Fusion Revision Surgery With Reamer-Irrigator-Aspirator to Harvest Autograft After Spinal Pseudarthrosis.

Background and purpose Spinal pseudarthrosis (SPA) is a common complication after attempted cervical or lumbosacral spinal fusion surgery. Revision surgeries usually necessitate bone graft implementation as an adjunct to hardware revision. Iliac crest bone graft is the gold standard but availability can be limited and usage often leads to persistent postoperative pain at the donor site. There is scant literature regarding the use of reamer-irrigator-aspirator (RIA)-harvested bone graft in lumbar spinal fusion. This is a collaborative study between orthopedic surgery and neurosurgery departments to utilize femur intramedullary autograft harvested using the RIA system as an adjunct graft in SPA revision surgeries. Materials and methods A retrospective review was conducted at a single center between August 2014 and December 2017 of patients aged ≥ 18 years and diagnosed with cervical, thoracic, or lumbar SPA who underwent revision fusion surgery using femur intramedullary autograft harvested using the RIA system. Plain radiographs and CT scans were utilized to confirm successful fusion. Results Eleven patients underwent 12 SPA revision surgeries using the RIA system as a source for bone graft in addition to bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) and allograft. The mean amount of graft harvested was 51.3 mL (range: 20-70 mL). Nine patients achieved successful fusion (81.8%). The average time to fusion was 9.1 months. Four patients (36.4%) had postoperative knee pain. Regarding patient position and approach for harvesting, 66.7% (n = 8) of cases were positioned prone and a retrograde approach was utilized in 91.7% (n = 11) of cases. Interpretation This is the first case series in known literature to report the RIA system as a reliably considerable source of autologous bone graft for SPA revision surgeries. It provides a useful adjunct to the known types of bone grafts. Patient positioning and the approach choice for graft harvesting can be adjusted according to the fusion approach and the surgeon's preference.

Incidental Durotomy Following Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Disease and the Impact of Minimally Invasive Surgical Technique on the Rate and Need for Surgical Revision: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Incidental durotomy (ID) is a common complication during lumbar spine surgery. A paucity of literature has studied the impact of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) on durotomy rates and strategies for repair as compared to open surgery. OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact that MIS techniques have on the durotomy rate, repair techniques, and need for surgical revision following surgery for degenerative lumbar disease as compared to open technique. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review of consecutive cases between 2013 and 2016 was performed. All patients underwent lumbar decompression with or without instrumented fusion for degenerative pathology using either open posterior or MIS techniques. ID rate, closure technique, and need for surgical revision related to the durotomy were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 1,196 patients were included with an overall ID rate of 6.8%. There was no difference between open or minimally invasive surgical techniques (P = .14). There was a higher durotomy rate with open technique in patients that underwent decompression with fusion (P = .03) as well as in revision cases (P = .02). Primary repair was feasible more frequently in the open group (P = .001), whereas use of dural substitute (P < .001) was more common in the MIS group. Fibrin sealant was used routinely in both groups (P = .34). There were no failed repairs, regardless of technique used. CONCLUSION: MIS techniques may reduce durotomies in cases involving instrumentation or revisions. Use of dural substitute onlay and fibrin sealant was effective at preventing reoperation. Both MIS and open techniques result in a low rate of future surgical revision when a durotomy occurs.

Evaluation of retraction time as a predictor of postoperative motor dysfunction after minimally invasive transpsoas interbody fusion at L4-L5.

BACKGROUND: Complications associated with the lateral lumbar transpsoas approach largely comprise various nerve-related syndromes particularly at L4-5. Quadriceps weakness can occur from stretch injury to the femoral nerve during retraction. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the role of retraction time in the development of postoperative neuropathic motor weakness at the L4-5 level. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database at a single institution was reviewed over a two-year period (March 2014-2016) for a single surgeon. Twenty-six patients undergoing single level LLIF at L4-5 were identified. Pre- and postoperative data collection obtained included motor function grading (0-5/5) with a minimum of 3-month postoperative follow-up. Intraoperative data collection included retraction time (RT) defined as the time the retraction system was affixed to the spine and expanded to the time of closure and removal. Two-Tailed T-Test was used to determine clinical significance. RESULTS: 50% of patients had leg weakness after surgery (13/26). All postoperative motor deficits were at least antigravity strength (>3/5) and all deficits resolved. The mean RT for the motor dysfunction cohort was 29 min (14-51) compared to 27.5 min for the cohort without postoperative weakness (19-37) (p = 0.685). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that longer retraction time (within a range of 14-51 min) did not correlate with a greater risk of postoperative neuropathic quadriceps muscle dysfunction for lateral lumbar interbody fusions performed at L4-5. Other factors may contribute to postoperative neurologic dysfunction regardless of RT. Motor deficits resolved quickly after surgery.

Differences in inflammatory bowel disease phenotype between South Asians and Northern Europeans living in North West London, UK.

OBJECTIVES: The incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is increasing throughout Asia. Since the 1950s, there has been substantial migration from South Asia (India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh) to the United Kingdom. The aim of this study was to define the clinical phenotype of IBD in UK South Asians living in North West London, and to compare the results with a white Northern European IBD cohort. METHODS: The phenotypic details of 367 South Asian IBD patients (273 ulcerative colitis (UC) and 94 Crohn's disease (CD)), undergoing active follow-up in five North West London hospitals, were compared with those of 403 consecutively collected white Northern European IBD patients (188 UC and 215 CD). RESULTS: The phenotype of IBD differed significantly between the two populations. 63.0% of South Asian UC patients had extensive colitis compared with 42.5% of the Northern European cohort (P < 0.0001). Proctitis was uncommon in South Asian UC patients (9.9 vs. 26.1% in Northern European patients, P<0.0001). In the South Asian CD cohort, disease location was predominantly colonic (46.8%). CD behavior differed significantly between the groups, with less penetrating disease compared with Northern Europeans (P=0.01) and a reduced need for surgery (P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The phenotype of IBD in South Asians living in North West London is significantly different from that of a white Northern European IBD cohort. Knowledge of ethnic variations in disease phenotype may help to identify key genetic, environmental, and behavioral factors contributing to the development of IBD.