Interobserver variability in target definition for stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation.

Background: Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) is a potential new therapy for patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT). The arrhythmogenic substrate (target) is synthesized from clinical and electro-anatomical information. This study was designed to evaluate the baseline interobserver variability in target delineation for STAR. Methods: Delineation software designed for research purposes was used. The study was split into three phases. Firstly, electrophysiologists delineated a well-defined structure in three patients (spinal canal). Secondly, observers delineated the VT-target in three patients based on case descriptions. To evaluate baseline performance, a basic workflow approach was used, no advanced techniques were allowed. Thirdly, observers delineated three predefined segments from the 17-segment model. Interobserver variability was evaluated by assessing volumes, variation in distance to the median volume expressed by the root-mean-square of the standard deviation (RMS-SD) over the target volume, and the Dice-coefficient. Results: Ten electrophysiologists completed the study. For the first phase interobserver variability was low as indicated by low variation in distance to the median volume (RMS-SD range: 0.02-0.02 cm) and high Dice-coefficients (mean: 0.97 ± 0.01). In the second phase distance to the median volume was large (RMS-SD range: 0.52-1.02 cm) and the Dice-coefficients low (mean: 0.40 ± 0.15). In the third phase, similar results were observed (RMS-SD range: 0.51-1.55 cm, Dice-coefficient mean: 0.31 ± 0.21). Conclusions: Interobserver variability is high for manual delineation of the VT-target and ventricular segments. This evaluation of the baseline observer variation shows that there is a need for methods and tools to improve variability and allows for future comparison of interventions aiming to reduce observer variation, for STAR but possibly also for catheter ablation.

Non-invasive stereotactic arrhythmia radiotherapy for ventricular tachycardia: results of the prospective STARNL-1 trial.

AIMS: Stereotactic arrhythmia radiotherapy (STAR) is suggested as potentially effective and safe treatment for patients with therapy-refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, the current prospective knowledge base and experience with STAR is limited. In this study we aimed to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of STAR. METHODS AND RESULTS: The StereoTactic Arrhythmia Radiotherapy in the Netherlands no.1 was a pre-post intervention study to prospectively evaluate efficacy and safety of STAR. In patients with therapy-refractory VT, the pro-arrhythmic region was treated with a 25 Gy single radiotherapy fraction. The main efficacy measure was a reduction in the number of treated VT-episodes by ≥50%, comparing the 12 months before and after treatment (or end of follow-up, excluding a 6-week blanking period). The study was deemed positive when ≥50% of patients would meet this criterion. Safety evaluation included left ventricular ejection fraction, pulmonary function, and adverse events. Six male patients with an ischaemic cardiomyopathy were enrolled, and median age was 73 years (range 54-83). Median left ventricular ejection fraction was 38% (range 24-52). The median planning target volume was 187 mL (range 93-372). Four (67%) patients completed the 12-month follow-up, and two patients died (not STAR related) during follow-up. The main efficacy measure of ≥50% reduction in treated VT-episodes at the end of follow-up was achieved in four patients (67%). The median number of treated VT-episodes was reduced by 87%. No reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction or pulmonary function was observed. No treatment related serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: STAR resulted in a ≥ 50% reduction in treated VT-episodes in 4/6 (67%) patients. No reduction in cardiac and pulmonary function nor treatment-related serious adverse events were observed during follow-up. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register-NL7510.

Reversible Cause of Cardiac Arrest and Secondary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: Value of Complete Revascularization and LGE-CMR.

Background In survivors of sudden cardiac arrest with obstructive coronary artery disease, it remains challenging to distinguish ischemia as a reversible cause from irreversible scar-related ventricular arrhythmias. We aimed to evaluate the value of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation in sudden cardiac arrest survivors with presumably reversible ischemia and complete revascularization. Methods and Results This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 276 patients (80% men, age 67±10 years) receiving ICD implantation for secondary prevention. Angiography was performed before ICD implantation. A subgroup of 166 (60%) patients underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with late gadolinium enhancement before implantation. Patients were divided in 2 groups, (1) ICD-per-guideline, including 228 patients with incomplete revascularization or left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, and (2) ICD-off-label, including 48 patients with complete revascularization and left ventricular ejection fraction >35%. The primary outcome was time to appropriate device therapy (ADT). During 4.0 years (interquartile range, 3.5-4.6) of follow-up, ADT developed in 15% of the ICD-off-label group versus 43% of the ICD-per-guideline group. Time to ADT was comparable in the ICD-off-label and ICD-per-guideline groups (hazard ratio (HR), 0.46; P=0.08). No difference in mortality was observed (HR, 0.95; P=0.93). Independent predictors of ADT included age (HR, 1.03; P=0.01), left ventricular end-diastolic volume HR, (1.05 per 10 mL increase; P<0.01) and extent of transmural late gadolinium enhancement (HR, 1.12; P=0.04). Conclusions This study demonstrates that sudden cardiac arrest survivors with coronary artery disease remain at high risk of recurrent ventricular arrhythmia, even after complete revascularization and with preserved left ventricular function. Late gadolinium enhancement-cardiac magnetic resonance imaging derived left ventricular volumes and extent of myocardial scar were independently associated with.

Differences between gap-related persistent conduction and carina-related persistent conduction during radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation.

BACKGROUND: During pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), nonisolation after initial encircling of the pulmonary veins (PVs) may be due to gaps in the initial ablation line, or alternatively, earliest PV activation may occur on the intervenous carina and ablation within the wide-area circumferential ablation (WACA) circle is needed to eliminate residual conduction. This study investigated prognostic implications and predictors of gap-related persistent conduction (gap-RPC) and carina-related persistent conduction (carina-RPC) during PVI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two hundred fourteen atrial fibrillation (AF) patients (57% paroxysmal, 61% male, mean age 62 ± 9 years) undergoing first contact force-guided radiofrequency PVI were studied. Preprocedural cardiac computed tomography imaging was used to assess left atrial and PV anatomy. PVI was assessed directly after initial WACA circle creation, after a minimum waiting period of 30 minutes, and after adenosine infusion. Persistent conduction was targeted for additional ablation and classified as gap-RPC or carina-RPC, depending on the earliest activation site. The 1-year AF recurrence rate was higher in patients with gap-RPC (47%) compared to patients without gap-RPC (28%; P = .003). No significant difference in 1-year recurrence rate was found between patients with carina-RPC (37%) and patients without carina-RPC (31%; P = .379). Multivariate analyses identified paroxysmal AF and WACA circumference as independent predictors of gap-RPC, whereas carina width and WACA circumference correlated with carina-RPC. CONCLUSIONS: Gap-RPC is associated with increased AF recurrence risk after PVI, whereas carina-RPC does not predict AF recurrence. Moreover, gap-RPC and carina-RPC have different correlates and may thus have different underlying mechanisms.

Left atrial sphericity as a marker of atrial remodeling: Comparison of atrial fibrillation patients and controls.

BACKGROUND: Left atrial (LA) sphericity has been proposed as a more sensitive marker of atrial fibrillation (AF)-associated atrial remodeling compared to traditional markers such as LA size. However, mechanisms that underlie changes in LA sphericity are not fully understood and studies investigating the predictive value of LA sphericity for AF ablation outcome have yielded conflicting results. The present study aimed to assess correlates of LA sphericity and to compare LA sphericity in subjects with and without AF. METHODS: Measures of LA size (LA diameter, LA volume, LA volume index), LA sphericity and thoracic anteroposterior diameter (APd) at the level of the LA were determined using computed tomography (CT) imaging data in 293 AF patients (62% paroxysmal AF) and 110 controls. RESULTS: LA diameter (40.1 ± 6.8 mm vs. 35.2 ± 5.1 mm; p < 0.001), LA volume (116.0 ± 33.0 ml vs. 80.3 ± 22.6 ml; p < 0.001) and LA volume index (56.1 ± 15.3 ml/m2 vs. 41.6 ± 11.1 ml/m2; p < 0.001) were significantly larger in AF patients compared to controls, also after adjustment for covariates. LA sphericity did not differ between AF patients and controls (83.7 ± 2.9 vs. 83.9 ± 2.4; p = 0.642). Multivariable linear regression analysis demonstrated that LA diameter, LA volume, female sex, body length and thoracic APd were independently associated with LA sphericity. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that thoracic constraints rather than the presence of AF determine LA sphericity, implying LA sphericity to be unsuitable as a marker of AF-related atrial remodeling.