Robot-assisted Foley Tie Ureteric Tapering and Reimplantation.

Objective: This study aimed to introduce and evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of a novel surgical technique, robot-assisted Foley tie ureteric tapering (RAFUT) and reimplantation, specifically designed for intravesical ureteral tapering during pediatric robotic-assisted ureteric reimplantation. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on pediatric patients diagnosed with primary vesicoureteric reflux (VUR), who underwent RAFUT between January 2019 and July 2021. Patient records were reviewed to assess preoperative characteristics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes. RAFUT involved meticulous patient positioning, precise port placement with a 6 mm separation, and bladder anchoring to maintain pneumovesicum. Ureteric tapering was performed with the Foley tie technique to enhance surgical precision. The primary outcome measures included operative time, complications, and postoperative VUR resolution. Results: All four patients underwent successful intravesical RAFUT without any intraoperative or postoperative complications. The age of the patients ranged from 3 to 12 years, with varying bladder capacities (range: 210-550 mL). The operating times ranged from 180 to 210 min, and the estimated blood loss was 35-50 mL. None of the patients required conversion to open surgery. Patients demonstrated resolution of VUR on postoperative imaging, and none experienced recurrent urinary tract infections during follow-up, which ranged from 1.5 to nearly 4 years. Conclusion: RAFUT represents a safe and effective surgical technique for intravesical ureteral tapering during pediatric robotic-assisted ureteric reimplantation. This innovative approach addresses the challenges posed by intravesical surgery for dilated ureters, maintains anatomical orientation, and offers precise excision and suturing capabilities.

Noninvasive Evaluation of Bladder Bowel Dysfunction and its Extrapolation as Biofeedback Therapy to Train Pelvic Floor Muscles.

Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the noninvasive methods to diagnose bladder bowel dysfunction (BBD) and its extrapolation on biofeedback therapy and pelvic floor exercises (PFE) to treat these children. Settings and Design: A retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care center was conducted between January 2010 and December 2020, on 204 children, aged 4-18 years, arbitrarily divided into two groups-4-12 and 13-18 years. Subjects and Methods: Details of lower urinary tract dysfunction were recorded as International Children's Continence Society nomenclature. Bowel habits were recorded and functional constipation was graded using ROME IV. The data recorded were urine analysis, a voiding diary, a dysfunctional voiding symptom score, and uroflowmetry with or without electromyography. Ultrasonography, voiding cystourethrogram, and magnetic resonance imaging were done in appropriate cases. Dysfunctional Voiding Severity Score was used to assist the evaluation and outcome. The treatment protocol included urotherapy, uroflow biofeedback, PFEs, prophylactic antibiotics, pharmacotherapy, and treatment of constipation. Statistical Analysis Used: Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 26 and paired t-test was used for comparison and calculating P value. Results: There was a significant improvement in DVSS and uroflow parameters. However, the magnitude of change produced varied among the age groups. Patients who failed to show any clinical benefit were subjected to alternative therapies such as intrasphincteric Botulinum A toxin with or without neuromodulation. Conclusions: Integrated uroflow biofeedback (IUB) and PFE expedites the recovery by supplementing the effect of urotherapy; hence, this should be offered to all children with BBD.

Safety and efficacy of retrograde intrarenal surgery in primary and residual renal calculi in children.

BACKGROUND: Minimal invasive approach is the current standard of care in the management of pediatric renal calculi. Current guidelines are clear with extra corporal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for stone size less than and greater than 20 mm respectively. Although retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is well established in adults but literature on its role, safety and efficacy in children is sparsely available. OBJECTIVE: To share our experience of RIRS and its outcome in a pediatric population in both primary and residual calculi of size less than 20 mm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed data of children who underwent RIRS for either primary or residual renal calculi from January 2017 to January 2021. Children less than 5 years underwent passive ureteric dilatation with stenting preoperatively. A7.5 Fr flexible ureteroscope with an access sheath was used in all cases while performing RIRS. All the patients had a stent left in situ at the end of the procedure. Data including stone burden, number of sittings, operative time, stone-free rate (SFR) and grade of post procedural complications were analysed with appropriate statistical methods. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients were included in this study. The median age at presentation was 9 years ranging from 9 months to 18 years. Eight patients (40%) presented with primary renal calculi and underwent RIRS directly while the rest of the 12 (60%) had residual calculi following other procedures like SWL, PCNL before undergoing RIRS. Seven patients (35%) had congenital renal anomalies. The mean stone size and operating time (OR) was 12.6 ± 3.2 mm 84.5 ± 7.2 min respectively. The post-procedural complications were seen in 4 (20%) patients in the form of Grade-1 modified Clavein classification in 3 and Grade 2 in 1 patient. The 100% stone-free rate was achieved in 80% of the cases after first attempt. DISCUSSION: In the present series, RIRS was effective in both the types of stones (primary and residual) less than 20 mm in size, showing 100% stone free rate with maximum of two attempts. Choosing age based optimised passive ureteric dilation led to injury free access for RIRS. Overall complications remained with in low grades and are comparable to current literature. Limitations of the study include small cohort, retrospective study and the need of three anaesthesia procedures in children under 5 years of age. CONCLUSION: RIRS is safe and effective in children with a renal stone(s) less than 20 mm and it has a high success rate in term of achieving stone free status in both primary and residual calculi.