Evolving Management of Distal Anastomotic Technical Issues During Open Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

BACKGROUND: Thrombosis of the iliac anastomosis is an important complication of open aortic aneurysm repair. We evaluated our evolving management of this complication to an endovascular approach and compared it with open revision to the common femoral artery. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing open aortic aneurysm repair from January 2009 through November 2016 at our institution were reviewed. Patients who developed iliac limb flow issues or thrombosis intraoperatively or within 48 hrs postoperatively were identified. Patients were grouped by management strategies of either 1) an endovascular approach including iliac angiography, thrombectomy if needed, and stenting or 2) open surgical revision of the iliac anastomosis with or without bypass to the common femoral artery. Demographics, comorbidities, operative variables, and outcomes were retrospectively analyzed between groups. Primary patency and mortality were assessed by Kaplan-Meier estimates. RESULTS: There were 711 patients who underwent aortoiliac aneurysm repair during the study period. 43/711 patients (6.0%) developed early perioperative iliac limb flow issues including thrombosis. Twenty-nine patients (31 limbs) were managed by an endovascular approach, and 14 patients (15 limbs) were managed by open surgical revision. The mean age of the cohort was 69 years, and 27 patients (62.8%) were male. Preoperative creatinine and diabetes frequency were higher in patients managed by an endovascular approach, although no other differences existed between preoperative comorbidities. Thrombosis or limb flow issues presented intraoperatively more commonly in the open surgical group and in the first 24 hrs postoperatively in the endovascular group. All patients had complete restoration of outflow as a result of the rescue procedure. Transfusion requirements and crystalloid replacement were significantly higher in the open surgical group. Length of stay, perioperative complications, and mortality were similar between groups. Overall, 21/31 limbs in the endovascular group and 9/15 limbs in the open surgical group had postoperative imaging, with mean follow-up of 35.0 and 55.6 months, respectively. Only one patient in the cohort lost patency: an iliofemoral jump graft that presented with late infection after postoperative wound infection, requiring staged extra-anatomic bypass and explant at 12 months. Three-year primary patency was 100% for the endovascular group and 85.7% for the surgical group by Kaplan-Meier method (P = 0.32). Endovascular management became our institution's primary salvage approach during the study. Whereas 8/15 limbs (53.3%) were managed by an endovascular approach from 2009-2011, 23/31 (74%) were managed by iliac stenting from 2012-2016. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular management of iliac limb flow issues or thrombosis after open aneurysm repair is potentially a viable alternative to open surgical revision in the early postoperative period.

Guidelines for hospital privileges in vascular surgery and endovascular interventions: Recommendations of the Society for Vascular Surgery.

The Hospital Privileges Practice Guideline Writing Group of the Society for Vascular Surgery is making the following five recommendations concerning guidelines for hospital privileges for vascular surgery and endovascular therapy. Advanced endovascular procedures are currently entrenched in the everyday practice of specialized vascular interventionalists, including vascular surgeons, but open vascular surgery remains uniquely essential to the specialty. First, we endorse the Residency Review Committee for Surgery recommendations regarding open and endovascular cases during vascular residency and fellowship training. Second, applicants for new hospital privileges wishing to perform vascular surgery should have completed an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited vascular surgery residency or fellowship or American Osteopathic Association-accredited training program before 2020 and should obtain American Board of Surgery certification in vascular surgery or American Osteopathic Association certification within 7 years of completion of their training. Third, we recommend that applicants for renewal of hospital privileges in vascular surgery include physicians who are board certified in vascular surgery, general surgery, or cardiothoracic surgery. These physicians with an established practice in vascular surgery should participate in Maintenance of Certification programs as established by the American Board of Surgery and maintain their respective board certification. Fourth, we provide recommendations concerning guidelines for endovascular procedures for vascular surgeons and other vascular interventionalists who are applying for new or renewed hospital privileges. All physicians performing open or endovascular procedures should track outcomes using nationally validated registries, ideally by the Vascular Quality Initiative. Fifth, we endorse the Intersocietal Accreditation Commission recommendations for noninvasive vascular laboratory interpretations and examinations to become a Registered Physician in Vascular Interpretation, which is included in the requirements for board eligibility in vascular surgery, but recommend that only physicians with demonstrated clinical experience in the diagnosis and management of vascular disease be allowed to interpret these studies.

An update on the role of proximal occlusion devices in carotid artery stenting.

Carotid artery stenting performed with distal embolic protection devices continues to show elevated rates of periprocedural stroke, in particular with high-risk groups. This article discusses the factors associated with protection devices that may contribute to this complication, performs a literature review to assess outcomes of carotid stenting with proximal occlusion devices, and assesses the role of proximal occlusion devices in the management of patients with carotid artery stenosis.

Repair of a disconnected stent-graft limb facilitated by in situ fenestration.

PURPOSE: To describe the use of in situ fenestration to facilitate management of a disconnected iliac stent-graft limb that could not be repaired by conventional endovascular techniques. TECHNIQUE: An 85-year-old man who had a Zenith endovascular graft deployed 3 years earlier for a 10-cm infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm presented with separation of the right iliac stent-graft limb from the main body, resulting in type III endoleak and sac enlargement. The disconnected limb occluded the ostium of the main stent-graft body, blocking all conventional endovascular techniques to traverse the graft limb-main body intersection. To overcome the problem, the cephalad portion of the proximal disconnected limb overlying the main body gate was successfully fenestrated with an endoscopic FNA needle and continuity restored with a Viabahn stent-graft across the balloon-modeled fenestration. CONCLUSION: In situ fenestration of endovascular stent-grafts may be a useful adjunct in performing rescues of late complications in patients not suitable for open repair.

Surgical site infections: incidence and trends at a community teaching hospital.

BACKGROUND: There has been increased national attention on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and surgical site infections (SSIs) highlighted by the media, the public, and federal agencies. It was therefore considered important to analyze the trends and incidence of inpatient detected SSIs and associated resistant organisms at our own institution. METHODS: The analysis reflects the cultures and sensitivities of SSI on the surgical services at Monmouth Medical Center, a 527-bed community teaching hospital, from January 2003 through December 2007. The SSIs included in the study were those detected in hospitalized patients. RESULTS: There were 312 surgical patients who developed SSIs. Contrary to observed national trends, our study demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in the incidence of MRSA among all the surgical services. We also noted a statistically significant decrease trend of SSIs in orthopedic surgery. The 312 patients' cultures yielded 399 bacterial strains. The most common strains varied with the service. Overall, the most common isolate identified was Staphylococcus species, numbering 143% or 35.8% of all isolates. MRSA was identified in 46 SSIs and 8 SSIs were positive for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). CONCLUSIONS: Only a hospital-specific SSI analysis can help focus improvement with clinical impact. The scrutiny of SSI analysis has highlighted SSI problems in the pediatric and orthopedic surgery services that have been addressed.

The transition to IVUS-guided IVC filter deployment in the nontrauma patient.

While prior reports have demonstrated intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) deployment to be feasible, larger reviews using the latest generation of filters in the nontrauma setting are absent. We review our experience with the deployment of 104 IVCFs using IVUS, whereby we transition from a combined use of IVUS with traditional road mapping techniques (venography and/or renal vein cannulation) to the sole use of the IVUS as the road mapping tool for IVCF insertion. The use of IVUS for IVCF deployment minimizes radiation exposure to patients and staff, minimizes patient contrast exposure, and minimizes dependency on auxiliary staff for fluoroscopy. Intravascular ultrasound IVCF deployments can be performed without increasing morbidity and mortality, case duration, or overall costs when compared to standard deployments. The learning curve for transitioning into the use of the IVUS as the primary road mapping tool for IVCF deployments is approximately 20 cases.