A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study of Visual Impairment in West Godavari and Krishna Districts in Andhra Pradesh: Akividu Visual Impairment Study (AVIS).

PURPOSE: To report the prevalence and causes of visual impairment (VI) among those aged ≥40 years in West Godavari and Krishna districts in Andhra Pradesh, India. METHODS: Trained teams visited the households in the selected clusters and conducted eye examinations. Presenting visual acuity (PVA) was assessed for distance and near. Torchlight examination was conducted to assess the anterior segment. Non-mydriatic retinal images were also obtained. VI was defined as PVA worse than 6/18 in the better eye. It included Moderate VI (PVA worse than 6/18 to 6/60), Severe VI (PVA worse than 6/60 to 3/60) and Blindness (PVA worse than 3/60). Multiple logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess the risk factors for VI. RESULTS: In total, 2587/3000 (86.2%) participants were examined. Of this, 1406 (54.4%) were women and 1224 (47.3%) had no education. The age- and gender-adjusted prevalence of VI was 12.8% (95% CI: 11.5-14.1). Compared to the 40-49-year age group, the odds of having VI among those aged 50-59 years, 60-69 years and ≥70 years were 2.93 (95% CI: 1.91-4.52), 6.53 (95% CI: 4.31-9.91) and 17.45 (95% CI: 11.50-26.46), respectively. Those respondents who had no education had a higher odds (OR: 1.73; 95% CI: 1.34-2.23) of VI compared to those who were educated. Cataract (62.4%) and uncorrected refractive errors (29.8%) were the leading causes of VI. Over 90% of the VI was due to avoidable causes. CONCLUSION: VI is a major public health challenge in Andhra Pradesh. Over 90% of this burden is avoidable and can be eliminated by low-cost interventions such as spectacles and cataract surgery.

Population-based assessment of prevalence of spectacle use and effective spectacle coverage for distance vision in Andhra Pradesh, India - Akividu Visual Impairment Study.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Effective spectacle coverage is a useful indicator to assess the coverage of refraction services in a given region. We found a low coverage in the Akividu region suggesting a need to develop effective refraction services. BACKGROUND: To assess the prevalence of spectacle use and effective spectacle coverage for distance vision among people aged 40 years and older in the Indian state of Andhra Pradesh. METHODS: A population-based cross-sectional survey was carried out in the Akividu region in West Godavari and Krishna districts. The study teams visited selected households and conducted eye examinations in the selected clusters. A structured questionnaire was used to collect information on spectacle use. 'Met Need' was defined as unaided VA worse than 6/12 but improved to 6/12 or better with their current spectacles. 'Unmet Need' was defined as unaided VA worse than 6/12 but improved to 6/12 with pinhole, among those not using spectacles. The 'Under-met Need' was defined as aided VA worse than 6/12 but improving with pinhole to 6/12 or better. Based on these definitions, Effective Refractive Error Coverage (e-REC) is calculated as: e-REC (%) s = ((met need)/(met need + under-met need + unmet need)) X100. RESULTS: Of 3,000 enumerated from 60 clusters, 2,587 (86.2%) participants were examined. The prevalence of current spectacle use was 43.1% (95% CI:41.2-45.0). The e-REC was 37.4%. It was also lower in men compared to women and among those without any education. Participants who had cataract surgery in either eye had similar e-REC compared to those who were not operated. CONCLUSION: Though spectacle use was found to be high, there is a still large unmet need for refractive correction for distance. Effective service delivery models to provide refraction and spectacle dispensing services are needed to achieve universal eye health coverage in the region.

Concept and Uptake of Just-A-Minute Clinical Pearl: A Novel Tele-Ophthalmology Teaching Tool.

PURPOSE: To describe the concept and report the uptake of a novel tele-ophthalmology educational tool, Just-A-Minute (JAM) clinical pearl, which was sent to all ophthalmologists in the email database of L V Prasad Eye Institute on a daily basis from September 2016 to August 2017. DESIGN: A survey was conducted among the recipients of JAM clinical pearls. METHODS: An online questionnaire was sent to the recipients and their responses were recorded and analyzed to evaluate the JAM pearls regarding qualifications of the recipients, their type of practice and regularity of accessing the pearls, type of pearl most sought, clarity of content, applicability to the clinic, relevance to practice, satisfaction with the format, and likelihood of recommendation. RESULTS: Of 14,311 recipients of JAM clinical pearls, 719 (5%) responded to the survey. The majority of respondents were in India (66.5%) followed by the United States (26.4%). Among the respondents, 52.9% were postgraduate ophthalmologists in general practice, 38.3% postfellowship subspecialty practitioners, 5.8% fellows, and 2.9% residents. Private practitioners constituted 57.3% of all respondents. The pearls were accessed "always" by 53.7%, "very regularly" by 34.6%, and "intermittently" by 11.8% of respondents. The subspecialty of the pearls most desired was cornea and anterior segment (48.7%). The JAM pearls scored high in clarity of content (9/10), applicability to the clinic (9/10), satisfaction with the format (9/10), and recommendation to a colleague (10/10). CONCLUSIONS: In this survey, it was found that the JAM clinical pearls are a unique, beneficial mode of tele-education with easily understandable and clinically applicable concepts.

Task sharing: Development of evidence-based co-management strategy model for screening, detection, and management of diabetic retinopathy.

BACKGROUND: The number of adults with diabetes is increasing worldwide and also the number of people with diabetic retinopathy (DR), a major complication of diabetes. Task sharing in eye care for people with diabetes could address the shortage in the number of ophthalmologists and increase access to eye care services. This study investigated the opinion of eye care professionals for a checklist of tasks, which are involved in DR management, to be possibly shared by optometrists and mid-level eye and health care workers with ophthalmologists. METHODS: The study used a purposive sampling technique. All available eye and health care workers from five selected hospitals in two provinces in Pakistan were recruited. A cross-sectional survey was conducted to investigate the potential roles of various cadres in eye care delivery for people with diabetes. RESULTS: Ninety-six (79%) participants including doctors (n = 56), optometrists (n = 29), and mid-level eye care workers (n = 11) responded to the survey. Two-thirds of the participants suggested mid-level eye care workers, while 88.5% stated that lady health workers could provide education and health promotion to people with diabetes. Most of the participants (88.5%) suggested that optometrists could share the task of dilated ophthalmoscopy with ophthalmologists for detection of DR and make referrals to ophthalmologists if needed. Ophthalmologists remained the recommended cadre to undertake the eye examinations of patients with proliferative DR and diabetic macular edema. CONCLUSION: This research provided an insight on how task sharing in DR management can be implemented by optimizing the roles of eye care workers.

Attitudes and perceptions of eye care workers and health administrators regarding task sharing in screening and detection for management of diabetic retinopathy in Pakistan.

PURPOSE: The shortage of ophthalmologists in many countries is a major barrier to timely provision of eye care. A team work approach to screen, detect and manage diabetic retinopathy (DR) could achieve greater screening coverage of people with diabetes to prevent vision loss. This study aimed to assess the attitudes and perceptions of eye care workers and health administrators regarding task sharing for management of DR. METHODS: Using purposive sampling, 121 eye and health care workers in five selected hospitals in two provinces in Pakistan were recruited. A cross-sectional survey explored the possibility for involvement of optometrists and mid-level eye care workers to share tasks with ophthalmologists for DR management and the potential outcomes of task sharing, through multiple choice and open-ended questions. RESULTS: Ninety-six (79%) participants-doctors (n = 56), optometrists (n = 29) and mid-level eye care workers (n = 11) responded to the survey. All participants supported task sharing in screening and detection for management of DR. There was no significant difference among the groups with respect to their positive attitude towards task sharing (p = 0.22). The majority in each group believed that the task sharing would not degrade the quality of care (p = 0.48). Two potential major outcomes of task sharing in the eye care system included the benefits for people with diabetes and potential DR and the strengthening of the health care system. CONCLUSION: Task sharing among various cadres of eye care workers has the potential to improve screening coverage of people with diabetes to prevent visual loss from DR.

Prevalence and causes of blindness, visual impairment, and cataract surgery in Timor-Leste.

PURPOSE: To estimate the prevalence and causes of blindness and visual impairment, cataract surgical coverage (CSC), visual outcome of cataract surgery, and barriers to uptake cataract surgery in Timor-Leste. METHOD: In a nationwide rapid assessment of avoidable blindness (RAAB), the latest population (1,066,409) and household data were used to create a sampling frame which consists of 2,227 population units (study clusters) from all 13 districts, with populations of 450-900 per unit. The sample size of 3,350 was calculated with the assumed prevalence of blindness at 4.5% among people aged ≥50 years with a 20% tolerable error, 95% CI, and a 90% response rate. The team was trained in the survey methodology, and inter-observer variation was measured. Door-to-door visits, led by an ophthalmologist, were made in preselected study clusters, and data were collected in line with the RAAB5 survey protocol. An Android smart phone installed with mRAAB software was used for data collection. RESULT: The age-gender standardized prevalence of blindness, severe visual impairment, and visual impairment were 2.8%, (1.8-3.8), 1.7% (1.7-2.3), and 8.1% (6.6-9.6), respectively. Cataract was the leading cause of blindness (79.4%). Blindness was more prevalent in the older age group and in women. CSC was 41.5% in cataract blind eyes and 48.6% in cataract blind people. Good visual outcome in the cataract-operated eyes was 62% (presenting) and 75.2% (best corrected). Two important barriers to not using available cataract surgical services were accessibility (45.5%) and lack of attendants to accompany (24.8%). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of blindness and visual impairment in Timor-Leste remains high. CSC is unacceptably low; gender inequity in blindness and CSC exists. Lack of access is the prominent barrier to cataract surgery.

Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990-2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Contemporary data for causes of vision impairment and blindness form an important basis of recommendations in public health policies. Refreshment of the Global Vision Database with recently published data sources permitted modelling of cause of vision loss data from 1990 to 2015, further disaggregation by cause, and forecasts to 2020. METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we analysed published and unpublished population-based data for the causes of vision impairment and blindness from 1980 to 2014. We identified population-based studies published before July 8, 2014, by searching online databases with no language restrictions (MEDLINE from Jan 1, 1946, and Embase from Jan 1, 1974, and the WHO Library Database). We fitted a series of regression models to estimate the proportion of moderate or severe vision impairment (defined as presenting visual acuity of <6/18 but ≥3/60 in the better eye) and blindness (presenting visual acuity of <3/60 in the better eye) by cause, age, region, and year. FINDINGS: We identified 288 studies of 3 983 541 participants contributing data from 98 countries. Among the global population with moderate or severe vision impairment in 2015 (216·6 million [80% uncertainty interval 98·5 million to 359·1 million]), the leading causes were uncorrected refractive error (116·3 million [49·4 million to 202·1 million]), cataract (52·6 million [18·2 million to 109·6 million]), age-related macular degeneration (8·4 million [0·9 million to 29·5 million]), glaucoma (4·0 million [0·6 million to 13·3 million]), and diabetic retinopathy (2·6 million [0·2 million to 9·9 million]). Among the global population who were blind in 2015 (36·0 million [12·9 million to 65·4 million]), the leading causes were cataract (12·6 million [3·4 million to 28·7 million]), uncorrected refractive error (7·4 million [2·4 million to 14·8 million]), and glaucoma (2·9 million [0·4 million to 9·9 million]). By 2020, among the global population with moderate or severe vision impairment (237·1 million [101·5 million to 399·0 million]), the number of people affected by uncorrected refractive error is anticipated to rise to 127·7 million (51·0 million to 225·3 million), by cataract to 57·1 million (17·9 million to 124·1 million), by age-related macular degeneration to 8·8 million (0·8 million to 32·1 million), by glaucoma to 4·5 million (0·5 million to 15·4 million), and by diabetic retinopathy to 3·2 million (0·2 million to 12·9 million). By 2020, among the global population who are blind (38·5 million [13·2 million to 70·9 million]), the number of patients blind because of cataract is anticipated to rise to 13·4 million (3·3 million to 31·6 million), because of uncorrected refractive error to 8·0 million (2·5 million to 16·3 million), and because of glaucoma to 3·2 million (0·4 million to 11·0 million). Cataract and uncorrected refractive error combined contributed to 55% of blindness and 77% of vision impairment in adults aged 50 years and older in 2015. World regions varied markedly in the causes of blindness and vision impairment in this age group, with a low prevalence of cataract (<22% for blindness and 14·1-15·9% for vision impairment) and a high prevalence of age-related macular degeneration (>14% of blindness) as causes in the high-income subregions. Blindness and vision impairment at all ages in 2015 due to diabetic retinopathy (odds ratio 2·52 [1·48-3·73]) and cataract (1·21 [1·17-1·25]) were more common among women than among men, whereas blindness and vision impairment due to glaucoma (0·71 [0·57-0·86]) and corneal opacity (0·54 [0·43-0·66]) were more common among men than among women, with no sex difference related to age-related macular degeneration (0·91 [0·70-1·14]). INTERPRETATION: The number of people affected by the common causes of vision loss has increased substantially as the population increases and ages. Preventable vision loss due to cataract (reversible with surgery) and refractive error (reversible with spectacle correction) continue to cause most cases of blindness and moderate or severe vision impairment in adults aged 50 years and older. A large scale-up of eye care provision to cope with the increasing numbers is needed to address avoidable vision loss. FUNDING: Brien Holden Vision Institute.

Barriers to the Uptake of Cataract Surgery and Eye Care After Community Outreach Screening in Takeo Province, Cambodia.

PURPOSE: To assess the barriers influencing eye healthcare seeking behavior after community outreach screening. DESIGN: A concurrent mixed methods study. METHODS: A total of 469 patients screened during the previous 12 months were followed up, of which 354 (75%) from 5 districts were interviewed in person, using a semi-structured questionnaire, in-depth interviews (n = 11), and 16 focus groups (n = 71). SPSS and NVivo were used to analyze response frequency and identify themes. RESULTS: Of the respondents, 98% (350/354) reported they were told they had an eye problem, with 295 individuals (83%) told to attend CARITAS Takeo Eye Hospital (CTEH) and 55 to have their eyes checked at Kiri Vong Vision Centre. Of those 68.9% (244/354) who reported seeking treatment, only 7.4% (18/244) reported they attended CTEH, 54% (n = 132) attended a "local pharmacy," 31.6% (n = 77) "self-treated at home," 11% (n = 27) reported "using steam from boiling rice," and 10.7% (n = 26) attended a "traditional healer." Of those who reported reasons for "not attending," responses included "no time" (47.8%, 86/180), "no one to accompany" (21.7%, n = 39), "fear of losing sight" (17.8%, n = 32), "cannot afford to travel" (16.1%, n = 29), and "eye problem is not serious enough" (15.6%, n = 28). Follow-up of patient records identified that 128 individuals (79 females) attended eye care services. CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic factors, personal concerns, and the use of local cultural remedies were reasons for not seeking eye hospital treatment. An integrated community approach to improve awareness and uptake of appropriate treatment is recommended.

Depression screening among older adults attending low-vision rehabilitation and eye-care services: Characteristics of those who screen positive and client acceptability of screening.

AIM: To investigate characteristics associated with screening positive for depressive symptoms among older adults accessing low-vision rehabilitation and eye-care services and to determine client acceptability of depression screening using the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) in these settings. METHODS: One-hundred and twenty-four older adults (mean = 77.02 years, SD = 9.12) attending low-vision rehabilitation and eye-care services across Australia were screened for depression and invited to complete a telephone-administered questionnaire to determine characteristics associated with depressive symptoms and client acceptability of screening in these settings. RESULTS: Thirty-seven per cent (n = 46/124) of participants screened positive for depressive symptoms, and the majority considered the new depression screening method to be a 'good idea' in vision services (85%). Severe vision loss (<6/60 in the better eye) was associated with an increased odds of screening positive for depressive symptoms (odds ratio 2.37; 95% confidence interval 1.08-6.70) even after adjusting for potential confounders. Participants who screened positive had a preference for 'talking' therapy or a combination of medication and 'talking therapy' delivered within their own home (73%) or via telephone (67%). CONCLUSION: The PHQ-2 appears to be an acceptable method for depression screening in eye-care settings among older adults. Targeted interventions that incorporate home-based or telephone delivered therapy sessions may improve outcomes for depression in this group.

The impact of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment on quality of life in neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment in routine medical practice on vision-related quality of life (VRQoL) in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Prospective case series. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 169 patients with neovascular AMD undergoing anti-VEGF treatment. METHODS: The VRQoL interviews at baseline (n = 169), 6 months (n = 138), and 12 months (n = 120), routine anti-VEGF treatment with up to monthly follow-ups, and re-treatment as indicated. The Impact of Vision Impairment (IVI) questionnaire was subjected to Rasch analysis to assess its measurement performance and generate interval-level estimates of VRQoL at all time points, anchoring the instrument to its baseline measurement characteristics. Factors associated with a change in reported VRQoL were assessed using generalized linear regression models. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The VRQoL as measured by the IVI using its 3 subscales: Accessing Information, Mobility, and Emotional Well-being. FINDINGS: The mean age was 70 years (±6 years standard deviation [SD]); 56% were female. Visual acuity (VA) improved by a mean of 8 letters (±17 SD), and mean retinal thickness decreased by 87 (±89.7) µm with an average of 6.5 (±2.6) injections over 12 months. Those who lost >2 lines (n = 13, 11%) reported worse VRQoL at 12 months on the Accessing Information and Mobility subscales (P = 0.007 and P = 0.050, respectively). Conversely, those who gained >2 lines (n = 29, 24%) reported better VRQoL on the Accessing Information and Emotional Well-being subscales (P = 0.009 and P = 0.008, respectively). Patients who did not experience a change in VA reported no change in their VRQoL. In multivariate analyses, only a change in VA but not whether the better or worse eye was treated predicted a change in VRQoL on the Accessing Information (P = 0.004) and the Emotional Well-being (P = 0.008) subscales. CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed that anti-VEGF treatment for neovascular AMD improves patients' VRQoL in those who gain vision and maintains VRQoL in those who maintain VA in their treated eye, irrespective of whether the worse or better eye is treated. Against this background, the best possible outcomes should be aimed for even if the worse eye is treated because a loss of VA in the worse eye will adversely affect patients' VRQoL.

Efficient capture of high-quality data on outcomes of treatment for macular diseases: the fight retinal blindness! Project.

PURPOSE: To describe the development of a web-based high-quality data collection tool to track the outcomes of treatment of macular disease in routine practice. METHODS: Testing of a larger data collection tool established which fields a clinician would reliably fill out. The program, which was developed using freely available software, consists of modules interacting with a core system. The module for neovascular age-related macular degeneration is described here. RESULTS: Data for initial visits can be entered within 30 seconds, 15 seconds for follow-up visits. Fifteen centers from Australia, New Zealand, and Switzerland are currently contributing data. Finalized data from 2,052 eyes of 1,693 participants dating from January 2006 were analyzed. Median (25th and 75th percentiles) visual acuity at the index visit was 55 (41, 68) logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution letters with the following lesion types: minimally classic 17.2%, predominantly classic 24.6%, occult 52.0%, idiopathic polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy 1.2%, and retinal angiomatous proliferation 3.2%. CONCLUSION: This software tool will facilitate the collection of large amounts of data on the routine use of treatments of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. This will allow us to analyze important potentially modifiable variables, such as the effect of different treatment patterns on visual outcomes, and to evaluate new treatments as they are introduced into practice.

Shared care for chronic eye diseases: perspectives of ophthalmologists, optometrists and patients.

OBJECTIVE: To report the perspectives of optometrists, ophthalmologists and patients on a model of shared care for patients with chronic eye diseases. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Qualitative study of a model of shared care between optometrists and ophthalmologists for patients with stable age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy and glaucoma, trialled by the Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital in Melbourne during 2007­2009. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with optometrists, ophthalmologists and patients at completion of the project to obtain their perspectives on this model. RESULTS: Seventeen optometrists submitted expressions of interest to participate, and 12 completed web-based training modules and clinical observerships and adhered to specified examination and reporting protocols. All five participating ophthalmologists and 11 of the optometrists were interviewed. Ninety-eight patients participated and 37 were interviewed. Optometrists not only met ophthalmologists' expectations but exceeded them, appropriately detecting and referring patients with additional, previously undetected conditions. Patients reported savings in travel time and were satisfied with the quality of care they received. Optometrists, ophthalmologists and patients indicated a general acceptance of shared care arrangements, although there were some issues relating to interprofessional trust. CONCLUSIONS: Shared care between local optometrists and hospital-based ophthalmologists can help to reduce patient waiting time for review and offers an opportunity for these two groups of eye care professionals to collaborate in providing localised care for the benefit of patients. However, trust and relationship building need to be further developed.

Screening for depression: integrating training into the professional development programme for low vision rehabilitation staff.

BACKGROUND: To describe the integration of depression screening training into the professional development programme for low vision rehabilitation staff and report on staff evaluation of this training. DESIGN: Pre-post intervention study, in a single population of low vision rehabilitation staff. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred and thirty-six staff from Australia's largest low vision rehabilitation organization, Vision Australia. METHODS: Staff completed the depression screening and referral training as part of a wider professional development programme. A pre-post-training questionnaire was administered to all staff. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Descriptive and non-parametric statistics were used to determine differences in self-reported knowledge, confidence, barriers to recognition and management of depression between baseline and post training. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-two participants completed both questionnaires. Following training, participants reported an increased knowledge of depression, were more likely to respond to depression in their clients and reported to be more confident in managing depression (P < 0.05). A range of barriers were identified including issues related to the client (e.g. acceptance of referrals); practitioners (e.g. skill, role); availability and accessibility of psychological services; time and contact constraints; and environmental barriers (e.g. lack of privacy). Additional training incorporating more active and 'hands-on' sessions are likely to be required. CONCLUSIONS: This training is a promising first step in integrating a depression screening tool into low vision rehabilitation practice. Further work is needed to determine the barriers and facilitators to implementation in practice and to assess clients' acceptability and outcomes.

The Impact of Knowledge and Attitudes on Access to Eye-Care Services in Cambodia.

PURPOSE: To investigate how knowledge and attitudes influence the access to eye-care services in Takeo Province, Cambodia. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey (n=600). METHODS: 30 villages were randomly selected. Groups included: >50 years, 30-49 years, and parents with children <5 years. A newly developed Knowledge, Attitude and Practice in Eye Health (KAP-EH) questionnaire about knowledge and treatment of eye diseases, practices and attitudes to accessing services was used to interview respondents. Descriptive analysis, including Chi square and logistic regression tested for associations with sub-groups of gender, age group, education and self-reported type of disability. RESULTS: The proportion of respondents who reported having knowledge of specific eye conditions ranged from 97% for eye injury, to 8% for diabetic eye disease. While 509 (85%) people reported knowledge of cataract, 47% did not know how cataract was treated and only 19% listed surgery. The older group (66.5%) were least informed about cataract (p= 0.001) compared to other groups, and were least likely to believe that some blindness could be prevented (p < 0.001). Women (55%) were more likely than men (46%) (p=0 .003) to report that a child with blindness could attend school, as did people without a disability compared to those with a disability (58% vs 34%) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The knowledge about cataract and refractive error and what to do to resolve the problems was low among this population and this study suggests that poor knowledge of eye diseases might contribute to the occurrence of un-operated cataract and uncorrected refractive error.

Economic impact of primary open-angle glaucoma in Australia.

BACKGROUND: Glaucoma is the World's leading cause of irreversible blindness, and poses serious public health and economic concerns. DESIGN: Review. SAMPLES: Published randomized trials and population-based studies since 1985. METHODS: We report the economic impact of primary open-angle glaucoma and model the effect of changes in detection rates and management strategies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The cost-effectiveness of different interventions to prevent vision loss from primary open-angle glaucoma was measured in terms of financial cost (Australian dollars) and disability-adjusted life years. RESULTS: The prevalence of glaucoma in Australia is expected to increase from 208 000 in 2005 to 379 000 in 2025 because of the aging population. Health system costs over the same time period are estimated to increase from $AU355 million to $AU784 million. Total costs (health system costs, indirect costs and costs of loss of well-being) will increase from $AU1.9 billion to $AU4.3 billion in Australia. CONCLUSION: Primary open-angle glaucoma poses a significant economic burden, which will increase substantially by 2025. This dynamic model provides a valuable tool for ongoing policy formulation and determining the economic impact of interventions to better prevent visual impairment and blindness from glaucoma.

Diabetic retinopathy management by Australian optometrists.

BACKGROUND: To survey the current diabetic retinopathy screening and management practices of Australian optometrists following the release of the 1997 National Health Medical Research Council Diabetic Retinopathy Management Guidelines. DESIGN: Cross-sectional national survey, primary care setting. PARTICIPANTS: 1000 Australian optometrists across different states. METHODS: A self-administered questionnaire was sent to 1000 optometrists across all states during 2007/2008. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Use of retinal camera, screening practices/attitudes and behaviour in diabetic retinopathy management. RESULTS: 568 optometrists (57%) responded to the survey. Patients' unpreparedness to drive post dilation (51%) and the fear of angle closure glaucoma (13%) were the two main barriers to optometrists not performing dilated ophthalmoscopy. Those who had strong desire to screen for diabetic retinopathy were more likely to use a retinal camera (p<0.005). Use of a retinal camera was significantly associated with an increased confidence in detecting clinical signs of diabetic retinopathy including macular oedema (P<0.001). Optometrists who read the guidelines at least once were 2.5-times (P<0.001) more likely to have confidence in detecting macular oedema than those who had never read the guidelines. Although they may be confident in diagnosis, and may use retinal cameras for screening, nearly 60% of optometrists would not refer patients with macular oedema to an ophthalmologist. CONCLUSIONS: Despite their self-reported desire for involvement in diabetic retinopathy, the management of macular oedema by Australian optometrists needs improvement. The use of retinal cameras and promotion of the 2008 NHMRC guidelines should be encouraged to improve overall optometric diabetic retinopathy management, particularly with macular oedema.

Barriers to the implementation of the SAFE strategy to combat hyperendemic trachoma in Australia.

OBJECTIVE: Australia is the only developed country in the world that still has endemic levels of blinding trachoma. The SAFE (Surgery, Antibiotics, Facial cleanliness, Environmental improvement) strategy is an effective public health intervention that has been successfully used to eliminate blinding trachoma in some of the poorest countries of the world. Yet the SAFE strategy has not been systematically implemented in Australia. We undertook semi-structured interviews to identify some of barriers to the implementation of the SAFE strategy within remote indigenous communities of Australia. METHODS: Health care professionals who were responsible for delivering trachoma control programs throughout the Northern Territory were asked to participate in a semi-structured interview. Quantitative analysis was performed using an existing strategic management framework. RESULTS: Fourteen individuals were interviewed. Responses were grouped into 19 categories; 12 from the existing strategic management framework and 7 additional categories that were created for ideas unique to the trachoma control program in Australia. CONCLUSIONS: A number of key themes emerged from the interview and are presented in a literary style. From these key themes critical success factors for the implementation of a sustainable trachoma control program were identified. With the election of the Rudd government there has been a renewed interest in "closing the gap" between the health of indigenous and non-indigenous Australians. A federal government funding package of $58 million over four years has just been announced to tackle trachoma. It is hoped that the findings of this research can assist in making sure that money achieves its goal.

Cataract in indigenous Australians: the National Indigenous Eye Health Survey.

BACKGROUND: To determine the prevalence of vision loss due to cataract in indigenous Australians. METHODS: A national, stratified, random cluster sample was selected in 30 communities across Australia. Data collection was undertaken in 2008. Adults 40 years and older were examined using a standardized protocol that included a questionnaire. The presence of visually significant cataract was assessed. RESULTS: Response rates were good and 1189 indigenous adults were examined and overall recruitment was 72%. Low vision (<6/12-6/60) due to cataract occurred in 2.52% (1.63-3.41%) and blindness (<6/60) in 0.59% (95% CI: 0.24-1.21%). The cataract coverage rate (proportion of those with visually significant cataract who had been operated on) was 65.3% (95% CI: 55.0-74.6%). Projections suggest that there are 3234 indigenous adults with vision loss from cataract. CONCLUSIONS: Cataract remains a major cause of vision loss in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. There were no significant regional or state differences in the prevalence of cataract or of cataract surgical coverage, which suggests that increased cataract surgery services are required across the country to address cataract in indigenous Australians.

Further survey of Australian ophthalmologist's diabetic retinopathy management: did practice adhere to National Health and Medical Research Council guidelines?

BACKGROUND: To compare the self-reported management of diabetic retinopathy by Australian ophthalmologists with the 1997 National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) guidelines. METHODS: Self-reported cross-sectional survey of patterns of practice. Questionnaires were sent to all Australian ophthalmologists, comprising questions regarding professional details, diabetic retinopathy screening attitudes/practices and specific hypothetical management scenarios. Data were analysed using Chi-squared and adjusted logistic regression. RESULT: 480 of the 751 (64%) eligible Australian ophthalmologists participated. The majority (80%, n = 376) reported they consistently reviewed patient's glycaemic control, but only 55% and 41% regularly reviewed blood pressure and serum cholesterol control, respectively. Ophthalmologists generally adhered to NHMRC-recommended screening intervals, although only 38% agreed with the guidelines relating to screening of pre-pubertal diabetic patients. Fluorescein angiogram was used more than recommended, especially for mild non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy where 45% of respondents used this investigation. Practice duration >15 years was associated with more regular fluorescein angiogram use (OR = 3.74; 95% CI: 2.53-5.53, P < 0.001). In the clinical scenarios where clinically significant macular oedema was concurrently present with cataract or proliferative diabetic retinopathy, >26% referred to retinal subspecialists for management; 85% of the remaining ophthalmologists performed macular laser first. Respondents with practice duration >15 years were 7.8 times (P = 0.001) more likely to perform cataract surgery first. CONCLUSION: Diabetic retinopathy management guidelines were generally well followed by Australian ophthalmologists. However, areas of practice variation existed including frequent use of fluorescein angiogram. Significant proportion of practitioners referred diabetic patients to retinal subspecialists, who were more likely to adhere to guideline recommendations. Ophthalmologists with greater experience (>15 years) were more likely to employ practices differing from NHMRC recommendations.

Detection of depression in patients with low vision.

PURPOSE: Depression is common in people with vision impairment and further reduces levels of functioning independent of vision loss. However, depression most often remains undetected and untreated this group. Eye health professionals (EHPs) (ophthalmic nurses, ophthalmologists, optometrists, and orthoptists) and rehabilitation workers (RWs) may be able to play a role in detecting depression. This study aimed to identify current practice and investigate factors associated with depression management strategies. METHODS: A self-administered cross-sectional survey of EHPs and RWs assessed current practice including confidence in working with depressed people with vision impairment; barriers to recognition, assessment, and management of depression; beliefs about the consequences, duration, and efficacy of treatment for depression in individuals with vision impairment. RESULTS: Ninety-four participants aged 23 to 69 years took part. Thirty-seven participants (39.8%) stated that they attempted to identify depression as part of patient management, with RWs significantly more likely to do so (n = 17, 60.7%) than EHPs (n = 20, 30.8%; p = 0.007). Intention to identify depression was not associated with sociodemographic factors, professional experience in eye care services, or the length and number of patient consultations, but a significant relationship was found for confidence, barriers, and beliefs about depression (p < 0.05). No consistent depression management strategy emerged and a range of barriers were highlighted. CONCLUSIONS: Training programs are needed to provide EHPs and RWs with the skills and resources to address depression in people with vision loss under their care and to support the development of procedures by which concerns about depression can be identified objectively, documented, and included as part of a referral to appropriate services.