Extended thoracic endovascular aortic repair is optimal therapy in acute complicated type B dissection.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) represents optimal therapy for complicated acute type B aortic dissection (aTBAD). Persistent knowledge gaps remain, including the optimal length of aortic coverage, impact on distal aortic remodeling, and fate of the dissected abdominal aorta. METHODS: Review of the Emory Aortic Database identified 92 patients who underwent TEVAR for complicated aTBAD from 2012 to 2018. Standard TEVAR covered aortic zones 3 and 4 (from the left subclavian to the mid-descending thoracic aorta). Extended TEVAR fully covered aortic zones 3 though 5 (from the left subclavian to the celiac artery). Long-term imaging, clinical follow-up, and overall and aortic-specific mortality were reviewed. RESULTS: Extended TEVAR (n = 52) required a greater length of coverage vs standard TEVAR (n = 40) (240 ± 32 mm vs 183 ± 23 mm; P < .01). In-hospital mortality occurred in 5.4% of patients (7.7% vs 2.5%; P = .27) owing to mesenteric malperfusion (n = 3) or rupture (n = 2). The overall incidences of postoperative stroke, transient paraparesis, paraplegia, and dialysis were 5.4% (3.9% vs 7.5%; P = .38), 3.2% (5.8% vs 0%; P = .18), 0%, and 0% respectively, equivalent between groups. Follow-up was 96.6% complete to a mean of 6.1 years (interquartile range, 3.5-8.6 years). There were significantly higher rates of complete thrombosis or obliteration of the entire thoracic false lumen after Extended TEVAR (82.2% vs 51.5%; P = .04). Distal aortic reinterventions were less frequent after extended TEVAR (5.8% vs 20%; P = .04). Late aorta-specific survival was 98.1% after extended TEVAR vs 92.3% for standard TEVAR (P = .32). CONCLUSIONS: Extended TEVAR for complicated aTBAD is safe, results in a high rate of total thoracic false lumen thrombosis/obliteration, and reduces distal reinterventions. Longer-term follow-up will be needed to demonstrate a survival benefit compared to limited aortic coverage.

Acute Type B Intramural Hematoma: Novel Insights in the Endovascular Era.

BACKGROUND: The pathophysiology and behavior of acute type B intramural hematoma (TBIMH) is poorly understood. The purpose of this study is to characterize the pathophysiology, fate, and outcomes of TBIMH in the endovascular era. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a US Aortic Database identified 70 patients with TBIMH from 2008 to 2022. Patients were divided into groups and analyzed based upon subsequent management: early thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR; Group 1) or hospital discharge on optimal medical therapy (OMT) (Group 2). RESULTS: Of 70 total patients, 43% (30/70) underwent TEVAR (Group 1) and 57% (40/70) were discharged on OMT (Group 2). There were no significant differences in age, demographics, or comorbidities between groups. Indications for TEVAR in Group 1 were as follows: 1) Penetrating atheroscletoic ulcer (PAU) or ulcer-like projection (n = 26); 2) Descending thoracic aortic aneurysm (n = 3); or 3) Progression to type B aortic dissection (TBAD) (n = 2). Operative mortality was zero. No patient suffered a stroke or spinal cord ischemia. During the follow-up period, 50% (20/40) of Group 2 patients required delayed surgical intervention, including TEVAR in 14 patients and open repair in 6 patients. Indications for surgical intervention were as follows: 1) Development of a PAU / ulcer-like projection (n = 13); 2) Progression to TBAD (n = 3), or 3) Concomitant aneurysmal disease (n = 4). Twenty patients did not require surgical intervention. Of the initial cohort, 71% of patients required surgery, 9% progressed to TBAD, and 19% had regression or stability of TBIMH with OMT alone. CONCLUSIONS: The most common etiology of TBIMH is an intimal defect. Progression to TBAD and intramural hematoma regression without an intimal defect occurs in a small percentage of patients. An aggressive strategy with endovascular therapy and close surveillance for TBIMH results in excellent short-term and long-term outcomes.

Hybrid Closure of Postinfarction Apical Ventricular Septal Defect Using Septal Occluder Device and Right Ventricular Free Wall: The Apical BASSINET Concept.

BACKGROUND: Postinfarction ventricular septal defect (VSD) is a catastrophic complication of myocardial infarction. Surgical repair still has poor outcomes. This report describes clinical outcomes after a novel hybrid transcatheter/surgical repair in patients with apical VSD. METHODS: Seven patients with postmyocardial infarction apical VSD underwent hybrid transcatheter repair via subxiphoid surgical access. A transcatheter occluder (Amplatzer Septal Occluder) with a trailing premounted suture was deployed through the right ventricular wall and through the ventricular septum into the left ventricular apex. The trailing suture was used to connect an anchor external to the right ventricular wall. Tension on the suture then collapses the right ventricular free wall against the septum and left ventricular occluder, thereby obliterating the VSD. Outcomes were compared with 9 patients who underwent surgical repair using either patch or primary suture closure. RESULTS: All patients had significant left-to-right shunt (Qp:Qs 2.5:1; interquartile range [IQR, 2.1-2.6] hybrid repair versus 2.0:1 [IQR, 2.0-2.5] surgical repair), and elevated right ventricular systolic pressure (62 [IQR, 46-71] versus 49 [IQR, 43-54] mm Hg, respectively). All had severely depressed stroke volume index (22 versus 21 mL/m2) with ≈45% in each group requiring mechanical support preprocedurally. The procedure was done 15 (IQR, 10-50) versus 24 (IQR, 10-134) days postmyocardial infarction, respectively. Both groups of patients underwent repair with technical success and without intraprocedural death. One patient in the hybrid group and 4 in the surgical group developed multiorgan failure. The hybrid group had a higher survival at discharge (86% versus 56%) and at 30 days (71% versus 56%), but similar at 1 year (57% versus 56%). During follow-up, 1 patient in each group required reintervention for residual VSD (hybrid: 9 months versus surgical: 5 days). CONCLUSIONS: Early intervention with a hybrid transcatheter/surgical repair may be a viable alternative to traditional surgery for postinfarction apical VSD.

Sitagliptin for the prevention and treatment of perioperative hyperglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing cardiac surgery: A randomized controlled trial.

AIM: To assess whether treatment with sitagliptin, starting before surgery and continued during the hospital stay, can prevent and reduce the severity of perioperative hyperglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial in adults with type 2 diabetes randomly assigned to receive sitagliptin or matching placebo starting 1 day prior to surgery and continued during the hospital stay. The primary outcome was difference in the proportion of patients with postoperative hyperglycaemia (blood glucose [BG] > 10 mmol/L [>180 mg/dL]) in the intensive care unit (ICU). Secondary endpoints included differences in mean daily BG in the ICU and after transition to regular wards, hypoglycaemia, hospital complications, length of stay and need of insulin therapy. RESULTS: We included 182 participants randomized to receive sitagliptin or placebo (91 per group, age 64 ± 9 years, HbA1c 7.6% ± 1.5% and diabetes duration 10 ± 9 years). There were no differences in the number of patients with postoperative BG greater than 10 mmol/L, mean daily BG in the ICU or after transition to regular wards, hypoglycaemia, hospital complications or length of stay. There were no differences in insulin requirements in the ICU; however, sitagliptin therapy was associated with lower mean daily insulin requirements (21.1 ± 18.4 vs. 32.5 ± 26.3 units, P = .007) after transition to a regular ward compared with placebo. CONCLUSION: The administration of sitagliptin prior to surgery and during the hospital stay did not prevent perioperative hyperglycaemia or complications after CABG. Sitagliptin therapy was associated with lower mean daily insulin requirements after transition to regular wards.

Outcomes of convergent atrial fibrillation ablation with continuous rhythm monitoring.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes of catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) are suboptimal. The convergent procedure (CP) may offer improved efficacy by combining endocardial and epicardial ablation. METHODS: We reviewed 113 consecutive patients undergoing the CP at our institution. The cohort was divided into two groups based on the presence (n = 92) or absence (n = 21) of continuous rhythm monitoring (CM) following the CP. Outcomes were reported in two ways. First, using a conventional definition of any atrial fibrillation/atrial tachycardia (AF/AT) recurrence lasting >30 seconds, after a 90 day blanking period. Second, by determining AF/AT burden at relevant time points in the group with CM. RESULTS: Across the entire cohort, 88% had either persistent or long-standing persistent AF, mean duration of AF diagnosis before the CP was 5.1 ± 4.6 years, 45% had undergone at least one prior AF ablation, 31% had impaired left ventricle ejection fraction and 62% met criteria for moderate or severe left atrial enlargement. Mean duration of follow-up after the CP was 501 ± 355 days. In the entire cohort, survival free from any AF/AT episode >30 seconds at 12 months after the blanking period was 53%. However, among those in the CM group who experienced recurrences, mean burden of AF/AT was generally very low (<5%) and remained stable over the duration of follow-up. Ten patients (9%) required elective cardioversion outside the 90 day blanking period, 11 patients (9.7%) underwent repeat ablation at a mean of 229 ± 178 days post-CP and 64% were off AADs at the last follow-up. Procedural complications decreased significantly following the transition from transdiaphragmatic to sub-xiphoid surgical access: 23% versus 3.8% (P = .005) CONCLUSIONS: In a large, consecutive series of patients with predominantly PeAF, the CP was capable of reducing AF burden to very low levels (generally <5%), which appeared durable over time. Complication rates associated with the CP decreased significantly with the transition from transdiaphragmatic to sub-xiphoid surgical access. Future trials will be necessary to determine which patients are most likely to benefit from the convergent approach.

A comparison of surgical pulmonary embolectomy and catheter-directed lysis for life-threatening pulmonary emboli.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with life-threatening pulmonary emboli (PE) have traditionally been treated with anticoagulation alone, yet emerging data suggest that more aggressive therapy may improve short-term outcomes. The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes between catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDL) and surgical pulmonary embolectomy (SPE) in the treatment of life-threatening PE. METHODS: A retrospective single-centre observational study was conducted for patients who underwent SPE or CDL at a single US academic centre. Preprocedural and postprocedural echocardiographic data were collected. Unadjusted regression models were constructed to assess the significance of the between-group postoperative differences. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients suffered a life-threatening PE during the study period [60 SPE (47.6%), 66 CDL 52.4%]. Ten (24.4%) SPE patients and 10 (15.2%) CDL patients had massive PEs marked by preprocedural hypotension. Six (10.0%) SPE patients and 4 (6.0%) CDL patients suffered a preprocedure cardiac arrest (P = 0.41). In-hospital mortality rate was 3.3% (2) for SPE, and 3.0% (2) for CDL (P = 0.99). SPE patients were more likely to require prolonged ventilation (15.0% vs 1.5%, P = 0.01). No significant differences were found in other major complications. At baseline echocardiography, 76.9% of SPE patients and 56.9% of CDL patients had moderate or severe right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. Both treatment groups showed marked and durable improvement in echocardiographic markers of RV function from baseline at midterm follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Both SPE and CDL can be applied to well-selected high-risk patients with low rates of morbidity and mortality. Further research is necessary to delineate which patients would benefit most from either SPE or CDL following a life-threatening PE.

The "thoracic endovascular aortic repair-first" strategy for acute type A dissection with mesenteric malperfusion: Initial results compared with conventional algorithms.

OBJECTIVE: Acute type A dissection with mesenteric malperfusion is a rare but lethal variant of aortic dissection. This study examines outcomes from various treatment algorithms. METHODS: A review from 2003 to 2017 of the Emory Aortic Database identified 34 patients who presented with acute type A dissection with mesenteric malperfusion. Outcomes from 4 different treatment strategies were analyzed: ascending aortic/arch replacement followed by laparotomy (n = 13), axillary-bifemoral artery bypass followed by ascending/arch replacement (n = 3); ascending/arch and concomitant antegrade thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) (n = 5), and TEVAR followed by delayed ascending/arch replacement (TEVAR-1st) (n = 13). RESULTS: The mean age of all patients was 53 ± 13 years and was equivalent among the groups. The incidence of concomitant renal and ileofemoral malperfusion was 52% and 41%, and the initial serum lactate level was 4.3 ± 2.1 mmol/L. Overall mortality was 55.8%. In the ascending aortic/arch replacement followed by laparotomy group, 77% of patients had postoperative bowel necrosis or intractable acidosis and the mortality was 69.2%. All patients in the axillary-bifemoral artery bypass followed by ascending/arch replacement group survived, but 66% required postoperative dialysis. In the ascending/arch and concomitant antegrade/TEVAR group, the mortality was 80% secondary to persistent postoperative bowel necrosis or intractable acidosis. Three patients in the TEVAR-1st group died before aortic replacement. In the 10 patients who underwent TEVAR followed by delayed aortic replacement, the mortality was 30%. There were no cases of postoperative bowel necrosis or intractable acidosis in the TEVAR-1st group. CONCLUSIONS: The TEVAR-1st strategy delays central aortic replacement until end-organ ischemia has resolved. This novel paradigm serves as a bridge to decision, and may improve survival compared with conventional treatment strategies in acute type A dissection with mesenteric malperfusion.

Salvage Coronary Artery Bypass Predicts Increased Mortality During Aortic Root Operation.

BACKGROUND: Aortic root replacement (ROOT) has been an established therapy, yet the impact of adding coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) to ROOT (CABG-R) is unknown. The purpose of this research was to investigate the impact of CABG on the outcomes of ROOT. METHODS: A retrospective review from 2004 to 2016 of patients undergoing nonemergent ROOT surgical procedure was performed. Cohorts were established based on the presence or absence of added CABG. A propensity-score weighted comparison of outcomes was then conducted. RESULTS: A total of 867 patients met inclusion criteria and were analyzed (711 ROOT [72.0%], 156 CABG-R [18.0%]). CABG-R patients were older and had higher proportions of previous valve operation, hypertension, endocarditis, immunosuppressive therapy, renal insufficiency, and redo operation (all p < 0.01). Indications for CABG included anatomy (n = 48, 30.8%), coronary artery disease (80, 51.3%), and ventricular failure (28, 17.9%). The permanent stroke rate was not significantly increased with the addition of CABG-R (p = 0.06). Thirty-day mortality was 5.5% for the entire cohort but was substantially higher in patients who underwent concomitant CABG (3.4% ROOT, 15.4% CABG-R). Mortality rates were highest among patients with acute ventricular failure and CABG (28.8%) compared with patients who underwent CABG for coronary artery disease (6.3%) or patients for anatomy (22.9%; p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: CABG-R results in increased postoperative morbidity or mortality compared with isolated ROOT. Outcomes, however, are influenced by the specific clinical indication. CABG for coronary artery disease was associated with similar outcomes compared with isolated ROOT. Patients undergoing unplanned CABG for acute ventricular failure had the worst outcomes, thus underscoring the importance of technical success during coronary reimplantation.

Safety of Moderate Hypothermia With Antegrade Cerebral Perfusion in Total Aortic Arch Replacement.

BACKGROUND: Total aortic arch replacement (TOTAL) is a complicated operation and has traditionally required deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. In this study, the impact of moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest (MHCA) and antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP) for TOTAL were examined. METHODS: The ARCH International aortic database was queried and 3,265 patients undergoing TOTAL using ACP were identified. Patients were divided into groups based on lowest cooling temperature: MHCA (20° to 28°C) or deep hypothermia (DHCA) (12° to 20°C). Propensity-matched scoring using 15 variables was used in 669 matched pairs. Multivariable analyses were performed. RESULTS: In the unmatched cohort, more patients underwent MHCA (2,586; 79.2%) who were also younger (p < 0.001) and more frequently underwent emergent operations (p < 0.001) than DHCA patients. For the propensity-matched patients, there were significant differences in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time (MHCA 200 minutes versus DHCA 243 minutes, p < 0.001), aortic crossclamp time (MHCA 120 minutes versus DHCA 142 minutes, p < 0.001), and cerebral perfusion time (MHCA 63 minutes versus DHCA 58 minutes, p < 0.001). Of note, there was no difference in neurologic outcomes nor in-hospital mortality for the two temperature groups. Multivariable analysis of risk factors for mortality included CPB time (odds ratio [OR] 1.006; p < 0.001), concomitant mitral valve surgery (OR 3.070; p = 0.003), emergent operation (OR 2.924; p < 0.001), and poor ejection fraction (OR 3.133; p = 0.011). Independent risk factors for stroke included coronary artery disease (OR 1.856; p < 0.001), cerebral vascular disease (OR 2.172; p < 0.001), emergent operation (OR 2.109; p < 0.001), and CPB time (OR 1.004; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this series, TOTAL with MHCA and ACP can be safely performed with acceptable operative risk. MHCA and ACP represent an effective strategy for TOTAL and may obviate the need for DHCA.

Hypothermia and cerebral protection strategies in aortic arch surgery: a comparative effectiveness analysis from the STS Adult Cardiac Surgery Database.

OBJECTIVES: Hypothermic circulatory arrest is essential to aortic arch surgery, although consensus regarding optimal cerebral protection strategy remains lacking. We evaluated the current use and comparative effectiveness of hypothermia/cerebral perfusion (CP) strategies in aortic arch surgery. METHODS: Using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database, cases of aortic arch surgery with hypothermic circulatory arrest from 2011 to 2014 were categorized by hypothermia strategy-deep/profound (D/P; ≤20°C), low-moderate (L-M; 20.1-24°C), and high-moderate (H-M; 24.1-28°C)-and CP strategy-no CP, antegrade (ACP), retrograde (RCP) or both ACP/RCP. After adjusting for potential confounders, strategies were compared by composite end-point (operative mortality or neurologic complication). RESULTS: Of the 12 521 aortic arch repairs with hypothermic circulatory arrest, the most common combined strategies were straight D/P without CP (25%), D/P + RCP (16%) and D/P + ACP (14%). Overall rates of the primary end-point, operative mortality and stroke were 23%, 12% and 8%, respectively. Among the 7 most common strategies, the 2 not utilizing CP (straight D/P and straight L-M) appeared inferior, associated with significantly higher risk of the composite end-point (odds ratio: 1.6; P < 0.01); there was no significant difference in composite outcome between the remaining strategies (D/P + ACP, D/P + RCP, L-M + ACP, L-M + RCP and H-M + ACP). CONCLUSIONS: In a comparative effectiveness study of cerebral protection strategies for aortic arch repair, strategies without adjunctive CP, including the most commonly utilized strategy of straight D/P hypothermia, appeared inferior to those utilizing CP. There was no clearly superior strategy among remaining techniques, and randomized trials are needed to define best practice.

Hypothermia and Selective Antegrade Cerebral Perfusion Is Safe for Arch Repair in Type A Dissection.

BACKGROUND: Unilateral selective antegrade cerebral perfusion with moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest has been shown to be a safe and effective method of cerebral protection during surgery for acute type A dissection. This study evaluates the impact of this cerebral protection strategy on clinical outcomes after extended aortic arch reconstruction in patients undergoing emergent repair of acute type A dissection. METHODS: A retrospective review from 2004 to 2016 at a US academic center of patients undergoing surgery for acute type A dissections using moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest and selective antegrade cerebral perfusion was performed. Patient data were abstracted from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) institutional database and patient charts. Cohorts were established based on extent of arch replacement: a hemiarch group and a transverse arch group were created. Owing to a dearth of events, a risk score was estimated using a logistic regression model with 30-day mortality as outcome and preoperative variables as predictors, including non-STS variables such as malperfusion. Postoperative outcomes were then adjusted in subsequent regression analyses for the estimated risk score. RESULTS: In all, 342 patients met inclusion criteria and were included for analysis (299 hemiarch, 43 transverse arch). The mean age was 55.4 years and not different between groups (p = 0.79). Preoperative comorbidities, including prior stroke, diabetes mellitus, and renal failure, were also similar between groups (p > 0.2). Inhospital mortality was 11.7% for the entire cohort (11.7% hemiarch, 9.3% transverse arch; p = 0.60), and the permanent stroke rate was 7.3% (7.7% hemiarch, 4.3% transverse arch; p = 0.47). Median circulatory arrest time was 38.9 ± 19.2 minutes (35.0 ± 13.2 hemiarch, 65.1 ± 30.1 transverse arch; p < 0.0001). Lowest median circulatory arrest temperature was 25.9° ± 3.1C° and not different between groups (25.9° ± 3.2°C hemiarch, 26.2° ± 2.6°C transverse arch; p = 0.50). In unadjusted analysis, no increase in operative mortality, temporary neurologic dysfunction, stroke, or renal failure was observed in the transverse arch group when compared with the hemiarch group. These results persisted when adjusted analysis was performed. CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral selective antegrade cerebral perfusion with moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest remains a safe strategy for cerebral protection during emergent surgical repair of acute type A dissection and provides equivalent outcomes for both limited and extensive aortic arch reconstruction. Based on these data, unilateral selective antegrade cerebral perfusion and moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest may represent an optimal strategy for cerebral protection in this acute setting.

Severity of Preoperative Aortic Regurgitation Does Not Impact Valve Durability of Aortic Valve Repair Following the David V Valve Sparing Aortic Root Replacement.

BACKGROUND: The David V valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSRR) is an established and durable method of root reconstruction for varying pathologies. However, the impact of the severity of preoperative aortic regurgitation (AR) on long-term durability remains unclear. The purpose of this research was to investigate the impact of the degree of preoperative AR on midterm durability following VSRR. METHODS: A retrospective review of the adult cardiac surgical database at a single academic center was undertaken from 2005 to 2015 for 223 adult patients who underwent VSRR. Patients were followed annually with echocardiograms, and a prospectively maintained database kept track of patient data. Follow-up was 97.7% complete, and the median echocardiographic follow-up was 25.5 months (range, 1 to 123 months). Patients with preoperative AR less than or equal to 2 were compared with patients with AR greater than 2 to determine the impact of preoperative AR upon valve repair durability. RESULTS: There were 223 patients who underwent VSRR during the study period, including 114 (51.1%) who required concomitant cusp repair. The operative mortality was 5 (2.2%). Ninety-seven patients (43.5%) had preoperative AR greater than 2. A total of 213 patients (95.5%) were available for long-term follow-up; of these patients, 7 (3.3%) had AR greater than 2. Fifty-two patients had a bicuspid aortic valve (22 AR ≤2 and 30 AR >2; p = 0.02). Patients with preoperative AR greater than 2 experienced greater reverse left ventricular remodeling and increases in left ventricular ejection fraction than did patients with preoperative AR less than or equal to 2 (p < 0.01). The midterm freedom from AR greater than 2 was similar for both preoperative AR groups (p = 0.57). The 8-year freedom from AR greater than 2 was 89.1% (95% confidence interval, 55.3% to 97.8%) for patients with preoperative AR less than or equal to 2 and 92.7% (95% confidence interval, 78.8% to 97.6%) for preoperative AR greater than 2. Five patients (2.4%) required aortic valve replacement during the follow-up period (3 preoperative AR ≤2, 2 preoperative AR >2). CONCLUSIONS: VSRR remains an effective and durable treatment for severe AR and preserved leaflet architecture. The severity of preoperative AR does not appear to impact midterm freedom from moderate to severe AR. VSRR results in significant left ventricular remodeling in patients with preoperative AR greater than 2.

The Racial Paradox in Multiarterial Conduit Utilization for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

BACKGROUND: It has been established that outcomes for black patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) are inferior to those of their white counterparts. The purpose of this study was to determine (1) whether rates of multiarterial grafting are different among black patients and white patients, and (2) whether racial differences exist in postoperative outcomes after accounting for grafting strategy. METHODS: A retrospective review of black patients (n = 2,810) and white patients (n = 13,569) who underwent isolated, primary CABG from January 2002 to June 2014 at a US academic institution was performed. A modified predicted risk of mortality (M-PROM) score was calculated for each patient using all The Society of Thoracic Surgeons variables for CABG excluding race. Multivariable linear, logistic, and Cox regression analyses were used to assess between-group differences, adjusted for M-PROM. RESULTS: Overall, 16,379 patients underwent CABG, and 2,441 (14.9%) received more than one arterial graft. When adjusted for M-PROM, the odds of blacks undergoing multiarterial CABG were 10% greater than for whites (p = 0.05). Blacks had worse inhospital outcomes, including higher odds of stroke (odds ratio 2.41, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.80 to 3.25) and prolonged intubation (odds ratio 2.01, 95% CI: 1.77 to 2.28). The increase in postoperative complications did not translate to a difference in inhospital mortality (p = 0.10) between racial cohorts. Moreover, among patients who underwent multiarterial grafting strategies, blacks had a hazard of mortality that was 34% higher (95% CI: 22% to 51%)) than that of their white counterparts. Among black patients, those who underwent multiarterial grafting strategies showed better long-term survival than those undergoing single grafting strategies (hazard ratio 0.86, 95% CI: 0.78 to 0.96). CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar rates of arterial grafting for black patients and white patients in this large single-center cohort, black patients continued to have significantly worse late survival when compared with white patients. Continued evaluation as to the causes of this disparity is warranted.

Outcomes After Surgical Pulmonary Embolectomy for Acute Pulmonary Embolus: A Multi-Institutional Study.

BACKGROUND: Surgical pulmonary embolectomy (SPE) has been sparingly used for the successful treatment of massive and submassive pulmonary emboli. To date, all data regarding SPE have been limited to single-center experiences. The purpose of this study was to document short-term outcomes after SPE for acute pulmonary emboli (PE) at four high-volume institutions. METHODS: A retrospective review of multiple local Society of Thoracic Surgeons databases of adults undergoing SPE from 1998 to 2014 for acute PE was performed (n = 214). Demographic, operative, and outcomes data were collected and analyzed. Patients were summarily categorized as having either massive or submassive PEs based on the presence or absence of preoperative vasopressors. RESULTS: A total of 214 patients with acute PE were treated by SPE. The mean age was 56.0 ± 14.5 years, and 92 (43.6%) patients were female. Of those, 176 (82.2%) PEs were submassive and 38 (17.8%) were massive. Fifteen (7.0%) patients underwent concomitant cardiac procedures, with 10 (4.7%) having simultaneous valvular interventions and 5 (2.4%) undergoing concomitant bypass grafting. Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was used for all cases. Cardioplegic arrest was used for 80 (37.4%) patients. The median CPB and aortic cross clamp times were 71.5 (interquartile range [IQR], 47.0-109.5) and 46.0 (IQR, 26.0-74.5), respectively. Notably, only 25 (11.7%) patients died in the hospital. Mortality was highest among the 28 patients who experienced preoperative cardiac arrest (9, 32.1%) CONCLUSIONS: These data represent the first multicenter experience with SPE for acute pulmonary emboli. Surgical pulmonary embolectomy for acute massive and submassive PE is safe and can be performed with acceptable in-hospital outcomes; the procedure should be included in the multimodality treatment of life-threatening pulmonary emboli.

Predicted Risk of Mortality, Transfusion, and Postoperative Outcomes in Isolated Primary Valve Operations.

BACKGROUND: Transfusion has been linked with increased postoperative morbidity and death after cardiac operations. The purpose of this study was to determine the associations among The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality (PROM), transfusion, and postoperative outcomes in patients who underwent isolated primary valve operations. METHODS: A retrospective review of the local Society of Thoracic Surgeons database of 1,575 adults undergoing isolated primary valve operations from 2003 to 2013 at a United States academic center was performed. Patients were compared by their postoperative transfusion status (NONE vs TRANS) and by PROM. Taking into account procedure type and preoperative hemoglobin, three-step multiple linear or logistic regression analyses were performed to assess (1) the influence of PROM on postoperative outcomes, (2) influence of PROM on transfusion, and (3) influence of PROM and transfusion on postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Of 1,575 patients studied, 1,245 (79%) received transfusions. The mean PROM was 1.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1 to 1.3) for patients in the NONE group, and was 2.7% (95% CI, 2.6 to 2.9) for the TRANS group. The correlation between PROM and total red blood cell units transfused was r = 0.31 (p < 0.0001). Patients with a PROM of 4% to 8% (odds ratio [OR], 2.10; 95% CI, 1.28 to 3.45) and exceeding 8% (OR 3.80, 95% CI, 1.35 to 10.68) were more likely to receive transfusions than the low-risk (<4%) PROM stratum. For each percentage increase in PROM, the odds of transfusion increased by 27% (95% CI, 16% to 39%), controlling for procedure type and preoperative hemoglobin. There were no 30-day deaths in the NONE group, and rates of stroke, renal failure, and mediastinitis were lower. Composite event rates increased with increasing PROM (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.19 to 1.63), with TRANS patients consistently showing a higher risk of major adverse cardiac events than NONE patients (OR, 7.47; 95% CI, 2.08 to 26.80). CONCLUSIONS: Increased PROM yielded higher risks of transfusion. Postoperative outcomes were worse in patients who received a transfusion. This study suggests that the association between transfusion and clinical outcomes may be partly explained by the higher PROM among patients who ultimately received transfusions.

Off-pump and on-pump coronary revascularization in patients with low ejection fraction: a report from the society of thoracic surgeons national database.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes of patients with low ejection fraction who underwent surgical coronary revascularization with or without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). METHODS: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database was queried from January 1, 2008, to June 30, 2011 for patients with an ejection fraction of less than 0.30 who underwent primary, nonemergent coronary artery bypass (CAB) grafting. The entire cohort of 25,667 patients was divided into those who underwent revascularization with (ONCAB, n = 20,509) and without (OPCAB, n = 5,158) CPB. OPCAB patients who were converted to CPB intraoperatively were counted as intended OPCAB and were included in the OPCAB group. Propensity scores were estimated using 32 covariates, and multivariate logistic regression was used to compare risk-adjusted outcomes between groups. RESULTS: Patients undergoing planned OPCAB were older, more frequently female, and had a lower body mass index than those who underwent ONCAB. The OPCAB cohort also had higher rates of prior stroke, peripheral vascular disease, and chronic lung disease. The predicted mortality risk was 2.3% for the OPCAB cohort vs 2.1% for the ONCAB group (p < 0.0001). Of the 5,158 patients who underwent OPCAB, unplanned conversion to CPB occurred in 270 (5.2%). OPCAB was associated with significantly lower adjusted risk of death (odds ratio [OR], 0.82), stroke (OR, 0.67), major adverse cardiac events (OR, 0.75), and prolonged intubation (OR, 0.78). Postoperative transfusion rates were significantly lower in the OPCAB group (44.8% vs 51.6%, p < 0.001). There were no adverse outcomes that occurred more commonly in OPCAB patients. The advantage associated with OPCAB was found in the entire Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database and among high-volume and low-volume OPCAB centers. CONCLUSIONS: In The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database, OPCAB is associated with significantly reduced adjusted risk of early morbidity and mortality for patients having coronary bypass grafting with an ejection fraction of less than 0.30.

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting attenuates morbidity and mortality for patients with low and high body mass index.

BACKGROUND: Patients at high and low body mass index have been shown to experience higher morbidity and mortality when undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. The purpose of this research was to compare outcomes of patients at body mass index extremes who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting with or without cardiopulmonary bypass. METHODS: A retrospective review of 6801 patients with a body mass index <25 or >35 undergoing isolated, primary coronary artery bypass grafting from 1996 to 2009 at Emory Healthcare Hospitals was performed. Patients were compared by therapy either on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 3210) or off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 3591). Salvage patients or those with concomitant operations were excluded. Comparisons were made using multivariable regression analysis, using a propensity score covariate calculated from 41 preoperative risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 6801 patients, including 4312 with a body mass index <25 (off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, n = 2083; on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, n = 2229) and 2489 with a body mass index >35 (off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, n = 1127; on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, n = 1362) were included for analysis. Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality was significantly higher for both body mass index strata in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (2.8% vs 3.1% for body mass index <25 [P = .043] and 1.7% vs 1.8% for body mass index >35 [P = .049]). For patients with a body mass index <25, multivariable analysis of outcomes showed a significant decrease in in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.82), stroke (adjusted odds ratio, 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.56), new-onset renal failure (adjusted odds ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.96), and prolonged ventilation (adjusted odds ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.64). Long-term survival was unaffected by method of revascularization for either body mass index strata (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with high and low body mass indices experience reduced morbidity and in-hospital mortality when undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Despite a higher risk profile, patients with a body mass index <25 who underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting experienced a significant reduction in in-hospital mortality.

Robotic lobectomy: flattening the learning curve.

Early experience with robotic technology in pulmonary resection has emphasized a steep learning curve. We initiated a robotic thoracic surgical program with the goal of minimizing complications, operative times, and hospital stays. We implemented robotic lobe resections at our institution with the intent of performing an operationally analogous procedure to that of the open technique. Specifically, we used single docking of the robotic cart, innovative retraction, single interspace port placement, and dockings specific to the resected lobe. We reviewed outcomes for patients undergoing robotic lobectomy at our institution. Data is presented as mean ± standard deviation. 20 patients (69 ± 12 years) underwent robotic lobe resections. American Joint Committee on Cancer staging for 14 patients undergoing resections for non-small cell lung cancers were Stage I (10), Stage II (2), and Stage III (2). Operative times for 20 patients undergoing robotic lobectomies were 203 ± 53 min. Median postoperative hospital stay was 3 days. Conversions to open procedures were required in two patients secondary to failure to progress (1) and bleeding (1). Complications occurred in four (20%) patients and included atelectasis (2), myocardial infarction (1), and atrial fibrillation (1). No fatalities occurred. The perception that robotic pulmonary resection involves a steep learning curve may not be universally accurate; our operative times and hospital stays are consistent with those reported by established programs. For surgeons experienced in open and thoracoscopic lobectomy, appropriate patient selection coupled with the specific robotic techniques described may flatten the learning curve.

Impact of preoperative renal dysfunction on long-term survival for patients undergoing aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: The impact of the degrees of renal dysfunction (RD) after aortic valve replacement (AVR) has not been well described. The purpose of this study was to compare patients undergoing AVR with a range of renal function from normal to dialysis-dependence. METHODS: A retrospective review of 2,408 patients undergoing AVR with or without coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) from January 1996 to March 2009 was performed. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was estimated for patients using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula. Multivariable logistic and Cox regression methods were used to determine the independent association of GFR with outcomes. Adjusted odds ratios were calculated for in-hospital outcomes, and Kaplan-Meier curves were created to estimate long-term survival. RESULTS: In all, 1,512 patients (62.8%) had isolated AVR, and 896 (37.2%) underwent AVR plus CABG. Preoperative RD was common among all patients: 1,148 of 2,408 (47.7%) with mild RD (GFR 60 to 90 mL·min(-1)·1.73 m(-2)), 644 of 2,408 (26.7%) moderate RD (GFR 30 to 59 mL·min(-1)·1.73 m(-2)), 59 of 2,408 (2.5%) severe RD (GFR 15 to 30 mL·min(-1)·1.73 m(-2)), and 114 (4.7%) with kidney failure (GFR<15) or requiring dialysis. In-hospital mortality generally rose with RD, from 2.9% for patients with no RD to 15.8% for patients with severe RD, and 17.3% for patients requiring dialysis. Patients with severe RD or preoperative dialysis were associated with significantly poorer outcomes. Adjusted long-term survival is progressively worse across levels of RD, as was postoperative length of stay (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative RD is common among the AVR population and is associated with diminished long-term survival. The association between RD and worse outcomes after AVR surgery has significant clinical implications.