Intraoperative epidural application of steroid and local anaesthetic agent following lumbar discectomy: A prospective double blinded randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain management following lumbar discectomy is a key part of the procedure and various postoperative pain protocols including a wide range of agents are being used in daily practice worldwide. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of intraoperative epidural infiltration of local anaesthetic and steroid compared with placebo (normal saline) following microscopic lumbar discectomy. METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing lumbar discectomy were randomized to intraoperative infiltration of 3 mg betamethoasone acetate and 18 mg ropivacaine (Group A) or normal saline (Group B). Infiltration was performed after discectomy and decompression and immediately prior to incision closure. Postoperatively a standard protocol of intravenous acetaminophen administration and physiotherapy was followed. Additional analgesia with tramadol was given only in patients who required further pain management. Postoperative pain was evaluated using VAS score. Opioid consumption was recorded. Primary outcome measures included immediate postoperative back pain VAS score, opioid consumption and infection rate. Patients were reviewed in clinic at 6 weeks, 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: None of the patients in Group A required further analgesia while 12 Group B patients required further treatment with tramadol (p = 0.01). At 3 h postoperatively the VAS score was significantly lower in Group A compared to Group B (p < 0.05). Fifty-seven patients completed the 1 year follow up (95%) and 2 patients (1 from each group) suffered a complication of postoperative radiculopathy. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative application of steroid and local anaesthetic agent is effective on pain reduction for only a short period after surgery, while there is no effect on infection rate or any other long-term outcome compared with placebo. Hence although it is a safe technique, its benefits are limited from the duration of action.

The computed tomography-based fractal analysis of trabecular bone structure may help in detecting decreased quality of bone before urgent spinal procedures.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: To date, no reliable method is available to determine the parameters of bone density based on the routine spinal computed tomography (CT) in the emergency setup. We propose the use of fractal analysis to detect patients with poor quality of bone before urgent or semi-urgent spinal procedures. PURPOSE: This study aimed to validate the hypothesis that the CT-based fractal analysis of the trabecular bone structure may help in detecting patients with poor quality of bone before urgent spinal procedures. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. METHODS: Patients in whom the dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan and lumbar spine CT were performed at an interval of no more than 3 months were randomly selected from a prospectively collected database. Diagnostic axial CT scans of L2, L3, and L4 vertebrae were processed to determine the fractal dimension (FD) of the trabecular structure of each spinal level. Box-count method and ImageJ 1.49 software were used. The FD was compared with the results of the DEXA scan: bone mineral density (BMD) and T-score by mean of correlation coefficients. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was later performed to determine the cutoff value of FD. RESULTS: A total of 102 vertebral levels obtained from 35 patients (mean age 60±18 years; 29 female) were analyzed. The FD was significantly higher in the group of patients with decreased bone density (DBD) (T-score<-1.0) (1.67 vs. 1.43; p<.0001) and negatively correlated with BMD (R Spearman, -0.53; p<.0001) and T-score (-0.49; p<.0001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that a cutoff value of FD>1.53 indicates DBD (p<.0001; area under the ROC curve [AUC], 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-0.91). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that fractal analysis of the lumbar spine CT images may be used to determine bone density before spinal instrumentation (eg, metastatic or traumatic cord compression). Further prospective studies comparing results of the fractal analysis of CT scans with quantitative CT (qCT) are warranted.

Arthroscopic versus conservative treatment of first anterior dislocation of the shoulder in adolescents.

BACKGROUND: Conservative treatment of posttraumatic antero-inferior shoulder instability leads to a high failure rate in a young and active population. However, treatment in an adolescent age group is not well documented. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study with adolescent patients (age 15 to 18 y) who suffered a first traumatic anterior dislocation of the shoulder. Two groups of patients were formed. The first group was treated with early arthroscopic stabilization and the second was treated conservatively. There were 43 shoulders in the operative group and 29 shoulders in the conservative group. The rehabilitation protocol was the same for both groups. All patients were followed up prospectively after 12, 24, and 36 months using Rowe Score. RESULTS: A total of 38 shoulders in the surgical group and 27 shoulders in the conservative group could be completely evaluated. From the conservative group, 19 patients (70.3%) suffered a recurrence of the instability. From the arthroscopic group, 5 patients (13.1%) suffered a recurrence of the instability. CONCLUSIONS: In an adolescent population (15 to 18 y), conservative treatment after first traumatic shoulder dislocation including immobilization in internal rotation leads to a significantly higher and unacceptable high failure rate compared with early arthroscopic stabilization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II-prospective comparative study.