Venous thrombosis following endovenous laser ablation with and without thromboprophylaxis.

OBJECTIVE: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurs infrequently after endovenous laser ablation (EVLA). The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence of VTE after EVLA with and without pharmacologic prophylaxis. METHODS: From October 2019 to March 2020, a series of consecutive patients from the prospectively maintained VEINOVA (vein occlusion with various techniques) registry was retrospectively analyzed. All the patients underwent EVLA with and without postoperative thromboprophylaxis. A 1470-nm laser wavelength with a radial fiber was used for EVLA. Concomitant phlebectomy or sclerotherapy of insufficient tributaries was allowed. Perivenous tumescence was applied with 1% Rapidocaine (lidocaine hydrochloride monohydrate; Sintetica SA). Ablation of varicose veins was performed by continuously drawing back the laser fiber at a power of 10 W, aiming for a linear endovenous energy delivery of 60 to 90 J/cm. Compression stockings were applied postoperatively, and the patients were advised to wear them for 1 week. Duplex ultrasound was performed at the 1- and 4-week follow-up visits to determine the occlusion rate and the occurrence of EHIT and VTE. RESULTS: Overall, 249 patients were identified from the registry. Of the 249 patients, 26 were omitted because of treatment of recurrent varicose veins. Finally, 223 consecutive patients with 223 legs and 227 saphenous veins (159 great saphenous veins, 49 small saphenous veins, and 19 anterior accessory saphenous veins) were included in the final analysis. Their mean age was 58.1 ± 13.8 years, and 167 patients (73.1%) were women. The clinical CEAP (clinical, etiology, anatomy, pathophysiology) classification was C2 for 11 legs (4.9%), C3 for 123 legs (55.2%), C4a or C4b for 86 legs (38.6%), and C5 to C6 for 3 legs (1.4%). Thromboprophylaxis was given to 132 patients (59.2%) for 3 days (rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily to 130 patients [98.5%] and low-molecular-weight heparin to 2 patients [1.5%]). No thromboprophylaxis was administered to 91 patients (40.8%) after EVLA. The average treatment length was 34.2 ± 19.3 cm and the average diameter was 5.0 ± 1.3 mm. At 1 week of follow-up, no thrombotic event had occurred in either group. At 4 weeks of follow-up, one case of EHIT class 2 (1.1%) and one case of pulmonary embolism (1.1%) had occurred in the group without thromboprophylaxis. In the thromboprophylaxis group, one deep vein thrombosis (0.8%) event had occurred (adjusted P = .135). At 1 and 4 weeks of follow-up, the treated varicose veins remained occluded in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Endovenous ablation of truncal varicose veins appears to be safe with a low thrombotic event rate with or without pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis. However, more data are needed before a final recommendation regarding the best thromboprophylaxis treatment option can be given.

Safety, feasibility, and early efficacy of the water-specific 1940-nm laser wavelength for ablation of saphenous incompetence.

Objective: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and early efficacy of saphenous vein ablation using a water-specific 1940-nm diode laser wavelength using low linear endovenous energy density. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a series of patients who had undergone endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) between July 2020 and October 2021 from the multicenter, prospectively maintained VEINOVA (vein occlusion with various techniques) registry. EVLA was performed using a water-specific 1940-nm radial laser fiber. In the same session, all insufficient tributaries were treated by phlebectomy or sclerotherapy. Tumescent anesthesia was injected into the perivenous space. The vein diameter, energy delivered, and linear endovenous density were reviewed at baseline. The incidence of venous thromboembolism, endovenous heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT), burns, phlebitis, paresthesia, and occlusion were reviewed at 2 days and 6 weeks of follow-up. We used descriptive statistics to describe the results. Results: Overall, 229 patients were identified. Of the 229 patients, 34 were excluded because of treatment of recurrent varicose veins at a previously operated site (residual or neovascularization). Finally, 108 patients with varicose veins and 87 with recurrent varicose veins (new varicose veins in an untreated area) due to disease progression were included in the present analysis. A total of 256 native saphenous veins (163 great saphenous veins, 53 small saphenous veins, and 40 accessory saphenous veins) in 224 legs had undergone EVLA. The mean patient age was 58.3 ± 16.5 years. Of the 195 patients, 134 (68.7%) were women and 61 (31.3%) were men. Nearly one half of the patients had a history of saphenous vein surgery (44.6%). The CEAP (clinical, etiology, anatomy, pathophysiology) class was C2 in 31 legs (13.8%), C3 in 108 (48.2%), C4a to C4c in 72 (32.1%), and C5 or C6 in 13 legs (5.8%). The treatment length was 34.8 ± 18.3 cm. The mean diameter was 5.0 ± 1.2 mm. The average linear endovenous density was 34.8 ± 9.2 J/cm. Concomitant miniphlebectomy was performed in 163 patients (83.6%) and concomitant sclerotherapy in 35 patients (18%). At 2 days and 6 weeks of follow-up, the occlusion rate of the treated truncal veins was 99.6% and 99.6%, respectively, with only one truncal vein (0.4%) with partial recanalization at 2 days and 6 weeks of follow-up. No cases of proximal deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or EHIT had occurred at follow-up. Only one patient (0.5%) had developed calf deep vein thrombosis at 6 weeks of follow-up. The incidence of postoperative ecchymosis was rare (1.5%) and had resolved at 6 weeks of follow-up. Conclusions: EVLA of incompetent saphenous veins using the water-specific 1940-nm diode laser wavelength is feasible and appears to be safe and efficient with a high occlusion rate, minimal side effects, and a zero rate of EHIT.

Safety and efficacy of outpatient endovenous laser ablation in patients 75 years and older: a propensity score-matched analysis.

AIMS OF THE STUDY: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) in patients 75 years and older in an outpatient setting. METHODS: In this multicentre retrospective study, we collected the demographic, procedural and outcome data of all consecutive patients with varicose veins class C2 to C6 undergoing EVLA of truncal and accessory saphenous veins. The primary efficacy endpoint was complete ablation of the treated veins diagnosed with duplex ultrasound at 4-week follow up. The primary safety endpoint was endothermal heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) at 4-week follow up as diagnosed by duplex ultrasound. A secondary endpoint was minor or major bleeding. RESULTS: Between February 2009 and December 2015, a total of 829 patients were treated with EVLA of the truncal and accessory saphenous veins. Among them, 747 were <75 years old (group 1) and 82 were ≥75 years old (group 2). The primary efficacy outcome was reached in 739 patients (98.9%) in group 1 and in 80 patients (97.6%) in group 2 (odd ratio [OR] 0.43, confidence interval [CI] 0.09–2.07; p = 0.295). The number of patients with EHIT type 2 and DVT were 4 (0.5%) and 2 (0.3%), respectively, in group 1, and 2 (2.4%) and 1 (1.2%), respectively, in group 2 (OR 4.64, CI 0.83–25.75; p = 0.079 and OR 4.59, CI 0.41–51.27; p = 0.215, respectively). Minor bleeding events occurred in 36 patients (4.8%) in group 1 and 7 patients (8.9%) in group 2 (OR 1.84, CI 0.79-4.29; p = 0.155). No major bleeding occurred in either group. Propensity score-matched analysis revealed no significant difference in efficacy and safety outcomes. CONCLUSION: EVLA performed as an outpatient procedure seems to be effective and safe in the elderly population as compared to the younger age group.