Development and validation of a rapid sarcopenia screening questionnaire: The Otassha study.

AIM: To develop a rapid and easy screening tool to detect sarcopenia. METHODS: In total, 683 community-dwelling older adults who participated in our cohort study, the "Otassha Study," in 2019, completely responded to a questionnaire, and were diagnosed with sarcopenia were included. Participants responded to a nine-item questionnaire, including candidate items for a new sarcopenia screening tool named rapid sarcopenia screening, based on items of the Strength, Assistance with walking, Rising from a chair, Climbing stairs, and Falls (SARC-F) questionnaire. To select appropriate items for the new screeening tool, multiple logistic regression analyses were performed, with sarcopenia as the dependent variable and questionnaire responses as independent variables. The area under the curve using 10 000 bootstraps was used to assess the rapid sarcopenia screening diagnostic ability for detecting sarcopenia. RESULTS: Responses to question nos 2 (how much can you squeeze a wet towel?), 5 (how much muscle strength do you think you have compared with that of people of your age and sex?), 7 (how fast do you usually walk?), and 9 (age-related item) were related to sarcopenia in multiple logistic regression analysis. The area under the curve of the total score of rapid sarcopenia screening was 0.82, 0.80, and 0.81 for men, women, and overall, respectively. At a cut-off value of 14/15, the sensitivity and specificity for sarcopenia detection were 0.73 and 0.73, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The newly developed sarcopenia screening tool has a better diagnostic ability for sarcopenia than the SARC-F. Rapid sarcopenia screening does not require physical function measurements, making it a useful and accessible tool among older adults to detect sarcopenia. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2023; 23: 945-950.

Association between sarcopenia and oral functions in community-dwelling older adults: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined the state of oral function in older adults with sarcopenia. We assessed the oral functions of community-dwelling older adults with sarcopenia from multiple perspectives to clarify their potentially low oral function. METHODS: A total of 1517 (86.2%; 990 women, 527 men; mean age 76.1 ± 7.6 years) participants were included in this study. Grip strength, gait speed and skeletal muscle mass index were assessed, and sarcopenia was evaluated according to the criteria of the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019. The degree of tongue coating, oral moisture, occlusal force, tongue-lip motor function, tongue pressure, masticatory function and swallowing function were assessed. The criteria for oral hypofunction (a disease that is a combination of multiple low oral functions) were used to assess oral function. Statistical analyses were performed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, unpaired t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, χ2 test, and univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses, with each oral function as the dependent variable and sarcopenia as one of the independent variables. The significance level was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: The prevalence rates of sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia were 14.2% and 3.8%, respectively. The prevalence of oral hypofunction was 39.9%. Compared with the robust group, the sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia groups tended to have a higher frequency of the following components (all P < 0.01): low occlusal force, low tongue-lip motor function, low tongue pressure, low masticatory function, low swallowing function and oral hypofunction. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that sarcopenia was associated with low occlusal force, low tongue-lip motor function, low tongue pressure, low masticatory function, low swallowing function and oral hypofunction. The odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of sarcopenia for each oral function were 2.62 [2.00, 3.43], 2.21 [1.69, 2.89], 3.66 [2.79, 4.81], 3.23 [2.46, 4.25], 1.66 [1.26, 2.20] and 3.59 [2.72, 4.72], respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that sarcopenia was associated with low occlusal force (1.63 [1.10, 2.40]), low tongue pressure (2.28 [1.65, 3.15]), low masticatory function, (1.94 [1.27, 2.97]), low swallowing function (1.64 [1.17, 2.28]) and oral hypofunction (2.17 [1.52, 3.09]). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that multiple aspects of oral function were low among community-dwelling older adults with sarcopenia. The potential decline in oral functions in older adults with sarcopenia may have been overlooked until now. This study indicates the need for dental perspectives in intervening with older adults with sarcopenia and the need to encourage them to see dental professionals.

Utility of SARC-F in daycare facilities for older people.

AIM: SARC-F, a sarcopenia screening tool, has limited use but may be beneficial for detecting sarcopenia in frail older people. This study aimed to clarify the validity of the SARC-F questionnaire in older people. METHODS: In this validation study, 74 (36 men; age, 81.9 ± 6.7 years, 38 women; age, 83 ± 6.2 years) community-dwelling older people who attended a daycare facility participated in our study. Participants completed the SARC-F and SARC-calf circumference (SARC-CalF) questionnaires, and their body composition, walk speed and grip strength were measured. Sarcopenia was determined using the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia criteria, and the participants were divided into non-sarcopenia and sarcopenia groups. SARC-F and SARC-CalF scores were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for sarcopenia considering the area under the curve. Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha. RESULTS: The prevalence of sarcopenia, defined by physical characteristics, was 60.0% in men and 48.1% in women. The area under the curve of the SARC-F for sarcopenia was 0.703 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.585-0.821, P = 0.001). Cronbach's alpha was 0.81, and the internal consistency was high. SARC-F had lower sensitivity (0.47; 95% CI: 0.31-0.64) but higher specificity (0.78; 95% CI: 0.60-0.89) than the sensitivity and specificity of SARC-CalF, respectively, and the sensitivity of SARC-F was higher than that reported in previous studies. CONCLUSION: The SARC-F questionnaire is more sensitive in assessing sarcopenia in low-functioning populations and can be used as a screening tool for sarcopenia in long-term daycare facilities for older people rather than in community-based healthcare activities. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2022; 22: 889-893.

Association between oral, social, and physical frailty in community-dwelling older adults.

OBJECTIVES: Oral frailty (OF) has been shown to be a predictor of disability. Therefore, it is important to be able to identify factors associated with OF in order to prevent long-term dependence. The purpose of this study was to clarify the relationships between OF, social frailty (SF), and physical frailty (PF) in community-dwelling older adults, with the overarching aim of informing the future development of effective measures to prevent frailty. METHODS: Oral, physical, and social function, nutritional and psychological status, and medical history were examined in 682 community-dwelling individuals (267 men, 415 women) aged ≥ 65 years. Ordinal logistic regression analysis with SF and PF as independent variables was performed with pass analysis to determine the relationship between the different types of frailty. RESULTS: Logistic regression analysis revealed significant associations between OF and decline in social function, physical function, and nutritional status, and an increase in the number of medications used. Path analysis showed that SF was directly related to OF and that OF and SF were directly related to PF. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that a decline in social function may directly influence a decline in oral and physical function. The results of this study provide initial evidence, that may guide the future development of measures that aim to prevent and manage OF.

Limitations of SARC-F in the diagnosis of sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults.

PURPOSE: The SARC-F is a recommended screening tool for sarcopenia; however, its sensitivity is reported to be very low. This study aimed to confirm the diagnostic efficacy of the SARC-F and whether it is affected by population characteristics. METHODS: In this study, 2 cohorts of 1060 community-dwelling older adults, who were monitored by the Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, were included. In addition to the overall dataset, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to obtain the SARC-F results for sarcopenia among the datasets for only those older in age (over 75 years), those with higher frailty points (above the median total score for the Kihon Checklist points), those with lower grip strength (below the median), lower gait speed (below the median), and those with comorbidities (hypertension, cerebral vascular disease, heart disease, and diabetes mellitus). RESULTS: In the overall dataset, sensitivity and specificity were 3.9% and 97.3%, respectively. In analyzing the area under the curve, sensitivity and specificity for older age and low physical function datasets were significant, but had low values. The diabetes dataset had higher values but did not effectively diagnose sarcopenia at a cutoff value of 4. CONCLUSION: The SARC-F had high specificity for the diagnosis of sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults with low physical function. However, its sensitivity was low. Despite these limitations, it may be used as a screening tool for sarcopenia in selected populations, such as adults in hospitals or nursing homes.

SARC-F: A validation study with community-dwelling older Japanese adults.

AIM: The SARC-F is a useful clinical index for sarcopenia screening; however, this measure has low sensitivity. Furthermore, this tool has never been validated on community-dwelling older Japanese adults. The goal of the present study was to validate a Japanese version of the SARC-F and confirm its suitability for Japanese samples. METHODS: Participants were 734 community-dwelling older adults in the Itabashi Ward, Japan. Bioimpedance measures, walking speed, grip strength and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) were measured. Sarcopenia was defined using the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People, the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia criteria and Japanese-adjusted Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia. SARC-F receiver operating characteristic curves for each sarcopenia measure were used to evaluate diagnostic accuracy. Physical functioning, IADL and sarcopenia screening tools were compared with the SARC-F. RESULTS: A total of nine men (3.1%) and 15 women (3.4%) were classified into a SARC-F sarcopenia group. The sarcopenia group had lower physical functioning and Mini Sarcopenia Risk Assessment scores and higher frailty status than the control group. The Cronbach's alpha for the SARC-F was 0.610, suggesting insufficient internal consistency. SARC-F scores were related to physical functioning, IADL, and Mini Sarcopenia Risk Assessment scores. Receiver operating characteristic analyses of the SARC-F based on each criterion showed low sensitivity, but high specificity. CONCLUSIONS: The Japanese version of the SARC-F appears to be a useful index for reflecting physical functioning and IADL. However, it is necessary to further determine whether this tool is useful for detecting sarcopenia among community-dwelling older adults. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2019; 19: 1172-1178.