Real-life Experience With Rituximab-CHOP Every 21 or 14 Days in Primary Mediastinal Large B-cell Lymphoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMLBCL) is an aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), whose prognosis has greatly improved since the incorporation of the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab into current therapeutic regimens. Evidence, however, on the optimal time interval between consecutive chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) cycles is still scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy outcomes of the more commonly administered 3-weekly regimens to the biweekly ones in a PMLBCL patients' population, who were mostly treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone every 21 days (R-CHOP-21) or R-CHOP-14. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied our cohort of consecutively treated PMLBCL patients, focusing on their treatment density, in order to determine possible differences in treatment outcomes. RESULTS: CIT, in the form of both R-CHOP-21 as well as R-CHOP-14 (or similar regimens), is highly active in PMLBCL, with low rates of early treatment failure. In our cohort of patients, R-CHOP-14 did not result in a meaningful improvement of freedom from progression (FFP) or overall survival (OS). CONCLUSION: Both R-CHOP-14 and R-CHOP-21 are probably equally effective in PMLBCL, yet further, prospective, randomized studies are warranted to clarify whether dose-dense regimens can be associated with better disease control and long-term results.

Hypoplastic thrombocytopenia and platelet transfusion: therapeutic goals.

Platelet transfusions consist a major part of the management of hypoplastic thrombocytopenia, the latter occurring mainly among patients with hematological malignancies. Platelet transfusions have led to a reduction of deaths attributable to thrombocytopenia-induced bleeding, despite their possible complications; nonetheless, prophylactic administration of platelets to patients with severe thrombocytopenia or before invasive procedures should be based on specific criteria, as well as therapeutic administration during active bleeding. Recently developed ex-vivo procedures have resulted in producing safer blood products, yet it remains unclear whether these pathogen-inactivated products have sufficient efficacy. What is more, another significant problem that remains to be more effectively addressed is the developing refractoriness to platelet transfusions.

The use of novel oral anticoagulants in cancer patients with venous thromboembolism.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is not uncommon among patients with cancer and is one of the major causes of mortality and morbidity. Treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is effective, yet accompanied by the need for daily administration of injections for a prolonged time and (even rarely) thrombocytopenia. The discovery of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) was based on an effort to improve the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of previous generation anticoagulants while maintaining efficacy without the need for daily subcutaneous administration and frequent laboratory monitoring. The MEDLINE database was searched using PubMed in order to find relevant studies on the use of NOACs in patients with active malignancy and VTE. Furthermore, critical reading of references in recently published studies and reviews was performed. NOACs appear to be at least equivalent to coumarin anticoagulants in terms of efficacy and safety and their administration is easier, but data specifically concerning patients with active malignancy or comparing them to LMWH in this specific clinical setting are not yet available. Furthermore, patients with active cancer present several unique characteristics and drawing conclusions from studies involving other patient groups may not be appropriate. Specific studies in cancer patients are still pending that will help decide if NOACs will be the drugs of choice in this group of patients in need of efficient and simple to administer treatments.