Tasa de publicaciones de trabajos presentados sobre artritis reumatoidea en congresos de Reumatología / Publication rates of papers on rheumatoid arthritis submitted to Congresses of Rheumatology

Resumen Introducción: se publica una minoría de todos los trabajos presentados en los Congresos Argentinos de Reumatología (CAR). Objetivos: analizar los temas de estudio (TDE) de los trabajos sobre artritis reumatoidea (AR) presentados en los CAR y su tasa de publicación. Materiales y métodos: se analizaron todos los resúmenes sobre AR, como motivo primario de estudio, presentados en los CAR entre 2008 y 2017. Se agruparon según TDE, y se determinaron los TDE repetidos definidos como, al menos, dos estudios similares presentados sobre el mismo tema. Se determinó la tasa de publicación, el número de estudios similares por TDE, el número de centros participantes y el número de pacientes estudiados. Resultados: sobre 346 trabajos presentados, 51 (14,7%) fueron publicados. Se publicaron 14 (11,9%) de los 118 estudios sobre TDE repetidos versus 37 (16,2%) del resto de los TDE (p=0,4). Los trabajos sobre TDE repetidos no incluyeron más pacientes ni involucraron a un número mayor de centros. Se encontraron 13 TDE repetidos con al menos tres estudios similares y ningún estudio publicado. Conclusiones: solo una minoría de los trabajos sobre AR se publicó. Un tercio de los trabajos presentados en los CAR correspondió a TDE repetidos, que no mejoraron la tasa de publicación.

Abstract Introduction: only a few articles submitted to the Argentine Congress of Rheumatology (ACOR) are published. Objectives: to analyse the topics of study (TOS) and the publication rate of articles on rheumatoid arthritis (RA) submitted to the ACOR. Materials and methods: every abstract submitted to the ACOR between 2008 and 2017, whose primary research subject was RA, was analyzed and sorted according to TOS. Repeated TOS, defined as at least two similar studies on the same topic, were identified. The publication rate and the number of similar studies according to TOS, participating centers, and patients were determined. Results: out of 346 articles submitted, 51 (14.7%) were published. Fourteen (11.9%) of the 118 studies on repeated TOS were published vs. 37 (16.2%) of the rest of the TOS (p: 0.4). The articles on repeated TOS neither included more patients nor involved a higher number of centers. Thirteen repeated TOS with at least three similar studies, but no published articles were identified. Conclusions: only a few articles on RA were published. One third of the studies submitted to the ACOR are repeated TOS, a fact that does not improve the publication rate.

Características de los pacientes con artritis reumatoidea que impactan en la satisfacción y la adherencia al tratamiento: subanálisis de los datos de Argentina, Chile y Uruguay del estudio SENSE / Characteristics of patients with rheumatoid arthritis that impact treatment satisfaction and adherence: subanalysis of data from Argentina, Chile and Uruguay from the SENSE study

Introducción: las necesidades y perspectivas de los pacientes son determinantes para tratar la artritis reumatoidea (AR). Objetivos: evaluar el impacto de la respuesta inadecuada a los fármacos antirreumáticos modificadores de la enfermedad (DMARD) sobre la satisfacción con el tratamiento, los resultados y las perspectivas de pacientes adultos con control inadecuado de la AR de actividad moderada/alta. Materiales y métodos: se evaluó la satisfacción mediante el cuestionario Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) v1.4. Se recolectaron datos sobre la calidad de vida, la adherencia y las estrategias de manejo. Se presentan los resultados para Argentina, Chile y Uruguay (n=202). Resultados: el promedio de la escala de satisfacción global TSQM fue de 62,3±21,8. El 83% informó buena adherencia. Las principales expectativas del tratamiento fueron "alivio duradero de los síntomas" y "menos dolor articular". El 53,47% prefirió tratamiento oral y el 75,74% eligió un rápido inicio de acción. El efecto secundario menos aceptado fue "mayor riesgo de neoplasias". Se planificó rotar el DMARD en el 55% de los casos. De estos, el 84,7% se consideraron terapias avanzadas. La mayoría estaba abierto a un esquema combinado, pero el 25,2% prefirió no utilizarlo. Conclusiones: los resultados reafirman el compromiso con las estrategias treat-to-target, considerando la individualización de las decisiones terapéuticas en el contexto regional.

Introduction: patients' needs and perspectives are determinants for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Objectives: to evaluate the impact of inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) on treatment satisfaction, outcomes and perspectives of adult patients with inadequate control of moderate/high activity RA. Materials and methods: satisfaction was assessed using the TSQM v1.4 questionnaire. Data on quality of life, adherence and management strategies were collected. Results are presented for Argentina, Chile and Uruguay (n=202). Results: the mean of the TSQM global satisfaction score was 62.3±21.8. Eighty-three percent reported good adherence. The main expectations of treatment were "lasting relief of symptoms" and "less joint pain". The 53.47% of patients preferred an oral treatment; 75.74% chose a rapid onset of action. The least accepted side effect was "increased risk of malignant neoplasms". Fifty-five percent planned to rotate DMARD. Of these, advanced therapies were considered in only 84.7%. Most were open to a combination treatment, but 25.2% preferred not to use it. Conclusions: the results reaffirm the commitment to treat-to-target strategies, considering the individualization of therapeutic decisions in the regional context.

Vacunación contra SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes con esclerosis sistémica en Argentina: preferencias, acceso y adherencia al plan de vacunación / Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with systemic sclerosis in Argentina: preferences, access and adherence to the vaccination plan

Introducción: en pacientes con enfermedades reumatológicas autoinmunes se recomienda la aplicación sistemática y secuencial de una serie de vacunas para la prevención de enfermedades transmisibles. El objetivo de este estudio fue estimar la proporción de pacientes con esclerosis sistémica (ES) que recibieron vacunación contra el coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2). Materiales y métodos: se envió una encuesta anónima por correo electrónico o contacto por WhatsApp desde mayo a septiembre de 2021, con preguntas para evaluar la adherencia al esquema de vacunación recomendado en pacientes con enfermedades reumatológicas, así como temores, preferencias y adherencia al esquema de vacunación contra el SARS-CoV-2. Resultados: se incluyeron 295 pacientes con ES. El 68,81% estaba vacunado contra el SARS-CoV-2 con al menos una dosis, de los cuales el 48,7% tenía dos dosis. El 84,75% refirió conversar con su médico sobre su esquema de vacunación general. Solo el 5,4% tenía las cuatro vacunas. El 93,56% manifestó voluntad de vacunarse contra el SARS-CoV-2; el 56,27% prefirió la vacuna Sputnik V. El 7,46% manifestó su voluntad de no vacunarse. Los factores que influyeron en la adherencia a la vacunación, con mayor frecuencia, fueron el miedo a contraer la infección por SARS-CoV-2 (86,1%) y las reacciones adversas (23,05%). Conclusiones: destacamos el hecho de que solo 6 meses después de que se dispusiera la vacunación contra el SARS-CoV-2, la mitad de los pacientes con ES tenía el esquema recomendado completo.

Introduction: in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases, the systematic and sequential application of a series of vaccines is recommended for the prevention of communicable diseases. The objective was to estimate the proportion of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) who received vaccination against coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2). Materials and methods: since may to september 2021, an anonymous survey was sent by email or messaging app, containing questions to assess adherence to the recommended vaccination schedule in patients with rheumatic diseases, as well as fears, preferences and adherence to vaccination schedule against SARS-CoV-2. Results: 295 patients with SSc were included. 68.81% were vaccinated for SARS-CoV-2 with at least one dose, 48.7% of this group had two doses. 84.75% reported talking to their doctor about their general vaccination schedule. Only 5.4% had all four vaccines. 93.56% expressed willingness to be vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2, 56.27% preferred the Sputnik V vaccine. 7.46% expressed their willingness to not be vaccinated. The factors that most frequently influenced adherence to vaccination were fear of contracting SARS-CoV-2 infection (86.1%) and adverse reactions (23.05%). Conclusions: we highlight the fact that only 6 months after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 became available, half of the patients with SSc had the full recommended schedule.

Systemic lupus erythematosus diagnosed during hospitalization: Greater baseline disease activity, short-term damage, and death / Lupus eritematoso sistémico diagnosticado durante una internación: mayor actividad basal de la enfermedad, daño y muerte a corto plazo

ABSTRACT Objectives: To analyze initial and follow-up features of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) diagnosed during hospitalization. Methods: Retrospective analysis of medical records: two groups were studied, a) SLE diagnosed during hospitalization (SLEin), b) SLE diagnosed on an outpatient basis (SLEout). Results: 123 patients were assessed, 87% female, mean age at diagnosis was 34 years and 45 (37%) of them were SLEin. Patients in the SLEin group had a median of 144 days from the onset of symptoms to diagnosis of SLE vs. 287 days in the SLEout group (p = 0.04). Initially, SLEin had an average SLEDAI of 10 vs. 8 in SLEout (p = 0.004) and anti-dsDNA was positive in 71% vs. 53% in SLEout (p = 0.07). Within the first 6 months, the average cumulative glucocorticoid dose was 6493 mg in SLEin patients vs. 3563 mg in SLEout (p < 0.001) and immunosuppressant usage was higher in SLEin: 62% vs. 26% in SLEout (p<0.001). Within the first year, SLEin's kidney biopsies showed lupus nephritis III or IV in 31% vs. 12% in SLEout (p = 0.003, log-rank test). Within the first 2 years, 6 SLEin patients died vs. 1 SLEout patient (p = 0.02) and SLEin patients had more damage as measured by SLICC/ACR Damage Index (median 0, range 25%-75% 0-1 vs. median 0, range 25%-75% 0-0 in SLEout; p = 0.04). Conclusions: SLEin are initially more active, require higher doses of glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants, have more significant kidney involvement, and present more damage and greater mortality in the short term.

RESUMEN Objetivo: Analizar las características de los pacientes con lupus eritematoso sistêmico (LES) diagnosticados durante una hospitalización. Métodos: Análisis retrospectivo de historias clínicas. Se estudiaron dos grupos: a) LES diagnosticado durante la hospitalización (SLEin) y b) LES diagnosticado de forma ambulatoria (SLEout). Resultados: Se evaluaron 123 pacientes (87% mujeres); edad promedio al diagnóstico 34 arios; el 37% de ellos era SLEin. Los pacientes del grupo SLEin tuvieron una mediana de 144 días desde el inicio de los síntomas hasta el diagnóstico, vs. 287 días en SLEout (p = 0,04). Inicialmente, los pacientes SLEin tenían un SLEDAI promedio de 10, vs. 8 en SLEout (p = 0,004) y anti-dsDNA positivo en el 71%, vs. el 53% en SLEout (p = 0,07). A los 6 meses, la dosis acumulada de glucocorticoides (promedio) fue de 6.493 mg en SLEin vs. 3.563 mg en SLEout (p<0,001), y el uso de inmunosupresores fue mayor en SLEin: 62% vs. 26% en SLEout (p< 0,001). Al año se halló nefritis lúpica clase III o IV en el 31% de SLEin vs. el 12% en SLEout (Log Rank Test: p = 0,003). A los 2 años, 6 pacientes de SLEin murieron, vs. un paciente de SLEout (p = 0,02). Los pacientes con SLEin tuvieron más daño (índice de daño SLICC/ACR: mediana 0, rango 25-75%: 0-1, vs. mediana 0, rango 25-75%: 0-0 en SLEout; p = 0,04). Conclusiones: Los pacientes SLEin fueron inicialmente más activos, requirieron mayores dosis de glucocorticoides e inmunosupresores, tuvieron una afectación renal más significativa y presentaron más daño y mayor mortalidad a corto plazo.

Disfunción sexual en mujeres con esclerosis sistémica / Sexual dysfunction in women with systemic sclerosis

Introducción: la disfunción sexual (DS) es común entre las mujeres con enfermedades crónicas, incluyendo esclerosis sistémica (ES). Se ha asociado con características como la duración de la enfermedad, dolor, disminución de la actividad funcional, entre otras. Desde nuestro conocimiento, aún no contamos con datos locales. Objetivos: evaluar la frecuencia de DS en mujeres con ES; describir las características sociodemográficas, clínicas y psicológicas asociadas con la DS en mujeres con ES. Materiales y métodos: estudio observacional, analítico y de corte transversal. Se incluyeron mujeres de entre 20 y 59 años con diagnóstico de ES, según los criterios de clasificación del European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology (ACR/EULAR 2013). Se excluyeron pacientes con enfermedades crónicas no controladas, otras patologías reumatológicas autoinmunes, e inactividad sexual o patología genitourinaria no relacionadas a ES en las últimas 4 semanas. La DS se evaluó con la versión en español del cuestionario índice de función sexual femenina (Female sexual function index, FSFI). Resultados: se incluyeron 56 pacientes. El 78,57% presentó DS y 19,64% era sexualmente inactiva debido a la enfermedad. Escala visual análoga (EVA) de fatiga (coeficiente β: -0,08, IC 95%: -0,14 a -0,02; p<0,01), edad (coeficiente β: -0,23, IC 95%: -0,40 a -0,05; p=0,01) y fibromialgia (coeficiente β: -11,90, IC 95%: -17,98 a -5,82; p<0,01) mostraron una asociación significativa e independiente con DS en el análisis multivariado. Conclusiones: la DS es frecuente entre las mujeres con ES, y las pacientes más jóvenes, sin fibromialgia y con menor fatiga presentaron una mejor funcionalidad sexual.

Introduction: sexual impairment (SI) is common among women with chronic diseases, including systemic sclerosis (SSc). It has been associated with characteristics such as the duration of the disease, pain, decreased functional activity, among others. To the best of our knowledge, we still do not have local data. Objectives: to evaluate the frequency of SI in women with SSc. To describe the sociodemographic characteristics, disease itself and psychological items associated with SI in women with SSc. Materials and methods: observational, analytical, cross-sectional study. We included women between 20 and 59 years diagnosed with SSc according to 2013 classification criteria ACR/EULAR. We excluded patients with uncontrolled chronic diseases or other autoimmune rheumatologic diseases and patients who, in the last 4 weeks, had dyspareunia or were sexually inactive due to causes not attributable to their disease. SI was assessed using the Spanish version of female sexual function index questionnaire (FSFI). Results: 56 patients were included. 78.57% presented SI and 19.64% of them were sexually inactive patients due to the disease. Fatigue VAS (β coefficient: -0.08, CI 95%: -0.14 to -0.02; p<0.01), age (β coefficient: -0.23, CI 95%: -0.40 to -0.05; p=0.01) and fibromyalgia (β coefficient: -11.90, CI 95%: -17.98 to -5.82; p<0.01) showed significant and independent association with SI in the multivariate analysis. Conclusions: SI is frequent among women with SSc, and younger patients, without fibromyalgia and with less fatigue have better sexual function.

Disfunción sexual en mujeres con esclerosis sistémica / Sexual dysfunction in women with systemic sclerosis

Introducción: la disfunción sexual (DS) es común entre las mujeres con enfermedades crónicas, incluyendo esclerosis sistémica (ES). Se ha asociado con características como la duración de la enfermedad, dolor, disminución de la actividad funcional, entre otras. Desde nuestro conocimiento, aún no contamos con datos locales. Objetivos: evaluar la frecuencia de DS en mujeres con ES; describir las características sociodemográficas, clínicas y psicológicas asociadas con la DS en mujeres con ES. Materiales y métodos: estudio observacional, analítico y de corte transversal. Se incluyeron mujeres de entre 20 y 59 años con diagnóstico de ES, según los criterios de clasificación del European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology (ACR/EULAR 2013). Se excluyeron pacientes con enfermedades crónicas no controladas, otras patologías reumatológicas autoinmunes, e inactividad sexual o patología genitourinaria no relacionadas a ES en las últimas 4 semanas. La DS se evaluó con la versión en español del cuestionario índice de función sexual femenina (Female sexual function index, FSFI). Resultados: se incluyeron 56 pacientes. El 78,57% presentó DS y 19,64% era sexualmente inactiva debido a la enfermedad. Escala visual análoga (EVA) de fatiga (coeficiente ß: -0,08, IC 95%: -0,14 a -0,02; p<0,01), edad (coeficiente ß: -0,23, IC 95%: -0,40 a -0,05; p=0,01) y fibromialgia (coeficiente ß: -11,90, IC 95%: -17,98 a -5,82; p<0,01) mostraron una asociación significativa e independiente con DS en el análisis multivariado. Conclusiones: la DS es frecuente entre las mujeres con ES, y las pacientes más jóvenes, sin fibromialgia y con menor fatiga presentaron una mejor funcionalidad sexual.

Introduction: sexual impairment (SI) is common among women with chronic diseases, including systemic sclerosis (SSc). It has been associated with characteristics such as the duration of the disease, pain, decreased functional activity, among others. To the best of our knowledge, we still do not have local data. Objectives: to evaluate the frequency of SI in women with SSc. To describe the sociodemographic characteristics, disease itself and psychological items associated with SI in women with SSc. Materials and methods: observational, analytical, cross-sectional study. We included women between 20 and 59 years diagnosed with SSc according to 2013 classification criteria ACR/EULAR. We excluded patients with uncontrolled chronic diseases or other autoimmune rheumatologic diseases and patients who, in the last 4 weeks, had dyspareunia or were sexually inactive due to causes not attributable to their disease. SI was assessed using the Spanish version of female sexual function index questionnaire (FSFI). Results: 56 patients were included. 78.57% presented SI and 19.64% of them were sexually inactive patients due to the disease. Fatigue VAS (ß coefficient: -0.08, CI 95%: -0.14 to -0.02; p<0.01), age (ß coefficient: -0.23, CI 95%: -0.40 to -0.05; p=0.01) and fibromyalgia (ß coefficient: -11.90, CI 95%: -17.98 to -5.82; p<0.01) showed significant and independent association with SI in the multivariate analysis. Conclusions: SI is frequent among women with SSc, and younger patients, without fibromyalgia and with less fatigue have better sexual function.

Participación laboral en espondiloartritis axial radiográfica y no radiográfica / Labor participation in radiographic and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis

Introducción: las limitaciones laborales son un punto importante a considerar en el tratamiento de la espondiloartritis axial (EspAax) dado que esta enfermedad afecta a las personas en la etapa más productiva de la vida. Objetivos: describir la situación laboral en pacientes con EspAax de Argentina, incluyendo la espondilitis anquilosante (EA) y la espondiloartritis axial no radiográfica (EspAax-nr), y evaluar los factores asociados a la pérdida de productividad laboral (PPL) en esta cohorte nacional y los factores asociados a estar empleado. Materiales y métodos: en este estudio transversal y multicéntrico se incluyeron pacientes con diagnóstico de EA y EspAax-nr según los criterios de clasificación de la Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS 2009) y en edad laboral (≤65 años). Los objetivos principales fueron evaluar la situación laboral, el ausentismo y el presentismo, valorados por el cuestionario Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA). Se utilizó el coeficiente de Spearman para evaluar la correlación entre las medidas de la enfermedad y la PPL. Se realizó un análisis bivariado y multivariado para evaluar los factores asociados a estar empleado. Resultados: se incluyeron 129 pacientes con EspAax, 95 (73,6 %) con EA y 34 (26,4%) con EspAax-nr. La mediana (p25-75) de edad fue de 45 (35-55) años. La duración mediana de la enfermedad fue de 62 (24-123) meses y el retraso en el diagnóstico fue de 24 (6-72) meses. Sesenta (46,5%) pacientes estaban empleados. La mediana (p25-75) de presentismo de los pacientes con EA fue del 29,6% (0-57) y del 30% (20-40) para los pacientes con EspAax-nr (p=0,02). Asimismo, la mediana (p25-75) de PPL fue del 30% en ambos grupos de pacientes. Se encontró una correlación positiva entre la PPL y las siguientes variables: ASDAS (Rho:0.60), BASDAI (Rho:0.50), BASFI (Rho:0.60), ASQoL (Rho:0.60) y ASAS health index (Rho:0.54). En el análisis bivariado, los factores asociados al desempleo fueron el diagnóstico de EA, la edad avanzada, la mayor duración de la enfermedad, las comorbilidades (hipertensión y diabetes), el menor número de años de educación, la peor calidad de vida y la menor capacidad funcional. En el análisis multivariado, una mejor función física (evaluada por BASFI) se asoció de forma independiente a estar empleado. Conclusiones: este estudio demostró que la PPL en esta cohorte nacional fue del 30% en la EspAax. Se asoció con la actividad de la enfermedad, el estado de salud, la calidad de vida y la capacidad funcional. Una mejor función física se relacionó en forma independiente con una mayor probabilidad de mantener a los pacientes con EspAax empleados.

Introduction: work disability is an important outcome in the treatment of spondyloarthritis (SpA) since this disease affects people in the most productive stage of life. Objectives: to investigate working status in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) from Argentina, including ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and nonradiographic axial SpA (nr-axSpA), and to evaluate factors associated with work productivity loss (WPL) in this national cohort and factors associated with being employed. Materials and methods: patients with a diagnosis of AS and nr-axSpA according to Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS 2009) classification criteria and in working age (≤65 years) were included in this multicentric cross-sectional study. Outcomes of interest were employment status, absenteeism and presenteeism, assessed by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) questionnaire. Spearman's coefficient was used to assess the correlation between disease measures and WPL. Bivariate and multivariate analysis were performed in order to evaluate factors associated with being employed. Results: 129 patients with axSpA were included, 95 (73.6%) with AS and 34 (26.4%) with nr-axSpA. Median (p25-75) age of 45 (35-55) years. Median (p25-75) disease duration was 62 (24-123) months and diagnosis delay was 24 (6-72) months. 60 (46.5%) of the patients were employed. Median (p25-75) presenteeism of AS patients was 29.6% (0-57) and 30% (20-40) for patients with EspAax-nr (p=0.02). Median (p25-75) WPL was 30% in both groups of patients. A positive correlation was found between WPL and the following variables: ASDAS (Rho:0.60), BASDAI (Rho:0.50), BASFI (Rho:0.60), ASQoL (Rho:0.60) and ASAS health index (Rho:0.54). In the bivariate analysis, the factors associated with unemployment were AS diagnosis, older age, longer disease duration, comorbidities (hypertension and diabetes), fewer years of education, worse quality of life and lower functional capacity. In the multivariate analysis, better physical function (assessed by BASFI) was independently associated with being employed. Conclusions: this study showed that WPL in this national cohort was 30% in axSpA. It was associated with disease activity, health status, quality of life and functional capacity. Better physical function was independently associated with a higher likelihood of keeping patients with axSpA employed.

Asociación entre Artritis Reumatoidea y otras enfermedades autoinmunes / Association between Rheumatoid Arthritis and other autoimmune diseases

Objetivos: Determinar la frecuencia de enfermedades autoinmunes (EAI) en pacientes con Artritis Reumatoidea (AR) y comparar la frecuencia de EAI entre pacientes con AR y sin AR ni otra EAI reumatológica. Material y Métodos: Estudio multicéntrico, observacional, analítico, retrospectivo. Se incluyeron pacientes consecutivos con AR (ACR/EULAR 2010) y como grupo control pacientes con diagnóstico inicial de Osteoartritis primaria (OA). Resultados: Se incluyeron 1549 pacientes: 831 con AR (84% mujeres, edad media 55.2 años [DE 13.6]) y 718 con OA (82% mujeres, edad media 67 años [DE 11.1]). La frecuencia de EAI en el grupo AR fue del 22% (n=183). Estos presentaron mayor frecuencia de EAI reumatológicas (9.4 vs 3.3%, p< 0.001), y menor frecuencia de EAI no reumatológicas que aquellos con OA (15.3 vs 20.5, p=0.007). La EAI reumatológica más prevalente fue el Síndrome de Sjögren, el cual fue más frecuente en el grupo AR (87.2 vs 29.2%, p< 0,001). La frecuencia de EAI reumatológicas en los pacientes con AR fue mayor en la forma erosiva (11 vs 6.8%, p=0.048). Conclusión: La frecuencia de EAI en los pacientes con AR fue del 22%, en quienes predominaron las de etiología reumatológica mientras que, las no reumatológicas predominaron en pacientes con OA.

Objectives: To determine the frequency of autoimmune diseases (AID) in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) patients and to compare this frequency between patients with and without RA or other rheumatologic AID. Methods: Multicenter, observational, analytical, retrospective study. Consecutive patients with diagnosis of RA (ACR/EULAR 2010) were included. Patients with initial diagnosis of primary ostearthritis (OA) were used as control group. Results: A total of 1549 patients were included: 831 RA (84% women, mean age 55.2 [±13.6]) and 718 OA (82% women, mean age 67 [± 11.1]). The frequency of AID in the RA group was 22% (n=183). RA patients showed higher frequency of rheumatologic AID (9.4 vs 3.3%, p< 0.001), and lower frequency of non-rheumatologic AID than OA patients (15.3 vs 20.5%, p= 0.007). The most prevalent rheumatic AID was Sjögren's Syndrome, which was more frequent in the AR group (87.2 vs 29.2%, p<0.001). The frequency of rheumatologic AID in RA patients was higher in those with erosive RA (11 vs 6.8%, p=0.048). Conclusion: The frequency of AID in RA patients was 22%. Rheumatologic AID were more frequent in RA patients, whereas non-rheumatologic AID prevailed in OA patients.

Use of systemic glucocorticoids in patients with psoriatic arthritis by Argentinian and other Latin-American rheumatologists.

To analyse the administration of systemic glucocorticoids (SGC) to patients with Psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Online, anonymous, multiple-choice, closed-ended survey on SGC use in PsA, dose, duration of therapy, and the reason for administration. One hundred and twenty rheumatologists from Argentina (ARG) and 75 from other countries in Latin-America (LAT) completed the survey. Only 6% of the respondents indicated that they did not prescribe SGC, and 65% claimed that they administered them to less than 10% of their patients. Among those physicians who used SGC, 71% prescribed between 5 and 10 mg/day of prednisone, and only 5% over 10 mg/day. Seventy-three percent of the respondents administered SGC for less than 3 months, and 93% associated them with DMARDs, Biological Therapy (BT), or DMARDs plus BT. Clinical indications for SGC were (more than one option was possible): peripheral arthritis (79%), dactylitis (23%), enthesitis (20%), cutaneous involvement (11%), and axial involvement (8%). Thirty-four percent of ARG physicians versus 21% of LAT used SGC in over 10% of their patients (p 0.07) while 76.5% of ARG versus 59% of LAT administered doses higher than 5 mg/day of prednisone (p 0.01). SGC were indicated by most of the rheumatologists surveyed, but only to a reduced number of patients with PsA, at low doses, for short periods of time, associated with DMARDs/BT, and with the aim of treating peripheral joint manifestations. Argentinian physicians tended to prescribe SGC to more patients and at slightly higher doses.

Una nueva herramienta para valorar la calidad de vida de pacientes con artritis reumatoidea que no requiere licencia: el cuestionario QOL-RA II (Quality of Life-Rheumatoid Arthritis Scale-II) / A new tool to assess quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis that does not require a license: QOL-RA II (Quality of Life-Rheumatoid Arthritis Scale-II)

Recientemente, validamos el cuestionario Quality of Life-Rheumatoid Arthritis Scale (QOL-RA) y detectamos la presencia de algunas limitaciones. Por esta razón, con la autorización de la autora, cambiamos dos preguntas y desarrollamos una nueva versión en español: el QOL-RA II. Objetivo: Validar el QOL-RA II en una cohorte argentina de pacientes con Artritis Reumatoidea (AR). Material y métodos: Estudio de corte transversal. Se incluyeron pacientes ≥18 años de edad, con diagnóstico de AR según criterios ACR-EULAR 2010. Se consignaron datos sociodemográficos, comorbilidades, características clínicas y actividad de la enfermedad. Se administraron los cuestionarios EQ-5D-3L, QOL-RA II, HAQ-A y PHQ-9. A 20 pacientes se les re-administró el cuestionario a los 7 días de haber completado el primero para evaluar reproducibilidad. Análisis estadístico: Test T de Student, ANOVA, Chi². Correlación de Spearman. Alpha de Cronbach. Coeficiente de correlación intraclase. Regresión Logística Multinomial con modelo factorial completo. Regresión lineal múltiple. Resultados: Se incluyeron 430 pacientes, con un tiempo mediano (m) de evolución de 9 años (RIC: 4-16). La m del QOL-RA II fue 6,7 (RIC: 5,3-8). El tiempo promedio para completarlo fue de 1,7±0,57 minutos y para su cálculo de 12±1,7 segundos. Solo 9 (2,1%) pacientes no contestaron alguna pregunta. El cuestionario presentó excelente confiabilidad (α de Cronbach 0,97), reproducibilidad (CCI: 0,96) y buena correlación entre los diferentes ítems y el cuestionario total, sin evidencia de redundancia. QOL-RA II presentó además, buena correlación con EQ-5D-3L (Rho: 0,6), HAQ-A (Rho: 0,55) y PHQ-9 (Rho: 0,56) y moderada con los índices de actividad de la enfermedad DAS28-ERS (Rho: 0,38) y CDAI (Rho: 0,46). Se evidenció peor calidad de vida en aquellos pacientes que no realizaban actividad física (X 6,4±1,9 vs. 7±1,8, p <0,0001), en los desocupados (X 6,1±1,9 vs. 7±1,8, p <0,0001) y en los tabaquistas (X 6,2±1,7 vs. 6,7±1,9, p=0,03). Se observó una tendencia significativa a empeorar la calidad de vida a mayor actividad de la enfermedad. Ajustando por edad, sexo y tiempo de evolución de la enfermedad, las variables que se asociaron significativamente a peor calidad de vida fueron la desocupación, la mayor actividad de la enfermedad, la discapacidad funcional y la presencia de depresión. Conclusión: El QOL-RA II demostró buena validez de constructo, reproducibilidad. Fue fácil de completar y calcular. No se observó redundancia entre las preguntas ni influencia por la edad ni el tiempo de evolución de la enfermedad.

We have recently validated the Quality of Life-Rheumatoid Arthritis Scale (QOL-RA). We have found some limitations, that is why, with the author's permission, we have changed two questions and developed a new Spanish version, QOL-RA II. Objective: To validate the QOL-RA II in an Argentinean cohort of patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). Material and methods: Cross-sectional study. Patients ≥18 years old, with a diagnosis of RA according to ACR-EULAR 2010 criteria were included. Sociodemographic data, comorbidities, RA characteristics, disease activity current treatment were registered. Questionnaires were administered: EQ-5D-3L, QOL-RA, HAQ-A and PHQ-9. The QOL-RA II was re-administered in 20 patients to evaluate reproducibility. Statistical analysis: Student's T, ANOVA and Chi² tests. Spearman correlation. Cronbach's alpha. Reproducibility using ICC. Multinomial logistic regression with completed factorial model. Multiple linear regression. Results: 430 patients were included, with a median (m) disease duration of 8.9 years (IQR: 4-16). QOL-RA was m 6.6 (IQR: 5.3-8). Mean time to complete it was 1.7±0.57 minutes and to calculate it 12±17 seconds. Only 2.1% of the questionnaires presented missing answers. It showed very good reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.97), reproducibility (ICC: 0.96) and good correlation between the different items and the total questionnaire, without evidence of redundancy. Besides, QOL-RA II presented good correlation with EQ-5D-3L (Rho: 0.6), HAQ-A (Rho: 0.55) and PHQ-9 (Rho: 0.56) and moderate with DAS28-ESR (Rho: 0.38) and CDAI (Rho: 0.46). Worse quality of life was observed in patients not doing physical activity (X 6.4±1.9 vs. 7±1.8, p <0.0001), unemployed (X 6.1±1.9 vs. 7±1.8, p <0.0001) and current smokers (X 6.2±1.7 vs. 6.7±1.9, p=0.03). Patients with higher disease activity had a significant poorer quality of life. Adjusting by age, sex and disease duration, unemployment, higher disease activity, disability and the presence of depression were independently associated to worse quality of life. Conclusions: QOL-RA II demonstrated good construct validity, reproducibility and reliability. It was easy to complete and calculate. There were no redundancy between questions and it was not influenced by age and disease duration.

Spanish Validation of the GEPARD Questionnaire for the Detection of Psoriatic Arthritis in Argentinian Patients with Psoriasis.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is preceded by psoriasis in approximately 80% of cases. Dermatologists are pivotal for early detection. It is important to have simple tools that allow the detection of PsA in patients with skin psoriasis. The aim of our study was to evaluate the performance of an adapted version of the GEPARD Questionnaire in Spanish in Argentinian patients with psoriasis. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study. A new Spanish (Argentinian) (GEPARDa) translated version of the original questionnaire (German) was developed and then tested as a diagnostic tool in patients with psoriasis, PsA, osteoarthritis associated to psoriasis, and osteoarthritis, all evaluated by rheumatologists who used the CASPAR criteria. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients were included (55 [66.3%] women with a mean age of 50.7 years [SD 6.3]). Forty-four patients had PsA (29 [34.9%] patients had previous diagnosis of PsA, and 15 [18%] were newly diagnosed after referral by their dermatologists), and 39 patients were without PsA (18 [21.6%] patients had psoriasis without articular involvement, 6 [7.22%] had psoriasis associated with osteoarthritis, and 15 [18%] had osteoarthritis). An area under the curve of 0.9554 (SD 0.01; 95% CI 0.91-0.99) was calculated considering the CASPAR criteria as the gold standard. With a cutoff of ≥6 the questionnaire showed a sensitivity of 88.64%, a specificity of 89.74%, a positive likelihood ratio of 8.6, and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.12. CONCLUSIONS: The GEPARDa version has proven to be a diagnostic tool with excellent performance so that it can be considered a valid tool for the detection of PsA in Argentinian patients.

Lung Ultrasound as a Screening Method for Interstitial Lung Disease in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) undergo chest radiographs and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) of the thorax both for interstitial lung disease (ILD) detection and for disease progression monitoring. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess whether lung ultrasound (LUS) is a useful screening tool for ILD in patients with SSc in comparison with HRCT. METHODS: This was a longitudinal cohort study carried out from December 2015 to April 2016. An LUS was performed to examine B-lines in 67 consecutive patients who met the 2013 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for SSc and had a previous HRCT. B-lines were quantified and classified according to the score modified from Picano. Severity and extent of lung involvement on the HRCT were determined by means of the Warrick score. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients had both abnormal HRCT (Warrick score >7) and abnormal LUS, 2 had a mild score (6-15 B-lines), and 27 had either moderate or severe scores (≥16 B-lines). Of the 38 patients with negative HRCT, 25 presented some degree of lung involvement on the LUS. Thus, LUS has a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 34%. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed the analytic relation between the number of B-lines and the presence of ILD on the HRCT (area under the curve, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Lung ultrasound may be a method to detect abnormal lung findings in a noninvasive manner in patients with SSc. Because of its high sensitivity, a low score almost rules out the need for an HRCT.

Immune-Mediated Inflammation Promotes Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Recent-Onset Psoriatic Arthritis Patients without Conventional Cardiovascular Risk Factors.

Studies on the inflammatory burden in recent-onset psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients without conventional cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs) are not available. This preliminary study focuses on cardiovascular risk in cutaneous psoriasis (CPs) and recent-onset PsA patients. Blood biochemistry (glucose, cholesterol, uric acid, lipid profile and apolipoprotein B) was analyzed using standard kits. Proatherogenic inflammation markers, C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6), and endothelial activators monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1), were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Ultrasound images allowed measuring carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT). Our study first shows an increase in cIMT, and in serum levels of sICAM-1 and CRP in recent-onset PsA patients not presenting conventional CVRFs over the non-medicated time-period, from disease diagnosis to the beginning of pharmacological treatment, compared with healthy subjects. The outcome highlights the importance of monitoring serum level of sICAM1, CRP, and cIMT, and the value of primary prevention in psoriatic patients even with no history of cardiovascular events.

Disfunción cognitiva en lupus eritematoso sistémico y su asociación con actividad y daño / Cognitive dysfunction in systemic lupus erythematosus in relation to disease activity and damage

El lupus eritematoso sistémico (LES), es una enfermedad reumatológica, que puede presentar en su evolución alteraciones neurocognitivas, con importante compromiso fronto-subcortical. Sin embargo, existe escasa evidencia publicada sobre la relación entre la disfunción cognitiva y la actividad y daño de la enfermedad sistémica. El objetivo del trabajo fue analizar dicha asociación. Se realizó un estudio observacional de corte transversal, incluyendo 84 pacientes con LES. Se evaluó la actividad con el índice de SLEDAI y el daño acumulado con el índice de SLICC. Mediante pruebas neuropsicológicas se evaluó la presencia de síntomas cognitivos, función cognitiva global, memoria verbal y visual, viso-construcción, fluencia verbal semántica, velocidad de procesamiento y memoria de trabajo. Se consideró disfunción en un área cognitiva a un rendimiento de más de 1.5 desvíos estándares por debajo de los valores normales del test neuropsicológico. Se observó asociación estadísticamente significativa entre un mayor valor de SLEDAI y la alteración en la memoria de trabajo, y un mayor valor de SLICC y el compromiso de la viso-construcción y la fluencia verbal semántica. La asociación observada en los pacientes con LES entre el grado de actividad o daño de la enfermedad con algunos dominios cognitivos podría estar involucrando diferentes mecanismos fisiopatogénicos de la disfunción cerebral de cada área con distinto grado de afectación o vulnerabilidad.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a rheumatic disease, which during its evolution may present neurocognitive dysfunction with fronto-subcortical compromise. However, there is no enough published evidence regarding the relationship between cognitive dysfunction and SLE activity and SLE induced damage. The objective of the study was to analyze this association. We designed an observational cross-sectional study including 84 patients with SLE. We used the SLEDAI index to evaluate activity and the SLICC index to evaluate cumulative damage. We used neuropsychological tests to assess the presence of cognitive symptoms, global cognitive function, verbal and visual memory, visual-construction, semantic verbal fluency, processing speed and working memory. Scores more than 1.5 standard deviations below adjusted normal values were considered as cognitive dysfunction. We observed a statistically significant association between the higher value of SLEDAI and working memory impairment and a higher value of SLICC and viso-construction and semantic verbal fluency impairment. The association observed in SLE patients between disease activity or damage and some cognitive domains may be involving different pathophysiological brain mechanisms of different areas with different degrees of severity and vulnerability.

The development of candidate composite disease activity and responder indices for psoriatic arthritis (GRACE project).

OBJECTIVE: To develop new composite disease activity indices for psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: Data from routine clinic visits at multiple centres were collected in a systematic manner. Data included all domains identified as important in randomised controlled trials in PsA. Decisions to change treatment were used as surrogates for high disease activity. New indices were developed by multiple linear regression (psoriatic arthritis disease activity score: PASDAS) and empirically, utilising physician-defined cut-offs for disease activity (arithmetic mean of desirability functions: AMDF). These were compared with existing composite measures: Composite Psoriatic arthritis Disease Activity Index (CPDAI), Disease Activity for PSoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA), and Disease Activity Score for rheumatoid arthritis (DAS28). RESULTS: 161/503 (32%) subjects had treatment changes. Although all measures performed well, compared with existing indices, PASDAS was better able to discriminate between high and low disease activity (area under receiver operating curves (ROC)) curve with 95% CI: PASDAS 0.773 (0.723, 0.822); AMDF 0.730 (0.680, 0.780); CPDAI 0.719 (0.668, 0.770); DAPSA 0.710 (0.654, 0.766); DAS28 0.736 (0.680, 0.792). All measures were able to discriminate between disease activity states in patients with oligoarthritis, although area under the receiver operating curves (AUC) were generally smaller. In patients with severe skin disease (psoriasis area and severity index>10) both nonparametric and AUC curve statistics were nonsignificant for all measures. CONCLUSIONS: Two new composite measures to assess disease activity in PsA have been developed. Further testing in other datasets, including comparison with existing measures, is required to validate these instruments.

A survey on the current evaluation and treatment of gout in Buenos Aires, Argentina.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the current management of gout in general practitioners and specialists in Buenos Aires city. MATERIAL AND METHODS: multiple choice, anonimous, survey, performed to 33 rheumatologists (REU), 52 Internal Medicine specialists (EMI) and 86 general practitioners (Otros). RESULTS: Gout is a very common or usual disease for 51.5% of REU vs 11.5% EMI and 8.1% Otros. At diagnosis, uric acid crystals are identified by 51.5% REU vs 28.8% EMI and 26.7% Otros and tophi observed by 60.6% REU vs 30.8% EMI and 30.2% Otros. REU and EMI should indicate colchicine for acute gout in 75.8% and 80.8% respectively vs 7.7% of Otros. REU measure patient's height/weight and waist circumference less frequently than EMI (66.7% vs 92.3% and 45.5% vs 75% respectively). CONCLUSIONS: REU usually examine patients with gout but in a chronic stage. The identification of crystals in synovial fluid is low. The use ofcolchicine is still high. REU should improve the evaluation of the metabolic syndrome.

The effects of tibolone in older postmenopausal women.

BACKGROUND: Tibolone has estrogenic, progestogenic, and androgenic effects. Although tibolone prevents bone loss, its effects on fractures, breast cancer, and cardiovascular disease are uncertain. METHODS: In this randomized study, we assigned 4538 women, who were between the ages of 60 and 85 years and had a bone mineral density T score of -2.5 or less at the hip or spine or a T score of -2.0 or less and radiologic evidence of a vertebral fracture, to receive once-daily tibolone (at a dose of 1.25 mg) or placebo. Annual spine radiographs were used to assess for vertebral fracture. Rates of cardiovascular events and breast cancer were adjudicated by expert panels. RESULTS: During a median of 34 months of treatment, the tibolone group, as compared with the placebo group, had a decreased risk of vertebral fracture, with 70 cases versus 126 cases per 1000 person-years (relative hazard, 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41 to 0.74; P<0.001), and a decreased risk of nonvertebral fracture, with 122 cases versus 166 cases per 1000 person-years (relative hazard, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.93; P=0.01). The tibolone group also had a decreased risk of invasive breast cancer (relative hazard, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.80; P=0.02) and colon cancer (relative hazard, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.96; P=0.04). However, the tibolone group had an increased risk of stroke (relative hazard, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.14 to 4.23; P=0.02), for which the study was stopped in February 2006 at the recommendation of the data and safety monitoring board. There were no significant differences in the risk of either coronary heart disease or venous thromboembolism between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Tibolone reduced the risk of fracture and breast cancer and possibly colon cancer but increased the risk of stroke in older women with osteoporosis. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00519857.)

Manual de investigaciones clínicas y farmacológicas

Contenido: El método científico. Introducción a las buenas prácticas clínicas. Desarrollo de un producto farmacéutico. Comités de ética en investigación. Los ensayos clínicos en la República Argentina: una perspectiva desde la Agencia Regulatoria. El protocolo del ensayo clínico. E-trials: la tecnología informática en la investigación clínica. Fármacovigilancia. Declaración de Helsinski de la Asociación Médica Mundial. Normas de buenas prácticas clínicas. Disposición 5330/1997 ANMAT. Disposición 690/2005 ANMAT. Disposición 2124/2005 ANMAT. Informe Belmont. Código de regulaciones federales. Aclaración sobre modificaciones a la Disposición 5330/97 y derogación 2124/05

Efecto de bajas dosis del pamidronato (APD) oral sobre la calcemia de pacientes osteopénicas u osteoporóticas / Effect of low doses of oral pamidronate (APD) on the calcemia of osteopenic or osteoporotic patients

El pamidronato (APD) oral se indica para tratar la osteítis de Paget en un rango de dosis altas, 400-900 mg/día. Con estas dosis ocasionalmente se presenta hipocalcemia, la que es interpretada como una sobredosis. Para prevenir este efecto se recomienda el uso concomitante de sales de calcio. En el tratamiento de los síndromes osteoporótipos el APD es utilizado en dosis menores, 200 mg/dia, y a estas dosis el efecto antirresortivo es sólo parcial y transitorio. Sin embargo también estos casos son suplementados sistemáticamente con sales de calcio o vitamina D. Para definir si estas asociaciones afectan la calcemia se estudarion a 129 mujeres postemonopáusicas, con el diagnóstico de osteopenia u osteoporosis, tratadas durante 6-10 meses con 200 mg/día de APD. Un grupo (n:13) recibió APD solamente, otras recibieron además 1g/día de sales de calcio (n:61), o 0,015-0,025 mg/día de vitamina D (n:10) o ambos suplementos a la vez (n:45). En todos los grupos se comprobó una tendencia hacia el aumento de la calcemia dentro del rango normal. Este aumento fue significativo (p<0,05) salvo en quienes sólo recibieron APD. Los marcadores de resorción ósea (HOP/Cr) no disminuyeron en el 27 por ciento de las pacientes tratadas con APD + Ca y en el 33 por ciento de las tratadas con APD + Ca + vit D, significando una menor respuesta al APD en esas pacientes. Se concluye que al utilizar dosis bajas de APD, la administración de suplementos de calcio no debiera ser sistemática, la calcemia no tiende a disminuir, reservándose para los casos con dietas muy deficitarias y no indicándose para prevenir supuestos efectos hipocalcemiantes del APD. Además las sales de calcio puedem interaccionar disminuyendo la eficacia del bisfosfonato, hecho que es sugerido pero no demonstrado en este trabajo.