Use of statins offsets insulin-related cancer risk.

AIM: There is firm evidence of a relation between type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and increased risks of cancer at various sites, but it is still unclear how different antihyperglycaemic therapies modify site-specific cancer risks. The aim of this study was to provide a complete characterization of all possible associations between individual T2DM therapies, statin use and site-specific cancers in the Austrian population. METHODS: Medical claims data of 1 847 051 patients with hospital stays during 2006-2007 were used to estimate age- and sex-dependent co-occurrences of site-specific cancer diagnoses and treatment with specific glucose-lowering drugs and statins. RESULTS: Patients treated with insulin or insulin secretagogues showed up to ninefold increased risks for cancers of the colon [males only (m)], liver (m), pancreas, lung (m) and brain (m), as well as a strongly decreased risk for prostate cancer (m). In patients taking statins, the risks were generally decreased, with a greater risk reduction in patients not receiving antihyperglycaemic therapies. The strongest effects were observed for use of insulin and pancreatic cancer [m: OR 4.5, 95% CI: 3.1-6.6; females (f): OR 4.2, 95% CI: 2.5-7.1], sulfonylureas (m: OR 2.8, 95% CI: 1.7-4.6; f: OR 3.0, 95% CI: 2.1-4.2) or glitazones and skin cancer (f: OR 0.54, 95% CI: 0.36-0.80), as well as metformin and cancer of the prostate (m: OR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.75-0.91) and corpus uteri (f: OR 1.7, 95% CI: 1.4-2.0) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (f: OR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.64-0.91). CONCLUSIONS: The use of statins offsets insulin-related cancer risks in patients with diabetes independently of sex and age. Overall, our data support the hyperglycaemia-cancer hypothesis. A reduction in endogenous or exogenous hyperinsulinaemia may be beneficial for cancer prevention. Therefore, insulin-sparing and insulin-sensitizing drugs should be the preferred treatment choices.

Diabetes mellitus without metformin intake is associated with worse oncologic outcomes after radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

AIMS: Evidence suggests a detrimental effect of diabetes mellitus (DM) on cancer incidence and outcomes. To date, the effect of DM and its treatment on prognosis in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) remains uninvestigated. We tested the hypothesis that DM and metformin use impact oncologic outcomes of patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for UTUC. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 2492 patients with UTUC treated at 23 institutions with RNU without neoadjuvant therapy. Cox regression models addressed the association of DM and metformin use with disease recurrence, cancer-specific mortality and any-cause mortality. RESULTS: A total of 365 (14.3%) patients had DM and 194 (7.8%) patients used metformin. Within a median follow-up of 36 months, 663 (26.6%) patients experienced disease recurrence, 545 patients (21.9%) died of UTUC and 884 (35.5%) patients died from any cause. Diabetic patients who did not use metformin were at significantly higher risk of disease recurrence and cancer-specific death compared to non-diabetic patients and diabetic patients who used metformin. In multivariable Cox regression analyses, DM treated without metformin was associated with worse recurrence-free survival (HR: 1.44, 95% CI 1.10-1.90, p = 0.009) and cancer-specific mortality (HR: 1.49, 95% CI 1.11-2.00, p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Diabetic UTUC patients without metformin use have significantly worse oncologic outcomes than diabetics who used metformin and non-diabetics. The possible mechanism behind the impact of DM on UTUC biology and the potentially protective effect of metformin need further elucidation.

Impact of statin use on biochemical recurrence in patients treated with radical prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND: The impact of statin use on biochemical recurrence (BCR) in patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) remains controversial. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 6842 patients who underwent RP for clinically localized prostate cancer (PC) between 2000 and 2011. Uni- and multivariable cox regression models addressed the association of statin use with BCR. RESULTS: Overall, 2275 (33.3%) patients used statins. Statin users were older and had a higher rate of positive surgical margins than patients not using statins (P-values 0.05). Within a median follow-up of 25 months (interquartile range: 8-42 months), 778 (11.4%) patients experienced BCR. Actuarial estimate 5-years BCR-free survival was 82%±1 for patients without statin use and 84±1% for patients using statins (P=0.05); statin use was not associated with BCR (hazard ratio: 0.88, 95% confidence interval: 0.76-1.03, P=0.10) after adjusting for the effects of standard clinicopathologic features. CONCLUSIONS: In PC patients undergoing RP, statin use was not independently associated with lower risk of BCR.

A two-step screening algorithm including fasting plasma glucose measurement and a risk estimation model is an accurate strategy for detecting gestational diabetes mellitus.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: It is currently not clear how to construct a time- and cost-effective screening strategy for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Thus, we elaborated a simple screening algorithm combining (1) fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurement; and (2) a multivariable risk estimation model focused on individuals with normal FPG levels to decide if a further OGTT is indicated. METHODS: A total of 1,336 women were prospectively screened for several risk factors for GDM within a multicentre study conducted in Austria. Of 714 women (53.4%) who developed GDM using recent diagnostic guidelines, 461 were sufficiently screened with FPG. A risk prediction score was finally developed using data from the remaining 253 women with GDM and 622 healthy women. The screening algorithm was validated with a further 258 pregnant women. RESULTS: A risk estimation model including history of GDM, glycosuria, family history of diabetes, age, preconception dyslipidaemia and ethnic origin, in addition to FPG, was accurate for detecting GDM in participants with normal FPG. Including an FPG pretest, the receiver operating characteristic AUC of the screening algorithm was 0.90 (95% CI 0.88, 0.91). A cut-off value of 0.20 was able to differentiate between low and intermediate risk for GDM with a high sensitivity. Comparable results were seen with the validation cohort. Moreover, we demonstrated an independent association between values derived from the risk estimation and macrosomia in offspring (OR 3.03, 95% CI 1.79, 5.19, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: This study demonstrates a new concept for accurate but cheap GDM screening. This approach should be further evaluated in different populations to ensure an optimised diagnostic algorithm.

Insulin resistance has no impact on ghrelin suppression in pregnancy.

Ghrelin is reduced in various states of insulin resistance. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between ghrelin and glucose metabolism during pregnancy - a natural insulin-resistant state - in women with normal glucose tolerance (NGT), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) or gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and potential changes 3 months after delivery. A total of 54 women, 37 pregnant and with various degrees of insulin resistance and 24 postpartum (PP, seven of them also studied during pregnancy) were studied. Ghrelin plasma concentrations at fasting and 60' following glucose loading (75 g-2 h-oral glucose tolerance test), area under the curve of plasma glucose (G-AUC(OGTT)) and insulin sensitivity [homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) and oral glucose sensitivity index (OGIS) indices, respectively] were determined. Both baseline and 60' ghrelin concentrations were to a comparable degree ( approximately by 65%) suppressed in NGT, IGT and GDM as compared to the PP group (the latter being indistinguishable from NGT regarding glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity). In all women studied both during and after pregnancy, ghrelin levels rose from pregnancy to PP (mean increase 313.8%; P < 0.03). There was no correlation between baseline ghrelin and insulin sensitivity as estimated from both baseline (HOMA) and dynamic (OGTT:OGIS) glucose and insulin data. Ghrelin is substantially decreased during pregnancy, but glucose-induced ghrelin suppression is preserved at a lower level. There is apparently no relation to the degree of insulin resistance.

Distribution and kinetics of amylin in humans.

The aim of the study was to determine the apparent volume of distribution (VTOT), total body clearance (CL), fractional clearance, and mean residence time (MRT) of the beta-cell hormone amylin. We therefore performed an intravenous injection of 50 micrograms of human synthetic amylin (amlintide) in nine healthy male subjects during suppression of endogenous amylin release by intravenous somatostatin (0.06 microgram.kg-1.min-1). The plasma levels of amylin concentrations over time were analyzed using three-exponential curves. VTOT was 173 +/- 16 ml/kg and was not different from that of insulin reported in the literature (157 ml/kg). MRT was 27.7 +/- 2.1 min and thus two times the reported value for insulin (14.1 min) and C-peptide (16.4 min). CL and fractional CL were 6.2 +/- 0.2 ml.kg-1.min-1 and 0.038 +/- 0.003 min-1, respectively. Fractional CL is therefore definitely lower than that reported for insulin (0.12-0.2 min-1) but is, however, in the range of that of C-peptide (0.05 min-1). In conclusion, clearance of amylin is similar to that reported for C-peptide and much slower than insulin, indicating that the commonly used molar insulin-to-amylin ratio does not reflect the correct relationship of the two peptides.

Amylin: history and overview.

The presence of amyloid deposits in the pancreas was first described at the beginning of the 20th century. However, it was not until 1987 that the structure of the amylin molecule was identified. Amylin is a 37-amino-acid peptide hormone that is co-secreted with insulin by the pancreatic beta-cells in response to a nutrient stimulus. It is deficient in patients with Type 1 diabetes and elevated in patients in the early stages of Type 2 diabetes, a condition which is characterized by hyperinsulinaemia. Elevation of plasma amylin levels has also been described in patients with impaired glucose tolerance, obese subjects and in pregnant women with both normal glucose tolerance and gestational diabetes mellitus. However, it appears that deficiencies of amylin secretion appear before those of insulin in patients in the later stages of Type 2 diabetes. Early experimental studies suggested that amylin inhibits basal insulin secretion, and induces insulin resistance in skeletal muscle, leading to the hypothesis that it has a role in the aetiology of Type 2 diabetes. However, a number of more recent experimental studies have indicated that amylin is a third active pancreatic islet hormone that works with insulin and glucagon to maintain glucose homeostasis. Amylin appears to regulate glucose inflow to the circulation by influencing the rate of gastric emptying, and thus the rate at which meal-derived glucose enters the system, and also by inhibiting glucose release and hepatic glucose production in the postprandial period.

Amylin release during oral glucose tolerance test.

The role of amylin in the beta-cell dysfunction that occurs in patients with diabetes mellitus may be important. Amyloid deposits are found in the pancreata of subjects with Type 2 diabetes and may contribute to beta-cell death. It is therefore necessary to study amylin secretion and kinetics to determine whether elevated levels of the peptide are due to elevated secretion, reduced clearance or both. The aim of this study was to measure amylin dynamics during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). We also used a mathematical model of beta-cell activity to assess the secretion and kinetics of C-peptide, insulin and amylin in humans during an OGTT. In particular, we were interested in characterizing the physiological meaning of one of the terms in the model, the amylin/C-peptide co-secretion factor (sigma). The model has been used in several pathophysiological conditions and results indicate an elevated secretion and clearance of amylin in glucose-intolerant states. Amylin clearance has been found to be similar to that of C-peptide, and much slower than that of insulin. In this study, direct measurements of insulin and amylin secretion in five obese subjects yielded an estimate of the amylin/insulin co-secretion factor of 0.004 with a standard deviation (SD) of 0.002. The point estimate of hepatic clearance was 80 ml min(-1), which was much lower than that of insulin (507 +/- 94 ml min[-1]). In addition, the estimated hepatic clearance was not significantly different from zero given its high SD of 213 ml min(-1). The absence of hepatic extraction of amylin is therefore a plausible hypothesis, which is also supported by the similarity between amylin and C-peptide clearances. This observation characterizes the physiological meaning of sigma and suggests that this parameter is associated mainly with beta-cell secretion.

Elevated islet amyloid pancreatic polypeptide and proinsulin in lean gestational diabetes.

Recent research indicates that islet amyloid pancreatic polypeptide (IAPP) might have a regulatory effect on beta-cell insulin processing and secretion. To study such interaction in more detail, IAPP secretion and kinetics and the serum concentrations of proinsulin were assessed both before and after delivery in lean pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM patients) in comparison to those with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) and to nonpregnant healthy lean (control) and obese insulin-resistant women during oral glucose tolerance tests. Kinetic analysis of IAPP was performed with mathematical modeling, providing indirect estimates of its secretion and fractional clearance. Total insulin secretion per 180 min was elevated by 30% in GDM patients (35 +/- 3 pmol/l) versus control subjects (27 +/- 1 pmol/l) (P < 0.05), but increased even more (190-250%) in obese insulin-resistant women, compared with all other groups (68 +/- 7 pmol/l, P < 0.0005). Pregnancy induced a more marked fourfold increase in apparent total IAPP secretion rate (TIR) (GDM patients, 172 +/- 31 pmol x 1(-1) x 3 h(-1); NGT subjects, 166 +/- 31 pmol x 1(-1) x 3 h(-1); control subjects, 40 +/- 1 pmol 1(-1) x 3 h(-1)) and a twofold rise in its fractional clearance versus control subjects (P < 0.01), whereas in GDM patients a 30% increase of IAPP secretion and a decreased clearance was found, compared with obese insulin-resistant women (TIR, 112 +/- 14 pmol x 1(-1) x 3 h(-1)). The increase in IAPP secretion in both pregnant groups was much higher than that of the insulin groups, resulting in a marked change of the IAPP-insulin cosecretion factor when compared with lean or obese nonpregnant women (P < 0.0005). Associated serum proinsulin and the postprandial (total divided by 180 min) proinsulin-to-insulin ratio were greater in GDM patients versus NGT and control subjects (0.11 +/- 0.01 vs. 0.07 +/- 0.01 and 0.08 +/- 0.01 pmol/l, P < 0.05), while the fasting proinsulin-to-insulin ratio was only increased in GDM patients versus control subjects (0.22 +/- 0.03 vs. 0.13 +/- 0.01 pmol/l, P < 0.05). After delivery, total IAPP secretion (52.4 +/- 1.5 pmol/l) was completely normalized in the GDM group, as were the clearance rate and the IAPP-insulin cosecretion factor. Similarly, serum proinsulin concentrations returned to normal, whereas proinsulin-to-insulin ratios remained elevated. In conclusion, IAPP hypersecretion is characteristic for pregnancy and might partially decrease hyperinsulinemia in pregnancy by inhibiting insulin secretion. Increased proinsulin concentrations and a raised proinsulin-to-insulin ratio, which did not abate following delivery, are specific to GDM and might thus serve as its marker and potentially even identify subjects at high risk for the development of NIDDM.

Beta-cell activity and hepatic insulin extraction following dexamethasone administration in healthy subjects.

Glucocorticoids induce an increase of hepatic glucose production and peripheral resistance to insulin action. It is further assumed that dexamethasone administration in humans causes insulin hypersecretion, although inferences on beta-cell activity have been made in absolute terms and mostly from observations of systemic insulin concentration. In fact, the role of hepatic insulin extraction in humans treated long-term with glucocorticoids has not been investigated. The aim of the present study was to factor out quantitatively the main components of the insulin pathway that are responsible for the peripheral hypersecretion observed after steroids. Frequently sampled intravenous (FSIGT) and oral (OGTT) glucose tolerance tests were performed in healthy subjects before and after 5 days of oral dexamethasone administration (4 mg/d). Insulin sensitivity, beta-cell secretion, and hepatic insulin extraction were estimated by means of mathematical modeling. After steroids, insulin sensitivity decreased from 6.00 +/- 1.29 to 4.23 +/- 1.04 min-1/(microU/mL) (P < .04). Basal beta-cell secretion increased from 45 +/- 7 to 104 +/- 26 pmol/L . min-1 (P < .004) during the FSIGT and from 40 +/- 6 to 88 +/- 21 (P < .05) during the OGTT; total insulin release increased from 19 +/- 5 to 36 +/- 7 nmol/L in 180 minutes (P < .005) and from 33 +/- 5 to 50 +/- 10 (P < .02), respectively, FSIGT data also showed that first-phase beta-cell sensitivity increased from 236 +/- 39 to 309 +/- 33 pmol/L . min-1/(mg/dL) (P < .04), and second-phase from 631 +/- 154 to 1,103 +/ 196 10(4) pmol/L . min-2/(mg/dL) (P < .03). Posthepatic insulin delivery increased only insignificantly during the FSIGT (from 3.4 +/- 0.6 to 4.5 +/- 0.5 nmol/L, P = .073) due to an augmented hepatic insulin extraction from 73.0% +/- 7.2% to 83.0% +/- 3.5% (P < .05). During the OGTT, posthepatic insulin delivery increased after treatment from 6.6 +/- 1.2 to 11.4 +/- 2.5 nmol/L (P < .035) due to an increase, although slight, of hepatic insulin extraction from 77.4% +/- 1.9% to 79.3% +/- 3.3% (P = .319). The increased overall beta-cell activity during both tests was observed also by analyzing OGTT profiles of islet amyloid polypeptide (IAPP), the secretion of which was higher after steroids (basal, 0.081 +/- 0.012 v 0.272 +/- 0.082 pmol/L/min, P < .02; total, 35 +/- 8 v 116 +/- 48 mpmol/L in 3 hours, P < .05). In conclusion, after dexamethasone administration, peripheral hyperinsulinemia due to marked prehepatic beta-cell insulin hypersecretion is partially ameliorated by a concomitant increase of hepatic insulin clearance, which is more evident during a FSIGT. Model-derived secretion parameters from the OGTT and FSIGT produced comparable results, indicating that both tests, when properly analyzed, are feasible tools to evaluate insulin secretion.

Integrated mathematical model to assess beta-cell activity during the oral glucose test.

A model describing beta-cell secretion during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is introduced. The aim was to quantify beta-cell activity in different pathologies by analyzing peripheral concentration data of insulin, C-peptide, and islet amyloid polypeptide (IAPP). Insulin appearance in periphery is given by the fraction of C-peptide secretion, CPS(t), which accounts for liver degradation. A novelty of this study is the inclusion of IAPP delivery assumed proportional to CPS(t). Although IAPP fractional clearance is estimated in every subject, the clearances of insulin and C-peptide are assigned from a wide set of previous independent studies. Sensitivity analysis was performed to quantify the "error" in the estimated variables due to these assignments. All parameters relating to beta-cell secretion increased in the glucose-intolerant states [integrated CPS(t)=56 +/- 8 nmol/l in 180 min vs. 32 +/- 3 of controls, P<0.05; total IAPP delivery= 83 +/- 21 pmol/l in 180 min vs. 41 +/- 6, P<0.05]. Elevated plasma IAPP concentration of the patients was due to augmented secretion since IAPP clearance was found to be even slightly greater than in controls, (0.053 +/- 0.011 vs. 0.034 +/- 0.004 min-1) and markedly lower than that of insulin (0.14 +/- 0.02, P<0.01). In conclusion, the model introduced here allows the characterization of beta-cell secretory parameters during a simple test such as OGTT.

Increased levels of circulating islet amyloid polypeptide in patients with chronic renal failure have no effect on insulin secretion.

To elucidate the metabolism of islet amyloid polypeptide (IAPP) with respect to a possible renal elimination we investigated IAPP levels in 20 lean, nondiabetic patients with renal failure maintained on chronic hemodialysis (HD) and in 20 healthy controls. The basal levels of IAPP were significantly higher in uremic patients than in controls (15.1 +/- 3.2 vs. 3.2 +/- 0.2 pM, P < 0.001) suggesting renal excretion of IAPP. To investigate the impact of chronically elevated levels of endogenous IAPP on insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity, a frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIGT) was performed in a subset of patients on hemodialysis and in age-matched healthy controls (C) and obese patients with normal (NGT) and with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). Insulin sensitivity index (SI) was 8.7 +/- 1.5 in C (P < 0.05 vs. NGT, P < 0.01 vs. IGT), 5.4 +/- 0.9 in HD (P < 0.05 vs. IGT), 3.1 +/- 1.0 in NGT, and 2.0 +/- 0.5 in IGT. First phase insulin secretion was increased in patients on HD compared with those of several control groups. The results of this study therefore indicate a renal route of metabolism of IAPP. Increased endogenous circulating IAPP levels over a long period of time do not lead to a decrease in insulin release in patients on HD and do not cause the insulin resistance commonly seen in obesity and diabetes. Increased levels of circulating IAPP therefore are not likely to be a pathogenetic factor in the development of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM).

Role of islet amyloid polypeptide secretion in insulin-resistant humans.

Although it is generally accepted that islet amyloid polypeptide is cosecreted with insulin, relatively few data on its kinetics are available. We therefore studied the dynamics of islet amyloid polypeptide release following oral and frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance tests in comparison to insulin and C-peptide using mathematical model techniques in 14 control subjects, 10 obese and 11 hypertensive patients. The fractional clearance rate of islet amyloid polypeptide (0.034 +/- 0.004 min-1 in control subjects, 0.058 +/- 0.008 in the obese and 0.050 +/- 0.008 in the hypertensive patients) was significantly different (p < 0.01) in each group compared with that of insulin (0.14 +/- 0.03 min-1) and similar to that of C-peptide (0.061 +/- 0.007 min-1), at least in the insulin-resistant subjects. Based on the insulin sensitivity index derived from the minimal model analysis of intravenous glucose tolerance test data, both the hypertensive (2.4 +/- 0.4 min-1/(microU/ml); p < 0.0005) and the obese (2.7 +/- 0.5; p < 0.001) patients demonstrated severe insulin resistance compared to control subjects (8.1 +/- 1.3). Marked insulin hypersecretion was found in the hypertensive (57.6 +/- 5.2 nmol.l-1 in 180 min; p < 0.001) and obese (60.8 +/- 10.1; p < 0.003) patients in comparison with control subjects (32.4 +/- 3.2). The release of islet amyloid polypeptide was significantly higher in the hypertensive (83.1 +/- 16.6 pmol/l in 180 min; p < 0.02) and obese (78.6 +/- 13.1; p < 0.005) patients than in control subjects (40.5 +/- 6.4). No correlation was found between islet amyloid polypeptide release and the insulin sensitivity index in any group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effect of dexamethasone on insulin sensitivity, islet amyloid polypeptide and insulin secretion in humans.

The response of islet amyloid polypeptide and insulin and their molar ratios were investigated in eight healthy volunteers before and after treatment with dexamethasone by oral and frequently-sampled intravenous glucose tolerance tests. Following dexamethasone treatment the insulin sensitivity index decreased significantly from 6.5 +/- 1.3 to 4.1 +/- 1.0 (microU.ml-1).min-1, p < 0.05. The area under the curve representing above-basal levels of insulin during oral glucose tolerance test increased significantly following dexamethasone treatment from 48132 +/- 9736 to 82230 +/- 14846 pmol.l-1 x 3 h-1, p < 0.05, the area under the curve of islet amyloid polypeptide increased from 1308 +/- 183 to 2448 +/- 501 pmol.l-1 x 3 h-1, p < 0.05. The overall insulin/islet amyloid polypeptide molar ratios calculated from the area under the curve during the 3-h period of the oral glucose tolerance test was not significantly different before and after dexamethasone treatment (42 +/- 5 vs 40 +/- 4). During the oral glucose tolerance test the insulin/islet amyloid polypeptide ratio increased significantly from baseline to 30 min (p < 0.05), then declined towards initial values before and after dexamethasone treatment. In conclusion, dexamethasone induced a significant decrease in insulin sensitivity and a significant increase in insulin secretion during the oral glucose tolerance test. However, in contrast to previous animal experiments we did not find a change in the insulin/islet amyloid polypeptide ratio before and after dexamethasone treatment.

Insulin secretion, insulin sensitivity and hepatic insulin extraction in primary hyperparathyroidism before and after surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) is associated with hypertension, hyperinsulinaemia, and insulin resistance. The present study investigated the causes of these metabolic disturbances by quantifying insulin sensitivity and glucose effectiveness, and by assessing the time course of beta-cell insulin secretion and hepatic insulin extraction, during a dynamic condition such as after an intravenous glucose load. In addition, we evaluated the possible link between metabolic disorders and high blood pressure. SUBJECTS: We studied 16 patients with pHPT, before and 12 weeks after parathyroidectomy; eight of these patients were re-evaluated one year after surgery. The control group consisted of 18 healthy volunteers. DESIGN AND MEASUREMENTS: All subjects underwent an oral and a frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test. The data from the intravenous glucose tolerance test were analysed by means of the minimal model technique which yields relevant parameters to comprehend the metabolic status of the single individual. RESULTS: The glucose intolerance condition was characterized by a severely impaired insulin sensitivity in pHPT (3.2 +/- 0.5 vs 9.5 +/- 1.5 x 10(4)/min/(microU/ml) of control subjects; P < 0.001), as well as by a reduced glucose effectiveness, (0.02 +/- 0.002 vs 0.03 +/- 0.003/min of control subjects; P < 0.04). Total insulin secretion during the 4 hours of the test was almost twofold elevated in comparison to the control subjects (32795 +/- 4769 vs 16864 +/- 1850 pM, P < 0.004) and its basal component significantly correlated with the high blood pressure. Hepatic extraction of insulin was significantly increased in pHPT (85 +/- 2 vs 76 +/- 2%, P < 0.03), possibly as a compensatory mechanism of hypersecretion, which however did not prevent peripheral hyperinsulinaemia in pHPT. Patients with pHPT were divided into two subgroups with normal and impaired glucose tolerance. The patients with impaired glucose tolerance had a significant reduction of first phase insulin response, although their basal and stimulated insulin levels were higher. Tissue insulin sensitivity and glucose effectiveness did not significantly differ between the two subgroups. After surgery, all the biochemical parameters (former hypercalcaemia, hypophosphataemia, elevated parathormone levels) were normalized, insulin sensitivity significantly improved (6 +/- 1 x 10(4)/min/(microU/ml), P < 0.001), whereas glucose effectiveness remained completely unchanged. Basal and stimulated insulin responses were insignificantly lowered after surgery, and hepatic extraction did not change either. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with pHPT exhibited decreased insulin sensitivity and insulin hypersecretion. The latter is only partially ameliorated by increased hepatic insulin extraction. After surgery, although the biochemical abnormalities were fully reversible, the metabolic changes improved only partially.