Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMJ Open ; 11(1): e041096, 2021 01 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33509845

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The current evidence on the efficacy of antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) in reducing the risk of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) after primary joint reconstruction is insufficient. In several European countries, the use of ALBC is routine practice unlike in the USA where ALBC use is not approved in low-risk patients. Therefore, we designed a double-blinded pragmatic multicentre register-based randomised controlled non-inferiority trial to investigate the effects of ALBC compared with plain bone cement in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A minimum of 9,172 patients undergoing full-cemented primary TKA will be recruited and equally randomised into the ALBC group and the plain bone cement group. This trial will be conducted in Norwegian hospitals that routinely perform cemented primary TKA. The primary outcome will be risk of revision surgery due to PJI at 1-year of follow-up. Secondary outcomes will be: risk of revision due to any reason including aseptic loosening at 1, 6, 10 and 20 years of follow-up; patient-related outcome measures like function, pain, satisfaction and health-related quality of life at 1, 6 and 10 years of follow-up; risk of changes in the microbial pattern and resistance profiles of organisms cultured in subsequent revisions at 1, 6, 10 and 20 years of follow-up; cost-effectiveness of routine ALBC versus plain bone cement use in primary TKA. We will use 1:1 randomisation with random permuted blocks and stratify by participating hospitals to randomise patients to receive ALBC or plain bone cement. Inclusion, randomisation and follow-up will be through the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial was approved by the Western Norway Regional Committees on Medical and Health Research Ethics (reference number: 2019/751/REK vest) on 21 June 2019. The findings of this trial will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04135170.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Artroplastia do Joelho , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Cimentos Ósseos , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Noruega , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/prevenção & controle , Qualidade de Vida
2.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 15(1): 365, 2020 Aug 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32859235

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The evidence supporting rifampin combination therapy in prosthetic joint infections (PJI) is limited due to the lack of controlled studies. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of adding rifampin to conventional antimicrobial therapy in early staphylococcal PJIs treated with debridement and retention of the implant (DAIR). METHODS: In this multicenter randomized controlled trial, 99 patients with PJI after hip and knee arthroplasties were enrolled. They were randomly assigned to receive rifampin or not in addition to standard antimicrobial treatment with cloxacillin or vancomycin in case of methicillin resistance. The primary endpoint was no signs of infection after 2 years of follow-up. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were included in the final analyses. There were no differences in patient characteristics or comorbidities between the two groups. There was no significant difference in remission rate between the rifampin combination group (17 of 23 (74%)) and the monotherapy group (18 of 25 (72%), relative risk 1.03, 95% confidence interval 0.73 to 1.45, p = 0.88). CONCLUSION: This trial has not proven a statistically significant advantage by adding rifampin to standard antibiotic treatment in acute staphylococcal PJIs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Regional Ethics Committee and the Norwegian Medicines Agency approved the study (EudraCT 2005-005494-29), and the study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov at Jan 18, 2007 ( NCT00423982 ).


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/tratamento farmacológico , Rifampina/administração & dosagem , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cloxacilina/administração & dosagem , Desbridamento , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Vancomicina/administração & dosagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA