about personal or professional activities for ICD patients arise. Restricting driving or other personal activities has adverse effects on the patient's quality of life. The national Societies of Cardiology provide recommendations for ICD patients concerning driving of motor vehicles. Patients with an ICD that is implanted prophylactically do not have to refrain from driving after recovery from the implantation procedure. Patients with arrhythmias are classified into different groups depending on the risk of recurrence of tachycardias and symptoms. Commercial driving is not allowed for patients with an ICD in Germany except for those with a prophylactic indication without a history of arrhythmias. Those patients may drive small cars but no trucks or busses. Guidelines for medical fitness in commercial or military flying are regulated by the Joint Aviation Authorities (JAA) and ventricular tachycardias are a contraindication for both. Fortunately, loss of consciousness is not dangerous in most jobs. Strong sources of EMI can occur at special workplaces. Patients have to be advised and tested individually concerning their risk for EMI at their employment site before returning safely. Modern life exposes to an increasing amount of EMI. Intact household devices usually do not interfere with ICDs. Mobile phones may interfere with implanted devices. Interaction can be minimized by special precautions like maintaining a distance of minimum 10 cm between mobile phone and ICD. Electronic surveillance systems work differently and have the potential to interact with devices. Patients should be advised to pass those systems with avoiding longer exposure. The presence of an ICD is presently a contraindication for undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) because of a high risk of destruction of the system with even potential harm to the patient. High-frequency application for electrocautery devices or ablation is possible under certain precautions that have to be planned before. There is a high sensitivity of ICD systems to ionizing radiation with defect of the devices after a cumulative dose > 5 Gy.

Incidence of complications in patients with implantable cardioverter/defibrillator who receive additional transvenous pace/sense leads.

BACKGROUND: Implantation of an additional pace/sense (P/S) lead is commonly used in patients with implantable cardioverter/defibrillators (ICDs) to overcome P/S defects of integrated defibrillation leads (HV-P/S leads). No information is available about the clinical outcome and the incidence of complications in these patients. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed in 151 patients (125 male, age 54.9 +/- 13.6 years, LVEF 48.1 +/- 17.8%, CAD in 86 [57%], DCM in 24 [16%], ARVCM in 11 [7%]) who received an additional P/S lead between 1990 and 2002 (54 patients with abdominal and 97 patients with pectoral ICD system). Statistical analysis was done using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. RESULTS: The average follow-up (FU) after implantation of the additional P/S lead was 43 +/- 27 months. In total 117 patients [77.5%] remain implanted; 22 patients died due to cardiac-related reasons. After a FU of 23 +/- 23 months, 43 patients [28.5%] experienced lead-related problems after implantation of the additional P/S lead: oversensing in 23 [53.5%], insulation defect in 3 [7.0%], fracture in 1 [2.3%], system infection in 4 [9.3%], and defect of the HV-P/S lead in 6 [14.0%] patients. The event-free cumulative survival of the additional P/S lead after 1, 2, and 5 years was 87.0%, 79.8%, and 59.4%, respectively (for pectoral leads: 89.6%, 82.0%, and 60.0%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of an additional P/S lead in case of failure of an HV-P/S lead is safe. However, it is associated with a substantial rate of complications during FU. Therefore, extraction of damaged defibrillation leads instead of implantation of P/S leads should be favored.