Efficacy and safety of platelet additive solution-E stored platelet concentrates.

INTRODUCTION: In 2018, platelet (PLT) additive solution-E (PAS-E) was introduced. The implementation of PAS-E was expected to diminish the number of allergic reactions in recipients following a PLT transfusion. Here, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of transfusions with PLTs stored in PAS-E. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: After implementation of PAS-E, data were collected from 2 cohorts of patients with hematological disorders as well as oncology patients, receiving PLTs in PAS-E. A similar patient group in a recent RCT, receiving PLTs in plasma, was used as a historical control group for both cohorts. Endpoints were corrected count increments (CCIs), bleeding scores (only reported in cohort 1), and the incidence of adverse reactions. RESULTS: In cohort 1, the mean 1-h CCI was 14.3 ± 6.9, and the 24-h CCI was 8.7 ± 5.6. In cohort 2, the 1-h CCI was 11.6 ± 7.8 and the 24-h CCI was 7.0 ± 6.1. In the control group, the 1-h CCI was 15.4 ± 5.5 and 24-h CCI 8.7 ± 4.8. Bleeding complications of WHO grade ≥2 occurred in 40% of patients in cohort 1 compared to 44% in plasma PCs. The incidence of adverse reactions was 1.2% in the two PAS-E cohorts, compared to 3.0% in plasma PCs. National hemovigilance data showed a significant reduction in allergic reactions with PAS-E PC transfusions as compared to plasma PCs with an odds ratio of 0.46 (CI 95% 0.37-0.58). CONCLUSION: The CCIs of PLTs in PAS-E were decreased compared to plasma PCs, but clinically acceptable. Allergic transfusion reactions were decreased in PAS-E PCs compared to plasma PCs.

Altered Fc glycosylation of anti-HLA alloantibodies in hemato-oncological patients receiving platelet transfusions.

BACKGROUND: The formation of alloantibodies directed against class I human leukocyte antigens (HLA) continues to be a clinically challenging complication after platelet transfusions, which can lead to platelet refractoriness (PR) and occurs in approximately 5%-15% of patients with chronic platelet support. Interestingly, anti-HLA IgG levels in alloimmunized patients do not seem to predict PR, suggesting functional or qualitative differences among anti-HLA IgG. The binding of these alloantibodies to donor platelets can result in rapid clearance after transfusion, presumably via FcγR-mediated phagocytosis and/or complement activation, which both are affected by the IgG-Fc glycosylation. OBJECTIVES: To characterize the Fc glycosylation profile of anti-HLA class I antibodies formed after platelet transfusion and to investigate its effect on clinical outcome. PATIENTS/METHODS: We screened and captured anti-HLA class I antibodies (anti-HLA A2, anti-HLA A24, and anti-HLA B7) developed after platelet transfusions in hemato-oncology patients, who were included in the PREPAReS Trial. Using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, we analyzed the glycosylation profiles of total and anti-HLA IgG1 developed over time. Subsequently, the glycosylation data was linked to the patients' clinical information and posttransfusion increments. RESULTS: The glycosylation profile of anti-HLA antibodies was highly variable between patients. In general, Fc galactosylation and sialylation levels were elevated compared to total plasma IgG, which correlated negatively with the platelet count increment. Furthermore, high levels of afucosylation were observed for two patients. CONCLUSIONS: These differences in composition of anti-HLA Fc-glycosylation profiles could potentially explain the variation in clinical severity between patients.

Association between cardiovascular risk factors and intracranial hemorrhage in patients with acute leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Intracranial hemorrhage is seen more frequently in acute leukemia patients compared to the general population. Besides leukemia-related risk factors, also risk factors that are present in the general population might contribute to hemorrhagic complications in leukemia patients. Of those, cardiovascular risk factors leading to chronic vascular damage could modulate the occurrence of intracranial hemorrhage in these patients, as during their disease and treatment acute endothelial damage occurs due to factors like thrombocytopenia and inflammation. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to explore if cardiovascular risk factors can predict intracranial hemorrhage in acute leukemia patients. METHODS: In a case-control study nested in a cohort of acute leukemia patients, including 17 cases with intracranial hemorrhage and 55 matched control patients without intracranial hemorrhage, data on cardiovascular risk factors were collected for all patients. Analyses were performed via conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: Pre-existing hypertension and ischemic heart disease in the medical history were associated with intracranial hemorrhage, with an incidence rate ratio of 12.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5 to 109.2) and 12.1 (95% CI 1.3 to110.7), respectively. CONCLUSION: Both pre-existing hypertension and ischemic heart disease seem to be strong predictors of an increased risk for intracranial hemorrhage in leukemia patients.

Thrombocytopenia and the effect of platelet transfusions on the occurrence of intracranial hemorrhage in patients with acute leukemia - a nested case-control study.

We designed a study to describe the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage according to severity and duration of thrombocytopenia and to quantify the associations of platelet transfusions with intracranial hemorrhage in patients with acute leukemia. In this case-control study nested in a cohort of 859 leukemia patients, cases (n = 17) were patients diagnosed with intracranial hemorrhage who were matched with control patients (n = 55). We documented platelet counts and transfusions for seven days before the intracranial hemorrhage in cases and in a "matched" week for control patients. Three measures of platelet count exposure were assessed in four potentially important time periods before hemorrhage. Among these leukemia patients, we observed the cumulative incidence of intracranial hemorrhage of 3.5%. Low platelet counts were, especially in the three to seven days preceding intracranial hemorrhage, associated with the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage, although with wide confidence intervals. Platelet transfusions during the week preceding the hemorrhage were associated with higher incidences of intracranial hemorrhage; rate ratios (95% confidence interval) for one or two platelet transfusions and for more than two transfusions compared with none were 4.04 (0.73 to 22.27) and 8.91 (1.53 to 51.73) respectively. Thus, among acute leukemia patients, the risk of intracranial hemorrhage was higher among patients with low platelet counts and after receiving more platelet transfusions. Especially, the latter is likely due to clinical factors leading to increased transfusion needs.

The quality of platelet concentrates related to corrected count increment: linking in vitro to in vivo.

BACKGROUND: Storage of platelet concentrates (PCs) results in reduced recovery and survival of transfused platelets (PLTs). Upon storage PLTs develop storage lesion that can be monitored by several laboratory tests. However, correlation of these descriptive tests with corrected count increments (CCIs), a marker frequently used to establish the effectiveness of PLT transfusions, is limited or unknown. This study investigated to what extent a functional test or a combined in vitro rating score improves the correlation of laboratory tests with 1-hour CCI. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: PCs were analyzed using six different laboratory tests (n = 123) before transfusion in a prophylactic setting to 74 hematooncologic patients. Linear regression and Spearman correlation were used to determine associations between descriptive (either separately or combined in an in vitro rating score) or functional test results and 1-hour CCIs obtained after transfusion. RESULTS: CD62P expression (r = -0.45), annexin V binding (r = -0.36), the updated in vitro rating score (r = 0.50), and PLT responsiveness after thrombin receptor activator for peptide-6 (TRAP) (r = 0.43-0.57) or adenosine diphosphate stimulation (r = 0.11-0.51) significantly correlated to 1-hour CCIs obtained after transfusion, whereas lactate concentration, ThromboLUX score, and thromboelastography measurements did not. The strongest correlations were observed for in vitro rating score and PLT responsiveness after TRAP stimulation and these tests could explain 24 and 33% of the observed variation in 1-hour CCI, respectively. CONCLUSION: Combining descriptive markers in one in vitro rating score improved correlation to 1-hour CCI compared to the tests separately. Of all tests investigated, mean PLT responsiveness after TRAP stimulation showed the strongest clinical correlation and was best able to predict the 1-hour CCI.

The identification of cases of major hemorrhage during hospitalization in patients with acute leukemia using routinely recorded healthcare data.

INTRODUCTION: Electronic health care data offers the opportunity to study rare events, although detecting these events in large datasets remains difficult. We aimed to develop a model to identify leukemia patients with major hemorrhages within routinely recorded health records. METHODS: The model was developed using routinely recorded health records of a cohort of leukemia patients admitted to an academic hospital in the Netherlands between June 2011 and December 2015. Major hemorrhage was assessed by chart review. The model comprised CT-brain, hemoglobin drop, and transfusion need within 24 hours for which the best discriminating cut off values were taken. External validation was performed within a cohort of two other academic hospitals. RESULTS: The derivation cohort consisted of 255 patients, 10,638 hospitalization days, of which chart review was performed for 353 days. The incidence of major hemorrhage was 0.22 per 100 days in hospital. The model consisted of CT-brain (yes/no), hemoglobin drop of ≥0.8 g/dl and transfusion of ≥6 units. The C-statistic was 0.988 (CI 0.981-0.995). In the external validation cohort of 436 patients (19,188 days), the incidence of major hemorrhage was 0.46 per 100 hospitalization days and the C-statistic was 0.975 (CI 0.970-0.980). Presence of at least one indicator had a sensitivity of 100% (CI 95.8-100) and a specificity of 90.7% (CI 90.2-91.1). The number of days to screen to find one case decreased from 217.4 to 23.6. INTERPRETATION: A model based on information on CT-brain, hemoglobin drop and need of transfusions can accurately identify cases of major hemorrhage within routinely recorded health records.

Hemostatic efficacy of pathogen-inactivated vs untreated platelets: a randomized controlled trial.

Pathogen inactivation of platelet concentrates reduces the risk for blood-borne infections. However, its effect on platelet function and hemostatic efficacy of transfusion is unclear. We conducted a randomized noninferiority trial comparing the efficacy of pathogen-inactivated platelets using riboflavin and UV B illumination technology (intervention) compared with standard plasma-stored platelets (control) for the prevention of bleeding in patients with hematologic malignancies and thrombocytopenia. The primary outcome parameter was the proportion of transfusion-treatment periods in which the patient had grade 2 or higher bleeding, as defined by World Health Organization criteria. Between November 2010 and April 2016, 469 unique patients were randomized to 567 transfusion-treatment periods (283 in the control arm, 284 in the intervention arm). There was a 3% absolute difference in grade 2 or higher bleeding in the intention-to-treat analysis: 51% of the transfusion-treatment periods in the control arm and 54% in the intervention arm (95% confidence interval [CI], -6 to 11; P = .012 for noninferiority). However, in the per-protocol analysis, the difference in grade 2 or higher bleeding was 8%: 44% in the control arm and 52% in the intervention arm (95% CI -2 to 18; P = .19 for noninferiority). Transfusion increment parameters were ∼50% lower in the intervention arm. There was no difference in the proportion of patients developing HLA class I alloantibodies. In conclusion, the noninferiority criterion for pathogen-inactivated platelets was met in the intention-to-treat analysis. This finding was not demonstrated in the per-protocol analysis. This trial was registered at The Netherlands National Trial Registry as #NTR2106 and at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02783313.

Thrombocytopenia and bleeding in myelosuppressed transfusion-dependent patients: a simulation study exploring underlying mechanisms.

BACKGROUND: Hematology-oncology patients often become severely thrombocytopenic and receive prophylactic platelet transfusions when their platelet count drops below 10×109 platelets/L. This so-called "platelet count trigger" of 10×109 platelets/L is recommended because currently available evidence suggests this is the critical concentration at which bleeding risk starts to increase. Yet, exposure time and lag time may have biased the results of studies on the association between platelet counts and bleeding risks. METHODS: We performed simulation studies to examine possible effects of exposure time and lag time on the findings of both randomized trials and observational data. RESULTS: Exposure time and lag time reduced or even reversed the association between the risk of clinically relevant bleeding and platelet counts. The frequency of platelet count measurements influenced the observed bleeding risk at a given platelet count trigger. A transfusion trigger of 10×109 platelets/L resulted in a severely distorted association, which closely resembled the association reported in the literature. At triggers of 0, 5, 10, and 20×109 platelets/L the observed percentages of patients experiencing bleeding were 18, 19, 19, and 18%. A trigger of 30×109 platelets/L showed an observed bleeding risk of 16% and triggers of 40 and 50×109 platelets/L both resulted in observed bleeding risks of 13%. CONCLUSION: The results from our simulation study show how minimal exposure times and lag times may have influenced the results from previous studies on platelet counts, transfusion strategies, and bleeding risk and caution against the generally recommended universal trigger of 10×109 platelets/L.

A study protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating clinical effects of platelet transfusion products: the Pathogen Reduction Evaluation and Predictive Analytical Rating Score (PREPAReS) trial.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopaenia frequently experience minor and sometimes severe bleeding complications. Unrestrictive availability of safe and effective blood products is presumed by treating physicians as well as patients. Pathogen reduction technology potentially offers the opportunity to enhance safety by reducing bacterial and viral contamination of platelet products along with a potential reduction of alloimmunisation in patients receiving multiple platelet transfusions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: To test efficacy, a randomised, single-blinded, multicentre controlled trial was designed to evaluate clinical non-inferiority of pathogen-reduced platelet concentrates treated by the Mirasol system, compared with standard plasma-stored platelet concentrates using the percentage of patients with WHO grade ≥ 2 bleeding complications as the primary endpoint. The upper limit of the 95% CI of the non-inferiority margin was chosen to be a ≤ 12.5% increase in this percentage. Bleeding symptoms are actively monitored on a daily basis. The adjudication of the bleeding grade is performed by 3 adjudicators, blinded to the platelet product randomisation as well as by an automated computer algorithm. Interim analyses evaluating bleeding complications as well as serious adverse events are performed after each batch of 60 patients. The study started in 2010 and patients will be enrolled up to a maximum of 618 patients, depending on the results of consecutive interim analyses. A flexible stopping rule was designed allowing stopping for non-inferiority or futility. Besides analysing effects of pathogen reduction on clinical efficacy, the Pathogen Reduction Evaluation and Predictive Analytical Rating Score (PREPAReS) is designed to answer several other pending questions and translational issues related to bleeding and alloimmunisation, formulated as secondary and tertiary endpoints. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained in all 3 participating countries. Results of the main trial and each of the secondary endpoints will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR2106; Pre-results.

Clinical effectiveness of leucoreduced, pooled donor platelet concentrates, stored in plasma or additive solution with and without pathogen reduction.

Pathogen reduction (PR) of platelet products increases costs and available clinical studies are equivocal with respect to clinical and haemostatic effectiveness. We conducted a multicentre, open-label, randomized, non-inferiority trial comparing the clinical effectiveness of buffy-coat derived leukoreduced platelet concentrates (PC) stored for up to 7 d in plasma with platelets stored in platelet additive solution III (PASIII) without and with treatment with amotosalen-HCl/ultraviolet-A (UVA) photochemical pathogen reduction (PR-PASIII). Primary endpoint of the study was 1-h corrected count increment (CCI). Secondary endpoints were 24-h CCI, bleeding, transfusion requirement of red cells and PC, platelet transfusion interval and adverse transfusion reactions. Compared to plasma-PC, in the intention to treat analysis of 278 evaluable patients the mean difference for the 1-h CCI of PR-PASIII-PC and PASIII-PC was -31% (P < 0.0001) and -9% (P = n.s.), respectively. Twenty-seven patients (32%) had bleeding events in the PR-PASIII arm, as compared to 19 (19%) in the plasma arm and 14 (15%) in the PASIII arm (P = 0.034). Despite the potential advantages of pathogen (and leucocyte) inactivation of amotosalen-HCl/UVA-treated platelet products, their clinical efficacy is inferior to platelets stored in plasma, warranting a critical reappraisal of employing this technique for clinical use.