Pooled Patient-Level Analysis of Inclisiran Trials in Patients With Familial Hypercholesterolemia or Atherosclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Inclisiran is a double-stranded small interfering RNA that suppresses proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) translation in the liver, leading to sustained reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and other atherogenic lipoproteins with twice-yearly dosing. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to conduct a patient-level pooled analysis from 3 phase 3 studies of inclisiran. METHODS: Participants with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (ORION-9 [Trial to Evaluate the Effect of Inclisiran Treatment on Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) in Subjects With Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (HeFH)]), atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) (ORION-10 [Inclisiran for Participants With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease and Elevated Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol]), or ASCVD and ASCVD risk equivalents (ORION-11 [Inclisiran for Subjects With ASCVD or ASCVD-Risk Equivalents and Elevated Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol]) taking maximally tolerated statin therapy, with or without other LDL-C-lowering agents, were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either inclisiran or placebo, administered by subcutaneous injection on day 1, day 90, and every 6 months thereafter for 540 days. The coprimary endpoints were the placebo-corrected percentage change in LDL-C level from baseline to day 510 and the time-adjusted percentage change in LDL-C level from baseline after day 90 to day 540. Levels of other atherogenic lipoproteins and treatment-emergent adverse events were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 3,660 participants (n = 482, n = 1,561, and n = 1,617 from ORION-9, -10, and -11, respectively) underwent randomization. The placebo-corrected change in LDL-C with inclisiran at day 510 was -50.7% (95% confidence interval: -52.9% to -48.4%; p < 0.0001). The corresponding time-adjusted change in LDL-C was -50.5% (95% confidence interval: -52.1% to -48.9%; p < 0.0001). Safety was similar in both groups. Treatment-emergent adverse events at the injection site were more frequent with inclisiran than placebo (5.0% vs. 0.7%), but were predominantly mild, and none were severe or persistent. Liver and kidney function tests, creatine kinase values, and platelet counts did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: These pooled safety and efficacy data show that inclisiran, given twice yearly in addition to maximally tolerated statin therapy with or without other LDL-C lowering agents, is an effective, safe, and well-tolerated treatment to lower LDL-C in adults with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, ASCVD, or ASCVD risk equivalents.

Effect of inclisiran, the small-interfering RNA against proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9, on platelets, immune cells, and immunological biomarkers: a pre-specified analysis from ORION-1.

AIMS: Small-interfering RNA (siRNA)-based targeting of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) represents a novel therapeutic approach that may provide a convenient, infrequent, and safe dosing schedule to robustly lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Given the long duration of action, however, establishing safety in particular with respect to immunogenicity is of paramount importance. In earlier clinical studies of other RNA-targeted treatment approaches (antisense oligonucleotide therapy) immunological and haematological adverse effects, in particular thrombocytopenia and pro-inflammatory effects, have been reported. Here, we present the pre-specified safety analysis from ORION-1 evaluating platelets, immune cells, immunological markers, antidrug antibodies, and clinical immunogenicity adverse events (AEs) under PCSK9 siRNA treatment with inclisiran. METHODS AND RESULTS: The pre-specified safety analysis from ORION-1 was performed in six different inclisiran dosing regimens in patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease with elevated LDL-C levels. Patients received either a single dose (SD: 200 mg, n = 60; 300 mg, n = 62 or 500 mg, n = 66) or double-dose starting regimen (DD: 100 mg, n = 62; 200 mg, n = 63; or 300 mg, n = 61 on days 1 and 90) of inclisiran or placebo (SD: n = 65; DD: n = 62). The effects of inclisiran on haematological parameters including platelet counts, lymphocytes, and monocytes as well as on the immune markers interleukin 6 (IL-6) and tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were examined after 180 days. Immunogenicity was further evaluated by analysis of anti-drug-antibodies (ADAs) towards inclisiran in 6068 study samples and by careful analysis of immunogenicity AEs as part of the pharmacovigilance strategy. At day 180, no significant alterations of platelet counts were observed in any of the dosing groups (change from baseline, SD: 200 mg: 0.8%; 300 mg: -0.5%; 500 mg: -1.8%; DD: 100 mg: 1.3%; 200 mg: -0.5%; 300 mg: 1.0%; no significant difference for any group as compared with placebo). No significant effects on other immune cells, including leucocytes, monocytes, or neutrophils were detected. Notably, no significant increase of inflammatory biomarkers (IL-6 or TNF-α) with either the SD or DD regimen became evident. There was no evidence for immunogenicity based on ADA level analysis and careful review of clinical immunogenicity AEs in none of the treatment regimens. CONCLUSION: In this pre-specified safety analysis of ORION-1 for the siRNA therapeutic inclisiran, no adverse effects on measures of inflammation or immune activation nor adverse effects on platelets or clinical immunogenicity AEs were observed over at least 6-month treatment. These safety findings in the largest analysis of an RNAi study in humans to date provide strong reassurance about the safety of inclisiran and the potential of cardiovascular RNA-targeted therapies.

Inclisiran for the Treatment of Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia.

BACKGROUND: Familial hypercholesterolemia is characterized by an elevated level of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and an increased risk of premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Monoclonal antibodies directed against proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) have been shown to reduce LDL cholesterol levels by more than 50% but require administration every 2 to 4 weeks. In a phase 2 trial, a twice-yearly injection of inclisiran, a small interfering RNA, was shown to inhibit hepatic synthesis of PCSK9 in adults with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. METHODS: In this phase 3, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, 482 adults who had heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia to receive subcutaneous injections of inclisiran sodium (at a dose of 300 mg) or matching placebo on days 1, 90, 270, and 450. The two primary end points were the percent change from baseline in the LDL cholesterol level on day 510 and the time-adjusted percent change from baseline in the LDL cholesterol level between day 90 and day 540. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 56 years, and 47% were men; the mean baseline level of LDL cholesterol was 153 mg per deciliter. At day 510, the percent change in the LDL cholesterol level was a reduction of 39.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], -43.7 to -35.7) in the inclisiran group and an increase of 8.2% (95% CI, 4.3 to 12.2) in the placebo group, for a between-group difference of -47.9 percentage points (95% CI, -53.5 to -42.3; P<0.001). The time-averaged percent change in the LDL cholesterol level between day 90 and day 540 was a reduction of 38.1% (95% CI, -41.1 to -35.1) in the inclisiran group and an increase of 6.2% (95% CI, 3.3 to 9.2) in the placebo group, for a between-group difference of -44.3 percentage points (95% CI, -48.5 to -40.1; P<0.001). There were robust reductions in LDL cholesterol levels in all genotypes of familial hypercholesterolemia. Adverse events and serious adverse events were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among adults with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, those who received inclisiran had significantly lower levels of LDL cholesterol than those who received placebo, with an infrequent dosing regimen and an acceptable safety profile. (Funded by the Medicines Company; ORION-9 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03397121.).

Interplay between cigarette smoking and pulmonary reverse lipid transport.

Reverse lipid transport is critical to maintain homeostasis. Smoking causes lipid accumulation in macrophages, therefore suggesting suboptimal reverse lipid transport mechanisms. In this study, we investigated the interplay between smoking and reverse lipid transport and the consequences on smoking-induced lung and peripheral alterations.To investigate the relationship between smoking and reverse lipid transport, we used a clinical lung gene expression dataset and a mouse model of cigarette smoke exposure. We also used ApoA-1-/- mice, with reduced reverse lipid transport capacity, and a recombinant ApoA-1 Milano/phospholipid complex (MDCO-216) to boost reverse lipid transport. Cellular and functional analyses were performed on the lungs and impact on body composition was also assessed.Smoking affects pulmonary expression of abca1, abcg1, apoe and scarb1 in both mice and humans, key genes involved in reverse lipid transport. In mice, the capacity of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and serum to stimulate cholesterol efflux in macrophages was increased after a single exposure to cigarette smoke. ApoA-1-/- mice showed increased lung neutrophilia, larger macrophages and greater loss in lean mass in response to smoking, whereas treatment with MDCO-216 reduced the size of macrophages and increased the lean mass of mice exposed to cigarette smoke.Altogether, this study shows a functional interaction between smoking and reverse lipid transport, and opens new avenues for better understanding the link between metabolic and pulmonary diseases related to smoking.

Persistent changes in lipoprotein lipids after a single infusion of ascending doses of MDCO-216 (apoA-IMilano/POPC) in healthy volunteers and stable coronary artery disease patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Effects of single ascending doses of MDCO-216 on plasma lipid and lipoprotein levels were assessed in human healthy volunteers and in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: MDCO-216 was infused at a single dose of 5, 10, 20, 30 or 40 mg/kg over 2 h and blood was collected at 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 168 and 720 h after start of infusion (ASOI). Lipoprotein lipids were assessed by FLPC and by 1H NMR. RESULTS: Plasma concentrations of free cholesterol (FC) displayed a rapid and dose-dependent rise, peaking at 8 h, but remaining above baseline until 48 h ASOI, whereas levels of esterified cholesterol (CE) increased at lower doses but not at higher doses, and even decreased below baseline at the highest dose. Plasma cholesterol esterification rate (CER) decreased with a first nadir between 4 and 8 h and a second nadir at 48 h ASOI. Taken over all subjects receiving MDCO-216, the increase in FC at 8 h correlated inversely with the drop in CER at 4 h but positively with the increase in basal and scavenger receptor class B type I (SR-BI)-mediated cholesterol efflux capacities at 2 h ASOI. Upon FPLC analysis, FC was found to increase first in high density lipoproteins (HDL) and very low density lipoproteins (VLDL) and later (at 48 or 168 h ASOI) in low density lipoproteins (LDL). CE initially decreased in LDL and HDL but after 24 h started to increase in VLDL and LDL whereas HDL-CE was still below baseline at 48 h. Phospholipids (PL) showed the same pattern as FC. Triglycerides (TG) also rose rapidly, most prominently in VLDL, but also in LDL and HDL. Apolipoprotein E (Apo-E) in VLDL increased at 4-8 h but returned to baseline at 24 h ASOI. 1H NMR analysis showed a rapid and dose-dependent increase in HDL particle size, peaking at 2 h and returning to baseline at 24 h, and a small increase in HDL particle concentration. After infusion of the 40 mg/kg dose, LDL and VLDL-particles also increased in number and size. CONCLUSIONS: A single administration of MDCO-216 caused rapid changes in lipid levels and lipoprotein composition, some of which persisted for at least 7 days.

High-Density Lipoprotein Subfractions and Cholesterol Efflux Capacities After Infusion of MDCO-216 (Apolipoprotein A-IMilano/Palmitoyl-Oleoyl-Phosphatidylcholine) in Healthy Volunteers and Stable Coronary Artery Disease Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine effects of single ascending doses of MDCO-216 on high-density lipoprotein (HDL) subfractions in relation to changes in cholesterol efflux capacity in healthy volunteers and in patients with stable angina pectoris. APPROACH AND RESULTS: Doses of 5- (in volunteers only), 10-, 20-, 30-, and 40-mg/kg MDCO-216 were infused during 2 hours, and plasma and serum were collected during 30 days. Plasma levels of HDL subfractions were assessed by 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis, immunoblotting, and image analysis. Lipoprotein particle concentrations and sizes were also assessed by proton nuclear magnetic resonance ((1)H-NMR). There was a rapid dose-dependent increase of total apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I) in pre-ß1, α-1, and α-2 HDL levels and decrease in α-3 and α-4 HDL. Using a selective antibody apoA-IMilano was detected in the large α-1 and α-2 HDL on all doses and at each time point. ApoA-IMilano was also detected at the α-4 position but only at high doses. (1)H-NMR analysis similarly showed a rapid and dose-dependent shift from small- to large-sized HDL particles. The increase of basal and ATP-binding cassette transporter A1-mediated efflux capacities reported previously correlated strongly and independently with the increase in pre-ß1-HDL and α-1 HDL, but not with that in α-2 HDL. CONCLUSIONS: On infusion, MDCO-216 rapidly eliminates small HDL and leads to formation of α-1 and α-2 HDL containing both wild-type apoA-I and apoA-IMilano. In this process, endogenous apoA-I is liberated appearing as pre-ß1-HDL. In addition to pre-ß1-HDL, the newly formed α-1 HDL particle containing apoA-I Milano may have a direct effect on cholesterol efflux capacity.

Fasting triglycerides predict recurrent ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with statins.

BACKGROUND: Most patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are treated with statins, which reduce atherogenic triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. It is uncertain whether triglycerides predict risk after ACS on a background of statin treatment. OBJECTIVES: This study examined the relationship of fasting triglyceride levels to outcomes after ACS in patients treated with statins. METHODS: Long-term and short-term relationships of triglycerides to risk after ACS were examined in the dal-OUTCOMES trial and atorvastatin arm of the MIRACL (Myocardial Ischemia Reduction with Acute Cholesterol Lowering) trial, respectively. Analysis of dal-OUTCOMES included 15,817 patients (97% statin-treated) randomly assigned 4 to 12 weeks after ACS to treatment with dalcetrapib (a cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor) or placebo and followed for a median 31 months. Analysis of MIRACL included 1,501 patients treated with atorvastatin 80 mg daily beginning 1 to 4 days after ACS and followed for 16 weeks. Fasting triglycerides at initial random assignment were related to risk of coronary heart disease death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, and unstable angina in models adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, smoking, diabetes, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and body mass index. RESULTS: Fasting triglyceride levels were associated with both long-term and short-term risk after ACS. In dal-OUTCOMES, long-term risk increased across quintiles of baseline triglycerides (p<0.001). The hazard ratio in the highest/lowest quintile (>175/≤80 mg/dl) was 1.61 (95% confidence interval: 1.34 to 1.94). There was no interaction of triglycerides and treatment assignment on the primary outcome. In the atorvastatin group of MIRACL, short-term risk increased across tertiles of baseline triglycerides (p=0.03), with a hazard ratio of 1.50 [corrected] (95% confidence interval: 1.05 to 2.15) in highest/lowest tertiles (>195/≤135 mg/dl). The relationship of triglycerides to risk was independent of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in both studies. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with ACS treated effectively with statins, fasting triglycerides predict long-term and short-term cardiovascular risk. Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins may be an important additional target for therapy. (A Study of RO4607381 in Stable Coronary Heart Disease Patients With Recent Acute Coronary Syndrome; NCT00658515).

Imaging in the cardiovascular and metabolic disease area.

There is a widely held belief that the use of non-invasive imaging can reduce the gap between basic science and clinical proof-of-concept, ultimately improving decision-making and therefore the efficiency of the drug development process. Imaging techniques such as positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are routinely used in oncology and neuroscience drug development. However, less attention has been paid to the systematic use of imaging in the cardiovascular and metabolic disease area. Here, with an emphasis on 'early clinical' development, we discuss the application of imaging in those areas, highlighting opportunities and challenges.

Effect of dalcetrapib plus pravastatin on lipoprotein metabolism and high-density lipoprotein composition and function in dyslipidemic patients: results of a phase IIb dose-ranging study.

BACKGROUND: Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) is involved in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) remodeling and transfer of lipids between HDL particles and other lipoproteins. Epidemiologic studies show that both elevated HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) and reduced CETP activity attenuate cardiovascular risk, making inhibition or modulation of CETP a potential therapeutic target. This study analyzed the effect of dalcetrapib on lipoprotein profile, CETP activity, and cellular cholesterol efflux when co-administered with pravastatin in patients with low or average HDL-C. METHODS: Patients were randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive placebo or dalcetrapib 300, 600, or 900 mg once daily for 12 weeks. All patients were concomitantly treated to their low-density lipoprotein cholesterol target with pravastatin. Lipoprotein profile was analyzed by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and polyacrylamide gradient gel electrophoresis. Composition of the HDL fraction was assessed after polyethylene glycol precipitation. Contribution of this fraction to cholesterol efflux was assessed using radiolabeled donor cells. RESULTS: Co-administration of dalcetrapib with pravastatin increased HDL-C, apolipoproteins (apo) A-I and A-II, and CETP mass, and decreased CETP activity. A relative increase in large HDL and low-density lipoprotein subparticle fractions was observed. High-density lipoprotein composition showed increased association of esterified cholesterol, free cholesterol, phospholipids, apo A-I, and apo E. Adenosine 5'-triphosphate-binding cassette A1- and scavenger receptor type BI-mediated cholesterol efflux increased. CONCLUSIONS: Dalcetrapib up to 600 mg, combined with pravastatin, increased HDL-C and altered lipoprotein profile, HDL composition, and HDL function, with little further change at a 900-mg dose. The impact on cardiovascular events in dyslipidemic patients is being evaluated.