RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Obtaining a categorical general surgery residency position is recognized as a highly challenging process, and many aspiring surgeons find themselves matching into a preliminary position. The American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) is relevant as a discriminator, as it is the only national evaluation metric that compares residents between programs. This study examines the correlation between ABSITE performance and the likelihood of obtaining a categorical position for non-designated preliminary surgery residents. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of preliminary residents who completed the ABSITE between 2011 and 2021 at a single academic training program. RESULTS: 108 preliminary residents were included. Among preliminary residents who were successful in securing a categorical position, the average ABSITE percentile was 59 (SD = 26.7). In contrast, those who were not able to secure a categorical position, the average ABSITE percentile was 23.6 (SD = 25.3). There was a strong significant correlation between ABSITE percentile and securing a categorical position (P < 0.001). There was a significant association between citizenship and gaining a categorical position, with US citizens being significantly more likely to successfully gain a categorical position (P = 0.01; OR 3.32 (95% CI 1.28-8.56)). There was not a significant correlation between citizenship and ABSITE score. CONCLUSION: This study presents compelling evidence that ABSITE percentile score is positively associated with the probability of securing a categorical position for preliminary general surgery residents. It is therefore imperative that both preliminary residents and their programs place a high value on ABSITE performance to enhance successful career progression.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Attrition rates among general surgery residents are notoriously high relative to other specialties. The aim of this study was to compare annual resident attrition rates between general surgery and other surgical subspecialties and to examine these trends in recent years. DESIGN: This was a retrospective study performed using Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Data Resource Books from 2012-2022. Annual attrition rate and average ten-year attrition rate were calculated for general surgery and surgical specialties. Differences were assessed by Pearson chi-square test. SETTING: All ACGME accredited residency programs in the United States were included. RESULTS: General surgery residencies had a significantly higher average annual attrition rate (3.3%) than all other surgical specialties studied except thoracic surgery. Most attrition among general surgery residents was voluntary and these rates did not appear to be affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: Attrition among general surgery residents is higher than in other surgical specialties, suggesting that early specialization may be protective against resident attrition.
Assuntos
Cirurgia Geral , Internato e Residência , Cirurgia Geral/educação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/educação , Masculino , Feminino , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Escolha da ProfissãoRESUMO
Background: This scoping review identifies existing literature that investigates what factors contribute to success on the American Board of Surgery (ABS) Certifying Exam (CE) to provide practical, evidence-based recommendations. Methods: A Pubmed search was completed utilizing the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis extension for scoping review (PRISMA-ScR) method. Results: Of 4368 articles identified, 45 articles met criteria for review. Manuscripts were placed into one of five categories: predictors from medical school, program interventions, modifiable candidate factors, the effect of mock oral exams, and those factors shown not to provide benefit for CE preparation. Conclusions: A variety of factors have either been shown to provide benefit for or be predictive of CE performance. Acknowledgement of these factors can provide benefit to both surgery residents as well as surgery programs. Despite these findings, research into these factors is generally of low quality, prompting the need for ongoing, high-quality investigations.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) holds significant potential in medical education and patient care, but its rapid emergence presents ethical and practical challenges. This study explored the perspectives of surgical residents on AI's role in medicine. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study surveying general surgery residents at a university-affiliated teaching hospital about their views on AI in medicine and surgical training. The survey covered demographics, residents' understanding of AI, its integration into medical practice, and use of AI tools like ChatGPT. The survey design was inspired by a recent national survey and underwent pretesting before deployment. RESULTS: Of the 31 participants surveyed, 24% identified diagnostics as AI's top application, 12% favored its use in identifying anatomical structures in surgeries, and 20% endorsed AI integration into EMRs for predictive models. Attitudes toward AI varied based on its intended application: 77.41% expressed concern about AI making life decisions and 70.97% felt excited about its application for repetitive tasks. A significant 67.74% believed AI could enhance the understanding of medical knowledge. Perception of AI integration varied with AI familiarity (P = .01), with more knowledgeable respondents expressing more positivity. Moreover, familiarity influenced the perceived academic use of ChatGPT (P = .039) and attitudes toward AI in operating rooms (P = .032). Conclusion: This study provides insights into surgery residents' perceptions of AI in medical practice and training. These findings can inform future research, shape policy decisions, and guide AI development, promoting a harmonious collaboration between AI and surgeons to improve both training and patient care.
Assuntos
Inteligência Artificial , Educação Médica , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Tomada de Decisões , Hospitais de EnsinoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The minimally invasive surgery (MIS) fellowship has existed for three decades and has steadily grown in both number of positions available and variety of techniques practiced. Despite continued popularity, growth, and wide breadth of surgical techniques of the MIS fellowship, publication rates in medical journals regarding these fellowships have not been as robust as one may expect. Our goal was to review the available literature on MIS fellowship. METHODS: We reviewed PubMed to search for articles pertinent for MIS fellowship. The initial search included "MIS fellowship" "minimally invasive surgery fellowship" and "laparoscopy fellowship." Articles pertaining to MIS fellowship were then reviewed by title and abstract for content. Articles were excluded from subsequent analysis if they focused on disciplines that were not direct extensions of general surgery (such as urology, gynecology, oncology). Using similar search techniques, we tabulated unfiltered publications rates specific to other major surgical fellowship disciplines. The metric articles per position was created by dividing the total number articles for each discipline by the annual fellowship positions RESULTS: An initial review of available literature produced 134 articles pertinent to MIS fellowship. Further analysis for direct relevance to MIS yielded only 58 published articles. MIS had the fewest number of publications and smallest APP, 0.7, of any of the major fellowship disciplines. CONCLUSIONS: There is a surprising dearth of material on MIS fellowship. While, MIS fellowship is a one-year experience, we have the opportunity to build on three decades of clinical experience to continue optimize the fellow experience and improve subspecialized surgical training and patient outcomes. This could be facilitated through broadened focus of inquiry and publication of findings.
Assuntos
Bolsas de Estudo , Internato e Residência , Humanos , Competência Clínica , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) fellowship is one of the most popular fellowship programs, but little is known about the individual fellow's clinical experience. Our goal was to determine the differences in case volume and case type in academic and community programs. METHODS: A retrospective review of advanced gastrointestinal, MIS, foregut, or bariatric fellowship cases logged into the Fellowship Council directory of fellowships during the 2020 and 2021 academic years included for analysis. The final cohort included 57,324 cases from all fellowship programs, that list data on the Fellowship Council website, including 58 academic programs and 62 community-based programs. All comparisons between groups were completed using Student's t-test. RESULTS: The mean number of cases logged during a fellowship year was 477.7 ± 149.9 with similar case numbers in academic and community programs, 462.5 ± 115.0 and 491.9 ± 176.2 respectively (p = 0.28). The mean data is illustrated in Fig. 1. The most common performed cases were in the following categories: bariatric surgery (149.8 ± 86.9 cases), endoscopy (111.1 ± 86.4 cases), hernia (68.0 ± 57.7 cases) and foregut (62.8 ± 37.3 cases). In these case-type categories, no significant differences in case volume were found between academic and community-based MIS fellowship programs. However, community-based programs had significantly more case experience compared to academic programs in all of the less commonly performed case-type categories: appendix 7.8 ± 12.8 vs 4.6 ± 5.1 cases (p = 0.08), colon 16.1 ± 20.7 vs 6.8 ± 11.7 cases (p = 0.003), hepato-pancreatic-biliary 46.9 ± 50.8 vs 32.5 ± 18.5 cases (p = 0.04), peritoneum 11.7 ± 16.0 vs 7.0 ± 7.6 cases (p = 0.04), and small bowel 11.9 ± 9.6 vs 8.8 ± 5.9 cases (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: MIS fellowship has been a well-established fellowship program under the Fellowship Council guideline. In our study, we aimed to identify the categories of fellowship training and the perspective case volumes in academic vs community setting. We conclude that fellowship training experience is similar in case volumes of commonly performed cases when comparing academic and community programs. However, there is substantial variability in the operative experience among MIS fellowship programs. Further study is necessary to identify the quality of fellowship training experience.
Assuntos
Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Internato e Residência , Humanos , Bolsas de Estudo , Competência Clínica , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/educação , EndoscopiaRESUMO
Electronic information is a vital resource used by fellowship applicants. This study aimed to assess the completeness of colon and rectal surgery (CRS) fellowship program online information. Program information on the Association of Program Directors for Colon and Rectal Surgery (APDCRS) website as well as each institutional website was evaluated based on templated criteria. Sixty-eight accredited fellowship programs were identified. Six (9%) programs had complete profiles on the APDCRS platform, with an average of 3.5 details completed per program. Sixty-two (91%) websites were easily accessible. None of these contained all 28 criteria assessed and 47 (69%) contained less than half of assessed content. The most common data point was fellowship program description (96%), while board pass rate (1%) was the least common. Most CRS fellowship websites were grossly incomplete. Electronically available information is vital to fellowship applicants, and programs should try to provide easily accessible information about their program.
Assuntos
Bolsas de Estudo , Internato e Residência , Humanos , Colo , InternetRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Data defining the utility of the system for improving and measuring procedural learning (SIMPL) in surgical education is limited. The aim of this pilot study is to describe the impact of SIMPL on resident and faculty perspectives regarding operative feedback. METHODS: Residents and faculty were surveyed prior to and 6 months after SIMPL implementation. Associations were analyzed using χ2 for categorical and Student's t-test for continuous variables. Statistical significance was defined as P-value < .05. RESULTS: The proportion of residents receiving intraoperative feedback at least once/day increased significantly (35% to 73%, P = .025); there was a trend toward increased postoperative feedback (15% to 33%, P = .201). Faculty reported an increase in intraoperative (55% to 91%, P = .041) and postoperative feedback (21% to 64%, P = .020). Satisfaction with intraoperative feedback improved from a score of 3.50 ± 1.05 to 3.93 ± .62, although not statistically significant (P = .181). Satisfaction with postoperative feedback improved significantly from 2.85 ± .93 to 3.50 ± .65 (P = .032). The proportion of faculty who felt they were providing effective feedback increased (53% to 91%, P = .032). The proportion of residents who perceived that feedback enhanced their surgical skill increased as well (65% to 93%, P = .048). DISCUSSION: Despite a modest increase in frequency of postoperative feedback, perceived quality of feedback improved substantially after implementation of SIMPL. Introduction of SIMPL also increased the amount of feedback provided by faculty intraoperatively. SIMPL, via direct and indirect effects, has a positive impact on the resident operative learning environment. Further work is necessary to examine the influence this may have on resident operative skill and patient outcomes.
Assuntos
Cirurgia Geral , Internato e Residência , Aplicativos Móveis , Competência Clínica , Retroalimentação , Cirurgia Geral/educação , Humanos , Projetos PilotoRESUMO
Objective: Median arcuate ligament (MAL) syndrome is a constellation of symptoms related to compression of the celiac artery trunk. Minimally invasive release of the ligament has been shown to improve these symptoms. This study describes one institution's experience with this procedure and reports on outcomes of minimally invasive release and patient quality of life. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent minimally invasive release of the MAL at our institution. Patients were mailed a survey consisting of the 36-Item Short Form and Visick questionnaires. If surveys were not returned after one month, patients were called and asked to complete them over the phone. Demographic and pre- and postoperative data were collected and analyzed. Results: Eleven patients underwent a laparoscopic MAL release from January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2020. Most patients, 73%, reported epigastric pain as their primary symptom for a median of 18 months. All cases were successfully completed laparoscopically, with only one intraoperative complication. Mean hospital length of stay was 1.4 d. At the time of survey completion, the mean weight change was 2.3 kg. Additional interventions for resolution of symptoms and celiac artery stenosis were required for two patients. Surveys were completed by eight patients. A mean Visick score of 1.8 showed resolution or improved symptoms for all patients. SF-36 scores were highest for physical functioning, emotional well-being, and social functioning health areas. Conclusions: Minimally invasive release of the MAL is a safe and effective surgery for patients suffering from MALS. Symptoms improved after adequate release of the ligament, with minimal morbidity and additional postoperative procedures needed.
Assuntos
Síndrome do Ligamento Arqueado Mediano , Humanos , Síndrome do Ligamento Arqueado Mediano/cirurgia , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Artéria Celíaca/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente InvasivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: More patients are turning to the internet for their health information than ever before. This is a growing problem as it is well recognized that medical information on the internet is highly variable. We assessed the quality of information on the internet regarding the anti-reflux procedure, Nissen Fundoplication. Three commonly used measures of website quality are the Health On the Net code, the Journal of the American Medical Association Benchmark criteria, and the DISCERN tool. The HON code is a seal of approval awarded by an independent organization where the JAMA Benchmark and DISCERN Tool are a set of standards that can be utilized by an internet user or webpage creator. METHODS: We performed a Google search using the term "Nissen Fundoplication", where we analyzed the top 75 websites. We included English language websites and excluded advertisements, websites for medical professionals, duplicates, and requiring a login. Each website included was evaluated for presence of the HON seal and scored with the JAMA Benchmark and DISCERN criteria to determine quality. RESULTS: Only 16.28% of websites were found to be HON code certified. The average JAMA benchmark score was 1.23, with 9.3% websites scoring the maximum 4 points and 39.53% receiving a score of 0. The average DISCERN score was 34.65 out of a total possible score of 75, where the mean score for the overall quality of the website (question 16) was 2.19 out of a maximal score of 5. CONCLUSION: This study, using 3 commonly used validated measures, has found that the quality of online information pertaining to Nissen Fundoplication is sorely lacking. The implications of these results are twofold as an important reference for institutions to update their source material and a guide when providing patients with adequate resources.
Assuntos
Informação de Saúde ao Consumidor , Fundoplicatura , Benchmarking , Humanos , InternetRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) is one of the more recently established surgical fellowships, with many candidates applying due to a perception of inadequate exposure to advanced MIS during residency. The desire for advanced training should be reflected in increased competitiveness for fellowship positions. The aim of this study is to determine the desirability of MIS fellowships over time through review of national application data. METHODS: We reviewed the fellowship match statistics obtained from The Fellowship Council, the organizing body behind the MIS fellowship match. Data from January 1, 2008 - December 31, 2019 were included. We compared match rates to other specialties using the National Resident Matching Program, a nonprofit organization established for US residency and some fellowship programs. RESULTS: In the period of 2008 to 2019, the number of certified MIS fellowship programs increased from 124 to 141. While this program expansion was associated with a 19% increase in available positions, the number of applications increased 36%. As a result, the number of positions filled increased from 83% to 97%, but the match rate among US applicants fell from 82% to 71% during this interval. In comparison, the match rates for pediatric surgery, surgical oncology, vascular surgery, and surgical critical care fellowships remained largely unchanged, most recently 50%, 56%, 99%, and 100% respectively. CONCLUSION: Over the last decade, US residents have shown an increased interest in pursuing MIS fellowship positions. As a consequence, the match process for MIS fellowships is becoming increasingly competitive.
Assuntos
Bolsas de Estudo/tendências , Internato e Residência/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/educação , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/educaçãoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Frequently, a residency program's website is the first interaction students interested in surgery have with the program. In the setting of virtual interviews for residency in 2020, the online availability of program information is of heightened importance. We sought to assess how academic versus community-based general surgery residency programs compared with respect to certain details on their websites. METHODS: A total of nâ¯=â¯268 surgery residency programs were investigated. Our database of website characteristics included: direct link to residency website from the American Council on Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) program page, resident research requirement, listing of residents' publications, availability of residents' demographic information, program alumni information, board pass rates, attrition rate, detail of educational/academic activities, residents' evaluation methods, diversity, and mentorship. Inter-group analyses between academic and community-based programs were performed using Pearson's Chi-squared test. RESULTS: Academic and community-based general surgery residency program websites were compared based on twelve (12) different parameters. Statistically significant differences were observed for eight of these comparisons: direct website access from ACGME (pâ¯=â¯0.007), research highlighted (p < 0.001), resident research requirement (pâ¯=â¯0.002), resident demographic information available (p=0.004), alumni information (pâ¯=â¯0.005), resident evaluation methods (pâ¯=â¯0.016), diversity (p < 0.001), and mentorship (pâ¯=â¯0.012). Across these domains, academic programs had more information available on their websites than the community programs did. The program websites did not differ significantly based on the frequency of mentioning resident publications, board pass rate, attrition rate, or resident education. CONCLUSION: Many general surgery programs are lacking detailed information on their websites. The amount of website information available on general surgery residency programs differs when comparing academic and community-based programs.
Assuntos
Internet , Internato e Residência , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Humanos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In 2017, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education program guidelines changed to include a section that requires programs to optimize resident and faculty member well-being. There is still a poor understanding of general surgery resident wellness, and there are few well-established wellness programs. METHODS: We created a novel 50-question anonymous survey to assess burnout, depression, and wellness that was distributed to the general surgery residents as part of a pilot study. Univariate analysis was performed to assess wellness and wellness changes. Bivariate analysis was performed to determine the association between wellness variables and gender, age, and postgraduate year (PGY) level. RESULTS: Thirty-five of 55 residents participated in the survey. Over half of the residents (54%) reported gaining weight during residency. Nearly 70% reported working while having an ongoing family issue, and 77% worked at least once while ill. Fourteen residents (40%) reported that their wellness worsened over the previous academic year, while 7 (20%) reported that it remained the same, and 11 (31%) reported that it improved. These changes varied significantly by the PGY level (P < .01). Age (younger vs older than 30) and sex were found to be effective measure modifiers of the association between wellness change and PGY level. DISCUSSION: The overall wellness of the general surgery residents at our institution varies greatly. Poor wellness may lead to inferior patient care, burnout and depression, and negative resident morale. Residency programs need to implement programming to address wellness deficiencies.
Assuntos
Cirurgia Geral/educação , Nível de Saúde , Internato e Residência , Cirurgiões/psicologia , Adulto , Baltimore , Esgotamento Profissional , Depressão , Exercício Físico , Relações Familiares , Feminino , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Apoio Social , Cirurgiões/educação , Aumento de PesoRESUMO
The United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 was recently made pass/fail. This decision was controversial largely because of the reliance on USMLE Step 1 scores in resident selection. However, these scores do not correlate with resident ability. In this manuscript, we consider if the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) should be pass/fail as well. The ABSITE has been used for "high-stakes" purposes, such as preliminary resident advancement and prospective fellow evaluation, for which it was not intended. Moreover, similar to the USMLE Step 1 exam, ABSITE scores have demonstrated no correlation with clinical ability. A pass/fail ABSITE would return the exam to its original purpose and minimize an over-reliance on scores. Moving forward, new objective measures will need to be developed to assess surgical trainees in a more holistic manner.
Assuntos
Internato e Residência , Competência Clínica , Avaliação Educacional , Estudos Prospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Gastrointestinal injury is a common adverse event associated with use of sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS), tradename Kayexalate. Risk factors for SPS-mediated gastrointestinal necrosis include chronic kidney disease, solid organ transplant recipiency and recent surgery. This report presents a patient with past medical history significant for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) complicated by graft versus host disease (GvHD) and Clostridium difficile colitis who initially presented with small bowel obstruction. She was taken to the operating room and her small bowel pathology was significant for transmural necrosis with SPS crystals in the granulation tissue, despite last receiving SPS over a year ago. Previous mucosal damage should be considered as a risk factor for SPS-mediated injury and the effects of this medication may occur longer than previously thought.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery remains underutilized at a national scale, and insurance company reimbursement is an important determinant of access to these procedures. We examined the current state of coverage criteria for bariatric surgery set by private insurance companies. METHODS: We surveyed medical policies of the 64 highest market share health insurance providers in the USA. ASMBS guidelines and the CMS criteria for pre-bariatric evaluation were used to collect private insurer coverage criteria, which included procedures covered, age, BMI, co-morbidities, medical weight management program (MWM), psychosocial evaluation, and a center of excellence designation. We derive a comprehensive checklist for pre-bariatric patient evaluation. RESULTS: Sixty-one companies (95%) had defined pre-authorization policies. All policies covered the RYGB, and 57 (93%) covered the LAGB or the SG. Procedures had coverage limited to center of excellence in 43% of policies (n = 26). A total of 92% required a BMI of 40 or above or of 35 or above with a co-morbidity; however, 43% (n = 23) of policies covering adolescents (n = 36) had a higher BMI requirement of 40 or above with a co-morbidity. Additional evaluation was required in the majority of policies (MWM 87%, psychosocial evaluation 75%). Revision procedures were covered in 79% (n = 48) of policies. Reimbursement of a second bariatric procedure for failure of weight loss was less frequently found (n = 41, 67%). CONCLUSIONS: A majority of private insurers still require a supervised medical weight management program prior to approval, and most will not cover adolescent bariatric surgery unless certain criteria, which are not supported by current evidence, are met.
Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica/economia , Cobertura do Seguro , Seguro Saúde , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Cirurgia Bariátrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Comorbidade , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Política de Saúde/economia , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro/economia , Cobertura do Seguro/organização & administração , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/economia , Seguro Saúde/organização & administração , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Programas Obrigatórios/economia , Programas Obrigatórios/organização & administração , Programas Obrigatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade Mórbida/economia , Obesidade Mórbida/epidemiologia , Obesidade Infantil/economia , Obesidade Infantil/epidemiologia , Obesidade Infantil/cirurgia , Reoperação/economia , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Redução de Peso , Programas de Redução de Peso/economia , Programas de Redução de Peso/organização & administração , Programas de Redução de Peso/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) is an important predictor of passing the Qualifying Examination and a determinant of fellowship competitiveness. OBJECTION: Study the impact of providing program-wide access to a commercially available question bank for ABSITE preparation. STUDY DESIGN: The surgery residency program purchased access to the TrueLearn question bank in 2018 A paired sample t test analysis compared the 2018 ABSITE percentage and percentile scores, prior to practice question bank access to 2019 ABSITE percentile scores. A simple linear regression analysis was calculated to predict improvement in percentage scores from 2018 to 2019 based on total number of practice questions as well as number of correct practice questions completed. Data were analyzed using SPSS. RESULTS: Among the residents utilizing practice questions with serial exam scores, the individual resident ABSITE percentage of correct questions showed a statistically significant improvement after introduction of the question bank from 2018 (meanâ¯=â¯68.7, standard deviationâ¯=â¯7.3) to 2019 (meanâ¯=â¯72.2, standard deviationâ¯=â¯7.2; t(35)â¯=â¯-4.529, p < 0.001). A statistically significant regression equation both linear (F(1,33)â¯=â¯6.274, pâ¯=â¯0.017) and logarithmic (F(1,33)â¯=â¯7.405, p =0.01) was found with an R2 of 0.160 and 0.183, respectively, for total number of practice questions completed, signifying that more completed practice questions correlated with a higher improvement in ABSITE percentage score. The improvement in residents' ABSITE percentage score increased by 3 ± 1 percentage point for each 100 practice questions completed from 2018 to 2019 (Figure 1). A significant regression equation was also found for improvement in percentage score among all residents (F (1,33)â¯=â¯8.211, pâ¯=â¯0.007) with an R2 of 0.199 for the number of correct practice questions completed. CONCLUSION: Use of a commercial question bank improved overall ABSITE scores. More questions answered translated into improved performance. Percent correct on the practice questions also correlated strongly with performance. Programs seeking to improve scores may wish to provide access to a question bank.
Assuntos
Cirurgia Geral , Internato e Residência , Competência Clínica , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Avaliação Educacional , Cirurgia Geral/educação , Humanos , Conselhos de Especialidade Profissional , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The expansion of Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) has been exponential since the introduction of laparoscopic surgery in the late 1980s. This shift in operative technique has led many to believe that surgery residents are not developing the skills needed to adequately perform open operations. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of the Accreditation Council for Graduating Medical Education national operative case log database of general surgery residents from January 2003 to December 2019. We compared the open vs. laparoscopic case numbers for six different operations, including cholecystectomy, appendectomy, inguinal hernia repair, colectomy, gastrectomy, and Nissen fundoplication. The Cochran-Armitage test was used to assess the linear trend in the procedures performed. RESULTS: Total average residency case volumes for the procedures studied have increased from 270 to 368 (36%) over the 16-year period with MIS steadily representing a greater proportion of these cases. From 2003 to 2018, MIS representation increased in all studied procedures: cholecystectomy (88% to 94%, p = 0.048), inguinal hernia repair (20% to 47%, p ≤ 0.001), appendectomy (38% to 93%, p ≤ 0.001), colectomy (8% to 43%, p ≤ 0.001), gastrectomy (43% to 84%, p = 0.048), and Nissen (71% to 91%, p = 0.21). CONCLUSION: While the overall operative volume has increased nationally for surgical residents, the representation of open cases has steadily declined since the advent of MIS. The experience needed in open surgery during resident training is still to be determined and may be necessary now that laparoscopy is progressively replacing open operations.
Assuntos
Internato e Residência/tendências , Laparoscopia/tendências , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/tendências , Cirurgia Geral/educação , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
The objective of this study was to assess the results of a structured remediation program for surgical residents scoring poorly on the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination®. Residents scoring below the threshold (<20th percentile) were placed in a remediation program consisting of textbook-based review and mandatory weekly quizzes overseen by the program director. The effects of the program were assessed over a five-year period (2014-2018). Of 168 tests taken, 23 (13.7%) instances of scoring below the threshold occurred (average percentile 11, range 1-19). Postremediation scores in the subsequent year improved with a median (IQR) percentile increase of 29 [23.5, 46] (P < 0.001). Two residents scored below the threshold twice; all others continued to score above the threshold. Participation in a structured remediation program results in dramatic improvement in American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination® performance, and a single occurrence of poor performance does not necessarily lead to a permanent handicap in academic performance.