Fire safety and emergency evacuation guidelines for intensive care units and operating theatres: for use in the event of fire, flood, power cut, oxygen supply failure, noxious gas, structural collapse or other critical incidents: Guidelines from the Association of Anaesthetists and the Intensive Care Society.

The need to evacuate an ICU or operating theatre complex during a fire or other emergency is a rare event but one potentially fraught with difficulty: Not only is there a risk that patients may come to harm but also that staff may be injured and unable to work. Designing newly-built or refurbished ICUs and operating theatre suites is an opportunity to incorporate mandatory fire safety features and improve the management and outcomes of such emergencies: These include well-marked manual fire call points and oxygen shut off valves (area valve service units); the ability to isolate individual zones; multiple clear exit routes; small bays or side rooms; preference for ground floor ICU location and interconnecting routes with operating theatres; separate clinical and non-clinical areas. ICUs and operating theatre suites should have a bespoke emergency evacuation plan and route map that is readily available. Staff should receive practical fire and evacuation training in their clinical area of work on induction and annually as part of mandatory training, including 'walk-through practice' or simulation training and location of manual fire call points and fire extinguishers, evacuation routes and location and operation of area valve service units. The staff member in charge of each shift should be able to select and operate fire extinguishers and lead an evacuation. Following an emergency evacuation, a network-wide response should be activated, including retrieval and transport of patients to other ICUs if needed. A full investigation should take place and ongoing support and follow-up of staff provided.

Universal videolaryngoscopy: a structured approach to conversion to videolaryngoscopy for all intubations in an anaesthetic and intensive care department.

BACKGROUND: Videolaryngoscopy (VL) is increasingly used, but not yet routine practice, for tracheal intubation. Few departments formally trial equipment before adopting it into practice. We describe the decision-making and implementation processes that our department used when introducing universal VL, with the C-MAC© (Karl Storz, Germany), throughout our anaesthesia and intensive care departments. METHODS: We used a structured process to assess the feasibility of a change to universal VL. After departmental training, we undertook a 2 month trial period of mandating VL for all adult in-theatre intubations. Thereafter, VL remained widely available, but not mandated. We regularly surveyed anaesthetists and anaesthetic assistants to evaluate departmental opinion regarding the introduction of universal VL. RESULTS: Before the trial period, one-third of anaesthetists judged that universal VL would be of overall benefit to patient safety, team dynamics, and quality of care. Reservations from both junior and senior anaesthetists focused on training concerns. Support for a changeover to VL, amongst both anaesthetists and anaesthetic assistants, increased throughout the trial period. Six months after the 2 month trial, support had grown further and was almost unanimous. Anaesthetists reported significant benefits in clinical performance, teaching, and human factors, especially teamwork and situation awareness. CONCLUSIONS: Performing a formal and prolonged trial of mandatory VL in theatre led to changes in perceptions and departmental consensus. As a result of the trial, the department agreed to the use of C-MAC© videolaryngoscopy as the default intubation technique throughout theatres and intensive care, with removal of standard Macintosh laryngoscopes from routine use.

A national survey of videolaryngoscopy in the United Kingdom.

BACKGROUND.: There are increasing numbers of videolaryngoscopes marketed and increasing interest in the technology. The Difficult Airway Society's 2015 guidelines recommend that videolaryngoscopes should be immediately available at all times and that all anaesthetists should be trained and skilled in their use. METHODS.: An electronic survey was sent to all UK National Health Service hospitals to examine availability, use, and attitudes to videolaryngoscopy, and closed in January 2014. RESULTS.: The return rate was 67%. Videolaryngoscopy was available in 91% of operating theatres, ∼50% of intensive care units (ICUs) and obstetric theatres, with lower availability in emergency departments (EDs), paediatric anaesthesia, and independent sector hospitals. The most widely available devices were the Airtraq, the GlideScope, and C-MAC. Approximately one in seven respondents reported availability of videolaryngoscopy in all clinical areas. Most departments imposed restrictions on videolaryngoscopy use, especially the ICU and ED. Device selection was only infrequently based on published literature or formal trial. Structured introduction of videolaryngoscopy into practice was uncommon. Penetration of videolaryngoscopy was highly variable; fewer than a third reported widespread use or enthusiasm, although this increased where the C-MAC and GlideScope were widely available. CONCLUSIONS.: Videolaryngoscopy is available in most hospitals' main operating departments, but in fewer than half of other locations. There is marked variation in device, methods of introduction, usage, and clinical adoption. Most hospitals need to change practice to comply with current guidelines. Selection and implementation vary widely.