Heterogeneous Uptake of 68 Ga-DOTATATE and 18 F-FDG in Initial Diagnosed Neuroendocrine Tumors Patients : Which Patients Are Suitable for Dual-Tracer PET Imaging?

PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess the uptake heterogeneity in neuroendocrine tumor (NET) patients at initial diagnosis with dual-tracer PET imaging and the staging changes and prognostic value it brings to explore the indication of the use of dual-tracer PET. METHODS: Fifty-one newly diagnosed patients with pathologically confirmed NET who underwent 18 F-FDG and 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET imaging between January 2020 and September 2022 were enrolled. Dual-tracer uptake patterns were classified into 3 groups: A. 68 Ga-DOTATATE positive and 18 F-FDG negative, B. 68 Ga-DOTATATE positive and 18 F-FDG positive, and C. 68 Ga-DOTATATE negative and 18 F-FDG positive. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the heterogeneity of dual-tracer uptake patterns among different grading (G) groups, between primary and metastatic lesions, and staging changes. Moreover, dual-tracer uptake patterns, grade, age, sex, and stage were compared with progression-free survival (PFS) by Cox regression. RESULTS: In the different G groups, none of the patients with dual-tracer uptake pattern A had grade 3 histology, but 57% of patients with grade 1 disease had FDG avidity (25% of them resulting in dual-tracer uptake pattern C). Patients with no metastasis were well differentiated, but one of them presented with dual-tracer uptake pattern C. Different uptake patterns were also observed between primary and metastatic lesions, particularly 44% of patients with dual-tracer uptake pattern A of primary with FDG avidity of metastases. Moreover, 9 (17.6%) had new lesions detected by additional 18 F-FDG PET imaging, and 3 of them (5.9%) had clinical stage changed accordingly. The Cox regression test showed that the dual-tracer uptake patterns were significantly correlated with PFS by univariate and multivariate analyses ( P = 0.026 and 0.039, respectively), whereas the grade and stage did not correlate with survival (all P >0.05). CONCLUSION: The current study has proven the uptake heterogeneity of the NET at initial diagnosis and demonstrated the staging and prognostic value of dual-tracer PET imaging. Our preliminary results have confirmed the importance of dual-tracer imaging modalities and concluded that dual-tracer PET imaging could be considered as prognostic tool for all patients with an initial diagnosis of NET.

Prognostic role and predictors of lymph node involvement in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

PURPOSE: To define the prognostic role of lymph node involvement (LNI) in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) and identify predictors of LNI using a comprehensive multifactor analysis focusing on preoperative radiological features. METHODS: This study included 236 patients with preoperative computed tomography who underwent radical surgical resection of PNETs at our hospital between 2009 and 2019. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the risk factors associated with LNI and tumor recurrence. The disease-free survival (DFS) rates with and without LNI were compared. RESULTS: Forty-four of the 236 patients (18.6%) had LNI. Biliopancreatic duct dilatation (odds ratio [OR], 2.295; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.046-5.035; p = 0.038), tumor margin (OR, 2.189; 95% CI, 1.034-4.632; p = 0.041), and WHO grade (G2: OR, 2.923; 95% CI, 1.005-8.507; p = 0.049; G3: OR, 12.067; 95% CI, 3.057-47.629; p < 0.001) were independent risk factors of LNI in PNETs. Multivariable analysis showed that LNI (OR, 2.728; 95% CI, 1.070-6.954; p = 0.036), G3 (OR, 4.894; 95% CI, 1.047-22.866; p = 0.044), and biliopancreatic duct dilatation (OR, 2.895; 95% CI, 1.124-7.458; p = 0.028) were associated with PNET recurrence in patients after surgery. Patients with LNI had a significantly worse DFS than those without LNI (3-year DFS: 85.9 vs. 96.7%; p < 0.001; 5-year DFS: 65.1 vs. 93.9%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: LNI was associated with decreased DFS. Biliopancreatic duct dilatation, irregular tumor margins, and grades G2 and G3 were independent risk factors for LNI.

The differential effects of sarcopenia and cachexia on overall survival for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients following pancreatectomy: A retrospective study based on a large population.

OBJECTIVES: Both cachexia and sarcopenia have been considered adverse predictors for prognosis in patients with pancreatic cancer; although sarcopenia and cachexia share some similarities, they are still defined as distinct nutritional conditions. We aimed to explore the differential impacts of sarcopenia and cachexia on prognosis for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients following radical excision. METHODS: From January 2015 to May 2022, 614 patients undergoing surgery for PDAC were retrospectively included. Sarcopenia was defined as the L3 total skeletal muscle index below 52.4 cm2 /m2 (men) and 38.5 cm2 /m2 (women). Cachexia was classified according to the following criteria: involuntary weight loss >5% over the past 6 months, or weight loss >2% and BMI <20 kg/m2 , or weight loss >2% and sarcopenia. RESULTS: Of the 614 patients included in the analysis, 62% and 48% were diagnosed with sarcopenia and cachexia, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that sarcopenia and/or cachexia were significantly associated with worse overall survival (OS) rather than worse recurrence-free survival (RFS). Moreover, Cox regression analysis revealed that cachexia rather than sarcopenia was an adverse factor for OS in all PDAC patients. For poorly differentiated PDAC, both cachexia and sarcopenia were significantly associated with shorter OS. However, for moderately/well-differentiated PADC, cachexia was an independent factor for adverse OS, but not sarcopenia. CONCLUSIONS: Sarcopenia and cachexia have different effects on OS for PDAC patients undergoing radical excision. This difference may provide some important information for preoperative management.

Clinicopathological features and long-term prognosis of purely cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are heterogenous neoplasms, of which the prognosis varies widely. Purely cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (C-pNETs) are a small subset of pNETs in which data are extremely rare. This study aimed to compare clinicopathological and long-term survival differences between C-pNETs and solid pNETs (S-pNETs). METHODS: A retrospective review of 242 patients with pNETs underwent resection in our institution from 2009 to 2019 was conducted. Demography characteristics, clinicopathological features and long-term outcomes of them were analyzed. RESULTS: Sixteen out of 242 patients (6.6%) were identified as C-pNETs. Compared with S-pNETs, C-pNETs were more frequently non-functional (75% vs 45%, P = 0.02), and the median tumor diameter of C-pNETs was smaller (36 mm vs. 47 mm, P = 0.001). And the accuracy of preoperative diagnosis of C-pNETs was significantly lower (31% vs 78%, P = 0.001). Of note, the majority of C-pNETs were well-differentiated with G1 (81% vs 35%, P = 0.001). And there were no G3 (0 vs 7%, P = 0.001) in C-pNETs. No T4 stage or R1/R2 surgical margin detected in C-pNETs. And only one C-pNETs (6%) had regional lymph node metastasis (N) or synchronous distant metastasis (M). Additionally, only one patient with C-pNETs (6%) suffered tumor recurrence, compared with 24 (13%) for S-pNETs. And survival analysis showed the patients with C-pNETs seemed to be with better disease-free survival (P = 0.26). CONCLUSION: C-pNETs are rare subtype with possibly less aggressive behavior comparing with their solid counterparts. Recurrence and tumor-related death still occurs in patients with resected C-pNETs, although they tend to be with more favorable prognosis.

Development and Validation of a Novel Radiomics-Based Nomogram With Machine Learning to Preoperatively Predict Histologic Grade in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Backgroud: Tumor grade is the determinant of the biological aggressiveness of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) and the best current tool to help establish individualized therapeutic strategies. A noninvasive way to accurately predict the histology grade of PNETs preoperatively is urgently needed and extremely limited. Methods: The models training and the construction of the radiomic signature were carried out separately in three-phase (plain, arterial, and venous) CT. Mann-Whitney U test and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) were applied for feature preselection and radiomic signature construction. SVM-linear models were trained by incorporating the radiomic signature with clinical characteristics. An optimal model was then chosen to build a nomogram. Results: A total of 139 PNETs (including 83 in the training set and 56 in the independent validation set) were included in the present study. We build a model based on an eight-feature radiomic signature (group 1) to stratify PNET patients into grades 1 and 2/3 groups with an AUC of 0.911 (95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.908-0.914) and 0.837 (95% CI, 0.827-0.847) in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. The nomogram combining the radiomic signature of plain-phase CT with T stage and dilated main pancreatic duct (MPD)/bile duct (BD) (group 2) showed the best performance (training set: AUC = 0.919, 95% CI = 0.916-0.922; validation set: AUC = 0.875, 95% CI = 0.867-0.883). Conclusions: Our developed nomogram that integrates radiomic signature with clinical characteristics could be useful in predicting grades 1 and 2/3 PNETs preoperatively with powerful capability.

The Role of Primary Tumor Resection in Patients With Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors With Liver Metastases.

Background: Liver metastases (LMs) are common in advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET) patients. Currently, the benefit of primary tumor resection (PTR) in the setting of PNET patients with liver metastases is still controversial in several guidelines. Methods: Data were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database to evaluate this issue. The main index of interest in our study was overall survival time. Results: Information on 536 PNET patients with liver metastases from the SEER database was identified. A total of 214 patients (PTR group) received primary tumor resection, and more than half of them (132 patients) had synchronous LM resection. The other 322 PNET patients (non-PTR group) with liver metastases did not receive primary tumor resection. A significant survival benefit was gained from PTR when compared with non-PTR patients, both in OS (72.93 ± 2.7 vs. 36.80 ± 2.22 months) and 3- or 5-year survival rates (75.1% vs. 28.9% and 67.9% vs. 22.3%, respectively). No difference was found between PTR alone and PTR with synchronous LM resection. From univariate and multivariate analyses, younger age (<65 years) and good or moderate tumor differentiation may be more important when considering primary tumor resection. However, we found that all grades of tumor differentiation could result in a better overall survival time after primary tumor resection. Conclusion: Our study suggested that primary tumor resection in pancreatic neuroendocrine patients with liver metastases could result in a longer survival time. Primary tumor resection with synchronous liver metastasis resection was not related to a better survival benefit. This treatment strategy may routinely be taken into consideration in these patients.

Which Surgeries Are the Best Choice for Chronic Pancreatitis: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Surgery is an effective choice for the treatment of chronic pancreatitis (CP). However, there is no clear consensus regarding the best choice among the surgical procedures. The aim of this study is to conduct a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing treatment outcomes to provide high-quality evidences regarding which is the best surgery for CP. METHODS: A systematic search of the PubMed (MEDLINE), SCIE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and CDSR databases were performed to identify studies comparing surgeries for CP from the beginning of the databases to May 2020. Pain relief and mortality were the primary outcomes of interest. RESULTS: Ten studies including a total of 680 patients were identified for inclusion. PPPD had a better postoperative short-term pain relief and quality of life (QOL), but a worse pancreatic exocrine function deficiency and high morbidity. Berne had a significant postoperative long-term pain relief and mortality with a lower risk of pancreatic exocrine function deficiency. CONCLUSION: The main surgical procedures including the PPPD, Beger procedure, Frey modification and Berne modification can efficaciously treat CP. The Berne modification may be first choice with better efficacy and less complications in pancreatic function, but the impact of postoperative QOL cannot be ignored. Furthermore, when the CP patients have a mass in the pancreatic head which cannot be distinguished from pancreatic cancer, the only legitimate choice should be PPPD or classical pancreaticoduodenectomy.

A comprehensive validation of the novel 8th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual for the long-term survivals of patients with non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Histologically, the World Health Organization has classified pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (p-NENs) into well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (G1/G2 p-NETs) and poorly-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (G3 p-NECs) based on tumor mitotic counts and Ki-67 index. Recently, the 8th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging manual has incorporated some major changes in 2017 that the TNM staging system for p-NENs should only be applied to well-differentiated G1/G2 p-NETs, while poorly-differentiated G3 p-NECs be classified according to the new system for pancreatic exocrine adenocarcinomas. However, this new manual for p-NENs has seldom been evaluated.Data of patients with both G1/G2 and G3 non-functional p-NENs (NF-p-NENs) from our institution was retrospectively collected and analyzed using 2 new AJCC 8th staging systems. We also made survival comparisons between the 8th and 7th edition system separately for different subgroups.For G1/G2 NF-p-NETs, there were 52 patients classified in AJCC 8th edition stage I, 40 in stage II, 41 in stage III and 19 in stage IV. As for G3 NF-p-NECs, 17, 19, 24, and 18 patients were respectively defined from AJCC 8th edition stage I to stage IV. In terms of the AJCC 7th staging system, the 230 patients with NF-p-NENs were totally distributed from stage I to stage IV (94, 63, 36, 37, respectively). For the survival analysis of both G1/G2 NF-p-NETs and G3 NF-p-NECs, the AJCC 7th edition system failed to discriminate the survival differences when compared stage III with stage II or stage IV (P > .05), while the 8th edition ones could perfectly allocate patients into 4 statistically different groups (P < .05). The HCIs of AJCC 8th stage for G1/G2 NF-p-NETs [HCI=0.658, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.602-0.741] and stage for G3 NF-p-NECs (HCI=0.704, 95% CI=0.595-0.813) was both statistically larger than those of AJCC 7th stage for different grading NF-p-NENs [(HCI=0.578, 95% CI=0.557-0.649; P=.031), (HCI=0.546, 95% CI=0.531-0.636; P = .019); respectively], indicating a more accurate predictive ability for the survivals of NF-p-NENs.Our data suggested the 2 new AJCC 8th staging systems were superior to its 7th edition for patients with both G1/G2 NF-p-NETs and G3 NF-p-NECs.

Clinical Features and Long-Term Survival of Metastatic Hepatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms Secondary to Gastroenteropancreatic Site: An Analysis by Applying the Grading Classification.

METHOD: Data of patients who were surgically treated and clinicopathologically diagnosed as (MH)-NENs secondary to (GEP)-NENs at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January 2006 to December 2018 were retrospectively collected and analyzed by the grading classification for (GEP)-NENs. RESULTS: We identified 150 patients with (MH)-NENs secondary to (GEP)-NENs, including 10 patients with G1 NETs, 26 with G2 NETs, 33 with G3 NETs, and 81 with G3 NECs. There were significant differences between patients with G1/G2/G3 NETs and those with G3 NECs, such as age at diagnosis (P=0.041), synchronous liver lesion (P=0.032), incidental diagnosis (P=0.014), tumor largest diameter (P=0.047), vascular invasion (P=0.017), and extrahepatic metastatic disease (P=0.029). The estimated 3-year overall survival for patients with G1 NETs, G2 NETs, G3 NETs, and G3 NECs was 100%, 79.4%, 49.5%, and 20.7%, respectively (P < 0.001). The survival of G1 NETs or G2 NETs was significantly better than that of G3 NETs (P=0.013, P=0.037, respectively) and G3 NECs (P=0.001, P < 0.001; respectively). Patients with G3 NECs present notably worse survival than those with G3 NETs (P=0.012), while survival comparison between G1 NETs and G2 NETs was not statistically different (P=0.131). The grading classification for (GEP)-NENs was an effective independent predictor of survival for (MH)-NENs secondary to (GEP)-NENs (hazard ratio: 4.234; 95% confidence intervals: 1.984-6.763; P=0.003). CONCLUSION: Our demonstration revealed that the grading classification for (GEP)-NENs could well stratify (MH)-NENs secondary to (GEP)-NENs into prognostic groups and supported its wide use in clinical practice.

World Health Organization grading classification for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: a comprehensive analysis from a large Chinese institution.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (p-NENs) are a group of highly heterogeneous tumors with distinct clinicopathological features and long-term prognosis. In 2017, in order to better stratify patients into prognostic groups and predicting their outcomes, World Health Organization (WHO) officially updated its grading system for p-NENs which distinguished these neoplasms among Grading 1 (G1) pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (p-NETs), G2 p-NETs, G3 p-NETs and G3 pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (p-NECs). However, this new grading classification for p-NENs has not yet been rigorously validated. METHODS: Data of patients who were surgically treated and histopathologically diagnosed as p-NENs at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January 2002 to December 2018 were retrospectively collected and analyzed according the novel WHO 2017 grading classification. RESULTS: We eventually enrolled 480 eligible patients with p-NENs in our present study, in which 150 patients with WHO 2017 G1 p-NETs, 158 with G2 p-NETs, 64 with G3 p-NETs and 108 with G3 p-NECs were identified. The estimated 5-year overall survival for patients with G1 p-NETs, G2 p-NETs, G3 p-NETs and G3 p-NECs was 75.8, 58.4, 35.1 and 11.1%, with a median survival time of 85.3mons, 67.4mons, 51.3mons and 26.8mons, respectively. Patients with G2 p-NETs present notably worse survival than those with G1 p-NETs (P = 0.03). Survival of G3 p-NETs were significantly worse than that of G1 p-NETs or G2 p-NETs (P < 0.001, P = 0.023, respectively), as well as that when comparing G3 p-NECs with G1 p-NETs or G2 p-NETs (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively). Patients with G3 p-NECs showed statistically shorter survival than those with G3 p-NETs (P < 0.001). Both WHO 2017 and 2010 grading criteria could be independent predictor for the OS of p-NENs (P = 0.016, P = 0.022; respectively). The 95% confidence intervals of WHO 2017 grading classification (0.983-9.454) was slightly smaller than that of WHO 2010 criteria (0.201-13.374), indicating a relatively more accurate predicting ability for the prognosis of p-NENs. CONCLUSION: The WHO 2017 grading classification for p-NENs could successfully allocate patients into four groups with distinct clinical features and significant survival differences, which might be superior to the WHO 2010 criteria for its better prognostic stratification and more accurate predicting ability.

[Inhibition of Copper Transporter-1 by Ammonium Tetrathiocarbolybdate in the Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer].

OBJECTIVE: To examine copper transporter 1 (CTR1) expression in pancreatic carcinoma cells, orthotopic xenograft pancreatic tumor model and clinical samples, and verify the effect of copper chelating agent ammonium tetrathiomolybdate (TM) regulate the expression of CTR1 in pancreatic carcinoma cells and the inhibition of pancreatic carcinoma. METHODS: The expressions of copper transporter CTR1 and antioxidant protein 1 (ATOX1) in 22 clinical pancreatic ductal carcinoma and paracancer tissues 0.5-1 cm away from the tumor were measured by immunohistochemistry (IHC). PANC-1 cells were used to construct 5 orthotopic xenograft pancreatic tumor of nude mice models. Pancreatic cancer tissues and corresponding normal pancreatic tissues were collected, and the expressions of CTR1 and ATOX1 were detected by IHC and compared with clinical tissues. The proliferation of pancreatic carcinoma cells PANC-1 treated with 10, 30, 50, 100 µmol/L TM for 24 h, 48 h, 72 h was measured by CCK8 assay. The migration abilities of PANC-1 cells treated with 50 µmol/L TM for 24 h, 48 h were detected by scratch test. The expressions of CTR1, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and CyclinD1 proteins in PANC-1 cells treated with 10, 30, 50, 100 µmol/L TM for 48 h were measured by Western blot. Then the subcutaneous tumor-bearing model of nude mice were established with PANC-1 cells, and the growth of tumor was observed after oral administration of 0.3 mg/d and 1.0 mg/d of TM, respectively. RESULTS: The immunohistochemical results indicated that 19 of the 22 clinical pancreatic ductal cancer tissues of carcinoma patients had high expression of CTR1, and the same high expression of CTR1 was found in the orthotopic transplanted tumor tissues of PANC-1 nude mice. The proliferation inhibition of PANC-1 cells increased with the concentration of TM increased and the treatment time prolonged. The expressions of intracellular CTR1, VEGF and CyclinD1 all decreased with the concentration of TM increased. The cell migration ability decreased after the PANC-1 cells treated with TM. The tumor growth of PANC-1 tumor-bearing nude mice was inhibited after different doses of TM were delivered. The reduction in tumor volume and weight was more pronounced in the high-dose TM group (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The expression of CTR1 is abnormally elevated in pancreatic carcinoma, and treatment with copper chelating agent for this target may help to inhibit pancreatic carcinoma.

Functionality is not an independent prognostic factor for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) that produce hormones leading to symptoms are classified as functional tumors, while others are classified as nonfunctional tumors. The traditional view is that functionality is a factor that affects the prognosis of pNEN patients. However, as the sample sizes of studies have increased, researches in recent years have proposed new viewpoints. AIM: To assess whether functionality is an independent factor for predicting the prognosis of pNEN patients. METHODS: From January 2004 to December 2016, data of patients who underwent surgery at the primary site for the treatment of pNENs from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and West China Hospital database were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Contemporaneous data from the two databases were analyzed separately as two cohorts and then merged as the third cohort to create a large sample that was suitable for multivariate analysis. From the SEER database, age (P = 0.006) and T stage (P < 0.001) were independent risk factors affecting the survival. From the West China Hospital database, independent prognostic factors were age (P = 0.034), sex (P = 0.032), and grade (P = 0.039). The result of the cohort consisting of the combined populations from the two databases showed that race (P = 0.015), age (P = 0.002), sex (P = 0.032) and T stage (P < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors. In the West China Hospital database and in the total population, nonfunctional pNETs and other functional pNETs tended to have poorer prognoses than insulinoma. However, functionality was not associated with the survival time of patients with pNETs in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Functionality is not associated with prognosis. Race, age, sex, and T stage are independent factors for predicting the survival of patients with pNETs.

Predicting survival in non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours.

BACKGROUND: Owing to the limited prevalence and heterogeneity, it is difficult to predict long-term survival of non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NF-PNETs).This study aimed to evaluate the factors predicting disease-specific survival (DSS) for well-differentiated NF-PNETs. METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively from 256 patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours who underwent surgical resection between January 2009 and December at our institution. Of these, 103 NF-PNETs (40%) were identified for analysis. RESULTS: Of the 103 patients, 54 were male (52%) and the mean age was 52 years (range 21-75 years). Most patients (60/103, 58%) in our series were symptomatic. Seventeen patients (16%) died during follow-up, with a median period of 47 months. There were 88 patients with well-differentiated tumours and 10 of them (10/88, 11%) died of tumour progression. Median DSS after primary resection was 58.8 months (range 16-122 months). Multivariate analysis identified age >52 years (P = 0.038) and tumour grade G2 (P = 0.001) as statistically significant predictors of DSS. There was no association between gender, tumour size, symptoms, surgical procedure, severe complications, tumour location, tumour size, resection margin, positive lymph nodes and vascular invasion with DSS. CONCLUSION: Tumour grade, age, presence of symptoms and distant metastasis were related to poor DSS of NF-PNETs. Age >52 years and tumour grade G2 might be independent predictors of poor DSS for patients with well-differentiated NF-PNETs.

Analysis of recurrence after resection of well-differentiated non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Although pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are generally considered to have a favorable overall prognosis after resection, disease recurrence has been observed. Few studies have specifically addressed recurrence after resection of PNETs, especially for non-functioning PNETs (NF-PNETs). The aim of our study is to analyze the recurrence of resected well-differentiated NF-PNETs.Patients who underwent surgical resection for grade 1 and 2 NF-PNETs without synchronous metastasis were identified for analysis. Patients were treated from January 2009 to December 2017 in our institution. Univariate and multivariate cox regression analysis were conducted to identify prognostic factors.Of the 88 patients, 46 were men (52%) and the mean age was 52 years. With a median follow-up of 49.1 months (range, 8-122 months), there were 12 recurrences (14%). Liver was the most common recurrence site (7/12, 58%). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year recurrence-free survival was 99%, 90%, and 88%, respectively. Univariate analysis identified that age >52 years, positive lymph nodes, tumor grade 2, and Ki67 index ≥5% were statistically significant. Multivariate analysis identified that Ki67 index ≥5% (hazard ratio [HR], 4.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36-16.75, P = .015), positive lymph nodes (HR, 6.75; 95% CI, 1.73-24.43, P = .006) were independently associated with recurrence. The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 53% (95% CI, 14.20-91.81%) for patients with Ki-67 ≥5% or (and) positive lymph nodes, while 95% (95% CI, 82.26-100%) for the patients without these 2 factors.Ki67 index and lymph node status are independently associated with recurrence after resection of well-differentiated NF-PNETs in this study.

Identification of Pancreaticoduodenectomy Resection for Pancreatic Head Adenocarcinoma: A Preliminary Study of Radiomics.

BACKGROUND: In a pathological examination of pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma, a resection margin without cancer cells in 1 mm is recognized as R0; a resection margin with cancer cells in 1 mm is recognized as R1. The preoperative identification of R0 and R1 is of great significance for surgical decision and prognosis. We conducted a preliminary radiomics study based on preoperative CT (computer tomography) images to evaluate a resection margin which was R0 or R1. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 258 preoperative CT images of 86 patients (34 cases of R0 and 52 cases of R1) who were diagnosed as pancreatic head adenocarcinoma and underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. The radiomics study consists of five stages: (i) delineate and segment regions of interest (ROIs); (ii) by solving discrete Laplacian equations with Dirichlet boundary conditions, fit the ROIs to rectangular regions; (iii) enhance the textures of the fitted ROIs combining wavelet transform and fractional differential; (iv) extract texture features from the enhanced ROIs combining wavelet transform and statistical analysis methods; and (v) reduce features using principal component analysis (PCA) and classify the resection margins using the support vector machine (SVM), and then investigate the associations between texture features and histopathological characteristics using the Mann-Whitney U-test. To reduce overfitting, the SVM classifier embedded a linear kernel and adopted the leave-one-out cross-validation. RESULTS: It achieved an AUC (area under receiver operating characteristic curve) of 0.8614 and an accuracy of 84.88%. Setting p ≤ 0.01 in the Mann-Whitney U-test, two features of the run-length matrix, which are derived from diagonal sub-bands in wavelet decomposition, showed statistically significant differences between R0 and R1. CONCLUSIONS: It indicates that the radiomics study is rewarding for the aided diagnosis of R0 and R1. Texture features can potentially enhance physicians' diagnostic ability.

MEX3A knockdown inhibits the development of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is one of the most serious causes of death in the world due to its high mortality and inefficacy treatments. MEX3A was first identified in nematodes and was associated with tumor formation and may promote cell proliferation and tumor metastasis. So far, nothing is known about the relationship between MEX3A and PDA. METHODS: In this study, the expression level of MEX3A in PDA tissues was measured by immunohistochemistry. The qRT-PCR and western blot were used to identify the constructed MEX3A knockdown cell lines, which was further used to construct mouse xenotransplantation models. Cell proliferation, colony formation, cell apoptosis and migration were detected by MTT, colony formation, flow cytometry and Transwell. RESULTS: This study showed that MEX3A expression is significantly upregulated in PDA and associated with tumor grade. Loss-of-function studies showed that downregulation of MEX3A could inhibit cell growth in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, it was demonstrated that knockdown of MEX3A in PDA cells promotes apoptosis by regulating apoptosis-related factors, and inhibits migration through influencing EMT. At the same time, the regulation of PDA progression by MEX3A involves changes in downstream signaling pathways including Akt, p-Akt, PIK3CA, CDK6 and MAPK9. CONCLUSIONS: We proposed that MEX3A is associated with the prognosis and progression of PDA,which can be used as a potential therapeutic target.

Prognostic Validity of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Eighth Edition TNM Staging System for Surgically Treated and Well-Differentiated Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Comprehensive Analysis of 254 Consecutive Patients From a Large Chinese Institution.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to validate the novel American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) eighth edition staging manual for well-differentiated (G1/G2) pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs). METHODS: Data of eligible patients were retrospectively collected, grouped, and analyzed by applying the new AJCC system. RESULTS: According to the AJCC eighth staging manual for pNETs, 93, 66, 53, and 42 patients had stage I, II, III, and IV disease, respectively, with estimated 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of 96.9%, 92.8%, 48.4%, and 16.8% (P < 0.005), respectively. A total of 57, 28, 20, and 17 patients with G1 pNETs and 36, 38, 33, and 25 ones with G2 tumors were defined by the new AJCC system as having stage I, II, III, and IV disease, respectively. The estimated 5-year OS for stage I, II, III and IV disease was 100.0%, 97.1%, 52.5%, and 18.2%, respectively, for G1 pNETs (P < 0.005) and 94.2%, 90.3%, 38.7%, and 12.7%, respectively, for G2 tumors (P < 0.005). The novel AJCC classification, tumor grading, and radical resection were all prognostic predictors for OS in patients with pNETs. CONCLUSIONS: The new AJCC eighth staging system for well-differentiated pNETs was prognostic and might be adopted in clinical practice.

Survivals of patients with surgically treated and High-grade pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas: A comparative study between two American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th tumor-node-metastasis staging systems.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the two new defined tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) systems in the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th staging manual for overall survival (OS) analysis of G3 pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (p-NECs) that are currently proposed for pancreatic exocrine adenocarcinomas (p-EACs) and G1/G2 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (p-NETs), respectively. METHODS: The data of patients who were surgically treated and histopathologically diagnosed with G3 p-NECs at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January 2002 to June 2017 were retrospectively analyzed and compared using the two new AJCC staging systems. RESULTS: Applying the p-EAC AJCC 8th TNM staging system to G3 p-NECs, the estimated 3-year OSs for each stage were 86.7%, 76.0%, 44.5% and 20.7%, respectively (P < 0.001). According to the G1/G2 p-NETs staging system, the estimated OSs at 3 years for each new AJCC stage were 100.0%, 83.6%, 47.1% and 20.7%, respectively (P < 0.001). The system for p-EACs significantly discriminated the survival difference of G3 p-NECs between Stage I and Stage II (P = 0.019), while the other one for G1/G2 p-NETs could not (P = 0.108). The consistent results of Akaike information criteria with Harrell's concordance index indicated that the AJCC 8th staging system for p-EACs was superior when applied to G3 p-NECs for its better prognostic stratification and more accurate prediction ability for OS. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis demonstrated that both TNM systems in the AJCC 8th staging manual were prognostic for patients with G3 p-NECs; however, the classification originally applied to p-EACs was superior and supported its use in clinical practice.

Enucleation of pancreatic solid pseudopapillary neoplasm: Short-term and long-term outcomes from a 7-year large single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Enucleation is increasingly used for pancreatic solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) to preserve function of the pancreas. The data was limited due to rarity of this low-grade neoplasm. We sought to describe the indications, operative technique, short and long-term outcomes after enucleation with largest series of enucleated SPNs. METHODS: Data collected retrospectively from 110 patients with SPN who underwent pancreatectomy between 2009 and 2016 in our institution were reviewed. Thirty-one patients underwent enucleation were identified for analysis, and compared with the 70 patients underwent conventional pancreatic resection. RESULTS: Of the 31 patients, 27 (87.1%) were women, and the mean age was 29.8 years (range, 11-49 years). Enucleated SPNs were mostly located in the head/uncinate process of the pancreas (38.7%). Overall morbidity was 25.8%, mainly due to POPF (19.4%), and severe morbidity was only 6.5% with no death. Compared with conventional pancreatic resection, enucleation had a shorter duration of surgery (P < 0.001), less blood loss (P < 0.001), lower rate of exocrine insufficiency (P = 0.033) and comparable morbidity (P = 1), with no increased risk of tumor recurrence (P = 1). The rate of endocrine insufficiency after enucleation seemed lower (Nil vs. 4.5%, P = 0.55). CONCLUSIONS: Enucleation of SPN of the pancreas appears to be feasible and safe for preserving exocrine and endocrine function of the gland. Enucleation with negative surgical margin seems adequate with no increased risk of tumor recurrence. Enucleation could be seriously considered as an alternative to conventional resection for this frequently young population.