Colorectal cancer harboring EGFR kinase domain duplication response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Epidermal growth factor receptor kinase domain duplication (EGFR-KDD) is a rare, recurrent oncogenic variant that constitutively activates EGFR in non-small-cell lung cancer. Herein, we report the case of a 70-year-old man with resectable colorectal adenocarcinoma who underwent surgery followed by adjuvant therapy. He relapsed with multiple liver metastases and received standard chemotherapy until his disease became refractory. Comprehensive genomic profiling of his postoperative colorectal cancer tissue revealed EGFR-KDD. He was treated with an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), afatinib and achieved a partial response (- 55%) after 8 weeks; however, he developed massive malignant ascites after 13 weeks. Osimertinib, another EGFR-TKI, controlled his tumors for 9 months. Patient-derived cancer organoids from his malignant ascites confirmed sensitivity to EGFR-TKIs. The findings suggest that EGFR-TKIs can be a potential treatment option for this molecular subgroup.

[Current Status and Issues of Companion Diagnostics in Cancer Genomic Medicine].

As of December 2023, there are 5 types of cancer gene panel tests covered by public insurance in Japan. Four of them partly feature companion diagnostics. When cancer gene panel test is used for the purpose of comprehensive gene profiling (CGP), a total of 56,000 points(44,000 points for the test administration fee and 12,000 points for the expert panel fee) can be claimed, whereas if the cancer gene panel test is used for the purpose of companion diagnostics, hospitals can claim only the reimbursement as a companion diagnostics, which fee is much cheaper than that of CGP. Therefore, cancer gene panel tests are rarely used as a companion diagnosis in daily clinical practice. Even when the test is performed as a CGP test, since its indication is limited to patients who have completed or are expected to complete standard chemotherapy, most biomarkers associated with approved drugs are already evaluated with stand-alone companion diagnostics at the time of CGP test application. On the other hand, there are some approved drugs, such as pembrolizumab for TMB-H or entrectinib or larotrectinib for NTRK fusion gene, for which there is no stand-alone companion diagnostics and the eligibility for these drugs cannot be judged without the results of CGP test. This paper discusses the current status and issues of companion diagnostics in cancer genomic medicine.

Response to capmatinib in a patient with neuroendocrine carcinoma of the gallbladder origin harboring MET amplification.

Neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) of the gallbladder origin is particularly rare, accounting for only 0.38% of primary malignancies of the gallbladder, and standard therapies are limited. The MET gene encodes the tyrosine kinase receptor, c-Met. Pathogenic variants of MET, such as MET exon 14 skipping and MET amplification, result in excessive downstream signaling that promotes tumor progression. A MET inhibitor, capmatinib, blocks signaling of c-Met and has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for non-small cell lung cancer with MET exon 14 skipping. The effectiveness of capmatinib has been reported in other cancers with MET amplification, but NEC with MET variants has not been reported. Here, we present a case of a 72-year-old woman with NEC of the gallbladder with multiple liver and lymph node metastases, who was resistant to conventional chemotherapy including carboplatin plus etoposide as first-line treatment and irinotecan as second-line treatment, but she responded to capmatinib. After 6 weeks of treatment, CT scan showed a partial response (80% reduction in size), but after 13 weeks, regrowth of liver metastasis was observed. Herein, we report a meaningful efficacy of capmatinib to the patient of NEC of the gallbladder origin with MET amplification.

Dabrafenib and trametinib administration in patients with BRAF V600E/R or non-V600 BRAF mutated advanced solid tumours (BELIEVE, NCCH1901): a multicentre, open-label, and single-arm phase II trial.

Background: BRAF V600 mutations are common in melanoma, thyroid, and non-small-cell lung cancers. Despite dabrafenib and trametinib being standard treatments for certain cancers, their efficacy across various solid tumours remains unelucidated. The BELIEVE trial assessed the efficacy of dabrafenib and trametinib in solid tumours with BRAF V600E/R or non-V600 BRAF mutations. Methods: Between October 1, 2019, and June 2022, at least 50 patients with measurable and seven without measurable diseases examined were enrolled in a subcohort of the BELIEVE trial (NCCH1901, jRCTs031190104). BRAF mutated solid tumour cases other than BRAF V600E mutated colorectal cancer, melanoma, and non-small cell lung cancer cases were included. Patients with solid tumours received dabrafenib (150 mg) twice daily and trametinib (2 mg) once daily until disease progression or intolerable toxicity was observed. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR), and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), 6-month PFS, and overall survival (OS). Bayesian analysis was performed using a prior distribution with a 30% expected response rate [Beta (0.6, 1.4)]. Findings: Fourty-seven patients with measurable disease, mainly with the BRAF V600E mutation (94%), and three others with non-V600E BRAF mutations (V600R, G466A, and N486_P490del) were enrolled. The primary sites included the thyroid gland, central nervous system, liver, bile ducts, colorectum, and pancreas. The confirmed ORR was 28.0%; the expected value of posterior distribution [Beta (14.6, 37.4)] was 28.1%, although the primary endpoint was achieved, not exceeding an unexpectedly high response rate of 60% obtained using Bayesian analysis. The disease control rate (DCR) was 84.0%. The median PFS was 6.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]; 4.2-7.2 months, 87.8% at 6 months). Responses were observed across seven tumour types. Median OS was 9.7 months (95% CI, 7.5-12.2 months). Additional patients without measurable diseases had a median PFS of 4.5 months. Adverse events (AEs) were consistent with previous reports, with 45.6% of patients experiencing grade ≥3 AEs. Interpretation: This study reported promising efficacy against BRAF V600-mutant tumours. Dabrafenib and trametinib would offer a new therapeutic option for rare cancers, such as high-grade gliomas, biliary tract cancer, and thyroid cancer. Funding: This study was funded by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (22ck0106622h0003) and a Health and Labour Sciences Research Grant (19EA1008).

A Learning Program for Treatment Recommendations by Molecular Tumor Boards and Artificial Intelligence.

Importance: Substantial heterogeneity exists in treatment recommendations across molecular tumor boards (MTBs), especially for biomarkers with low evidence levels; therefore, the learning program is essential. Objective: To determine whether a learning program sharing treatment recommendations for biomarkers with low evidence levels contributes to the standardization of MTBs and to investigate the efficacy of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based annotation system. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective quality improvement study used 50 simulated cases to assess concordance of treatment recommendations between a central committee and participants. Forty-seven participants applied from April 7 to May 13, 2021. Fifty simulated cases were randomly divided into prelearning and postlearning evaluation groups to assess similar concordance based on previous investigations. Participants included MTBs at hub hospitals, treating physicians at core hospitals, and AI systems. Each participant made treatment recommendations for each prelearning case from registration to June 30, 2021; participated in the learning program on July 18, 2021; and made treatment recommendations for each postlearning case from August 3 to September 30, 2021. Data were analyzed from September 2 to December 10, 2021. Exposures: The learning program shared the methodology of making appropriate treatment recommendations, especially for biomarkers with low evidence levels. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the proportion of MTBs that met prespecified accreditation criteria for postlearning evaluations (approximately 90% concordance with high evidence levels and approximately 40% with low evidence levels). Key secondary end points were chronological enhancements in the concordance of treatment recommendations on postlearning evaluations from prelearning evaluations. Concordance of treatment recommendations by an AI system was an exploratory end point. Results: Of the 47 participants who applied, 42 were eligible. The accreditation rate of the MTBs was 55.6% (95% CI, 35.3%-74.5%; P < .001). Concordance in MTBs increased from 58.7% (95% CI, 52.8%-64.4%) to 67.9% (95% CI, 61.0%-74.1%) (odds ratio, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.06-1.86]; P = .02). In postlearning evaluations, the concordance of treatment recommendations by the AI system was significantly higher than that of MTBs (88.0% [95% CI, 68.7%-96.1%]; P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this quality improvement study suggest that use of a learning program improved the concordance of treatment recommendations provided by MTBs to central ones. Treatment recommendations made by an AI system showed higher concordance than that for MTBs, indicating the potential clinical utility of the AI system.

Completion of adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy after surgical resection for biliary tract cancer: A single center experience.

BACKGROUNDS: A recent randomized control trial (JCOG1202; ASCOT trial) demonstrated the efficacy of adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy (ASC) for biliary tract cancer (BTC) after surgical resection; however, the significance of the completion of ASC in the real-world setting remains unknown. METHODS: Data of consecutive patients who underwent surgical resection for biliary tract cancer (BTC) from 2011 to 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, patients who underwent ASC were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether ASC was completed: the completion group and the non-completion group. Clinicopathological features and survival outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 223 patients with BTC who underwent surgical resection, 75 patients who underwent ASC were included for analysis. Among them, 48 (64.0 %) completed the intended ASC course, while 27 cases (36.0 %) discontinued the treatment. The most common reason for the discontinuation was adverse event (n = 16, 59.3 %), followed by disease recurrence (n = 9, 33.3 %). Patients in the completion group showed significantly better overall survival (OS) (p < 0.001) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (p < 0.001) compared to the non-completion group. Further, after excluding the patients in the non-completion group who discontinued ASC due to disease recurrence, the significance of ASC completion was retained for both OS and RFS. CONCLUSION: The completion of ASC was associated with improved prognosis in patients with BTC after surgical resection. The achievement of ASC should be the goal after surgical resection, while further study may be warranted regarding the resistance of ASC.

Impact of tumor shrinkage pattern with biweekly triplet gemcitabine+cisplatin+S-1 regimen for biliary tract cancers: Implications for neoadjuvant therapy from the data of KHBO1401 (KHBO1401-1A study).

BACKGROUND: The multicenter randomized phase III KHBO1401 study (gemcitabine+cisplatin+S-1 [GCS] versus GC in biliary tract cancers [BTC]) demonstrated that GCS not only prolonged patient survival but also achieved a high response rate and that it should be good for neoadjuvant therapy. Therefore, to explore the possibilities of neoadjuvant therapy, we investigated the tumor shrinkage pattern. METHODS: Among the total of 246 patients enrolled in the KHBO1401, the tumor shrinkage pattern and survival were investigated in patients with measurable BTC (n=183, 74%; GCS, n=91; GC, n=92). RESULTS: The tumor shrinkage pattern could be divided to 4 categories based on the response at 100 days after enrollment: category A (<-30% in size), B (-30% to 0%), C (0% to +20%), and D (>+20%). The GCS arm included more category A and B cases (61 [67%] vs. 33 [36%], P<0.0001). Each category predicted best response and overall survival (P<0.0001). Category A showed sustained tumor response compared with category B; in GCS, the time to maximum tumor response was 165 ± 76 days in category A and 139 ± 78 in category B. Categories C and D did not achieve tumor shrinkage. The maximum tumor shrinkage size in category A was -53% in the GCS arm and -65% in the GC arm (P=0.0892). Twenty percent of patients in the GCS showed tumor regrowth 154 ± 143 days later. CONCLUSION: GCS provided faster and greater tumor shrinkage with better survival in comparison to GC, although 20% of patients showed re-growth after 6 cycles.

Impact of conversion surgery after chemotherapy in patients with initially unresectable and recurrent biliary tract cancer.

Purpose: Gemcitabine, cisplatin, and S-1 chemotherapy was superior to gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy for progression-free survival and overall survival for unresectable and recurrent biliary tract cancer in a randomized phase III trial (KHBO1401). This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of conversion surgery after chemotherapy in biliary tract cancer patients (ancillary study, KHBO1401-3C). Methods: A total of 246 patients were enrolled in KHBO1401. We compared progression-free and overall survivals between the conversion surgery and non-conversion surgery groups. Results: Eight patients (3.3%) underwent conversion surgery with chemotherapy, seven of whom were diagnosed with unresectable disease and one with recurrence. Six and two patients received gemcitabine, cisplatin, and S-1 chemotherapy as well as gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy, respectively. Three patients in the conversion surgery group who received gemcitabine, cisplatin, and S-1 chemotherapy showed no disease progression and survived without postoperative chemotherapy. Preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) level was a prognostic factor for conversion surgery. After correcting for immortal time bias, 1-year progression-free survival rates in the conversion surgery and non-conversion surgery groups were 50.0% and 19.0%, respectively (hazard ratio 0.343, 95% confidence interval 0.286-0.843, p = 0.0092). One-year overall survival rates in the conversion surgery and non-conversion surgery groups were 87.5% and 56.0%, respectively (hazard ratio 0.222, 95% confidence interval 0.226-0.877, p = 0.0197). Conclusions: Conversion surgery might be an option for the treatment of unresectable and recurrent biliary tract cancer in patients with normal preoperative CA19-9 level.

Phase II Trial of Nivolumab in Metastatic Rare Cancer with dMMR or MSI-H and Relation with Immune Phenotypic Analysis (the ROCK Trial).

PURPOSE: Mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) are positive predictive markers for immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, data on the activity of nivolumab in advanced dMMR/MSI-H rare cancers and more accurate biomarkers are worth exploring. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a multicenter phase II, open-label, single-arm clinical trial to explore the effectiveness and safety of nivolumab monotherapy in patients with advanced rare cancers with dMMR/MSI-H, in parallel with immune phenotype analysis, to explore new biomarkers. A Bayesian adaptive design was applied. Characterization of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) was characterized by multicolor flow cytometric analysis and CyTOF using samples collected before and after the intervention. The dMMR was identified by the complete loss of MLH1/MSH2/MSH6/PMS2. RESULTS: From May 2018 to March 2021, 242 patients were screened, and 11 patients were enrolled, of whom 10 were included in the full analysis. Median follow-up was 24.7 months (interquartile range, 12.4-31.5). Objective response rate was 60% [95% confidence interval (CI), 26.2-87.8] by central assessment and 70% (95% CI, 34.8-93.3) by local investigators. Median progression-free survival was 10.1 months (95% CI, 0.9-11.1). No treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher were observed. Patients with a tumor mutation burden of ≥10/Mb showed a 100% response rate (95% CI, 47.8-100). Responders had increased T-bet+ PD-1+ CD4+ T cells in PBMC compared with nonresponders (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The trial met its primary endpoint with nivolumab, demonstrating clinical benefit in advanced dMMR/MSI-H rare solid cancers. Besides, the proportion of T-bet+ PD-1+ CD4+ T-cells may serve as a novel predictive biomarker.

Determinants of Anaerobic Threshold at Each Stage of Renal Dysfunction in Patients With Heart Disease.

Patients with heart disease have a low anaerobic threshold (AT), and the determinants of AT may differ, depending on the severity of renal dysfunction. This study aimed to verify the determinants of AT for each stage of renal function in patients with heart disease. We consecutively enrolled 250 patients with heart disease who underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing in our institution. The patients were divided into 3 groups by their estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR): <45, 45 to 59, and ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2. A multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate the independent determinants of AT for each group. In total, 201 patients were analyzed. AT decreased with the deterioration of renal function (eGFR <45, 10.9 ± 2.1 vs eGFR 45 to 59, 12.4 ± 2.5 vs eGFR ≥60, 14.0 ± 2.6 ml/min/kg, p <0.001). In the eGFR <45 group, left ventricular ejection fraction and hemoglobin were significantly associated with AT (ß = 0.427, p = 0.006 and ß = 0.488, p = 0.002, respectively). In the eGFR 45 to 59 and ≥60 groups, ΔPETO2 (end-tidal oxygen partial pressure from rest to AT) showed a significant association with AT (ß = 0.576, p <0.001 and ß = 0.308, p = 0.003, respectively). The determinants of AT depended on the stage of renal dysfunction in patients with heart disease. In conclusion, in the eGFR <45 group, the determinants of AT were left ventricular ejection fraction and hemoglobin, whereas in the eGFR 45 to 59 and eGFR ≥60 groups, the determinant of AT was ΔPETO2.

Safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with moderately hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy for resectable pancreatic cancer: A prospective, open-label, phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Resectable pancreatic cancer (RPC) is potentially resectable on admission, and the impact of neoadjuvant therapy on these tumors is controversial. Moreover, the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with moderately hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy (NACIMRT) for RPC have not been studied. Here, we conducted a phase II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of hypofractionated NACIMRT for RPC. METHODS: A total of 54 RPC patients were enrolled and treated according to the study protocol. We used moderately hypofractionated (45 Gy in 15 fractions) IMRT with gemcitabine to shorten the duration of radiotherapy and reduce gastrointestinal toxicity. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and we subsequently analyzed the microscopically margin-negative resection (R0) rate, disease-free survival (DFS), and histologic effects and safety of NACIMRT. RESULTS: Median OS for the cohort was 40.0 months. Forty-two patients (77.8%) underwent pancreatectomy after NACIMRT. Median DFS was 20.3 months. The R0 resection rate was 95.2% (40/42) per protocol and 85.2% (46/54) for the cohort. There were no intervention-related deaths during the study period. Local treatment response, as assessed by the CAP classification, showed no residual tumor in 4.8% of patients. Overall, 23.9% of patients experienced CTCAE grade 3 or 4 during NACIMRT. Adjuvant therapy was initiated in 88% of patients undergoing resection. Postoperative complications grade ≥3b on the Clavien-Dindo scale occurred in 4.8% of patients. CA19-9 level at enrollment was an independent prognostic factor for OS and DFS. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first prospective study of hypofractionated IMRT as neoadjuvant therapy for RPC. Hypofractionated NACIMRT for RPC could be safely introduced with a high induction rate of adjuvant chemotherapy, with an overall survival of 40.0 months.

Association between worsening renal function severity during hospitalization and low physical function at discharge: a retrospective cohort study of older patients with heart failure and chronic kidney disease from Japan.

BACKGROUND: The number of hospitalized older patients with chronic heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and worsening renal function is rising in Japan. This study aimed to clarify the impact of the severity of worsening renal function during hospitalization on low physical function at discharge of these patients. METHODS: We included 573 consecutive heart failure patients who underwent phase I cardiac rehabilitation. Worsening renal function severity was defined according to elevation during hospitalization of baseline serum creatinine on admission: non-worsening renal function, serum creatinine < 0.2 mg/dL; worsening renal function II/I, serum creatinine ≥ 0.2 to < 0.5 mg/dL; worsening renal function III, and serum creatinine ≥ 0.5 mL/dL. Physical function was measured with the Short Performance Physical Battery. We compared background factors, clinical parameters, pre-hospitalization walking levels, Functional Independence Measure score, and physical function in the three renal function groups. Multiple regression analysis was performed with the Short Performance Physical Battery at discharge as the dependent variable. RESULTS: The final analysis included 196 patients (mean age 82.7 years, male 51.5%) categorized into three groups based on worsening renal function: worsening renal function grade III group (n = 55), worsening renal function grade II/I group (n = 36), and non-worsening renal function group (n = 105). There is no significant difference in walking levels before hospitalization between the three groups, but physical function at discharge was significantly lower in the worsening renal function III group. Moreover, worsening renal function III was an independent factor for low physical function at discharge. CONCLUSION: Worsening of renal function during hospitalization in older patients with heart failure and chronic kidney disease was strongly associated with low physical function at discharge, even after adjusting for other potentially confounding factors, such as pre-hospitalization walking levels, walking start day, and Geriatric Nutrition Risk Index at discharge. Notably, worsening renal function of mild or moderate severity (grade II/I) did not show a significant association with low physical function.

Comprehensive review of undifferentiated carcinoma of the pancreas: from epidemiology to treatment.

Undifferentiated carcinoma (UC) of the pancreas is a rare subtype of pancreatic cancer displaying no definitive direction of differentiation. UC has been reported as a highly aggressive malignant neoplasm, with a median overall survival of <1 year, except for several surgical series. On the other hand, UC tissue sometimes contains non-neoplastic osteoclast-like giant cells (OGCs), and such cases have been reported to have relatively longer survival. Thus, the World Health Organization (WHO) classification histologically distinguishes UC with OGCs (UCOGCs) from UC, and UCs were subclassified into three subtypes: anaplastic UC, sarcomatoid UC and carcinosarcoma. However, still less is known about UC due to its rarity, and such situations lead to further difficulties in treatment for UC. To date, only surgical resection can offer curative treatment for patients with UC, and no clear evidence for chemotherapy exists for them. However, a retrospective cohort study and case reports showed that relatively promising results paclitaxel-containing regimens for treatment of patients with unresectable UC. Furthermore, high programmed cell death protein 1 expression has been reported in sarcomatoid UCs and UCOGCs, and promising responses to anti-programmed death-ligand 1 therapy have been described in case reports of UCOGCs. Recent advances in chemotherapeutic agents and molecular technologies are opening up the possibilities for expanded treatments.

Association of Malnutrition With Physical Activity Intensity in Patients With Subacute Stroke.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between nutritional status measured by the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria and the intensity of physical activity, and to determine the association between these factors and the activities of daily living (ADLs) in patients with subacute stroke during hospitalization. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. SETTING: The study was conducted in the rehabilitation unit at a neurosurgical hospital. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and twenty-eight patients with subacute stroke (N=128). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Nutritional status was assessed using GLIM criteria. Sedentary behavior (SB), light-intensity physical activity (LIPA), and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) were measured using an accelerometer. Multiple regression analysis was used to investigate the relationship between nutritional status and intensity of physical activity. Moreover, the association of nutritional status and physical activity intensity with ADLs was determined using multiple regression analysis and mediation analysis. RESULTS: Malnutrition was associated with SB time (B = 16.241, P=.009) and LIPA time (B = -17.656, P=.002), but not MVPA time (B = -0.472, P=.776). SB time (B = -0.063, P=.009) and LIPA time (B = 0.093, P<.001) were associated with functional independence measure for motor function, while MVPA time (B = -0.080, P=.379) was not. SB time (coefficient = -10.785, P<.001) and LIPA time (coefficient = -12.054, P<.001) were significant mediators between nutrition status and ADLs. CONCLUSIONS: Malnutrition was associated with a SB time and LIPA time, but not MVPA time, in patients with sub-acute stroke. SB and LIPA times were associated with ADLs and mediated between nutrition status and ADLs in these patients. The association of nutritional status on physical activity and ADLs should be considered in stroke rehabilitation.

Association between homologous recombination gene variants and efficacy of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic cancer: prospective multicenter observational study.

Next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based gene profiling can identify patients with pancreatic cancer with homologous recombinant repair gene pathogenic variants (HRRv). Several retrospective studies have reported a positive association between HRRv and the efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy. However, this association remains to be validated in a prospective study. This multicenter, prospective, observational study included patients with histologically confirmed unresectable or recurrent pancreatic cancer who required systemic chemotherapy. Patients who were oxaliplatin-naïve patients were eligible. The HRRv status was measured using a College of American Pathologists-accredited NGS panel. One-year overall survival rate (1yr-OS%) was calculated after initiation of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy and was set as the primary endpoint. Forty patients were enrolled between August 2018 and March 2020. The NGS success rate was 95% (38/40). HRRv was detected in 11 patients (27.5%). Oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy was administered to 9 of 11 patients with HRRv (81.8%) and 15 of 29 patients with non-HRRv (51.7%). The 1yr-OS% after initiation of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy was 44.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 13.7-71.9] and 57.1% (95% CI 28.4-78.0) in HRRv-positive and -negative cohorts, respectively. These data suggested that HRRv status alone could not be a potential predictive marker of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. These results were in line with the results of a recent phase II study reporting the limited efficacy of poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor in patients with pancreatic cancer who harbored HRRv other than BRCA. Future studies investigating patients with biallelic HRRv in the first-line setting are warranted.Trial registration UMIN000033655.

Clinical outcomes of second­line chemotherapy after gemcitabine and cisplatin plus S­1 treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer in the KHBO1401­3A study.

Since the completion of the KHBO1401 study, which evaluated the efficacy of the combination of gemcitabine (GEM) and cisplatin (GC) compared with GC plus S­1 (GCS), GCS has become a standard chemotherapy for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). However, there are currently no data revealing second­line therapy options after GCS. The present study aimed to evaluate the survival outcomes of patients receiving second­line chemotherapy for advanced BTC, refractory or intolerant to GCS, using data from the KHBO1401 study. Patients who received a second­line treatment after GCS chemotherapy between July 2014 and February 2016 were retrospectively studied. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the day of GCS treatment failure or the first day of second­line chemotherapy to the final follow­up date or until death from any cause. Among 83 patients refractory or intolerant to GCS chemotherapy, 51 (61%) received second­line chemotherapy, including GCS (n=8), GC (n=15), GEM (n=6), GEM plus S­1 (GS) (n=4) and S­1 (n=18). The 6­ and 12­month OS rates were 66.7 and 44.4%, respectively, following second­line chemotherapy, and 6.3 and 3.1%, respectively, in the best supportive care group (P<0.0001). In addition, the 12­ and 24­month OS rates were 59.3 and 36.2%, respectively, in the multidrug chemotherapy group, and 26.9 and 9.0%, respectively, in the single­agent chemotherapy group (P=0.0191). These results suggested that second­line combination chemotherapy is a viable treatment option for patients with advanced BTC that is refractory or intolerant to first­line GCS therapy.

Poor association between dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD) genotype and fluoropyrimidine-induced toxicity in an Asian population.

OBJECTIVE: Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD) genotype is closely associated with fluoropyrimidine (FP)-induced toxicities in Caucasian population and European Medicines Agency now recommends DPYD genotype-based FP dosing strategy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The current study aimed to investigate their impact on FP-related toxicities in an Asian population using genome-wide association study (GWAS) data set from 1364 patients with colon cancer. RESULTS: Among 82 variants registered in the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium, 74 DPYD variants were directly genotyped in GWAS cohort; however, only 7 nonsynonymous DPYD variants (CPIC variants) were identified and none of the four recurrent DPYD variants (DPYD*2A, c.2846A>T, c.1679T>G, c.1236G>A) were included. Seven CPIC variants were investigated for their association with the incidence of FP-related toxicities; however, none of these variants revealed a significant correlation with FP-related toxicities. CONCLUSION: These data suggested that the DPYD genotype registered in CPIC plays a minor role in FP-related toxicities in an Asian population.

A prospective multicenter phase II study of FOLFIRINOX as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced and recurrent biliary tract cancer.

Given the promising activity and tolerability of FOLFIRINOX as a second-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC), it can be an attractive first-line treatment option as well. This is a single-arm, open-label, multicenter phase II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of FOLFIRINOX as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced BTC. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), tumor response and safety. This study defined primary endpoint might be met when the lower limit value of 80% confidence interval [CI] of the median PFS ≥ 6.0 months. Between June 2016 and March 2020, 35 BTC patients (21 intrahepatic, 10 extrahepatic, 2 gallbladder, 2 ampulla) including 26 unresectable and 9 recurrent disease were enrolled. After a median follow-up of 13.9 months, the median PFS and OS were 7.4 (80% CI, 5.5-7.5) and 14.7 (80% CI, 11.8-15.7) months, respectively. Complete response was achieved in 1 (2.9%) and partial response in 10 (28.6%), giving an objective response rate of 31.4% and disease control rate of 74.3%. Major grade 3-4 adverse events included neutropenia (54.3%), leukopenia (34.4%), febrile neutropenia (17.1%), thrombocytopenia (8.6%), cholangitis (8.6%), anemia, nausea, diarrhea, and peripheral sensory neuropathy (2.9% each). FOLFIRINOX was well tolerable in patients with advanced BTC, however, this study did not meet the primary endpoint to conduct a phase III trial. Thus, further explorations are required to find a subset of patients and/or certain clinical scenario which might be beneficial from FOLFIRINOX.

Randomized phase III study of gemcitabine, cisplatin plus S-1 versus gemcitabine, cisplatin for advanced biliary tract cancer (KHBO1401- MITSUBA).

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) combination therapy has been the standard palliative chemotherapy for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). No randomized clinical trials have been able to demonstrate the survival benefit over GC during the past decade. In our previous phase II trial, adding S-1 to GC (GCS) showed promising efficacy and we aimed to determine whether GCS could improve overall survival compared with GC for patients with advanced BTC. METHODS: We performed a mulitcenter, randomized phase III trial across 39 centers. Enrolled patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to either the GCS or GC arm. The GCS regimen comprised gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 ) and cisplatin (25 mg/m2 ) infusion on day 1 and 80 mg/m2 of S-1 on days 1-7 every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), and adverse events (AEs). This study is registered with Clinical trial identification: NCT02182778. RESULTS: Between July 2014 and February 2016, 246 patients were enrolled. The median OS and 1-year OS rate were 13.5 months and 59.4% in the GCS arm and 12.6 months and 53.7% in the GC arm, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 0.79, 90% confidence interval [CI]: 0.628-0.996; P = .046 [stratified log-rank test]). Median PFS was 7.4 months in the GCS arm and 5.5 months in the GC arm (HR 0.75, 95% CI: 0.577-0.970; P = .015). RR was 41.5% in the GCS arm and 15.0% in the GC arm. Grade 3 or worse AEs did not show significant differences between the two arms. CONCLUSIONS: GCS is the first regimen which demonstrated survival benefits as well as higher RR over GC in a randomized phase III trial and could be the new first-line standard chemotherapy for advanced BTC. To exploit the advantage of its high RR, GCS is now tested in the neoadjuvant setting in a randomized phase III trial for potentially resectable BTC.

Nivolumab for malignant transformation of ovarian mature cystic teratoma.

Mature cystic teratoma of the ovary (MCT) occasionally undergoes malignant transformation (MT) that is resistant to chemotherapy and has a poor prognosis. We experienced a case of clinically aggressive MCT-MT that invades surrounding organs and tissues. Although tumor was resected entirely, a rapid tumor recurrence occurred during postoperative chemotherapy (paclitaxel + ifosfamide + cisplatin). The results of comprehensive genomic profiling test performed early in the postoperative period showed a high tumor mutational burden of 23 mutations/Mb. Treatment with nivolumab monotherapy has promptly been initiated and has been very successful for more than one year.