Ursodeoxycholic acid potentiates dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor sitagliptin by enhancing glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic liver disease: a pilot randomized controlled and add-on study.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the effects of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) on glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) secretion and glucose tolerance in patients with type 2 diabetes with chronic liver disease. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes (glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels ≥7.0%) and chronic liver disease were included in this study. Sixteen patients (HbA1c level, 7.2%±0.6%(55.2 mmol/mol)) were randomized to receive 900 mg UDCA for 12 weeks followed by 50 mg sitagliptin add-on therapy for 12 weeks (UDCA-first group; n=8) or 50 mg sitagliptin for 12 weeks followed by 900 mg UDCA add-on therapy for 12 weeks (sitagliptin-first group; n=8). All patients underwent a liquid high-fat meal test before and after 12 or 24 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics were similar between the UDCA-first and sitagliptin-first groups. There was a decrease in body weight (72.5±8.4 to 70.6±8.6 kg; P=0.04) and the HbA1c level (7.0%±0.3% to 6.4%±0.5%(53.0 to 46.4 mmol/mol); P=0.01) in the UDCA-first group. The HbA1c level decreased further after sitagliptin administration (6.4%±0.5% to 6.0%±0.4%(46.4 to 42.1 mmol/mol); P<0.01). Although there were no initial changes in the weight and HbA1c level in the sitagliptin-first group, the HbA1c level decreased after UDCA addition (7.1%±1.1% to 6.6%±0.9%(54.1 to 48.6 mmol/mol); P=0.04). UDCA alone increased the area under the curve0-30 for GLP-1 response (115.4±47.2 to 221.9±48.9 pmol·min/L; P<0.01), but not the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide response, in the UDCA-first group. CONCLUSIONS: UDCA treatment resulted in a greater reduction in HbA1c levels, and an increased early phase GLP-1 secretion. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01337440.

Pleiotropic effects of sitagliptin versus voglibose in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled via diet and/or a single oral antihyperglycemic agent: a multicenter, randomized trial.

PURPOSE: A step-up strategy for diet therapy and/or single oral antihyperglycemic agent (OHA) regimens has not yet been established. The aim of this study was to evaluate hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) as a primary end point, and the pleiotropic effects on metabolic and cardiovascular parameters as secondary end points, of sitagliptin versus voglibose in patients with type 2 diabetes with inadequate glycemic control while on diet therapy and/or treatment with a single OHA. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group trial, a total of 260 patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (HbA1c levels >6.9%) were randomly assigned to receive either sitagliptin (50 mg, once daily) or voglibose (0.6 mg, thrice daily) for 12 weeks. The primary end point was HbA1c levels. RESULTS: Patients receiving sitagliptin showed a significantly greater decrease in HbA1c levels (-0.78±0.69%) compared with those receiving voglibose (-0.30±0.78%). Sitagliptin treatment also lowered serum alkaline phosphatase levels and increased serum creatinine, uric acid, cystatin-C and homeostasis model assessment-ß values. Voglibose increased low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels and altered serum levels of several fatty acids, and increased Δ-5 desaturase activity. Both drugs increased serum adiponectin. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was significantly lower in the sitagliptin group, due to the decreased incidence of gastrointestinal AEs. CONCLUSIONS: Sitagliptin shows superior antihyperglycemic effects compared with voglibose as a first-line or second-line therapy. However, both agents possess unique pleiotropic effects that lead to reduced cardiovascular risk in Japanese people with type 2 diabetes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN 000003503.

Renoprotective effects of atorvastatin compared with pravastatin on progression of early diabetic nephropathy.

INTRODUCTION: Several studies have shown that statins suppress the progression of diabetic nephropathy. However, few reports have directly compared the renoprotective effects between potent and conventional statins. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with diabetic nephropathy, selected as those with a serum creatinine level of 0.9-1.5 mg/dL and simultaneously having either microalbuminuria or positive proteinuria, were randomly assigned to one of three groups: a conventional diet therapy group, a group given 10 mg of pravastatin and a group given 10 mg of atorvastatin. Renal function was evaluated before and after a 12-month period of therapy. RESULTS: The atorvastatin group had a significant decrease in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol at 3 months and thereafter compared with the other groups. The urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio significantly decreased in the atorvastatin group; the degree of this decrease was significantly greater than that in the diet therapy group. The kidney function estimated with cystatin C (CysC) and the estimated glomerular filtration rate calculated from CysC were significantly preserved in the atorvastatin group compared with the pravastatin group. In a multivariate regression analysis, the use of atorvastatin was the only explanatory variable for the changes in CysC; this was independent of changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. CONCLUSIONS: Atorvastatin is more effective than pravastatin for the prevention of increase in CysC, and this renoprotective effect was considered to a result of the pleiotropic effect of atorvastatin independent of its lipid-lowering effect. This study was registered with UMIN (no. UMIN 000001774).

Liver steatosis is associated with insulin resistance in skeletal muscle rather than in the liver in Japanese patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: To examine the association between liver histological features and organ-specific insulin resistance indices calculated from 75-g oral glucose tolerance test data in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Liver biopsy specimens were obtained from 72 patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and were scored for steatosis, grade and stage. Hepatic and skeletal muscle insulin resistance indices (hepatic insulin resistance index and Matsuda index, respectively) were calculated from 75-g oral glucose tolerance test data, and metabolic clearance rate was measured using the euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp method. RESULTS: The degree of hepatic steatosis, and grade and stage of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis were significantly correlated with Matsuda index (steatosis r = -0.45, P < 0.001; grade r = -0.54, P < 0.001; stage r = -0.37, P < 0.01), but not with hepatic insulin resistance index. Multiple regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, body mass index and each histological score showed that the degree of hepatic steatosis (coefficient = -0.22, P < 0.05) and grade (coefficient = -0.40, P < 0.01) were associated with Matsuda index, whereas the association between stage and Matsuda index (coefficient = -0.07, P = 0.593) was no longer significant. A similar trend was observed for the association between steatosis and metabolic clearance rate (coefficient = -0.62, P = 0.059). CONCLUSIONS: Liver steatosis is associated with insulin resistance in skeletal muscle rather than in the liver in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, suggesting a central role of fatty liver in the development of peripheral insulin resistance and the existence of a network between the liver and skeletal muscle.

Ectopic fat accumulation and distant organ-specific insulin resistance in Japanese people with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the association between ectopic fat and organ-specific insulin resistance (IR) in insulin-target organs in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). METHODS: Organ-specific IR in the liver (hepatic glucose production (HGP) × fasting plasma insulin (FPI) and suppression of HGP by insulin [%HGP]), skeletal muscle (insulin-stimulated glucose disposal [Rd]), and adipose tissue (suppression of FFA by insulin [%FFA]) was measured in 69 patients with NAFLD using a euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp with tracer infusion ([6,6-2H2]glucose). Liver fat, intramyocellular lipid (IMCL), and body composition were measured by liver biopsy, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and bioelectrical impedance analysis, respectively. RESULTS: HGP × FPI was significantly correlated with Rd (r =  -0.57, P<0.001), %HGP with %FFA (r = 0.38, P<0.01), and Rd with %FFA (r = 0.27, P<0.05). Liver steatosis score was negatively associated with Rd (r =  -0.47, P<0.001) as well as with HGP × FPI (r = 0.43, P<0.001). Similarly, intrahepatic lipid was negatively associated with Rd (r =  -0.32, P<0.05). IMCL was not associated with Rd (r =  -0.16, P = 0.26). Fat mass and its percentage were associated with HGP × FPI (r = 0.50, P<0.001; r = 0.48, P<0.001, respectively) and Rd (r =  -0.59, P<0.001; r =  -0.52, P<0.001, respectively), but not with %FFA (r =  -0.21, P = 0.10; r =  -0.001, P = 0.99, respectively). CONCLUSION: Unexpectedly, fat accumulation in the skeletal muscle and adipose tissue was not associated with organ-specific IR. Instead, liver fat was associated not only with hepatic IR but also with skeletal muscle IR, suggesting a central role of fatty liver in systemic IR and that a network exists between liver and skeletal muscle.

The effects of ezetimibe on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and glucose metabolism: a randomised controlled trial.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The cholesterol absorption inhibitor ezetimibe has been shown to ameliorate non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) pathology in a single-armed clinical study and in experimental animal models. In this study, we investigated the efficacy of ezetimibe on NAFLD pathology in an open-label randomised controlled clinical trial. METHODS: We had planned to enrol 80 patients in the trial, as we had estimated that, with this sample size, the study would have 90% power. The study intervention and enrolment were discontinued because of the higher proportion of adverse events (significant elevation in HbA(1c)) in the ezetimibe group than in the control group. Thirty-two patients with NAFLD were enrolled and randomised (allocation by computer program). Ezetimibe (10 mg/day) was given to 17 patients with NAFLD for 6 months. The primary endpoint was change in serum aminotransferase level. Secondary outcomes were change in liver histology (12 control and 16 ezetimibe patients), insulin sensitivity including a hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp study (ten control and 13 ezetimibe patients) and hepatic fatty acid composition (six control and nine ezetimibe patients). Hepatic gene expression profiling was completed in 15 patients using an Affymetrix gene chip. Patients and the physician in charge knew to which group the patient had been allocated, but people carrying out measurements or examinations were blinded to group. RESULTS: Serum total cholesterol was significantly decreased in the ezetimibe group. The fibrosis stage and ballooning score were also significantly improved with ezetimibe treatment. However, ezetimibe treatment significantly increased HbA1c and was associated with a significant increase in hepatic long-chain fatty acids. Hepatic gene expression analysis showed coordinate downregulation of genes involved in skeletal muscle development and cell adhesion molecules in the ezetimibe treatment group, suggesting a suppression of stellate cell development into myofibroblasts. Genes involved in the L-carnitine pathway were coordinately downregulated by ezetimibe treatment and those in the steroid metabolism pathway upregulated, suggestive of impaired oxidation of long-chain fatty acids. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Ezetimibe improved hepatic fibrosis but increased hepatic long-chain fatty acids and HbA1c in patients with NAFLD. These findings shed light on previously unrecognised actions of ezetimibe that should be examined further in future studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000005250. FUNDING: The study was funded by grants-in-aid from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan, and research grants from MSD.

Proteasome dysfunction mediates obesity-induced endoplasmic reticulum stress and insulin resistance in the liver.

Chronic endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress is a major contributor to obesity-induced insulin resistance in the liver. However, the molecular link between obesity and ER stress remains to be identified. Proteasomes are important multicatalytic enzyme complexes that degrade misfolded and oxidized proteins. Here, we report that both mouse models of obesity and diabetes and proteasome activator (PA)28-null mice showed 30-40% reduction in proteasome activity and accumulation of polyubiquitinated proteins in the liver. PA28-null mice also showed hepatic steatosis, decreased hepatic insulin signaling, and increased hepatic glucose production. The link between proteasome dysfunction and hepatic insulin resistance involves ER stress leading to hyperactivation of c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase in the liver. Administration of a chemical chaperone, phenylbutyric acid (PBA), partially rescued the phenotypes of PA28-null mice. To confirm part of the results obtained from in vivo experiments, we pretreated rat hepatoma-derived H4IIEC3 cells with bortezomib, a selective inhibitor of the 26S proteasome. Bortezomib causes ER stress and insulin resistance in vitro--responses that are partly blocked by PBA. Taken together, our data suggest that proteasome dysfunction mediates obesity-induced ER stress, leading to insulin resistance in the liver.

Duodenal adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine features in a patient with acromegaly and thyroid papillary adenocarcinoma: a unique combination of endocrine neoplasia.

A 67-year-old woman with familial clustering of thyroid papillary adenocarcinoma was diagnosed with acromegaly due to pituitary macroadenoma. She had multiple skin vegetations, but had no parathyroid and pancreas diseases. Before transsphenoidal surgery, she was further diagnosed as having a duodenal tumor and multiple hypervascular liver nodules. Biopsy specimens from the duodenal tumor and liver nodules were diagnosed histologically as moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells were positive for chromogranin, synaptophysin and somatostatin receptor 2a, suggestive for neuroendocrine features. After surgery, the patient was not in biochemical remission, and octreotide treatment was initiated. The duodenal cancer was treated with chemotherapy (neoadjuvant cisplatin and S-1). After 24 months, the patient's insulin-like growth factor I level had been normalized, and her liver tumors had not progressed macroscopically. This is a rare case of acromegaly associated with multiple endocrine tumors, not being categorized as conventional multiple endocrine neoplasia. Octreotide treatment might have had beneficial effects on our patient's duodenal adenocarcinoma and liver metastases, both directly via SSTR2a and indirectly via GH suppression, thereby contributing to their slow progression.

Carcinosarcoma of the liver.

Herein we present a 73-year-old man with primary carcinosarcoma of the liver, a rare malignant tumor of the liver. The case was followed up due to HBV-related liver cirrhosis. Regular check-up by ultrasound demonstrated a hyperechoic tumor in the left lobe of the liver, and he was referred and admitted to our hospital. Dynamic CT studies revealed a mostly hypoenhancing hepatic mass with a peripheral ring enhancement. Surgical resection was performed, and the resected tumor was macroscopically a simple nodular type, 3 cm in diameter, with a dense fibrous capsule. Microscopically, undifferentiated cells were dominant in the tumor, while moderately differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were also observed. A transitional zone was noted between the undifferentiated tumor and HCC. Tumor tissue with adenocarcinoma, osteosarcoma and chondrosarcoma were also detected. Immunohistochemical studies demonstrated that tumor cells were HepPar 1 positive in hepatocellular carcinoma, and CK19 and partly CK7 positive in adenocarcinoma. Moreover, CD56, chromogranin A and c-kit were occasionally positive in undifferentiated tumor cells. The diagnosis of carcinosarcoma was made based on the concomitant presence of HCC and sarcomatous components, yet it is noteworthy that various types of tumor cells were observed.