Contemporary Practice Patterns in the Treatment of Cervical Stenosis and Central Cord Syndrome: A Survey of the Cervical Spine Research Society.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate for areas of consensus and divergence of opinion within the spine community regarding the management of cervical spondylotic conditions and acute traumatic central cord syndrome (ATCCS) and the influence of the patient's age, disease severity, and myelomalacia. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is ongoing disagreement regarding the indications for, and urgency of, operative intervention in patients with mild degenerative myelopathy, moderate to severe radiculopathy, isolated axial symptomatology with evidence of spinal cord compression, and ATCCS without myelomalacia. METHODS: A survey request was sent to 330 attendees of the Cervical Spine Research Society (CSRS) 2021 Annual Meeting to assess practice patterns regarding the treatment of cervical stenosis, myelopathy, radiculopathy, and ATCCS in 16 unique clinical vignettes with associated MRIs. Operative versus nonoperative treatment consensus was defined by a management option selected by >80% of survey participants. RESULTS: Overall, 116 meeting attendees completed the survey. Consensus supported nonoperative management for elderly patients with axial neck pain and adults with axial neck pain without myelomalacia. Operative management was indicated for adult patients with mild myelopathy and myelomalacia, adult patients with severe radiculopathy, elderly patients with severe radiculopathy and myelomalacia, and elderly ATCCS patients with pre-existing myelopathic symptoms. Treatment discrepancy in favor of nonoperative management was found for adult patients with isolated axial symptomatology and myelomalacia. Treatment discrepancy favored operative management for elderly patients with mild myelopathy, adult patients with mild myelopathy without myelomalacia, elderly patients with severe radiculopathy without myelomalacia, and elderly ATCCS patients without preceding symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is uncertainty regarding the treatment of mild myelopathy, operative intervention was favored for nonelderly patients with evidence of myelomalacia or radiculopathy and for elderly patients with ATCCS, especially if pre-injury myelopathic symptoms were present. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

Is Severe Neck Pain a Contraindication to Performing Laminoplasty in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy?

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the surgical outcomes in a cohort of patients with severe preoperative axial neck pain undergoing laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: No study has investigated whether patients with severe axial symptoms may achieve satisfactory neck pain and disability outcomes after laminoplasty. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 91 patients undergoing C4-6 laminoplasty for CSM at a single academic institution between 2010 and 2021. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including Neck Disability Index (NDI), visual analog scale (VAS) Neck, and VAS Arm, were recorded preoperatively and at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. Patients were stratified as having mild pain if VAS neck was 0-3, moderate pain if 4-6, and severe pain if 7-10. PROMs were then compared between subgroups at all the perioperative time points. RESULTS: Both the moderate and severe neck pain subgroups demonstrated a substantial improvement in VAS neck from preoperative to 6 months postoperatively (-3.1±2.2 vs. -5.6±2.8, respectively; P <0.001), and these improvements were maintained at 1 year postoperatively. There was no difference in VAS neck between subgroups at either the 6-month or 1-year postoperative time points. Despite the substantially higher mean NDI in the moderate and severe neck pain subgroups preoperatively, there was no difference in NDI at 6 months or 1 year postoperatively ( P =0.99). There were no differences between subgroups in the degree of cord compression, severity of multifidus sarcopenia, sagittal alignment, or complications. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with moderate and severe preoperative neck pain undergoing laminoplasty achieved equivalent PROMs at 6 months and 1 year as patients with mild preoperative neck pain. The results of this study highlight the multifactorial nature of neck pain in these patients and indicate that severe axial symptoms are not an absolute contraindication to performing laminoplasty in well-aligned patients with CSM.

Paraspinal Sarcopenia is Associated With Worse Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Laminoplasty for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The present study is the first to assess the impact of paraspinal sarcopenia on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following cervical laminoplasty. BACKGROUND: While the impact of sarcopenia on PROMs following lumbar spine surgery is well-established, the impact of sarcopenia on PROMs following laminoplasty has not been investigated. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing laminoplasty from C4-6 at a single institution between 2010 and 2021. Two independent reviewers utilized axial cuts of T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging sequences to assess fatty infiltration of the bilateral transversospinales muscle group at the C5-6 level and classify patients according to the Fuchs Modification of the Goutalier grading system. PROMs were then compared between subgroups. RESULTS: We identified 114 patients for inclusion in this study, including 35 patients with mild sarcopenia, 49 patients with moderate sarcopenia, and 30 patients with severe sarcopenia. There were no differences in preoperative PROMs between subgroups. Mean postoperative neck disability index scores were lower in the mild and moderate sarcopenia subgroups (6.2 and 9.1, respectively) than in the severe sarcopenia subgroup (12.9, P =0.01). Patients with mild sarcopenia were nearly twice as likely to achieve minimal clinically important difference (88.6 vs. 53.5%; P <0.001) and six times as likely to achieve SCB (82.9 vs. 13.3%; P =0.006) compared with patients with severe sarcopenia. A higher percentage of patients with severe sarcopenia reported postoperative worsening of their neck disability index (13 patients, 43.3%; P =0.002) and Visual Analog Scale Arm scores (10 patients, 33.3%; P =0.03). CONCLUSION: Patients with severe paraspinal sarcopenia demonstrate less improvement in neck disability and pain postoperatively and are more likely to report worsening PROMs following laminoplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Incidental Durotomy Is Associated With Increased Risk of Delirium in Patients Aged 65 and Older.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of incidental durotomy during spine surgery on the development of delirium in patients aged 65 and older. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Delirium after spine surgery has been shown to increase the risk of adverse events, including morbidity and readmissions. Durotomy has previously been postulated to influence the risk of delirium, but this has not been explored in patients 65 and older, the demographic at greatest risk of developing delirium. METHODS: We obtained clinical data on 766 patients, including 182 with incidental durotomy, from the Partners healthcare registry (2012-2019). Patients had their medical records abstracted and age, biologic sex, body mass index, smoking status, preoperative diagnosis, use of a fusion-based procedure, and number of comorbidities were recorded. Our primary outcome was the development of delirium. Our primary predictor was incidental durotomy. We used logistic regression techniques to adjust for sociodemographic and clinical confounders. We performed propensity score matching as a sensitivity test. We hypothesized that elderly patients would be at increased risk of delirium following durotomy. RESULTS: Delirium was identified in 142 patients (19%). Among patients with an incidental durotomy, 26% were diagnosed with delirium. The incidence of delirium was 16% in the control group. Following adjusted analysis, the likelihood of delirium was significantly greater in patients with a durotomy (odds ratio [OR] 1.91; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27, 2.88). After propensity score matching, durotomy remained significantly associated with delirium in multivariable adjusted analyses (OR 1.90; 95% CI 1.07, 3.39). CONCLUSION: This investigation is among the first to specifically evaluate an association between durotomy and delirium in elderly patients undergoing spine surgery. The increased association between durotomy and delirium in this cohort should prompt increased surveillance and interventions designed to minimize the potential for cognitive deterioration or impairment during postoperative management of a durotomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Antegrade Versus Retrograde Technique for Fixation of Scaphoid Waist Fractures: A Comparison of Screw Placement.

Background Scaphoid waist fractures are often treated using headless compression screws using dorsal or volar approaches. Objectives The purpose of this study is to compare differences in screw position using a volar (retrograde) or dorsal (antegrade) approach. Patients and Methods A total of 82 patients were retrospectively evaluated: 41 treated with a volar and 41 with a dorsal approach were selected. Postoperative radiographs were reviewed by three observers who rated screw location in the proximal pole, waist, and distal pole. Results Thirty-four patients (83%) in the antegrade group had central screw placement in the waist of the scaphoid in posteroanterior and lateral planes compared with 14 (34.9%) in the retrograde group ( p < 0.05). For the antegrade group, the screw was central in 217 of 246 zones (88.2%) compared with 127 of 246 (51.6%) in the retrograde group ( p < 0.05). Conclusions The dorsal antegrade approach appears to allow the surgeon to achieve central screw placement along all three scaphoid regions. Level of Evidence This is Level III study.

Natural language processing for automated detection of incidental durotomy.

BACKGROUND: Incidental durotomy is a common intraoperative complication during spine surgery with potential implications for postoperative recovery, patient-reported outcomes, length of stay, and costs. To our knowledge, there are no processes available for automated surveillance of incidental durotomy. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop natural language processing (NLP) algorithms for automated detection of incidental durotomies in free-text operative notes of patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. PATIENT SAMPLE: Adult patients 18 years or older undergoing lumbar spine surgery between January 1, 2000 and June 31, 2018 at two academic and three community medical centers. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was defined as intraoperative durotomy recorded in free-text operative notes. METHODS: An 80:20 stratified split was undertaken to create training and testing populations. An extreme gradient-boosting NLP algorithm was developed to detect incidental durotomy. Discrimination was assessed via area under receiver-operating curve (AUC-ROC), precision-recall curve, and Brier score. Performance of this algorithm was compared with current procedural terminology (CPT) and international classification of diseases (ICD) codes for durotomy. RESULTS: Overall, 1,000 patients were included in the study and 93 (9.3%) had a recorded incidental durotomy in the free-text operative report. In the independent testing set (n=200) not used for model development, the NLP algorithm achieved AUC-ROC of 0.99 for detection of durotomy. In comparison, the CPT/ICD codes had AUC-ROC of 0.64. In the testing set, the NLP algorithm detected 16 of 18 patients with incidental durotomy (sensitivity 0.89) whereas the CPT and ICD codes detected 5 of 18 (sensitivity 0.28). At a threshold of 0.05, the NLP algorithm had specificity of 0.99, positive predictive value of 0.89, and negative predictive value of 0.99. CONCLUSIONS: Internal validation of the NLP algorithm developed in this study indicates promising results for future NLP applications in spine surgery. Pending external validation, the NLP algorithm developed in this study may be used by entities including national spine registries or hospital quality and safety departments to automate tracking of incidental durotomies.

Early post-operative opioid consumption: A comparison between medial unicompartmental, patellofemoral, and total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: While there is emerging literature describing the use of narcotics for post-operative pain control following TKA, little data is available regarding narcotic use in partial knee replacements. The aim of this study is to compare the early post-operative narcotic requirements after medial compartmental arthroplasty (UKA) and patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) with that of TKA. METHODS: In this retrospective chart review, we identified 37 patients who underwent PFA and 71 patients who underwent UKA. We identified a cohort of TKA patients who were matched to the unicompartmental group based on sex and age (n = 108). The primary outcome measure was self-reported use of opioids for pain management at the first post-operative clinic visit. Opioid use between groups was compared using Chi-square analysis. RESULTS: The PFA group was younger (p < 0.001) and consisted of more females (p < 0.001) than the UKA group. The UKA cohort had more non-smoking patients (p = 0.044) compared to the PFA cohort. Self-reported opioid use at the first post-operative visit differed between the three groups of patients (p < 0.001). A greater proportion of both PFA (38% vs. 11%; p < 0.001) and TKA (41% vs. 11%; p = 0.01) patients reported opioid use when compared to UKA patients. No differences in opioid use existed between TKA and PFA groups (p = 0.61). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of PFA patients who report opioid use at the first post-operative visit is similar to that for patients following TKA, suggesting that pain management protocols for this specific subset of partial knee arthroplasty patients should be structured similar to TKA patients and separate from UKA patients.

Core Concepts: Orthopedic Intern Curriculum Boot Camp.

Orthopedic surgical interns must gain a broad array of clinical skills in a short time. However, recent changes in health care have limited resident-patient exposures. With the reported success of simulation training in the surgical literature, the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) and Residency Review Committee for Orthopaedic Surgery have required that surgical simulation training be a component of the intern curricula in orthopedic surgical residencies. This study examined the short-term effectiveness of an orthopedic "intern boot camp" covering 7 of 17 simulation training concept modules published by the ABOS. Eight orthopedic post-graduate year 1 (PGY-1) residents (study group) completed a structured 3-month curriculum and were compared with 7 post-graduate year 2 (PGY-2) residents (comparison group) who had just completed their orthopedic surgical internship. Seven core skills were assessed using both task-specific and global rating scales. The PGY-1 residents demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in all 7 modules with respect to their task-specific pre-test scores: sterile technique (P=.001), wound closure (P<.001), knot tying (P=.017), casting and splinting (P<.001), arthrocentesis (P=.01), basics of internal fixation (P<.001), and compartment syndrome evaluation (P=.004). After the camp, PGY-1 and -2 scores in task-specific measures were not significantly different. A 3-month simulation-based boot camp instituted early in orthopedic internship elevated a variety of clinical skills to levels exhibited by PGY-2 residents.