Identification and characteristics of patients with potential difficult-to-treat Psoriatic Arthritis: exploratory analyses of the Greek PsA registry.

OBJECTIVE: To present the characteristics of patients with potential difficult-to-treat (D2T) psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: We used data from the Greek multicentre registry of PsA patients. D2T-PsA was defined as follows: patients with at least 6-months disease duration, who have failed to at least 1 csDMARD and at least 2 bDMARDs/tsDMARDs with a different mechanism of action and have either at least moderate disease activity (MODA) defined as DAPSA > 14, and/or are not at minimal disease activity (MDA). Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between D2T and non-D2T PsA patients. In two sensitivity analyses, patients classified as D2T solely according to the MODA or MDA criterion were examined separately. RESULTS: Among 467 patients included, 77 (16.5%) were considered D2T and 390 non-D2T PsA. Compared with non-D2T, patients with D2T PsA presented more commonly with extensive psoriasis (p< 0.0001) and were more likely to have higher BMI (p= 0.023) and a history of inflammatory bowel disease (p= 0.026). In the MODA and MDA sensitivity analyses, 7.5% and 12.5% of patients were considered D2T, respectively. In both sensitivity analyses, extensive psoriasis was again identified as an independent variable for D2T PsA (p= 0.001 and p= 0.008, respectively). Moreover, female gender (p= 0.034) in the MODA analysis and axial disease (p= 0.040) in the MDA analysis were independent variables for D2T PsA. CONCLUSION: Despite the availability of therapies, D2T PsA is common in real-life cohorts of patients with PsA and extensive psoriasis. High BMI, female gender, axial-disease, and history of IBD were also associated with D2T PsA.

Disease Profile and Achievement of Therapeutic Goals in a Modern, Nationwide Cohort of 923 Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis.

Background: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a heterogenous chronic inflammatory disease affecting skin, joints, entheses, and spine with various extra-musculoskeletal manifestations and comorbidities. The reported patient, disease and treatment characteristics in the modern therapeutic era are limited. Methods: In this cross-sectional, multi-centre, nationwide study, we recorded the demographic, clinical, and therapeutic characteristics as well as the comorbidities of patients with PsA seen for 1 year (1/1/2022-31/12/2022). Results: 923 patients (55% females) with a median (IQR) age of 57 (48-65) years and a mean disease duration of 9.5 years were enrolled. Family history of psoriasis and PsA was noted in 28.3% and 6.3%, respectively. Most patients had limited psoriasis (BSA<3: 83%) while enthesitis, dactylitis, nail and axial involvement reported in 48.3%, 33.2%, 43% and 25.9% of patients, respectively. Regarding comorbidities, approximately half of patients had dyslipidaemia (42%) or hypertension (45.4%), 36.8% were obese and 17% had diabetes while 22.7% had a depressive disorder. Overall, 60.1% received biologics and among them more patients treated with anti-IL-17 or -12/23 agents were on monotherapy (64.2%) compared to those on TNFi monotherapy (49.4%, p=0.0001). The median PsA activity as assessed by the DAPSA score was 6 (IQR: 2.3 - 13.1) with 46% of patients reaching minimal disease activity status (MDA). Conclusion: In this large, real life, modern cohort of patients with PsA with frequent comorbidities who were treated mainly with biologics, almost half achieved minimal disease activity. These results show the value of existing therapeutic approaches while at the same time highlight the existing unmet needs.

New onset of lupus nephritis in two patients with SLE shortly after initiation of treatment with belimumab.

PURPOSE: Belimumab is currently approved for the treatment of patients with active SLE despite standard treatment. However, it has not been formally tested for patients with lupus nephritis because such patients had been excluded from the clinical trials. In this report, we present two patients with SLE who developed lupus nephritis de novo shortly after belimumab treatment initiation; both patients improved rapidly upon belimumab discontinuation. RESULTS: The first patient (a 30-year-old female, with a 15-year disease duration, receiving prednisolone, hydroxychloroquine, and azathioprine, with no previous history of nephritis that was repeatedly anti-dsDNA negative) had exacerbation of a facial butterfly-like rash developed after 3 months of belimumab treatment initiation. Concomitantly, her urinalysis became abnormal for the first time during her long follow-up (15-20 red blood cells per hpf, and a 24-h urine protein of 1600mg), and a renal biopsy documented the diagnosis of a Class III (WHO classification). Her anti-dsDNA titers became highly positive for the first time. Belimumab was discontinued and her proteinuria and abnormal urinalysis reverted to normal rapidly, and before MMF administration was approved by local regulatory authorities. Our second patient (a 38-year-old female with a 19-year disease duration) was being treated with prednisone and azathioprine. Two months following belimumab treatment initiation, she became edematous and had an active urine sediment (50-60 rbc per hpf, dysmorphic, and a 24-h urine protein levelabove 6000mg) for the first time during her disease course. Her renal biopsy was compatible with a Class V membranous nephritis. Belimumab was discontinued and MMF (2g/d) was substituted for azathioprine with her urinary protein declining to 2.7g/d just 10 days afterwards. CONCLUSIONS: In this report, apart from our two patients, we discuss the relevant literature consisting of a handful of studies and case reports. The studies analyze patients with renal involvement treated with belimumab and are inconclusive. There are only a few case reports in which belimumab along with other agents had a potential benefit, although not straightforward. There is only one case report with striking similarities to the two patients with SLE we report herein. It could be claimed that belimumab was unable to prevent the appearance of lupus nephritis during a potentially serious disease exacerbation. Certainly, a causative association between belimumab treatment and the de novo appearance of lupus nephritis cannot be claimed because of our report. However, a potential association between belimumab treatment and the development of such a serious manifestation cannot be entirely excluded. In support of the latter hypothesis is the quick resolution/significant reduction of proteinuria shortly after belimumab discontinuation and before other treatment measures had any reasonable effect. Studies evaluating the potential usefulness of belimumab in patients with lupus nephritis are currently ongoing; until then, one should keep in mind unanswered questions as far as renal safety is concerned.