Effects of Different Frequencies of Physical Therapy Visits on Shoulder Function After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.

OBJECTIVE: There is no consensus about the optimal frequency of patient visits during the rehabilitation program after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). This study aimed to investigate the short- and long-term effects of high-frequency (HF) and low-frequency (LF) visits of the patients in the first 12 weeks of rehabilitation after ARCR. METHODS: This was a quasi-randomized study with 2 parallel groups. Forty-seven patients with ARCR were included in 2 different patient visit frequency protocols (HF = 23, LF = 24) in 12 weeks of postoperative rehabilitation. Patients in the HF group visited the clinic twice a week, whereas patients in the LF group visited once every 2 weeks for the first 6 weeks and once a week for the following 6 weeks. Both groups performed the same exercise protocol. Outcome measurements were pain and range of motion measured at baseline; at the 3rd, 5th, 8th, 12th, and 24th weeks; and at 1-year follow-up. Shoulder function was assessed at the 12th and 24th weeks and at 1-year follow-up with an American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score. RESULTS: There was a significant group × time interaction in pain intensity during the activity between the groups. The activity pain intensity was higher in the LF group (4.2 points) at 8 weeks post surgery than in the HF group (2.7 points) (mean difference: 1.5 points, P < .05), whereas it was similar in both groups at other time periods. The interaction term was not significant between the groups for pain intensity during rest and night through the 1-year follow-up. No group × time interactions were observed in shoulder range of motion and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score over the postoperative period. CONCLUSION: Both rehabilitation programs at different visit frequencies after ARCR showed similar clinical results in the long term. A supervised, controlled rehabilitation program with LF visits in the first 12 weeks after surgery can be sufficient to achieve optimal clinical results and reduce rehabilitation-related costs after ARCR. IMPACT: This study highlights that LF treatment protocols under the supervision of the therapist can be adopted after the arthroscopic rotator cuff repair to achieve successful results while decreasing the treatment costs. Physical therapists should plan the treatment sessions efficiently for the compliance of the patients to the exercise treatment. LAY SUMMARY: If you are a patient with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, a supervised, controlled rehabilitation program with low-frequency visits in the first 12 weeks after surgery could help you achieve the best outcome and help lower the costs of rehabilitation. A total of 3 visits in the first 6 weeks might be sufficient (once every 2 weeks). More frequent visits (1-2 visits a week) should happen 6 to 12 weeks after the surgery.

Tender point examination with palpation in different shoulder pathologies: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Shoulder pain is a common symptom for non-traumatic shoulder pathologies and affects 4.7-66.7% of entire population. Even with the latest technological advantages, palpation still is a cost and time efficient tool to evaluate the shoulder pathologies. Our aim was to investigate and compare palpation findings in different shoulder pathologies. METHOD: We used first assessments of impingement syndrome (IS) (n = 205), rotator cuff tear (RCT) (n = 185) and frozen shoulder (FS) (n = 210) patients who received treatment between 2010 and 2019 years. Two experienced physiotherapists palpated predefined points: long head of biceps brachii, pectoralis minor, lateral intermuscular septum, proximal tendons of extensor group. These points categorized into "proximal", "mid-proximal", "mid-distal", "distal", "irregular". We also grouped patients by their BMIs. RESULTS: We found RCT patients had higher BMI than IS and FS patients (p < 0.001, p = 0.001); more tender intermuscular septum points and night pain than IS patients (p = 0.001, p = 0.003) and more extensor group proximal tendon points than IS and FS patients (p < 0.001, p = 0.001). "No tenderness" group had lesser resting pain than distal group (p < 0.001) and lesser activity and night pain than middle-proximal, middle-distal, and distal groups (all ps < 0.002). Distal group had higher night pain than middle-proximal group (p = 0.003). Morbidly obese patients had higher night pain than normal and overweight patients (p = 0.003 and p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Tender point distribution varies depending on the pathology with biceps brachii being the most common. RCT patients had higher night pain related to more distal tender points. Patients with higher night pain had increased tenderness in septum intermuscular and extensor muscles' proximal tendons.