Instability after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a retrospective review of thirty one cases.

PURPOSE: A retrospectively analyze of instability after RSA in terms of aetiology, treatment and final functional outcome. METHODS: A bicentric retrospective study of 31 patients (mean age 67.6 years; 42-83) treated for RSA instability using RSA Arrow System (FH Orthopedics, Mulhouse, France), mean follow-up 41months (range 12-158). Aetiologies for dislocation were evaluated using a previously described classification system for RSA instability. Actions performed during the Revision Surgeries were analyzed and grouped into five categories. Clinical outcome measures included range of motion, SSV, VAS, Constant-Murley scores, satisfaction level and recurrence of instability. RESULTS: The most frequent aetiology for RSA instability was loss of compression (18), followed by impingement (8) and loss containment (5). Total RSA revision (bipolar procedure) involving both distalization and lateralization occurred in 13 instances. Isolated distalization through the humerus was performed in ten patients and Isolated lateralization through the glenoid in three patients. Three cases of components exchange due to mechanical failure were noted. Bone graft was used in nine instances. Three patients (10%) suffered recurrent instability following Revision Surgery and required an additional stabilizing procedure. At final follow-up all 31 RSA were reported as stable with a mean VAS of 1.1, SSV 54.5%, constant score 48.3, constant ponderate 74.9%. CONCLUSION: The management of unstable RSA represent a challenge that can be successfully overcome with a revision surgery with compromised functional results. Loss of compression was the most common cause for primary and recurrent RSA instability that were treated principally with bipolar revisions involving component lateralization and distalization.

Tendon transfers for the management of irreparable subscapularis tears.

Rotator cuff pathology is the main cause of shoulder pain and dysfunction in older adults. When a rotator cuff tear involves the subscapularis tendon, the symptoms are usually more severe and the prognosis after surgery must be guarded. Isolated subscapularis tears represent 18% of all rotator cuff tears and arthroscopic repair is a good alternative primary treatment. However, when the tendon is deemed irreparable, tendon transfers are the only option for younger or high-functioning patients. The aim of this review is to describe the indications, biomechanical principles, and outcomes which have been reported for tendon transfers, which are available for the treatment of irreparable subscapularis tears. The best tendon to be transferred remains controversial. Pectoralis major transfer was described more than 30 years ago to treat patients with failed surgery for instability of the shoulder. It has subsequently been used extensively to manage irreparable subscapularis tendon tears in many clinical settings. Although pectoralis major reproduces the position and orientation of the subscapularis in the coronal plane, its position in the axial plane - anterior to the rib cage - is clearly different and does not allow it to function as an ideal transfer. Consistent relief of pain and moderate recovery of strength and function have been reported following the use of this transfer. In an attempt to improve on these results, latissimus dorsi tendon transfer was proposed as an alternative and the technique has evolved from an open to an arthroscopic procedure. Satisfactory relief of pain and improvements in functional shoulder scores have recently been reported following its use. Both pectoralis minor and upper trapezius transfers have also been used in these patients, but the outcomes that have been reported do not support their widespread use.

Traumatic avulsion of the subscapularis tendon in adolescents: Return to sport after surgical repair.

INTRODUCTION: Traumatic complete rotator cuff tears are rare in the pediatric population. These injuries might be a result of shoulder dislocation or direct trauma experienced during contact sports (i.e., rugby, judo). The purpose of this study was to identify the epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of these injuries and assess the medium- and long-term outcomes following surgery, with return to sport as the primary endpoint. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic questionnaire was sent to all surgeons who were members of the French Shoulder and Elbow Society (SOFEC) and/or the French Society of Arthroscopy (SFA), asking if they ever had to surgically treat a traumatic complete tear of 1 or more rotator cuff tendons in a child or adolescent. Ninety (38.6%) of the 233 surgeons members of the SOFEC and/or the SFA responded to our questionnaire. We then contacted the 15 surgeons who answered affirmatively to collect the complete medical records of their patient(s). RESULTS: We reviewed the records of 17 children and adolescents who underwent surgery for a traumatic complete rotator cuff tear. The mean age at surgery was 15.2 years (range, 12-17). Glenohumeral dislocation during contact sports (n=7/17) was a frequent mechanism of injury (41%). All of these cases involved at least the subscapularis muscle with an avulsed bony insertion. The injury involved other rotator cuff tendons in 29% of cases (5/17). The bone and tendon repair was either performed as open surgery (n=5/17) or arthroscopically (n=12/17). At a median follow-up of 24 months and a mean follow-up of 50 months, 82.4% of patients had returned to sport at their preinjury level. Three patients presented neurologic complications resulting from the traumatic event, but only 1 of them required nerve grafting with a favorable outcome. We also reported 3 cases of nonunion of the lesser tuberosity that required revision surgery with good outcomes. Only 1 patient out of all those with at least 1 episode of dislocation presented a recurrent anterior shoulder instability that required a bone block-type procedure 7 years after the initial surgery. CONCLUSION: Traumatic complete rotator cuff tears are rare in children and adolescents. They often occur during contact sports. These types of injuries are diagnosed by clinical examination and confirmed by cross-sectional imaging, ideally magnetic resonance imaging. Tendon injuries mainly involve the subscapularis but can also affect other cuff tendons. Return to preinjury activity levels after surgical management was possible in more than 80% of cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Full arthroscopic vs. arthroscopically assisted posterosuperior latissimus dorsi tendon transfer for shoulders with failed and irreparable rotator cuff repair: matched case-control study.

PURPOSE: To compare clinical outcomes and complication rates of full arthroscopic latissimus dorsi tendon transfer (LDTT) vs. arthroscopically assisted LDTT, for the treatment of irreparable posterosuperior massive rotator cuff tears (mRCTs) in shoulders that had failed rotator cuff repair (RCR). METHODS: We evaluated a continuous series of 191 patients who underwent LDTT over 4 consecutive years. A total of 107 patients did not have previous shoulder surgery, leaving 84 patients who had prior surgical procedures. All procedures performed over the first 2 years were arthroscopically assisted (n = 48), whereas all procedures performed over the last 2 years were full arthroscopic (n = 36). We noted all complications, as well as clinical scores and range of motion at ≥24 months. To enable direct comparison between the 2 techniques, propensity score matching was used to obtain 2 groups with equivalent age, sex, and follow-up. RESULTS: Compared with the 48 patients who underwent arthroscopically assisted LDTT, the 36 patients who underwent full arthroscopic LDTT had comparable complications (13% vs. 11%) and conversions to RSA (8.3% vs. 5.6%). Propensity score matching resulted in 2 groups, each comprising 31 patients, which had similar outcomes in terms of clinical scores (except mobility component of Constant score, which was better following fully arthroscopic LDTT; P = .037) and range of motion at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. CONCLUSION: At a minimum follow-up of 24 months, for the treatment of irreparable posterosuperior mRCTs in shoulders that had surgical antecedents, full arthroscopic LDTT had significantly better mobility component of the Constant score than arthroscopically assisted LDTT, although there were no significant differences in the other clinical or functional outcomes. Arthroscopically assisted LDTT and full arthroscopic LDTT had comparable rates of complications (8.3% vs. 13%) and conversion to RSA (5.6% vs. 8.3%).

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty renders better clinical scores at a minimum follow-up of two years for patients with no rotator cuff deficiency operated by the deltopectoral approach.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this multi-centre study was to report outcomes of a large cohort of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) at a minimum follow-up of two years and to determine patient and surgical factors that influence postoperative outcomes. The hypothesis was that surgical indication, surgical approach, and implant design would affect clinical outcomes significantly. METHODS: The authors reviewed records of 743 RSAs in patients with primary osteoarthritis (OA) with or without rotator cuff (RC) tears, secondary OA due to RC tears, and irreparable massive rotator cuff tears (mRCT). The deltopectoral (DP) approach was used in 540 and the anterosuperior (AS) approach in 203. Pre- and postoperative Constant scores (CS) were recorded. Multivariable linear analyses were performed to determine if CS was associated with indications for surgery, surgical approach, or implant design. RESULTS: Of the 743 shoulders, 193 (25.7%) were lost to follow-up, 16 (2.1%) died, and 33 (4.4%) were revised, leaving 501 for analysis. At a mean follow-up of 3.2 ± 0.9 years, net improvement in CS was 29.2 ± 17.0. Multivariable analyses revealed that postoperative CS decreased with age and was worse in shoulders that had preoperative rotator cuff deficiency and in shoulders operated by the AS approach. Multivariable analyses also revealed worse net improvement in shoulders operated for secondary OA due to RC tears or for irreparable mRCT, as well as shoulders operated by the AS approach. CONCLUSION: This large multi-centre study confirms that, at two or more years following RSA, Constant scores are not associated with implant design, but rather with rotator cuff deficiency and surgical approach. Multivariable analysis revealed that postoperative CS was worse for shoulders with preoperative rotator cuff deficiency and for shoulders operated by the AS approach. Multivariable analysis also revealed that net improvement in CS was worse in shoulders treated for secondary OA due to RC tears and for shoulders with irreparable mRCT, as well as for shoulders operated by the AS approach.

Matched Cohort Study Comparing Arthroscopic-Assisted Versus Full-Arthroscopic Latissimus Dorsi Tendon Transfer for Irreparable Massive Rotator Cuff Tears.

Background: Latissimus dorsi tendon transfer (LDTT) is increasingly performed with arthroscopic assistance, requiring an open axillary incision, which could increase risks of infection, hematoma, and lymphoedema. Technological advancements now enable LDTT to be fully arthroscopic, but its benefits and safety have not yet been confirmed. Purpose: To compare the clinical outcomes and complication rates of arthroscopic-assisted versus full-arthroscopic LDTT for irreparable posterosuperior massive rotator cuff tears in shoulders with no surgical antecedents. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The study included 90 patients who had undergone LDTT over 4 consecutive years by the same surgeon and did not have prior surgery. During the first 2 study years, all procedures were arthroscopically assisted (n = 52), while during the last 2 years, all procedures were fully arthroscopic (n = 38). Procedure duration and all complications were recorded, as well as clinical scores and range of motion at minimum 24-month follow-up. To enable direct comparison between the techniques, propensity score matching was used to obtain 2 groups with equivalent age, sex, and follow-up. Results: From the initial cohort of 52 patients who underwent arthroscopic-assisted LDTT, 8 had complications (15.4%), of which 3 (5.7%) required conversion to reverse shoulder arthroplasty and 2 (3.8%) required drainage or lavage. From the initial cohort of 38 patients who had full-arthroscopic LDTT, 5 had complications (13.2%), of which 2 (5.2%) required conversion to reverse shoulder arthroplasty but no patients (0%) required other procedures. Propensity score matching resulted in 2 groups, each comprising 31 patients, with similar outcomes in terms of clinical scores and range of motion. The procedure time was about 18 minutes shorter for full-arthroscopic LDTT, which had different complications (2 axillary nerve pareses) as compared with arthroscopic-assisted LDTT (1 hematoma and 2 infections). Conclusion: Equivalent outcomes at minimum 24-month follow-up were found for arthroscopic-assisted and full-arthroscopic LDTT in terms of complications rates (15.4% and 13.2%, respectively), conversion to reverse shoulder arthroplasty (5.7% and 5.2%), clinical scores, and range of motion.

A new self-assessment tool following shoulder stabilization surgery, the auto-Walch and auto-Rowe questionnaires.

PURPOSE: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) are increasingly used for patient evaluation, as well as for scientific research. Few are used for practical purposes in the clinical setting, and few are reliable enough to allow proper feedback to physicians. Two of the most commonly used assessment tools in shoulder instability are the Walch-Duplay and the Rowe scores. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of self-administered versions of the Walch-Duplay and Rowe scores following shoulder stabilization procedure. METHODS: Between the months of May and December 2021, all patients who were followed in one of six institutions for shoulder instability were included. Patients were required to anonymously fill a self-administered version of Walch-Duplay and Rowe score. The classic scores were measured by the surgeon. Correlations between self-assessment and physician-assessment were then recorded. RESULTS: A total of 106 patients were evaluated during the study period. Using the Spearman coefficient for correlation, a strong correlation (r > 0.5) was found between the results of the self-administered questionnaire and the surgeon-measured score. The difference between surgeon- and patient-administered questionnaires was non-significant. CONCLUSION: The self-administered version of the Walch-Duplay and Rowe questionnaires can reliably be used in the clinical setting for post-operative follow-up of patients undergoing shoulder stabilization procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Posterior latissimus dorsi transfer for massive irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears: does it work in the elderly population? A comparative study between 2 age groups (≤55 vs. ≥75 years old).

HYPOTHESIS AND/OR BACKGROUND: Management of irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears (RCTs) presents a significant challenge to shoulder surgeons. Previous studies on latissimus dorsi transfer (LDT) have demonstrated good to excellent outcomes in younger patients, but this indication is debatable in the elderly. The main objective of this study was to compare the results of LDT in a group of patients aged ≤55 years vs. one of patients aged ≥75 years. We hypothesized that LDT could give equally good results in the elderly as in the younger population. METHODS: Between 2014 and 2017, a total of 153 patients who underwent LDT either for irreparable posterosuperior RCT or for failed prior repair were enrolled. All LDTs were performed by a single surgeon, were arthroscopically assisted, and fixed onto the humeral head with 2 anchors. A retrospective comparative clinical study was conducted. Patients with a minimum of 24 months of follow-up were divided into 2 groups: group A (≤55 years old at surgery) and group B (≥75 years old at surgery). The age-adjusted Constant-Murley score (aCMS), Subjective Score Value (SSV), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Activities of Daily Living requiring active External Rotation (ADLER) score, visual analog scale for pain (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) score, patient's satisfaction, and rate of LD tendon rupture at last follow-up were compared. RESULTS: A total of 66 patients met inclusion criteria. Four in 66 patients (6%) were lost to follow-up. There were 31 patients in group A and 31 patients in group B. The mean age was 52 and 77 years for the respective groups. Preoperatively, the 2 groups were comparable with respect to other characteristics like the mean number of ruptured tendons, mean preoperative Hamada stage, mean SST, and mean aCMS. The mean follow-up was 33 and 31 months, respectively. At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in the scores evaluated between groups A and B with SSV (61 vs. 66.7 points), ADLER (23 vs. 26.4 points), VAS (2.8 vs. 2.2 points), and ASES (64.4 vs. 72.4 points), respectively, except for the aCMS (75 vs. 96.3; ±001) and the SST (6.2 vs. 8.3; P < .001). Patient's satisfaction was not significantly different in both groups (81% of either satisfied or very satisfied patients in both groups). The rate of LD tendon rupture was higher in group A: 10 (33%) vs. 8 (26%). CONCLUSION: Posterior transfer of latissimus dorsi tendon could be an effective surgical option for the treatment of massive irreparable posterosuperior cuff tears in patients ≥75 years of age.

Short-term outcomes of arthroscopic partial repair vs. latissimus dorsi tendon transfer in patients with massive and partially repairable rotator cuff tears.

BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence on clinical outcomes of arthroscopic partial repair (APR) and latissimus dorsi tendon transfer (LDTT) for posterosuperior massive rotator cuff tears (mRCTs). We aimed to compare clinical outcomes of APR and LDTT for partially repairable posterosuperior mRCTs and to determine whether outcomes differ among tears that involve the teres minor. METHODS: We retrieved the records of 112 consecutive patients with mRCTs deemed partially repairable due to fatty infiltration (FI) stage ≥3 in one or more rotator cuff muscles. Of the tears, 12 involved the subscapularis, 32 were managed conservatively, 14 were treated by reverse shoulder arthroplasty, and 7 were treated by stand-alone biceps tenotomy. Of the remaining 47 shoulders, 26 underwent APR and 21 underwent LDTT. At a minimum of 12 months, we recorded complications, active forward elevation, external rotation, the Constant-Murley score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), and Simple Shoulder Test (SST) score. RESULTS: No significant differences between the APR and LDTT groups were found in terms of follow-up (23.4 ± 3.5 months vs. 22.1 ± 4.1 months, P = .242), Constant-Murley score (64.8 ± 13.7 vs. 58.9 ± 20.0, P = .622), ASES score (78.3 ± 19.3 vs. 74.4 ± 14.5, P = .128), active forward elevation (158.1° ± 19.4° vs. 142.8° ± 49.1°, P = .698), or external rotation (33.3° ± 17.4° vs. 32.2° ± 20.9°, P = .752). By contrast, the APR group had a higher SSV (73.3 ± 17.5 vs. 59.5 ± 20.0, P = .010), and SST score (8.3 ± 2.4 vs. 6.4 ± 3.0, P = .024). Univariable analysis revealed that advanced FI of the teres minor compromised Constant-Murley scores (ß = -25.8, P = .001) and tended to compromise ASES scores (ß = -15.2, P = .062). Multivariable analysis corroborated that advanced FI of the teres minor compromised Constant-Murley scores (ß = -26.9, P = .001) and tended to compromise ASES scores (ß = -16.5, P = .058). CONCLUSION: Both APR and LDTT granted similar early clinical outcomes for partially repairable posterosuperior mRCTs, regardless whether the teres minor was intact or torn. Advanced FI of the teres minor was the only independent factor associated with outcomes, as it significantly compromised Constant-Murley scores and tended to compromise ASES scores.

Osteoarthritis of the shoulder in under-50 year-olds: A multicenter retrospective study of 273 shoulders by the French Society for Shoulder and Elbow (SOFEC).

INTRODUCTION: Osteoarthritis (OA) of the shoulder in under-50 year-olds is rare, and treatment is delicate. Shoulder replacement incurs frequent long-term risk of progression and a high revision rate, making it unsuited to young active patients. The aim of the present study was to determine the epidemiology of shoulder OA in under-50 year-olds and to assess the clinical results of the various treatment options. HYPOTHESIS: The main study hypothesis was that well-conducted non-operative treatment can allow shoulder replacement to be postponed. The secondary hypothesis was that anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is the treatment of choice when other options fail. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study included primary (POA) and post-instability osteoarthritis (PIOA) in patients aged≤50years at symptom onset. Exclusion criteria comprised post-traumatic OA, rheumatoid arthritis and necrosis. Two hundred and sixty-six patients for 273 shoulders were included from 13 shoulder surgery centers: 2 types of non-operative treatment (28 by platelet-rich plasma [PRP] and 88 by viscosupplementation), 73 arthroscopies, and 150 implantations (62 humeral hemiarthroplasties [HA], comprising 10 hemi-metal, 24 hemi-pyrocarbon and 28 hemi-resurfacing; 77 anatomic total prostheses, and 11 reverse prostheses). Minimum follow-up was 12 months for non-operative treatment and 24 months for arthroplasty (some patients having both). Endpoints comprised Constant score, Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) and number of complications/revision procedures. RESULTS: Mean age at treatment was 43 years (range, 23-65 years), with 75% male predominance. Symptom onset was earlier in PIOA than in POA: 36 vs. 39 years (range, 20-50 years). PRP and viscosupplementation postponed implantation by a mean 3.5 years in 86% of cases, as did arthroscopy in 56%. ER1 restriction was the most negative factor. At 74 months' follow-up for HA and 95 months for TSA, mean Constant score was significantly lower for HA (56 vs. 67; p=0.004), with higher rates of complications (31% vs. 11%) and implant exchange (13% vs. 9%). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: PRP, viscosupplementation and arthroscopy allow implantation to be postponed until the shoulder becomes stiff and painful. In case of failure, TSA is the most effective solution in the medium-term. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV a; therapeutic study - investigating the results of treatment.

Latissimus dorsi transfer for irreparable subscapularis tear.

There is a paucity of information on latissimus dorsi transfer (LDT) for subscapularis insufficiency. The purpose of this study is to report the outcome of LDT to reconstruct an irreparable subscapularis tear. METHODS: Excluding patients with prior failed Latarjet procedures, we examined 56 consecutive patients who underwent open (n = 14) or arthroscopic (n = 42) LDT. The average age was 53 years (range, 23-79), and 46 patients had a prior surgery. Outcome measures included visual analog scale score for pain, range of motion (ROM), subjective shoulder value (SSV), and Constant shoulder score (CSS). RESULTS: At a mean 13-month follow-up (7-51 months), patients had significant improvements in their pain, ROM, SSV, and CSS when compared to preoperatively. At final follow-up, 26% of patients continued to have proximal migration, and 11% of patients had anterior subluxation. The patients with frank anterior escape had a higher likelihood of having proximal migration and anterior subluxation, but this was not statistically significant. Stages of arthritis did not progress. Revision surgeries included 2 patients who revised to a reverse shoulder arthroplasty for rupture of the tendon transfer. Furthermore, 3 patients had LDT ruptures but did not elect to undergo further surgery. CONCLUSIONS: LDT for irreparable subscapularis tears has the potential to lead to significant clinical improvements. Most patients improve in many of the signs of subscapularis insufficiency, including anterior and/or proximal subluxation, clinical examination maneuvers, and shoulder function. Overall, this transfer represents a reasonable option for this difficult pathology.

The arthroscopic Latarjet: a multisurgeon learning curve analysis.

BACKGROUND: The open Latarjet procedure is a standard surgical treatment option for anterior shoulder instability in patients with a high risk of failure following soft tissue stabilization. The arthroscopic technique has potential advantages of minimal invasiveness, reduced postoperative stiffness, and faster rehabilitation but is regarded as technically challenging with concern over surgical risk during the learning curve. The aim of this study was to undertake a multisurgeon, large-volume learning curve analysis of the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure using continuous learning curve analysis. METHODS: Individual patient data from 12 surgeons across 5 countries were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 573 patients undergoing the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure were included. Outcome measures of learning were collected, including operative time, computed tomography (CT) bone-block positioning, complications, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). A segmented linear regression modeling technique was used for learning curve analysis. RESULTS: High-volume surgeons converged to an operative time steady state after 30-50 cases. Surgeons completing fewer procedures demonstrated a constant reduction in operative time without reaching a plateau. Low-volume surgeons completing fewer than 14 operations did not demonstrate a reduction in operative time. Accuracy of bone-block positioning on postoperative CT demonstrated constant improvement without reaching a plateau after 53 cases. There was no change in PROMs or complications with increased operative volume. CONCLUSION: Specialist shoulder surgeons require 30-50 arthroscopic Latarjet procedures to attain steady-state operative efficiency, during which there is improvement in bone-block positioning. Only surgeons expecting to undertake the arthroscopic Latarjet in high volume should consider adopting this procedure.

Outcomes After Latarjet Procedure: Patients With First-Time Versus Recurrent Dislocations.

BACKGROUND: The preoperative number of dislocations has been previously proved to be a major factor influencing the results after Bankart repair with more preoperative dislocations correlated with higher recurrence rates and more reoperations. This could possibly be because of the lower quality of the tissue repaired during the procedure after multiple dislocations. On the other hand, the Latarjet procedure does not "repair" but rather reconstructs and augments the anterior glenoid. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The main objective was to report the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing a Latarjet procedure after 1 dislocation versus multiple (≥2) dislocations. The hypothesis was that the preoperative number of dislocations would not influence clinical results. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Patients older than 18 years who had undergone a primary Latarjet procedure for shoulder instability with at least 2 years of follow-up were included. Three different techniques were used: a mini-open technique using 2 screws, an arthroscopic technique using 2 screws, and an arthroscopic technique using 2 cortical buttons. Patients were evaluated and answered a questionnaire to assess the number of episodes of dislocation before surgery, the time between the first dislocation and surgery, recurrence of the dislocation, revision surgery, the Walch-Duplay score, the Simple Shoulder Test score, and the visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain. RESULTS: A total of 308 patients were included for analysis with a mean follow-up of 3.4 ± 0.8 years. Of that, 83 patients were included in the first-time dislocation group and 225 in the recurrent dislocation group. At last follow-up, the rates of recurrence and reoperation were not significantly different between groups: 4.8% in the first-time dislocation group versus 3.65% in the recurrent dislocation group and 6.1% versus 4.0%, respectively. The overall Walch-Duplay scores at last follow-up were also comparable between the 2 groups, 67.3 ± 24.85 and 71.8 ± 25.1, even though the first-time dislocation group showed a lower pain subscore (15.0 ± 8.6 vs 18.0 ± 7.5; P = .003). The VAS for pain was also significantly higher in the first-time dislocation group compared with the recurrent dislocation group (1.8 ± 2.3 vs 1.2 ± 1.7; P = .03). CONCLUSION: The number of episodes of dislocation before surgery does not affect postoperative instability rates and reoperation rates after the Latarjet procedure. However, patients with first-time dislocations had more postoperative pain compared with patients with recurrent dislocations before surgery.

Outcomes of the Latarjet Procedure for the Treatment of Chronic Anterior Shoulder Instability: Patients With Prior Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Primary Cases.

BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether results differ between a Latarjet procedure performed after a failed arthroscopic Bankart repair and one performed as the primary operation. PURPOSE: To compare the postoperative outcomes of the Latarjet procedure when performed as primary surgery and as revision for a failed arthroscopic Bankart repair. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective comparative case-cohort analysis was performed for all patients undergoing a Latarjet procedure for recurrent anterior shoulder instability. Patients were separated into 2 groups depending on if the Latarjet procedure was performed after a failed arthroscopic Bankart repair (group 1) or as the first operation (group 2). Outcome measures included recurrent instability, reoperation rates, complications, pain, Walch-Duplay scores, and Simple Shoulder Test. RESULTS: A total of 308 patients were eligible for participation in the study; 72 (23.4%) did not answer and were considered lost to follow-up, leaving 236 patients available for analysis. Mean follow-up was 3.4 ± 0.8 years. There were 20 patients in group 1 and 216 in group 2. Despite similar rates of recurrent instability (5.0% in group 1 vs 2.3% in group 2; P = .5) and revision surgery (0% in group 1 vs 6.5% in group 2; P = .3), group 1 demonstrated significantly worse pain scores (2.56 ± 2.7 vs 1.2 ± 1.7; P = .01) and patient-reported outcomes (Walch-Duplay: 52 ± 25.1 vs 72.2 ± 25.0; P = .0007; Simple Shoulder Test: 9.3 ± 2.4 vs 10.7 ± 1.9; P = .001) when compared with those patients undergoing primary Latarjet procedures. CONCLUSION: Functional outcome scores and postoperative pain are significantly worse in patients undergoing a Latarjet procedure after a failed arthroscopic Bankart repair when compared with patients undergoing primary Latarjet. The assumption that a failed a Bankart repair can be revised by a Latarjet with a similar result to a primary Latarjet appears to be incorrect. Surgeons should consider these findings when deciding on the optimal surgical procedure for recurrent shoulder instability.

Tendon transfers in rotator-cuff surgery.

Indications and techniques for tendon transfer in irreparable rotator-cuff tear have greatly progressed and are no longer restricted to external rotation deficit. The present article first reviews the various types of tear and corresponding tendon transfers and the biomechanics of the pseudoparalytic shoulder. The indication of choice for tendon transfer is iterative tear following failure of isolated long biceps tenotomy or partial repair. Latissimus dorsi, inferior trapezius and pectoralis major transfer are the 3 types to be used after failure of primary surgery. Latissimus dorsi transfer is indicated for partial loss of active limb elevation or isolated loss of internal rotation. Inferior trapezius transfer is best indicated for isolated active external rotation deficit. In pseudoparalytic shoulder with total loss of active elevation or combined loss of elevation and active external rotation, isolated transfer is insufficiently powerful to restore active range of motion and should be associated to reverse arthroplasty. We describe the various transfer techniques and report their results.

Risk of latissimus dorsi tendon rupture after arthroscopic transfer for posterior superior rotator cuff tear: a comparative analysis of 3 humeral head fixation techniques.

BACKGROUND: To compare latissimus dorsi tendon rupture rates after arthroscopic transfer for posterior superior rotator cuff tear using 3 different humeral head fixation techniques. METHODS: One-hundred fifty consecutive latissimus dorsi transfers were included. Inclusion criteria were massive irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tear with advanced fatty infiltration associated with persistent pain and limited range of motion after failed conservative treatments or surgery. All transfers were arthroscopically assisted and fixed in a transosseous tunnel with a cortical button (group 1, n = 59), "over the top" onto the footprint of the supraspinatus (group 2, n = 47), or posteriorly onto the footprint of the infraspinatus (group 3, n = 44) with 2 suture anchors. The tendons were marked with 3 metallic clips placed intraoperatively at a fixed distance of 2, 4, and 6 cm from the tip. Immediate postoperative standard anteroposterior radiographs were performed to confirm the position of the clips and to determine whether the clips displaced on subsequent radiographs during follow-up, indicating tendon rupture. RESULTS: Repeat radiographs at 3-month follow-up showed higher risk of latissimus dorsi transfer rupture rate in 27/59 patients in group 1 (46%), 11/47 in group 2 (24%), and 7/44 in group 3 (15%). CONCLUSION: Posterior anchor fixation of the latissimus dorsi tendon onto the infraspinatus footprint had the lowest rupture rate.

Internal impingement of the shoulder in overhead athletes: Retrospective multicentre study in 135 arthroscopically-treated patients.

BACKGROUND: Internal impingement of the shoulder (IIS) is the leading cause of chronic shoulder pain in overhead throwing athletes. No consensus exists about which techniques are optimal when surgery is in order. The available studies are limited by small sample sizes and short follow-ups. The primary objective of this study was to assess return-to-sports (RtS) outcomes after surgical treatment for IIS. A favourable RtS outcome (RtS+) was defined as returning to the previous sport at the same or a higher level. HYPOTHESIS: The main hypothesis was that surgical treatment resulted in an RtS+ outcome. The secondary hypothesis was that epidemiological factors, pre- and intra-operative anatomical factors, and specific surgical procedures were associated with higher RtS+ rates. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective multicentre design was used. We included 135 patients with IIS managed arthroscopically using any of the following procedures: anterior capsulorrhaphy, posterior capsulotomy/capsulectomy, postero-superior labral debridement, posterior glenoidplasty, and rotator cuff tear debridement or repair. Follow-up was at least 1 year. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether they had an RtS+ outcome as defined above or an RtS- outcome defined as a return to the previous sport at a lower level, a switch to another sport, or an inability to engage in any sport. The Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic (KJOC) and Constant's score were used to evaluate subjective and objective shoulder function. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 7.9 years. Of the 135 patients, 120 (90%) returned to sports after surgery including 70 (52%) to the previous sport at the same level (RtS+ outcome). By univariate analysis, the following factors were associated with an RtS+ outcome: male sex, rotator cuff tear documented intra-operatively, absence of a greater tuberosity cyst on pre-operative imaging studies, and cuff tear debridement. Anterior capsulorrhaphy was associated with worse post-operative pain. DISCUSSION: The RtS+ rate in this study differed from previously reported values, due to differences in the sports practiced by the patients and to considerable variability in the surgical techniques used. The positive association between presence of a rotator cuff tear and an RtS+ outcome is at variance with most of the previously published data. Some of the apparent discrepancies between our results and those from other countries may be ascribable to differences in the most popular sports. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Internal impingement of the shoulder: An international survey of 261 orthopaedic surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Internal impingement of the shoulder (IIS) is a specific disorder of young overhead-throwing athletes that was first described in 1991. The many non-operative and surgical treatments suggested to date have produced mixed outcomes. The objective of this study was to compare the practices of surgeons in France versus other countries regarding the diagnosis and treatment of IIS. HYPOTHESIS: Diagnostic and therapeutic practices regarding IIS differ between surgeons in France and in other countries. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A 21-item questionnaire in French and English was emailed to the 1300 members of the French Arthroscopy Society and to surgeons from countries other than France. The questionnaire collected information on knowledge about IIS (2 items), the frequency of IIS in clinical practice (2 items), the diagnosis of IIS (6 items), the non-operative and surgical treatment of IIS (3 and 5 items, respectively), and return-to-sports rates after treatment for IIS (3 items). RESULTS: The completed questionnaire was sent back by 261 surgeons, 206 in France and 55 in other countries, including 42 in Japan. Among the respondents, 90% knew about IIS. Experience with IIS in terms of number of patients seen or surgical treatments performed was greater in the international group (45% vs. 19% in France, p<0.001). Posterior shoulder pain in the arm cocking position was the most widely recognised symptom (99% in France, 74% internationally, p<0.001), followed by excessive external rotation during arm abduction (55% vs. 65%, p=0.23). The most commonly sought lesions were those of the postero-superior labrum and articular surface of the rotator cuff. Rotator cuff debridement was among the surgical options according to most respondents (74% vs. 70%). In contrast, postero-superior glenoidplasty was cited almost only by surgeons in France (67% vs. 4%, p<0.001). The proportion of patients who are able to return to sports was estimated at 50% to 75% by most respondents. DISCUSSION: Most respondents had theoretical knowledge about IIS, but surgery was rarely performed in France. Only very few athletes in France play baseball, which is responsible for most sports injuries of the shoulder seen in Japan. This fact, combined with differences in the lesions or even the diagnoses, may have contributed to the differences in the responses to the survey items between the French and international groups.

Management of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: Prospective study in 218 patients.

BACKGROUND: No consensus exists about the management of massive and symptomatic rotator cuff tears (RCTs). The objective of this study was to compare the 12-month clinical outcomes of various treatment options for massive RCTs. HYPOTHESIS: Arthroscopic surgery has a role to play in the treatment of massive and apparently irreparable RCTs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective multicentre non-randomised study was performed in patients with massive RCTs managed non-operatively (NONOP) or by arthroscopic tenotomy/tenodesis of the long head of biceps (aTLB), arthroscopic partial tendon repair (aPTR), arthroscopic latissimus dorsi transfer (aLDT), or reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Clinical outcomes were evaluated based on the Constant score, Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score after 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: The 218 included patients (mean age, 69 years) were distributed as follows: NONOP, n=71; aTLB, n=26; aPTR, n=61; aLDT, n=25; and RSA, n=35. After 12 months, the mean Constant score, SSV, and ASES score values were 70, 68%, and 73, respectively, and had improved significantly versus the preoperative values in all treatment groups. RSA was the only treatment followed by improvements in all Constant score items. Active forwards elevation improved significantly in the NONOP (+25°), aPTR (+26°), and RSA (+66°) groups. An improvement in active external rotation was seen only in the RSA group, where it was small (+10°, p=0.046). Significant increases in internal rotation were seen in the NONOP (+1.6 points) and aPTR (+1.7 points) groups. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic techniques (aTLB, aPTR, and aLDT) for managing massive irreparable RCTs produce significant functional gains. Partial tendon repair (aPTR) and RSA may provide better outcomes than isolated aTLB or aLDT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, non-randomised prospective study.

Convertible Glenoid Components Facilitate Revisions to Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Easier: Retrospective Review of 13 Cases.

Removal of a cemented glenoid component often leads to massive glenoid bone loss, which makes it difficult to implant a new glenoid baseplate. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of revisions with a completely convertible system and to report clinical and radiographic results of a retrospective review of 13 cases. Between 2003 and 2011, 104 primary total shoulder arthroplasties (TSAs) were performed with an uncemented glenoid component in our group. Of these patients, 13 (average age, 64 years) were revised to reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) using a modular convertible platform system and were included in this study. Average follow-up after revision was 22 months. Outcome measures included pain, range of motion, Constant-Murley scores, Simple Shoulder Tests, and subjective shoulder values. Active flexion increased significantly from a mean of 93° (range, 30°-120°) to 138° (range, 95°-170°) (P = 0.021), and active external rotation increased significantly from 8° (range, -20°-15°) to 25° (range, -10°-60°). Mean pain scores significantly improved from 4.2 to 13.3 points. The mean Constant Scores improved from 21 (range, 18-32) to 63 (range, 43-90). Subjectively, 12 patients rated their shoulder as better or much better than preoperatively. This retrospective study shows that a complete convertible system facilitates conversion of TSAs to RSAs with excellent pain relief and a significant improvement in shoulder function.