Medial malleolar osteotomy in the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the Talus - incidence and impact on functional outcome: a retrospective analysis based on data from the German Cartilage Register (KnorpelRegister DGOU).

BACKGROUND: There has long been discussion regarding the impact of medial malleolar osteotomies (MMO) as an adjunctive treatment for osteochondral lesions of the talus (OCLT). MMO may improve the visibility and accessibility of the talus, but they also pose a risk of periprocedural morbidity. There is a lack of research about the prevalence and consequences of MMO in the surgical treatment of OCLT. METHODS: This study retrospectively evaluated data from the German Cartilage Register (KnorpelRegister DGOU) from its implementation in 2015 to December 2020. The impact of MMO on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) was investigated. Wherever possible, subgroups were built and matched using a propensity score which matched a group undergoing OCLT without MMO. Matching included age, sex, weight, localization of the OCLT, the international cartilage repair society (ICRS) grading, surgical procedure and preoperative symptoms using the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) and the Activities of Daily Living Subscale (ADL). RESULTS: The prevalence of MMO in the operative treatment of OCLT was 15.9%. Most of the osteotomies were performed in OCL of the medial talar dome (76.8%) and in more serious lesions with an ICRS grade of III (29.1%) and IV (61.4%). More than half of the osteotomies (55.6%) were performed during revision surgery. A matched pair analysis of n = 44 patients who underwent AMIC® via arthrotomy and MMO vs. arthrotomy alone showed no significant differences in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs, i.e. FAAM-ADL, and FAOS) at 6,12 and 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: MMO are mostly used in the treatment of severe (≥ ICRS grade 3) OCL of the medial talar dome and in revision surgery. Functional and patient-reported outcome measures are not significantly affected by MMO compared to arthrotomy alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The German Cartilage Register (KnorpelRegister DGOU) was initially registered at the German Clinical Trials Register ( https://www.drks.de , register number DRKS00005617, Date of registration 03.01.2014) and was later expanded by the ankle module.

Non-unions and wound infections do not differ following intramedullary nailing and plate osteosynthesis for distal third femur fractures: a meta-analysis.

Purpose: The fixation method of distal, extra-articular femur fractures is a controversially discussed. To ensure better stability itself, earlier mobilization and to prevent blood loss - all these are justifications for addressing the femur via reamed intramedullary nailing (RIMN). Anatomical reposition of multifragmentary fractures followed by increased risks of non-union are compelling reasons against it. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature for rates of non-union and wound infection, as well as blood loss and time of surgery. Methods: According to the PRISMA guidelines we conducted this systematic review by searching the Cochrane, PubMed, Ovid, MedLine, and Embase databases. Inclusion criteria were the modified Coleman methodology score (mCMS) >60, age >18 years, and extra-articular fractures of the distal femur. Biomechanical and animal studies were excluded. By referring to title and abstract relevant articles were reviewed independently. In the consecutive meta-analysis, we compared 9 studies and 639 patients. Results: There is no statistically significant difference comparing superficial wound infections when RIMN was performed (OR = 0.50; 95% CI: 0.18 - 1.42; P = 0.19) as well as in deep wound infections (OR = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.19-2.81; P = 0.62). However, these results were not significant. We also calculated for potential differences in the rate of non-unions depending on the surgical treatment applied. Data of 556 patients revealed an overall number of 43 non-unions. There was no significant difference in rate of non-unions between both groups (OR = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.51-1.85; P = 0.92). Conclusion: No statistical difference was found in our study among RIMN and plate fixation in the treatment of distal femoral fractures with regard to the incidence of non-union and wound infections. Therefore, the indication for RIMN or plating should be made individually and based on the surgeon's experience.