RESUMO
Background: Data are limited about the effect (or lack thereof) of sex on clinical outcomes in adults with coarctation of the aorta (COA). The purpose of this study was to compare atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk profile, blood pressure (BP) data, echocardiographic indices, and mortality between men and women with COA. Methods: Retrospective study of adults with COA, and no associated left-sided obstructive lesions, who received care at Mayo Clinic (2003-2022). ASCVD risk profile was assessed as the prevalence of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, type 2 diabetes, obesity, smoking history, and coronary artery disease. A 24-hour BP monitor was used to assess daytime and nighttime BP and calculate nocturnal dipping. Results: Of 621 patients with isolated COA, 375 (60%) were men, and 246 (40%) were women. Women had similar ASCVD risk profile and daytime BP as men. However, women had less nocturnal dipping (7 ± 5 mm Hg vs 16 ± 7 mm Hg, P < 0.001), higher pulmonary artery mean pressure (23 mm Hg [interquartile range: 16-31] vs 20 mm Hg [interquartile range: 15-28], P = 0.04), and higher pulmonary vascular resistance index (3.41 ± 1.14 WU · m2 vs 3.02 ± 0.76 WU · m2, P = 0.006). Female sex was associated with all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1.26, 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.94) and cardiovascular mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1.38, 95% confidence interval 1.09-2.18). Conclusions: Women had a higher risk of both cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality compared to the risks in men. This difference may be related to the higher-than-expected ASCVD risk factors, abnormal nocturnal blood pressure, and pulmonary hypertension observed in women in this cohort. Further studies are required to identify optimal measures to address these risk factors.
Contexte: Il existe peu de données sur l'issue clinique en fonction du sexe chez les adultes présentant une coarctation de l'aorte (CoA). Le but de cette étude consistait donc à comparer le profil de risque de maladie cardiovasculaire athéroscléreuse (MCVAS), les données relatives à la pression artérielle (PA), les indices échocardiographiques et le taux de mortalité chez des hommes et des femmes présentant une CoA. Méthodologie: Il s'agissait d'une étude rétrospective réalisée chez des adultes présentant une CoA en l'absence de lésions obstructives gauches, soignés à la clinique Mayo entre 2003 et 2022. Le profil de risque de MCVAS a été évalué en fonction de la prévalence de l'hypertension, de l'hyperlipidémie, du diabète de type 2, de l'obésité, des antécédents tabagiques et de la coronaropathie. Une surveillance sur 24 heures a été utilisée pour évaluer la PA diurne et nocturne, en plus de calculer la chute nocturne de la PA. Résultats: Parmi les 621 patients présentant une CoA isolée, 375 (60 %) étaient des hommes et 246 (40 %) étaient des femmes. Les femmes présentaient une PA diurne et un profil de risque de MCVAS semblables aux hommes. Elles présentaient néanmoins une chute nocturne de la PA moins prononcée (7 ± 5 mmHg vs 16 ± 7 mmHg, p < 0,001), une pression artérielle pulmonaire moyenne plus haute (23 mmHg [max.-min. : 16-31] vs 20 mmHg [max.-min. : 15-28], p = 0,04) et un indice de résistance vasculaire pulmonaire plus élevé (3,41 ± 1,14 UW · m2 vs 3,02 ± 0,76 UW · m2, p = 0,006). Le sexe féminin a été associé à un plus fort taux de mortalité toutes causes confondues (rapport de risques ajusté : 1,26; intervalle de confiance à 95 % : 1,04-1,94) et de mortalité cardiovasculaire (rapport de risques ajusté : 1,38; intervalle de confiance à 95 % : 1,09-2,18). Conclusions: Les femmes sont exposées à un risque de mortalité cardiovasculaire et de mortalité toutes causes confondues plus élevé que les hommes. Cette différence pourrait être attribuable au rôle plus important que prévu joué par les facteurs de risque de MCVAS ainsi qu'à la pression artérielle nocturne anormale et à l'hypertension pulmonaire chez les femmes de cette cohorte. D'autres études sont nécessaires pour savoir quels seraient les paramètres optimaux qui permettraient d'évaluer ces facteurs de risque.
RESUMO
Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a unilateral, paroxysmal, sharp, shooting, or jabbing pain that occurs in the trigeminal nerve divisions, including the ophthalmic (V1), maxillary (V2), and mandibular (V3) nerves. Typically, an episode is triggered by anything touching the face or teeth. TN is a clinical diagnosis with no specific diagnostic test; it is determined by the patient's medical history and pain description. Imaging is necessary to exclude secondary causes. The precise reason for TN is uncertain, but it is commonly believed to result from vascular compression of the trigeminal nerve root, typically near its origin in the pons. There are numerous surgical and medical treatment options available. The most frequently applied medical treatment therapies are carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine. Surgical alternatives are reserved for patients who do not respond to medical treatment. Botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) has emerged as a novel and promising alternative to surgery for individuals whose pain is unresponsive to medication. Multiple studies have established the safety and usefulness of BTX-A in treating TN, with the most significant benefits occurring between six weeks and three months after the surgery. This article reviews various studies published in the last 10 years regarding the therapeutic use of BTX-A in TN. These studies include various observational, clinical, pilot, and animal studies.
RESUMO
Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a chronic disease characterized by inadequate or absent insulin production due to the autoimmune destruction of beta (ß) cells in the pancreas. It was once called "juvenile diabetes" since the disease frequently occurs in children, but it can also develop in adults. According to the International Diabetes Federation, an estimated 700 million adults will suffer from diabetes by 2045. Although the exact cause of diabetes remains unknown, it is hypothesized that genetic factors, environmental factors, and exposure to certain viruses play a role in the development of T1D. To date, exogenous insulin is the most common treatment for T1D. However, it is not a cure for the disease. Islet cell transplantation and pancreatic transplantation are two additional treatments that have gained popularity in recent years, but their clinical application may be limited by the need for high doses of immunosuppressants, the rarity of human cadaveric islets, and the need for extensive surgery in pancreatic transplantation. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are a highly promising novel treatment for T1D and their discovery has advanced biological sciences by allowing for modification of cell fate and the development of higher-order cellular structures. They play an essential role in lowering levels of fasting blood sugar, hemoglobin A1c, and C-peptide, and in treating microvascular complications associated with T1D. However, some of the disadvantages of its use in clinical practice are limited to its method of collection, proliferation rate, cell activity with age, and the risk of tumour formation identified in some studies. Large-scale studies are required to discover the mechanism of action of MSCs after administration as well as the optimal route, dose, and timing to maximize the benefits to patients. This article focuses primarily on the role of MSCs in the treatment of T1D and compares the feasibility, benefits, and drawbacks of MSCs in the treatment of T1D.