Long-term persistence and other treatment patterns among bio-naïve patients with Crohn's disease treated with ustekinumab or adalimumab.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate long-term persistence among bio-naïve patients with CD initiated on ustekinumab or adalimumab. METHODS: Adults with CD initiating ustekinumab or adalimumab (index date, between September 23, 2016 and August 1, 2019) were sampled from the IBM MarketScan Commercial Database. Patients without CD-indicated biologics (bio-naïve) and with no diagnoses for other autoimmune diseases 12 months pre-index date (baseline) were included. Cohorts were balanced on baseline characteristics with inverse probability of treatment weighting. Persistence was defined as the absence of therapy exposure gaps >120 days (ustekinumab) or >60 (adalimumab) between days of supply. Composite endpoints were persistence and being corticosteroid-free (no corticosteroids >14 days of supply after day 90 post-index) and persistence while on monotherapy (no immunomodulators/non-index biologics). Persistence was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox's models. RESULTS: Ustekinumab and adalimumab cohorts included 671 and 2,975 patients. At 12 months post-index, ustekinumab patients were significantly more persistent (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.33-1.93), persistent while on monotherapy (HR = 1.43; 95% CI = 1.24-1.65), and trended toward being more persistent and corticosteroid-free (HR = 1.14; 95% CI = 0.99-1.30) vs adalimumab. At 24 months post-index, ustekinumab patients were significantly more persistent (HR = 1.66; 95% CI = 1.40-1.97), persistent while on monotherapy (HR = 1.44; 95% CI = 1.26-1.64), and persistent and corticosteroid-free (HR = 1.15; 95% CI = 1.01-1.31) vs adalimumab. CONCLUSIONS: Bio-naïve patients with CD initiated on ustekinumab demonstrated significantly more persistence than patients initiated on adalimumab at 12 and 24 months of treatment. Long-term persistence is a measure of a drug's real-world performance and findings may aid clinical decision-making.

Choosing a treatment on which a patient can stay over a long period of time is key for the successful management of chronic conditions such as Crohn's disease. Information on whether and how long patients stay on treatment can help physicians make the right therapeutic choice. This study examined whether adults with Crohn's disease, who have not previously taken biologics, stay on treatment longer when given the biologic ustekinumab or adalimumab. At 12 and 24 months after starting the treatment, a larger proportion of patients were still using ustekinumab compared with adalimumab. The proportion of patients using the biologic without immunomodulators or other biologics was also higher with ustekinumab. The results suggest that patients without previous biologic experience stay on treatment longer with ustekinumab than with adalimumab.

Persistence Among Patients with Crohn Disease Previously Treated with an Anti-tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor and Switching or Cycling to Another Biologic Agent.

PURPOSE: Nonresponse to an anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agent in patients with Crohn disease (CD) is often managed by either a switch to a different class of biologic (ie, ustekinumab, vedolizumab) or by cycling to another anti-TNF agent (ie, adalimumab, infliximab, certolizumab pegol). Persistence after a switch to a different biologic class or after cycling within the anti-TNF class was assessed in patients with nonresponse to an anti-TNF agent. METHODS: Adults with CD who discontinued from an anti-TNF agent and either switched to a different class of biologic (ie, anti-interleukin/integrin; the switching cohort) or cycled within the anti-TNF class (the cycling cohort) between September 23, 2016, and August 1, 2019, were selected from a commercial database. The index date was defined as the date of the first claim of the subsequent-line biologic (index biologic) after an anti-TNF. The switching and cycling cohorts were balanced with regard to baseline characteristics, using inverse probability of treatment weights-average treatment effect (IPTW-ATE). Persistence with the index biologic was defined as consistent use with no gaps of >120 days (ustekinumab, vedolizumab, infliximab) or of >60 days (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol) in biologic supply. Composite end points were persistence while being corticosteroid-free (defined as no use of corticosteroids with ≥14 days of supply after day 90 post-index) and persistence while on monotherapy (no immunomodulators/nonindex biologics). Weighted Kaplan-Meier and Cox models were used to assess outcomes at 12 months post-index. FINDINGS: There were 444 patients in the weighted switching cohort (mean age, 40.4 years; 56.3% female) and 441 in the weighted cycling cohort (mean age, 39.5 years; 58.4% female). At 12 months post-index, the rate of persistence with the index biologic was 75.7% in the switching cohort compared to 67.5% in the cycling cohort (log-rank P = 0.023); the rate of persistence while on monotherapy was 58.2% compared to 44.2%, respectively (log-rank P < 0.001). The rate of persistence was 44% greater in the switching compared to that in the cycling cohort (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.44; 95% CI, 1.11-1.88; P = 0.007); the rate of persistence while on monotherapy was 56% greater in the switching cohort (HR = 1.56; 95% CI, 1.28-1.90; P < 0.001). The between-cohort difference in persistence while being corticosteroid-free was not statistically significant (HR = 1.08; 95% CI, 0.89-1.32; P = 0.426). IMPLICATIONS: Patients with CD who switched to a different biologic class were more persistent than were patients who cycled to another anti-TNF agent. These findings may be useful for physicians when considering the treatment of patients who have experienced nonresponse or loss of response to the first-line anti-TNF agent.

Persistence and other treatment patterns among bio-experienced patients with Crohn's disease initiated on ustekinumab or adalimumab.

BACKGROUND: Real-world data on persistence on ustekinumab and adalimumab among bio-experienced patients with Crohn's disease (CD) are limited. OBJECTIVE: To compare treatment persistence and describe switching, restart, and dose titration among bio-experienced patients with CD initiated on ustekinumab or adalimumab. METHODS: IBM MarketScan Commercial Database was used to identify bio-experienced adults with CD who were assigned to either the ustekinumab or adalimumab cohort based on the agent first initiated (index date) after September 23, 2016. Cohorts were balanced using inverse probability of treatment weights-average treatment effect on treated. Persistence on index agent (absence of exposure gap > 120 days for ustekinumab or > 60 days for adalimumab), persistence while corticosteroid-free, and persistence while receiving monotherapy were assessed at 12 months after index date and compared between cohorts using weighted Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards model analyses. RESULTS: Among 903 patients in the ustekinumab cohort and 525 patients in the adalimumab cohort, baseline characteristics were balanced after weighting. At 12 months post-index, ustekinumab was associated with higher persistence (80.1% vs 64.6%; hazard ratio = 2.02 [95% CI = 1.60-2.56]; P < 0.001) and persistence while receiving monotherapy (51.6% vs 40.0%; 1.51 [1.28-1.78]; P < 0.001) vs adalimumab. Persistence while corticosteroid-free was similar in the ustekinumab vs adalimumab cohort (50.1% vs 48.2%; 1.19 [1.00-1.41]; P = 0.0516). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective real-world study demonstrated that among bio-experienced patients with CD, initiation of ustekinumab was associated with better persistence at 12 months of follow-up, including persistence while receiving monotherapy, compared with adalimumab. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC. Drs Zhao, Ding, and Kachroo are employees of Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, and stockholders of Johnson & Johnson. Dr Manceur, Mr Lefebvre, Ms Zhdanava, and Mr Pilon are employees of Analysis Group, Inc., a consulting company that has provided paid consulting services to Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, which funded the development and conduct of this study and article. Mr Holiday was an employee of Analysis Group, Inc., at the time of study conduct.

Clinical and utilization outcomes associated with tumor mutational burden in a real-world pan-tumor population.

Aim & methods: This real-world study examined the association of tumor mutational burden (TMB) with clinical and healthcare utilization in adults diagnosed with advanced solid tumor 1 January 2015- 31 January 2019. Results: There were 170 patients in low-TMB group (TMB<10 mut/Mb) and 32 in high-TMB group (TMB ≥10 mut/Mb). Median overall survival was 18.8 (95% CI: 17.3-28.8) and 15.9 months (95% CI: 11.3-18.0) whereas median progression-free survival was 9.9 (95% CI: 8.6-11.4) and 7.8 months (95% CI: 3.8-12.5) for the low- and high-TMB groups, respectively. Hospitalization (49.4 vs 37.5%), emergency visit (25.3 vs 21.9%), and median overall cost of care (US$135,403 vs 87,570) were all lower in low-TMB group. Conclusion: Despite the limited sample, these data provide a historical perspective for examining real-world outcomes associated with TMB.

Lay abstract Tumor mutational burden (TMB) is the total number of mutations found in the DNA of cancer cells. Knowing the TMB may help plan the best treatment. The goal of this study was to examine whether higher TMB is directly associated with clinical outcomes or healthcare use and costs in patients who have not received immuno-oncology treatment. This study included 202 adult patients who were diagnosed with advanced solid tumors between January 2015 and January 2019. Patients were divided into two groups based on their TMB level. The study results indicate some relationship between TMB level and real-world outcomes. Future studies with a larger sample size are needed to confirm these results.

Real-world patterns on tumor mutation burden testing in a pan-tumor population.

Background: There is limited real-world information on use of tumor mutational burden (TMB) testing and characteristics of patients receiving it. Materials & methods: Patients ≥18 years old and diagnosed with advanced solid tumors between 1 January 2015 and 31 January 2019 with TMB testing (TMB cohort) and without it (non-TMB) were included in this retrospective, observational study. Results: The TMB cohort (n = 202) was younger than non-TMB (n = 212) (mean age: 62.1 vs 65.6 at diagnosis; p = 0.005). There were more Black patients in the TMB cohort (21.3 vs 11.8% in non-TMB; p = 0.004). Clinical characteristics were comparable between the two cohorts; however, systemic anticancer treatment was higher among TMB cohort (91.6 vs 77.8% in non-TMB). Conclusion: Notable differences were observed between patients receiving TMB test and those not receiving it.

Clinical effectiveness outcomes and healthcare resource utilization of patients diagnosed with small-cell lung cancer.

Background: Real-world data are lacking on patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) with extensive-stage SCLC (eSCLC) and poor performance status (PS). Patients & methods: Eligible patients diagnosed with eSCLC between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2017 were included in this retrospective, observational study. Results: The study included 406 patients, with 14.3% impaired PS. Progression-free survival and overall survival were not significantly different between impaired (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ≥2) and not impaired patients (median, 4.5 vs 5.3 months, and 7.2 vs 8.4 months, respectively). Impaired patients used more supportive care drugs (mean, 3.0 vs 2.0; p = 0.033). Conclusion: Effectiveness outcomes among patients with and without impaired PS did not differ in the real-world setting. Progression-free survival and overall survival were similar to data from clinical trials.

Association of clinico-genomic characteristics with tumor mutational burden in small cell lung cancer patients.

Aim: We evaluated the relationship between clinical and genomic characteristics and tumor mutational burden (TMB) in small cell lung cancer. Materials & methods: In a retrospective analysis of small cell lung cancer patients aged ≥18, we assessed treatment patterns and survival in relation to TMB; the association of clinical and genomic characteristics with TMB was determined by multivariate regression. High TMB (TMB-H) was defined as ≥10 mutations/megabase. Results: Among 186 patients, treatment patterns and overall survival were similar for TMB-H and non-TMB-H patients. TMB was determined for 179 patients, 41.9% of whom were TMB-H. Short variants of LRP1B, FAT3, MLL3, MED12 and NOTCH3 were significantly associated with TMB-H (p ≤ 0.01). Conclusion: Neither treatment patterns nor survival differed by TMB status.

Healthcare-Related Costs Associated with Switching Subcutaneous Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Inhibitor in the Treatment of Inflammatory Arthritis: a Retrospective Study.

INTRODUCTION: Subsequent lines of subcutaneous tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitor (SC-TNFi) treatment may be well motivated in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA)-collectively named inflammatory arthritis (IA). However, the costs associated with switching SC-TNFis are largely unknown. The objective of this retrospective observational study was to explore costs of healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) associated with switching SC-TNFi treatment among biologic-naïve Swedish patients with IA. METHODS: Using population-based register data, adult patients filling prescriptions between May 6, 2010 and December 31, 2014 for an SC-TNFi (adalimumab, etanercept, certolizumab, and golimumab) were included. Patients switching treatment (cyclers) were matched to treatment persistent patients on the basis of propensity score and follow-up time. HCRU-associated costs were captured and compared 12 months before and 12 months after the index date (defined as the date of the switch). RESULTS: A balanced cohort of 594 matched pairs was derived. Prior to the index date, cyclers had significantly higher non-treatment HCRU costs compared to persistent patients ($3815 [3498-4147] vs. $2900; 95%CI [2565-3256]). However, 12 months after the index date, cyclers had significantly increased their non-treatment HCRU costs while persistent patients lowered theirs ($822 [232-1490] vs. $- 313 [- 664-36]). This resulted in a statistically significant difference in difference of $1135 between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In biologic-naïve patients treated with SC-TNFi for IA, cyclers significantly increased their non-treatment HCRU costs 12 months after switching treatment while persistent patients lowered their costs during the same time period. As these findings indicate that differences in treatment persistence may have an impact on costs, further research utilizing more comprehensive data sources in alternate settings is warranted.

The value of persistence in treatment with subcutaneous TNF-alpha inhibitors for ankylosing spondylitis.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the impact of persistence on cost-effectiveness of subcutaneous tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors (SC-TNFis) from healthcare and societal perspectives in a United Kingdom ankylosing spondylitis (AS) population using a recently published Markov cohort model. METHODS: A recently published cost-effectiveness model developed for a National Institute for health and Care Excellence appraisal was extended to fit the current study; in brief, it is a Markov cohort model where treatment responders continue from the trial period with maintenance SC-TNFi treatment, while non-responders transition to conventional care. Costs and effects were modeled for a hypothetical SC-TNFi with average efficacy and price. Model outcomes included quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), total direct and indirect lifetime costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). The cost-effectiveness of SC-TNFi persistence was estimated by decreasing the annual discontinuation probability in five percentage point increments from 25 to 5% per annum. RESULTS: From a health care perspective, the ICERs for the modeled discontinuation rates compared to the baseline annual discontinuation rate (25%) ranged between GBP 17,277 and GBP 18,161. From a societal perspective, increased discontinuation rates resulted in decreased total costs and higher QALYs; hence, lower discontinuation rates dominated higher discontinuation rates from a societal perspective. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this study shows that, all else equal, higher SC-TNFi treatment persistence in AS is cost effective from a health care perspective and dominant from a societal perspective. Hence, all else equal, prescribing the SC-TNFi with the highest persistence may be considered a cost-effective strategy.

Survival, Chemotherapy Treatments, and Health Care Utilization Among Patients with Advanced Small Cell Lung Cancer: An Observational Study.

INTRODUCTION: Most cases of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) are diagnosed at an advanced stage. The objective of this study was to investigate patient characteristics, survival, chemotherapy treatments, and health care use after a diagnosis of advanced SCLC in subjects enrolled in a health system network. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients aged ≥ 18 years who either were diagnosed with stage III/IV SCLC or who progressed to advanced SCLC during the study period (2005-2015). Patients identified from the Indiana State Cancer Registry and the Indiana Network for Patient Care were followed from their advanced diagnosis index date until the earliest date of the last visit, death, or the end of the study period. Patient characteristics, survival, chemotherapy regimens, associated health care visits, and durations of treatment were reported. Time-to-event analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 498 patients with advanced SCLC were identified, of whom 429 were newly diagnosed with advanced disease and 69 progressed to advanced disease during the study period. Median survival from the index diagnosis date was 13.2 months. First-line (1L) chemotherapy was received by 464 (93.2%) patients, most commonly carboplatin/etoposide, received by 213 (45.9%) patients, followed by cisplatin/etoposide (20.7%). Ninety-five (20.5%) patients progressed to second-line (2L) chemotherapy, where topotecan monotherapy (20.0%) was the most common regimen, followed by carboplatin/etoposide (14.7%). Median survival was 10.1 months from 1L initiation and 7.7 months from 2L initiation. CONCLUSION: Patients in a regional health system network diagnosed with advanced SCLC were treated with chemotherapy regimens similar to those in earlier reports based on SEER-Medicare data. Survival of patients with advanced SCLC was poor, illustrating the lack of progress over several decades in the treatment of this lethal disease and highlighting the need for improved treatments.

Chemotherapy treatments, costs of care, and survival for patients diagnosed with small cell lung cancer: A SEER-Medicare study.

OBJECTIVES: The effectiveness and costs of new treatments should be assessed in relation to existing practice. We describe treatments, survival and costs for advanced or metastatic small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients receiving systemic therapy in the period preceding the introduction of immunotherapies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients aged ≥65 years, identified using linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results and Medicare databases. Individuals with a new primary diagnosis of SCLC between January 2007 and December 2013 were followed until December 2014. Chemotherapy treatments, health care visits and costs (in 2016 USD), and survival were determined by line of therapy. RESULTS: A total of 11 812 patients were identified with SCLC. First-line (1L) chemotherapy was received by 6509 (55.1%) patients, most (93.2%) with carboplatin- (71.0%) or cisplatin- (22.2%) based therapies, typically combined with etoposide (79.2%). Second- (2L) and third- (3L) line chemotherapies were received by 2238 (18.9%) and 679 (5.7%) patients, of which 48.4% and 30.9%, respectively, were platinum-based. The median durations of 1L, 2L, and 3L carboplatin-based therapies were 5.9, 4.8, and 5.4 months, respectively, and the corresponding durations of cisplatin-based therapies were 5.3, 4.2, and 5.3 months. During 1L, 2L, and 3L chemotherapies, patients averaged 8.2, 7.4, and 7.3 health care visits per month, respectively, and incurred total mean health care costs of $60 223, $42 636, and $35 903 per patient, respectively. Median survival from the start of 1L, 2L, and 3L chemotherapy was 9.2, 6.0, and 5.7 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: First-line chemotherapy was primarily platinum-based, and a plethora of different regimens was used for 2L and 3L chemotherapies. Median survival from the start of 1L chemotherapy was 9 months, with an associated health care cost of $60 000. These data highlight an unmet medical need among SCLC patients receiving systemic therapy.

Real-world treatment persistence of golimumab in the management of immune-mediated rheumatic diseases in Europe: a systematic literature review.

OBJECTIVES: To summarise real-world data from studies reporting golimumab persistence in European immune-mediated rheumatic disease (IMRD) populations and to report pooled estimates. DESIGN: Systematic literature review. DATA SOURCES: Relevant literature was identified through searching Medline and Embase via Ovid as well as the conference databases of European League Against Rheumatism and American College of Rheumatology-Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We screened records using predefined patients, interventions, comparators, outcomes and study design criteria. Eligible studies included reports of persistence among adult IMRD patients in Europe receiving treatment with subcutaneous golimumab. Clinical trials, randomised controlled trials, literature reviews, editorials, guidelines and studies with <20 patients receiving golimumab were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Following double screening by two independent reviewers, 27 studies out of 578 identified records were selected for inclusion and subsequent data extraction. Persistence was most commonly reported at 12and 24 months; hence, pooled persistence estimates were calculated for these two time points and reported according to indication. RESULTS: Persistence ranged between 58.1% (psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients regardless of treatment line) and 75.7% (biological-naïve rheumatoid arthritis patients) at 12 months; at 24 months, the range was 43% (axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA) patients regardless of treatment line) and 69.6% (biological-naïve PsA patients). On the basis of data from 12 studies, persistence with golimumab treatment was either significantly higher or not significantly different from other tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). CONCLUSIONS: Golimumab persistence at 24 months approximates 50%, with a lower persistence among AxSpA (43%) patients. However, as the number of studies in these populations was low, they warrant further research. In 12 studies comparing various TNFi treatments, golimumab was shown to have significantly better or equal persistence to its comparators.

Treatment with golimumab or infliximab reduces health resource utilization and increases work productivity in patients with ankylosing spondylitis in the QUO-VADIS study, a large, prospective real-life cohort.

AIM: We evaluated the effects of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents on health economics in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients. METHODS: QUality of Life as Outcomes and its VAriation with DIsease States (QUO-VADIS) was a prospective observational study following bio-naïve AS patients (modified New York criteria) newly treated with golimumab (GLM) or infliximab (IFX; originator) in a clinical practice setting over 6 months. We evaluated use of concomitant medications, hospitalizations (in-patient care or acute care) and visits in day care and out-patient settings for the assessment of healthcare resource utilization (HCRU). Work productivity and activity impairment (WPAI) was assessed by the number of work days missed and quantifying absenteeism, presenteeism, work impairment, and activity using the WPAI instrument adapted to spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA). RESULTS: Nine hundred and sixty-three patients received ≥1 dose of medication (78%, n = 751 GLM; 22%, n = 221 IFX). Mean age was 42.7 years; 61.4% were male. At baseline, the percentage of patients who reported hospitalizations (in-patient care) was 13.6%, which decreased to 3.1% at 6 months, while out-patient care at baseline was reported by 39.4% of patients, which decreased to 19.0% at 6 months. The percentage of patients receiving acute emergency at baseline reduced from 1.6% to 0.3% at 6 months. The mean (SD) number of days of work missed due to AS, was reduced from 6.3 (31.1) days at baseline to 2.7 (12.3) days at 6 months. CONCLUSION: In patients with AS newly treated with GLM or IFX for 6 months, HCRU was reduced and work productivity and activity increased.

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Golimumab in the Treatment of Non-Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis in Scotland.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to assess the cost-effectiveness of golimumab for the treatment of non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) vs. conventional therapy and other tumor necrosis factor inhibitors from the Scottish payer perspective. METHODS: A model comprising a short-term decision tree and a long-term Markov model was developed to compare cost-effectiveness (incremental costs per quality-adjusted life-year [QALY]) for patients in Scotland with nr-axSpA treated by conventional therapy, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, or golimumab for a lifetime period. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to identify clinical and safety data for treatments and synthesize the available evidence into relative treatment effects between comparators. The probability of patients achieving an Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society 20/40% response criteria (ASAS20/ASAS40) or a 50% improvement in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index score (BASDAI50) at week 12 was obtained from the NMA for each of the comparators. Baseline health state utilities were based on the EQ-5D questionnaire collected in the golimumab GO-AHEAD study. The cost of treatment was calculated based on drug acquisition, drug administration, and initiation/monitoring costs. RESULTS: Golimumab resulted in an increase of 2.06 QALYs and additional cost of £39,770 compared with conventional therapy. Incremental cost per QALY gained was £19,280 for golimumab, which was lower than adalimumab (£19,737), etanercept (£20,089), and higher than certolizumab pegol (£18,710). Golimumab remained cost-effective throughout a range of sensitivity analyses where key assumptions were tested. CONCLUSIONS: From a Scottish perspective, golimumab was a cost-effective treatment for nr-axSpA compared with conventional therapy at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £30,000 per QALY. FUNDING: Merck & Co., Inc.

The impact of non-persistence on the direct and indirect costs in patients treated with subcutaneous tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors in Germany.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of the present study was to estimate the treatment costs in immune-mediated rheumatic disease patients initiating treatment with an s.c. biologic agent based on treatment persistence. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study based on the German statutory health insurance funds database. Patients ⩾18 years of age with a diagnosis of AS, PsA or RA treated with s.c. TNF-α inhibitors (TNFis) were included. Persistence was estimated as the duration of time from s.c. TNFi therapy initiation to discontinuation, which was defined as at least 60 days without therapy. We performed 1:1 matching based on a propensity score that was constructed as the conditional probability of being persistent as a function of age, gender, index year, physician specialty and Charlson comorbidity index. Finally, the cost differences between the matched pairs were estimated using the Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: After 1:1 matching, 678 persistent and 678 non-persistent patients were available for cost analyses. Using a 2-year time period, the costs for office-based visits per patient were €2319 in the persistent cohort compared with €3094 in the non-persistent cohort (P < 0.001). Co-medication costs were €2828 in the persistent cohort compared with €5498 in the non-persistent cohort, hospitalization costs were €3551 in the persistent cohort compared with €5890 in the non-persistent cohort and sick leave costs were €717 in the persistent cohort compared with €1241 in the non-persistent cohort (all P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that persistence with s.c. TNFi treatment can be associated with several cost offsets for immune-mediated rheumatic disease patients.

Second-line treatment persistence and costs among patients with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases treated with subcutaneous TNF-alpha inhibitors.

The objective of this study was to describe treatment persistence with second-line subcutaneous tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors (SC-TNFis) in patients with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases (IMRDs) in Sweden, and the impact of non-persistence on healthcare costs. This retrospective observational study was based on Swedish national health register data. Adults were identified through filled prescriptions for adalimumab (ADA), etanercept (ETA), certolizumab pegol (CZP) and golimumab (GLM). Persistence was estimated over 3 years for propensity score-matched (PSM) cohorts using non-parametric survival analysis. Unadjusted comparisons of costs comprised specialized outpatient care, inpatient care, and medication. In total, N = 845 patients were identified and three PSM cohorts were generated (GLM vs. ADA, ETA, and CZP, respectively). GLM exhibited higher persistence than ADA over the study period (p = 0.040), and numerically higher persistence than ETA and CZP for 36 and 30 months, respectively. Persistent and non-persistent patients had similar mean total cost at 12 month pre-treatment ($5185 vs. $5064, p = 0.750). During the 12 month post-treatment initiation, persistent patients had lower mean total costs ($4377 vs. $6605), corresponding to a cost difference of $2228 (p < 0.001). In second-line treatment with SC-TNFis for IMRDs in Sweden, GLM exhibited significantly higher persistence than ADA over the course of the study. Similarly, GLM showed numerically higher persistence than ETA and CZP, which is concurrent with results observed in first-line SC-TNFi treatment. Considering the lower healthcare costs for persistent patients, the choice of second-line SC-TNFi among eligible patients may merit careful consideration given its impact on patients and payers.

Cost-Effectiveness of Golimumab in Ankylosing Spondylitis from the UK Payer Perspective.

INTRODUCTION: Golimumab is a tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitor for treatment of patients with severe, active ankylosing spondylitis. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of golimumab compared with conventional care and other TNF-α inhibitors in treatment of AS from the UK National Health Service perspective. METHODS: A long-term Markov model (with initial decision tree) was developed to simulate the progression of a hypothetical cohort of patients with active AS over a lifetime. The effectiveness outcome was quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Utilities were estimated by mapping Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index scores, and the primary response measure was ≥50% improvement on the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index at 12 weeks. Direct, medication, and AS management costs were included. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 3.5%. RESULTS: All TNF-α inhibitors were comparable to each other and superior to conventional care. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for TNF-α inhibitors were £19,070-42,532 per QALY gained compared with conventional care. Analyses of the ICERs for each TNF-α inhibitor compared with conventional care demonstrated that golimumab was the most cost-effective treatment, and that adalimumab and etanercept were dominated by golimumab. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Golimumab may be considered a cost-effective treatment alternative for patients with active AS. With comparable costs and efficacy among TNF-α inhibitors, the choice of TNF-α inhibitor to treat AS is likely to be driven by patient and physician choice. FUNDING: Merck & Co., Inc.

Assessing gastroenterologist and patient acceptance of biosimilars in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease across Germany.

OBJECTIVES: This study examined gastroenterologists' motivation for prescribing biosimilars, assessed their treatment preferences in relation to prescribing behaviour, and explored patient attitudes to biosimilars. METHODS: Data were taken from the Adelphi Real World Biosimilars Programme, a real-world, cross-sectional study undertaken in 2015-2016 with German gastroenterologists and patients with ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease. Gastroenterologists provided data on their prescribing behaviour and attitudes towards biosimilars, and invited the next eight eligible consecutive consulting patients to complete a detailed questionnaire. For analysis, gastroenterologists were split into 'Investigative', 'Conservative', and 'Other' groups. RESULTS: Overall, 25 gastroenterologists and 136 patients participated. Biosimilars accounted for <15% of all biologic therapies and >80% of gastroenterologists would prescribe a bio-originator rather than biosimilar as 1st line therapy if unrestricted. Patients showed some reluctance to accept biosimilars, although of those receiving biosimilars, 79% were satisfied with the current treatment of their condition, and 69% were satisfied with the control of symptoms. Although at least 35% of patients in each analysis group reported no concerns when starting treatment with a bio-originator or biosimilar, 41% of previously biologic-naïve patients prescribed a biosimilar indicated potential side effects and potential long-term problems, and 24% not knowing enough about the drug, as concerns. CONCLUSION: Results demonstrate that there is reluctance from patients to accept biosimilars and the need to further educate patients who are unsure to allow them to be involved in decision making, highlighting the importance of patient and physician communication. There remains a need for further research into non-clinical switching and the long term impact of prescribing biosimilars.

Persistence with golimumab in immune-mediated rheumatic diseases: a systematic review of real-world evidence in rheumatoid arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, and psoriatic arthritis.

PURPOSE: In immune-mediated rheumatic diseases (IMRDs), persistence to treatment may be used as a surrogate marker for long-term treatment success. In previous comparisons of persistence to tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors (TNFis), a paucity of data for subcutaneous (SC) golimumab was identified. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of persistence to SC golimumab in clinical practice and contextualize these data with five-year persistence estimates from long-term open-label extension (OLE) trials of SC TNFis in IMRDs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and conference proceedings from European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR), American College of Rheumatology (ACR), and International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) were searched. All studies on patients treated with SC golimumab for IMRD were included if they reported data on the persistence to golimumab. RESULTS: Of 376 available references identified through the searches, 12 studies with a total of 4,910 patients met the inclusion criteria. Furthermore, nine OLE trials were available. Among the included studies from clinical practice, at six months, one year, two years, and three years, the proportion of patients persistent to treatment ranged from 63% to 91%, 47% to 80%, 40% to 77%, and 32% to 67%, respectively. In the four studies that included comparisons to other biologics, golimumab was either statistically noninferior or statistically superior to other treatments, an observation that was supported by indirect comparisons of unadjusted point estimates of OLE trials. CONCLUSION: The data reviewed in this study indicate that golimumab may have higher persistence than other TNFis, a notion that is supported by indirect comparisons of persistence data from OLEs of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Furthermore, the study suggests that persistence may be lower in biologic-experienced compared with biologic-naive patients and higher in axial spondyloarthritis compared with rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis.

Persistence and costs with subcutaneous TNF-alpha inhibitors in immune-mediated rheumatic disease stratified by treatment line.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to 1) describe and compare treatment persistence with first- and second-line subcutaneous tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors (SC-TNFis) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), or rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (collectively immune-mediated rheumatic disease) in Sweden and 2) estimate and contrast health care costs in the two groups. METHODS: Patients who initiated their first or second SC-TNFi between May 6 2010 and December 12 2012 were identified from the Prescribed Drug Register. Persistence was estimated using survival analysis. Costs comprised specialized outpatient care, inpatient care, and medication. The persistence analysis was stratified by immune-mediated rheumatic disease diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 4,903 patients treated with their first and 845 patients treated with their second SC-TNFi were identified. Baseline characteristics differed between the two groups. Therefore, propensity score matching analysis was implemented. Second-line patients were matched to first-line patients, and four cohort pairs (AS, PsA, RA, and all diagnoses combined) were generated. Patients treated with their first SC-TNFi had statistically significant higher persistence than patients treated with their second SC-TNFi in PsA (P=0.036), RA (P=0.048), and all diagnoses combined (P<0.001) but not in AS (P=0.741). Patients who were treated with their second SC-TNFi incurred higher costs than patients treated with their first SC-TNFi. CONCLUSION: Overall, persistence to the first SC-TNFi was higher than persistence to the second SC-TNFi. Furthermore, the second SC-TNFi was associated with higher costs than the first SC-TNFi. Therefore, prescribing the SC-TNFi with the best long-term persistence first may be beneficial.