Testing a new method of osteosynthesis of forearm fractures in children; a prospective randomized controlled longitudinal study.

Purpose: Displaced children's forearms fractures are commonly treated surgically with Kirschner Wires or Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nails. The osteosynthesis system "Minimally Invasive Reduction and Osteosynthesis System" might be beneficial in the treatment of these fractures due to being minimally invasive while achieving fracture stability. In this exploratory prospective randomized controlled longitudinal study, we compared Minimally Invasive Reduction and Osteosynthesis System to Kirschner Wires and Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nails osteosynthesis. Methods: Twenty children were included consecutively to treatment with either conventional surgery (5 Kirschner Wires/5 Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nails) or Minimally Invasive Reduction and Osteosynthesis System (10). Evaluation of radiographic alignment and clinically of range of motion, pain status, grip strength, level of physical activity and scar size were compared after 3 months and after 5 years. Results: Surgical parameters of the duration of insertion- and removal-surgery, the need for postoperative casting and scar size were significantly better for Minimally Invasive Reduction and Osteosynthesis System. All osteosynthesis systems maintained radiographically fracture alignment at three months and 5 years follow-up. Clinical status regarding pain, grip strength difference, and return to recreational activities were not significantly different. The complication rates were nonsignificant, but MIROS had moderate severe complications of refractures, while mild complications occurred when operated on with Kirschner Wires/Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nails. Our study was sufficiently powered at 3 months, but the comparisons are suggestive at 5 years. Conclusion: In conclusion, Minimally Invasive Reduction and Osteosynthesis System is not significantly different to other surgical methods in radiological outcomes for forearm fractures in children. Minimally Invasive Reduction and Osteosynthesis System has the clinical benefit of omitting casting after surgery, obtaining reduced scar size, and shorter insertion and removal time without general anesthesia. However, moderately severe complications occurred. Level of evidence: Level II-a prospective comparative study.

Minimal Access vs. Open Spine Surgery in Patients With Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression - A One-Center Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND/AIM: We conducted a randomized controlled trial to investigate whether minimally access spine surgery (MASS) is less morbid than open surgery (OS) in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 49 MSCC patients were included in the trial. The outcome measures were bleeding (L), operation time (min), re-operations and prolonged wound healing. RESULTS: The median age was 67 years (range=42-85 years) and 40% were men. The peri-operative blood loss in the MASS-group was significantly lower than that in the OS-group; 0.175L vs. 0.500L, (p=0.002). The median operation time for MASS was 142 min (range=72-203 min) vs. 103 (range=59-435 min) for OS (p=0.001). There was no significant difference between the two groups concerning revision surgery or delayed wound healing. CONCLUSION: The MASS technique in MSCC patients is associated with less blood loss, but a longer operation time when compared to the OS technique.

Moderate Interrater and Substantial Intrarater Reproducibility of the Roussouly Classification System in Patients With Adult Spinal Deformity.

STUDY DESIGN: Reproducibility study of a classification system. OBJECTIVES: To provide the inter- and intrarater reproducibility of the Roussouly Classification System in a single-center prospective cohort of patients referred for Adult Spinal Deformity. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The Roussouly Classification System was developed to describe the variation in sagittal spine shape in normal individuals. A recent study suggests that patients' spine types could influence the outcome following spinal surgery. The utility of a classification system depends largely on its reproducibility. METHODS: Sixty-four consecutive patients were included in a blinded test-retest setting using digital radiographs. All ratings were performed by four spine surgeons with different levels of experience. There was a 14-day interval between the two reading sessions. Inter- and intrarater reproducibility was calculated using Fleiss Kappa and crude agreement percentages. RESULTS: We found moderate interrater (κ = 0.60) and substantial intrarater (κ = 0.68) reproducibility. All 4 raters agreed on the Roussouly type in 47% of the cases. The most experienced rater had significantly higher intrarater reliability compared to the least experienced rater (κ = 0.57 vs 0.78). The two most experienced raters also had the highest crude agreement percentage (75%); however, they also had a significant difference in distribution of spine types. CONCLUSION: The current study presents moderate interrater and substantial intrarater reliability of the Roussouly Classification System. These findings are acceptable and comparable to previous results of reproducibility for a classification system in patients with Adult Spinal Deformity. Additional studies are requested to validate these findings as well as to further investigate the impact of the classification system on outcome following surgery.