Responsive neurostimulation as a treatment for super-refractory focal status epilepticus: a systematic review and case series.

OBJECTIVE: Super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) has high rates of morbidity and mortality. Few published studies have investigated neurostimulation treatment options in the setting of SRSE. This systematic literature review and series of 10 cases investigated the safety and efficacy of implanting and activating the responsive neurostimulation (RNS) system acutely during SRSE and discusses the rationale for lead placement and selection of stimulation parameters. METHODS: Through a literature search (of databases and American Epilepsy Society abstracts that were last searched on March 1, 2023) and direct contact with the manufacturer of the RNS system, 10 total cases were identified that utilized RNS acutely during SE (9 SRSE cases and 1 case of refractory SE [RSE]). Nine centers obtained IRB approval for retrospective chart review and completed data collection forms. A tenth case had published data from a case report that were referenced in this study. Data from the collection forms and the published case report were compiled in Excel. RESULTS: All 10 cases presented with focal SE: 9 with SRSE and 1 with RSE. Etiology varied from known lesion (focal cortical dysplasia in 7 cases and recurrent meningioma in 1) to unknown (2 cases, with 1 presenting with new-onset refractory focal SE [NORSE]). Seven of 10 cases exited SRSE after RNS placement and activation, with a time frame ranging from 1 to 27 days. Two patients died of complications due to ongoing SRSE. Another patient's SE never resolved but was subclinical. One of 10 cases had a device-related significant adverse event (trace hemorrhage), which did not require intervention. There was 1 reported recurrence of SE after discharge among the cases in which SRSE resolved up to the defined endpoint. CONCLUSIONS: This case series offers preliminary evidence that RNS is a safe and potentially effective treatment option for SRSE in patients with 1-2 well-defined seizure-onset zone(s) who meet the eligibility criteria for RNS. The unique features of RNS offer multiple benefits in the SRSE setting, including real-time electrocorticography to supplement scalp EEG for monitoring SRSE progress and response to treatment, as well as numerous stimulation options. Further research is indicated to investigate the optimal stimulation settings in this unique clinical scenario.

Drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy with temporal encephaloceles: How far to resect.

PURPOSE: This study sought to evaluate the impact of surgical extent on seizure outcome in drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy (DR-TLE) with temporal encephaloceles (TE). METHODS: This was a single-institution retrospective study of patients who underwent surgery for DR-TLE with TE between January 2008 and December 2020. The impact of surgical extent on seizure outcome was evaluated. In a subset with dominant DR-TLE, the impact of surgical extent on neuropsychometric outcome was evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were identified (female, 56%; median age at surgery, 43 years). TE were frequently overlooked on initial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with encephaloceles only detected after repeat or expert re-review of MRI, additional multi-modal imaging, or intra-operatively in 31 (91%). Sixteen (47%) underwent limited resections, including encephalocele resection only (n = 5) and encephalocele resection with more extensive temporal corticectomy sparing the amygdala and hippocampus (n = 11). The remainder (n = 18, 53%) underwent standard anterior temporal lobectomy and amygdalohippocampectomy (ATLAH). Limited resection was performed more frequently on the left (12/17 vs. 4/17, p = 0.015). Twenty-seven patients (79%) had a favourable outcome (Engel I/II), and 17 (50%) were seizure-free at the last follow-up (median seizure-free survival of 27.3 months). There was no statistically significant difference in seizure-free outcomes between limited resection and ATLAH. In dominant DR-TLE, verbal memory decline was more likely after ATLAH than limited resection (3/4 vs. 0/9, p = 0.014). CONCLUSION: Expert re-review of imaging and multi-modal advanced imaging improved TE identification. There was no statistical difference in seizure-free outcomes based on surgical extent. Preservation of verbal memory supports limited resection in dominant temporal cases.