Risk Factors for Corneal Monochromatic Aberrations and Implications for Multifocal and Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lens Implantation.

PURPOSE: To discuss factors influencing corneal aberrations that might influence the optical quality after intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. METHODS: PubMed and Scopus were the main resources used to search the medical literature. An extensive search was performed to identify relevant articles concerning factors influencing the level of corneal aberrations as of August 27, 2023. The following keywords were used in various combinations: corneal, aberrations, defocus, astigmatism, spherical aberration, coma, trefoil, quadrafoil, intraocular lens, and IOL. RESULTS: Conclusive evidence is lacking regarding the correlation between age and changes in corneal aberrations. Patients with astigmatism have greater corneal higher-order aberrations than those with minimal astigmatism, particularly concerning trefoil and coma. Increased levels of corneal higher-order aberrations are noted following contact lens wear, in patients with dry eye disease, and with pterygium. Increased higher-order aberrations have been reported following corneal refractive surgery and for 3 months following trabeculectomy; regarding intraocular lens surgery, the results remain controversial. CONCLUSIONS: Several factors influence the level of corneal higher-order aberrations. Multifocal and extended depth-of-focus IOLs can share similarities in their optical properties, and the main difference arises in their design and performance with respect to spherical aberration. Preoperative evaluation is critical for proper IOL choice, particularly in corneas with risk of high levels of aberrations. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(6):e420-e434.].

The Effect of Blue-light Filtering Intraocular Lenses on the Development and Progression of Macular Atrophy in Eyes With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration.

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of blue-light filtering (BLF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) on the development and progression of macular atrophy (MA) in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). DESIGN: Retrospective, clinical cohort study. METHODS: The study included patients with nAMD with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections who underwent uneventful cataract surgery between 2007 and 2018 with follow-up until June 2023. Subsequent MA rates were compared between subjects who received a BLF IOL or a non-BLF IOL. All optical coherence tomography scans were manually reviewed in a masked manner regarding patient baseline variables and IOL status by an experienced research technician. By using Heidelberg software, the area of MA was manually evaluated and calculated (mm2) by the program. The overall risk of developing new-onset MA and the effect of IOL type on disease progression were assessed. Death was included as a censoring event. RESULTS: Included were 373 eyes of 373 patients (mean age, 78.6 ± 6.7 years at surgery; 67.4% were female). BLF IOLs were implanted in 206 eyes, and non-BLF IOLs were implanted in 167 eyes with comparable follow-up times (3164 ± 1420 days vs 3180 ± 1403 days, respectively, P = .908) and other baseline parameters (age, gender, corrected distance visual acuity, macular thickness, cumulative number of anti-VEGF injections). Nine preexisting and 77 new-onset MA cases were detected, with similar distribution between BLF and non-BLF eyes (P = .598 and P = .399, respectively). Both univariate Kaplan-Meier (P = .366) and multivariate Cox regression analyses adjusted for age and gender showed that BLF-IOLs were comparable to non-BLF IOLs regarding hazard for new-onset MA (hazard ratio [HR], 1.236; 95% CI, 0.784-1.949; P = .363). Final MA area at the last visit was 5.14 ± 4.71 mm2 for BLF IOLs and 8.56 ± 9.17 mm2 for non-BLF IOLs (P = .028), with the mean annual MA area increase of 0.78 ± 0.84 mm2 and 1.26 ± 1.32 mm2, respectively (P = .042). CONCLUSIONS: BLF IOLs did not show added benefit over non-BLF IOLs in terms of MA-free survival but were associated with less progression over time in a cohort of patients with nAMD.

Does the introduction of streamlight decrease refractive surgery operating time?

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to analyze the time-savings associated with introduction of Streamlight™ (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX, USA) transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in surface corneal ablations. METHODS: All refractive surgeries were performed using the Alcon WaveLight® EX500 at the ArtLife Clinic, Gdansk, Poland. The study included patients treated for refractive errors with transepithelial PRK between April 2019 and October 2021, who were matched with patients treated with alcohol-assisted PRK during the same period. Only results for the left eye were analyzed. RESULTS: One-hundred-five patients underwent transepithelial PRK (age 33.42 ± 8.67 years) and were matched with 105 patients that underwent alcohol-assisted PRK (age 33.05 ± 10.16 years; p = 0.11). The mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was - 2.04 ± 2.28 D, and - 1.9 ± 1.71 D for the transepithelial and alcohol-assisted PRK group, respectively (p = 0.20). The total surgery time was non-significantly shorter in transepithelial PRK (349.46 ± 47.83 s) than in alcohol-assisted PRK (354.93 ± 137.63 s; p = 0.7); however, the variance of surgical time was significantly lower in transepithelial PRK (p < 0.001). The laser treatment duration was greater in transepithelial PRK (41.78 ± 17.2 s) than in alcohol-assisted PRK (8.48 ± 6.12 s; p < 0.001), and so was the number of breaks during the laser treatment (0.95 ± 0.63 vs. 0.53 ± 0.88, respectively; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The introduction of transepithelial PRK did not bring significant time-associated savings into the refractive surgery suite.

Corneal Tomography in a Commercially Available Optical Coherence Tomography Device and Comparison With a Rotating Scheimpflug Camera.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of corneal tomography obtained with an anterior-to-posterior segment optical coherence tomography device (Revo, Optopol Technologies Sp. z o.o.) and a rotating Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam AXL, Oculus Optikgeräte, Wetzlar, Germany). METHODS: In healthy subjects, agreement in stereometric parameters commonly used in cataract and refractive surgery was assessed. Comparison between the devices was performed using correlation coefficients, the Bland-Altman method, and a paired t test. RESULTS: Results of right eyes of 78 patients (47 women) aged 25.24±5.56 years were analyzed. The flat and steep anterior keratometry values were significantly higher for Revo than Pentacam (43.65±1.58 D vs. 42.99±1.47 D; P = 0.000, and 44.53±1.57 D vs. 43.82±1.49 D; P =0.000, respectively) and showed excellent correlation ( r =0.978 and 0.974, respectively). The results for maximal keratometry manifested a higher difference (45.89±1.69 D vs. 44.27±1.51 D for Revo and Pentacam, P =0.000) but were also strongly correlated ( r =0.871). Revo showed significantly lower corneal thickness values than Pentacam, both for apex pachymetry (535.54±32.45 vs. 550.74±31.55 µm; P =0.000) and for thinnest pachymetry (522.58±32.16 vs. 547.25±31.95 µm; P =0.000). The correlation coefficients for anterior and posterior corneal elevation at the thinnest point showed weak positive correlation ( r =0.179 and 0.185), while the correlation for corneal asphericity was moderate ( r =0.317). CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant difference between keratometric values obtained with Revo and the Pentacam AXL, although the measurements showed excellent correlation. Similar results were found for corneal thickness measurements, but not for corneal surface elevation and corneal asphericity.

Illumination levels in commonly used ophthalmic devices.

Pupil diameter is a key parameter for corneal and multifocal intraocular lens surgery. Many devices are dedicated to measure the pupil size, but do not specify the illumination during capture. The aim of this study was to present illumination levels in routinely used ophthalmic devices which present pupil sizes. To obtain measurements, the lux meter was placed in the chin rest in the corneal plane and the room was completely dimmed. Ten measurements were taken for each device. The illumination levels for white and red Placido disk corneal topographers were 1253.1 ± 0.2 and 329.0 ± 0.2 lux, respectively (both photopic conditions). Scheimpflug corneal tomography should be considered as a mesopic measurement (14.5 ± 0.1 lux). Optical coherence tomography and autorefractometry are scotopic measurements (0.4-0.6 lux). We postulate that producers should provide illumination levels of their devices measuring pupil size. Moreover, when mentioning a pupil size, one should consider presenting to what lighting conditions it refers to.

Applications of the pinhole effect in clinical vision science.

The pinhole effect is commonly used to discriminate uncorrected refractive error from ocular diseases. A small aperture limits the width of light beams entering the eye, thus increasing the depth of focus. The pinhole effect has also been used in spectacles, contact lenses, corneal inlays, and intraocular lenses (IOLs) to improve reading by compensating for loss of accommodative function. Pinhole spectacles improve near visual acuity, but reduce reading speed, increase interblink interval, and decrease tear break-up time. For contact lenses and IOLs, pinhole devices are usually used in the nondominant eye, which allow compensation of various refractive errors and decrease spectacle dependence. Pinhole corneal inlays are implanted during laser in situ keratomileusis or as a separate procedure. Pinhole IOLs are gaining popularity, particularly as they do not bring a risk of a local inflammatory reaction as corneal inlays do. Disadvantages of using the pinhole effect include high susceptibility to decentration, decrease in retinal luminance levels, and difficulties in performing fundus examinations or surgery in eyes with implanted devices. There are also concerns regarding perceptive issues with different retinal illuminances in the 2 eyes (the Pulfrich effect).

Technical failure rates for biometry between swept-source and older-generation optical coherence methods: a review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Precise ocular measurements are fundamental for achieving excellent target refraction following both cataract surgery and refractive lens exchange. Biometry devices with swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) employ longer wavelengths (1055-1300 nm) in order to have better penetration through opaque lenses than those with partial coherence interferometry (PCI) or low-coherence optical reflectometry (LCOR) methods. However, to date a pooled analysis showing the technical failure rate (TFR) between the methods has not been published. The aim of this study was to compare the TFR in SS-OCT and in PCI/LCOR biometry. METHODS: PubMed and Scopus were used to search the medical literature as of Feb 1, 2022. The following keywords were used in various combinations: optical biometry, partial coherence interferometry, low-coherence optical reflectometry, swept-source optical coherence tomography. Only clinical studies referring to patients undergoing routine cataract surgery, and employing at least two (PCI or LCOR vs. SS-OCT) optical methods for optical biometry in the same cohort of patients were included. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were included in the final analysis, which presented results of 2,459 eyes of at least 1,853 patients. The overall TFR of all included studies was 5.47% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.66-8.08%; overall I2 = 91.49%). The TFR was significantly different among the three methods (p < 0.001): 15.72% for PCI (95% CI: 10.73-22.46%; I2 = 99.62%), 6.88% for LCOR (95% CI: 3.26-13.92%; I2 = 86.44%), and 1.51% for SS-OCT (95% CI: 0.94-2.41%; I2 = 24.64%). The pooled TFR for infrared methods (PCI and LCOR) was 11.12% (95% CI: 8.45-14.52%; I2 = 78.28%), and was also significantly different to that of SS-OCT: 1.51% (95% CI: 0.94-2.41%; I2 = 24.64%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A meta-analysis of the TFR of different biometry methods highlighted that SS-OCT biometry resulted in significantly decreased TFR compared to PCI/LCOR devices.

The Effect of Blue-Light Filtering Intraocular Lenses on the Development and Progression of Glaucoma.

PRCIS: Among patients who underwent uneventful cataract surgery, an advantage was seen to blue-light filtering (BLF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) in terms of glaucoma-free survival and glaucoma procedure-free survival. Among patients with preexisting glaucoma, no advantage was seen. PURPOSE: To assess the effect of BLF IOLs on the development and progression of glaucoma after cataract surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent uneventful cataract surgery between 2007 and 2018 at Kymenlaakso Central Hospital, Finland. Survival analyses for the overall risk of developing glaucoma or undergoing glaucoma procedures were assessed between patients who received a BLF IOL (SN60WF) and a non-BLF IOL (ZA9003 and ZCB00). A separate analysis was performed on patients with preexisting glaucoma. RESULTS: Included 11,028 eyes of 11,028 patients with a mean age of 75 ± 9 years (62% females). The BLF IOL was used in 5188 eyes (47%) and the non-BLF IOL in 5840 eyes (53%). During the follow-up (mean: 55 ± 34 mo), 316 cases of glaucoma were diagnosed. Glaucoma-free survival rates showed an advantage to the BLF IOL ( P = 0.036). In a Cox regression analysis controlling for age and sex the use of a BLF IOL was again associated with a lower ratio of glaucoma development (hazard ratio:0.778; 95% CI: 0.621-0.975). Furthermore, glaucoma procedure-free survival analysis revealed an advantage to the BLF IOL (hazard ratio:0.616; 95% CI: 0.406-0.935). Among 662 cases, which already had glaucoma at the time of surgery, no significant differences were seen in any outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Among a large cohort of patients who underwent cataract surgery, the use of BLF IOLs was associated with favorable glaucoma outcomes compared with the use of non-BLF IOLs. Among patients with preexisting glaucoma, no significant advantage was seen.

Association of clear vs blue-light filtering intraocular lenses with mental and behavioral disorders and diseases of the nervous system among patients receiving bilateral cataract surgery.

PURPOSE: To analyze new-onset mental and behavioral disorders and nervous system diseases in patients with cataract implanted with either non-blue-light filtering (BLF) or BLF intraocular lenses (IOLs) in both eyes. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Kymenlaakso Central Hospital, Kotka, Finland. DESIGN: A retrospective registry-based cohort study of patients operated between September 2007 and December 2018 who were followed until December 2021. We included 4986 patients who underwent bilateral cataract surgery. METHODS: Patients were implanted with either non-BLF IOLs (N = 2609) or BLF IOLs (N = 2377) in both eyes. Follow-up before the first-eye surgery and between the first-eye and the second-eye surgery was performed to acknowledge the preexisting disorders and diseases. After the second-eye surgery, the groups were analyzed for the new-onset mental and behavioral disorders and diseases of the nervous system subcategorized by the International Classification of Diseases codes. RESULTS: 1707 male and 3279 female patients, aged 73.2 ± 8.6 years at the first-eye surgery and 74.3 ± 8.8 years at the second-eye surgery, were identified. In univariate log-rank tests, the use of BLF IOLs showed no association in overall new-onset disorders or diseases over non-BLF IOLs, in any subtype diagnosis codes except for sleep disorders, which favored BLF IOLs ( P = .003). A multivariate analysis adjusted for age and sex identified no associations in any new-onset disorders or diseases. Multivariate analysis of sleep disorders showed a nonsignificant advantage for BLF-IOLs (hazard ratio 0.756, 95% CI 0.534-1.070, P = .114). CONCLUSIONS: BLF IOLs were not associated with mental and behavioral disorders or diseases of the nervous system.

Should Multifocal Intraocular Lenses Become a Standard in Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery?

Cataracts impair daily activities such as reading, outdoor sports, and driving, which may not match best-corrected visual acuity at optimal room light conditions, but can be just as important to patients [...].

Secondary outcomes of lens and cataract surgery: More than just "best-corrected visual acuity".

Most studies evaluating cataract surgery focus on the primary outcome of early, central, best-corrected visual acuity. However, cataract surgery and intraocular lens (IOL) design have other secondary visual outcomes as well as impacts on various ocular tissues, the visual function, and quality of life. Some of these aspects are more difficult to quantify, or are historically neglected, but might be extremely important to patients. One important development was the addition of blue-light filtering to IOL design. Whether these IOLs truly have the retinal protective qualities they were designed for is disputed, yet other inadvertent desirable and possibly detrimental influences are being examined. Risk of falls, driving accidents, and other injuries decrease following cataract surgery, especially in the elderly, the importance of which cannot be overemphasized. Cataract formation contributes to social isolation and decreases cognitive stimulation in the elderly population, while cataract extraction can reduce the risk of dementia and cognitive decline. Diffractive multifocal and extended depth-of-focus IOLs improve spectacle independence and patient reported outcomes, but positive and negative dysphotopsia may be persistent. Future directions such as using the IOL enabling clear spectacle-free vision at all distances, or intraoperative drug delivery systems show promising preliminary results. It seems inevitable that a higher focus on the secondary outcomes of surgery will increase. We believe that these aspects will become more and more relevant when considering new IOL designs and surgical techniques, a fact that will benefit both the patients and the surgeons.

Association of Blue Light-Filtering Intraocular Lenses With All-Cause and Traffic Accident-Related Injuries Among Patients Undergoing Bilateral Cataract Surgery in Finland.

Importance: Blue light-filtering (BLF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) have been widely used in clinical practice for more than 20 years and have been implanted in millions of patients with cataracts worldwide. However, little evidence on the association of BLF IOLs with injuries is available. Objective: To assess the association of BLF IOLs with all-cause and traffic accident-related injuries and quality of vision while driving after bilateral cataract surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective registry-based cohort study included patients who underwent bilateral cataract surgery between September 3, 2007, and December 14, 2018, and were followed until December 14, 2021. Surgery was performed at the Department of Ophthalmology, Kymenlaakso Central Hospital, Kotka, Finland. The 4986 participants received non-BLF IOLs (n = 2609) or BLF IOLs (n = 2377) in both eyes. Patients undergoing bilateral surgery between 2015 to 2016 with non-BLF IOLs (n = 102) or BLF IOLs (n = 91) and currently driving a car were interviewed using a structured questionnaire for visual performance while driving. Exposures: Follow-up for a mean (SD) of 2166 (1110) days after second eye surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures: Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses for the risk of all-cause and traffic accident-related injuries after surgery in the second eye obtained from the patient medical records were assessed. To improve follow-up precision, both death and the end of the follow-up were used as censoring events. Results: A total of 4986 patients were included in the analysis (1707 [34.2%] men and 3279 [65.8%] women; mean [SD] age, 73.2 [8.6] years at the first surgery and 74.3 [8.8] years at the second). Injury-free survival rates preceding the first eye surgery were comparable between the non-BLF and BLF IOL groups (hazard ratio adjusted for age and sex, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.81-1.13; P = .57]). In multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis controlling for age and sex, the use of BLF IOLs showed no advantage in overall injuries compared with the use of non-BLF IOLs (hazard ratio, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.88-1.11]; P = .85) or in any injury subtype. Subjective visual performance parameters for driving were all comparable between the non-BLF and BLF IOL groups except for glare when driving in the dark (evening or night), which occurred among 9 of 80 patients with BLF IOLs compared with 0 of 83 non-BLF IOLs (P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cohort study suggest that use of BLF IOLs was not associated with reduced risk of injuries, whereas glare during nighttime driving was significantly worse in the BLF IOL group with pseudophakia.

Incidence and Risk Factors for Berger's Space Development after Uneventful Cataract Surgery: Evidence from Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography.

Background: This study investigates the incidence and risk factors for the development of Berger's space (BS) after uneventful phacoemulsification based on swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT). Methods: Cataractous eyes captured using qualified SS-OCT images before and after uneventful phacoemulsification cataract surgery were included. Six high-resolution cross-sectional anterior segment SS-OCT images at 30° intervals were used for BS data measurements. BS width was measured at three points on each scanned meridian line: the central point line aligned with the cornea vertex and two point lines at the pupil's margins. Results: A total of 223 eyes that underwent uneventful cataract surgery were evaluated. Preoperatively, only two eyes (2/223, 0.9%) were observed to have consistent BS in all six scanning directions. BS was observed postoperatively in 44 eyes (44/223, 19.7%). A total of 13 eyes (13/223, 5.8%) with insufficient image quality, pupil dilation, or lack of preoperative image data were excluded from the study. A total of 31 postoperative eyes with BS and 31 matched eyes without BS were included in the final data analysis. The smallest postoperative BS width was in the upper quadrant of the vertical meridian line (90°), with a mean value of 280 µm. The largest BS width was observed in the opposite area of the main clear corneal incision, with a mean value >500 µm. Conclusions: Uneven-width BS is observable after uneventful phacoemulsification. Locations with a much wider BS (indirect manifestation of Wieger zonular detachment) are predominantly located in the opposite direction to the main corneal incisions.

Advancements in Postoperative Care after Cataract Surgery.

Cataract surgery is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures in many countries [...].

Comparison Study of the Two Biometers Based on Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Technology.

This research aimed to investigate the potential differences in the parameters, including axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), flat keratometry (Kf), steep keratometry (Ks), mean keratometry (Km), astigmatism, white-to-white (WTW) distance, acquired rate, and intraocular lens (IOL) power, between the two swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) biometers, the ANTERION (biometer A) and IOLMaster 700 (biometer B). In a prospective observational comparative case series study, we enrolled 198 eyes undergoing cataract surgery. The AL, CCT, ACD, LT, Kf, Ks, Km, astigmatism, WTW, acquired rate, and IOL power were assessed. McNemar tests compared the acquired rate, and the paired sample t-test compared the quantitative measurement results between the groups. Nineteen eyes were excluded owing to missing AL data for either biometer. Finally, data from 179 eyes were analyzed. Between the two devices, no significant difference was found in AL, astigmatism magnitude, J0, and J45, while significant differences existed in CCT, ACD, LT, Kf, Ks, Km, WTW, astigmatism axis, and IOL power; no statistical significance was found in the AL acquired rate (biometer A, 90.9% and biometer B, 93.9%). Approximately 65.4% of eyes demonstrated ≥0.5-D difference in IOL power between the two biometers. In conclusion, the two biometers showed significant differences in all measurements (CCT, ACD, LT, K, WTW, astigmatism axis, and IOL power), except for AL.

Chlorhexidine and other alternatives for povidone-iodine in ophthalmic surgery: review of comparative studies.

Povidone-iodine (PVI) is a universally accepted antiseptic agent used in ophthalmic surgery. Insufficient antisepsis in patients with self-reported allergies to iodine has led to devastating complications. The aim of this study was to review the current evidence for alternatives to PVI in ocular surgery. Aqueous chlorhexidine has been used as a primary antiseptic agent in Sweden for several years and has proven efficiency and safety; in a study of a large series of intravitreal injections in Australia, the endophthalmitis rates were similar to those after the use of PVI. The evidence related to using other disinfectants such as picloxydine, hypochlorous acid solution, and polyhexanide is scarce. Single studies have shown lower patient discomfort after conjunctival lavage with chlorhexidine or hypochlorous acid than with PVI. No evidence was found to suggest changing from PVI to other antiseptic agents. Disinfectant solutions other than PVI or chlorhexidine will require further investigations to show their utility in ocular surgery.