Serum HER2/ECD value in stage I and II early breast cancer: need of a lower cut-off?

BACKGROUND: HER2 overexpression is well-established risk factor of worse prognosis in metastatic and early breast cancer. HER2 positivity can be determined from tumor tissue by immunohistochemical staining or by fluorescent in situ hybridization, or from serum by measuring concentration of HER2 receptor extracellular domain (HER2/ECD). HER2/ECD correlates well with worse prognosis in metastatic and locally advanced (stage III) disease if serum concentration is >15 ng/ml, but there are no consistent data for patients with early breast cancer. METHODS AND RESULTS: 41 patients with stage I and II breast cancer and 52 healthy controls were included into the study. HER2/ECD was determined before surgery and correlated with HER2/neu overexpression, Ki67, hormone receptor status and disease stage, and compared with value in healthy controls. Mean serum HER2/ECD concentration in patients was 8.62 ng/ml and 5.78 ng/ml in controls, and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.000061). The best diagnostic cut-off value was 7.7 ng/ml, with 76.92% sensitivity and 72.92% specificity. Positive predictive value of the test was 69.77% and negative predictive value was 79.55%, with 74.71% of patients correctly classified. Serum HER2/ECD correlated with hormone receptors status, and no correlation with histological overexpression has been observed. CONCLUSION. Serum HER2/ECD concentration of ≥7.7 ng/ml has possible diagnostic value in stage I and II breast cancer. It should not be used as a determinant of HER2 positivity. Prognostic significance of HER2/ECD in early breast cancer, its correlation with hormone receptor status, and interconnection between hormone receptors and HER2 receptor signaling should be further analyzed, since it may have therapeutic implications.

Sex or surgery--erectile dysfunction after radical treatment of localized prostate cancer.

The maintenance of satisfactory quality of life is major concern in majority of patients who elect treatment for localized prostate cancer. We conducted a cross-sectional study to determine sexual function after radical prostatectomy (RP) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Study population consisted of series of 57 patients with early-stage adenocarcinoma of the prostate, treated in our institution in the period from January 2003 till December 2003. Thirty three patients underwent radical retropubical prostatectomy and 24 patients were treated by primary radical radiotherapy. Patients have been given the full international index of erectile function (IIEF) questionnaire two to four and six months after the treatment. Post treatment sexual function in patients treated by EBRT is significantly better than in patients treated by RP (48.5% vs. 21.57%, p < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis reveals that satisfaction with erectile function, maintaining of sexual intercourse and possibility of ejaculation is better in patients treated by EBRT than in patients treated by RP (44.67% vs. 11.57%, p < 0.0001) as well as general satisfaction with quality of sexual life (48.5% in EBRT group vs. 21.57% in RP group, p < 0.0001). On the other hand, sexual desire remains the same in both groups of patients (63.75% in EBRT group vs. 60.61% in RP group, p = 0.71). Six months after surgical or radiotherapy treatment erectile function is almost as twice as worse in patients treated by surgery than in patients treated by radiotherapy.

[Side effects of radiotherapy in oral cavity: diagnosis, prevention and treatment guidelines]. / Nuspojave radioterapije u usnoj supljini: dijagnostika, prevencija i terapijske smjernice.

To avoid, or at least to reduce complications in patients who require head and neck radiotherapy, adequate oral cavity treatment is necessary before the therapy. Recent management guidelines speak of possibilities of preventing osteoradionecrosis with hyperbaric oxygen, using long-wave ultrasound in stimulating osteoblasts growth, and surgical transfer of submandibular salivary glands to submental area with 99% effectiveness in preventing xerostomia, besides traditional therapy. Preventive measures are naturally the best choice, since late complications treatment is not needed as often, and should draw special attention of physicians and patients. Since wide a spectrum of preventive and curative measures is required, the need exists for standard teams to look after the patients during and after radiotherapy, and which should include, besides radiotherapist, oral or maxillofacial surgeon in cooperation with oral medicine specialist.