Monitoring of estradiol levels in premenopausal women receiving adjuvant abemaciclib and ovarian function suppression.

PURPOSE: Approximately 15% of women who receive ovarian function suppression (OFS) as adjuvant treatment for high-risk, localized hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer may have inadequate estradiol suppression which can require therapeutic modification when used in combination with an aromatase inhibitor (AI). We previously reported that abemaciclib may interfere with the estradiol Abbott Alinity chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) commonly used to monitor estradiol levels and suggested liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is preferred in this setting. The aim of this study was to determine discrepancies in estradiol levels using CMIA compared to LC-MS/MS and subsequent treatment changes in a larger patient population. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of premenopausal women with early-stage HR+ breast cancer at our institution who received adjuvant OFS and abemaciclib with at least 1 CMIA estradiol level drawn during abemaciclib therapy from October 2021 to April 2023. RESULTS: Of the 22 women who met criteria for review, 20 (90.9%) had CMIA estradiol levels in the premenopausal range, of whom 9 also had estradiol measured by LC-MS/MS. All 9 women receiving OFS and abemaciclib with estradiol measurements by both methods had premenopausal range CMIA estradiol levels and postmenopausal range LC-MS/MS estradiol levels. Of the 20 patients with premenopausal estradiol levels by CMIA estradiol, treatment changes included increased OFS dosage or preparation (n = 7), change from AI to tamoxifen (n = 3), and surgical oophorectomy (n = 7). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest the likely interference of abemaciclib with the Abbott Alinity immunoassay which may lead to unnecessary treatment changes. It is recommended that the LC-MS/MS assay be used when monitoring estradiol levels in patients receiving abemaciclib concurrently with OFS.

Discrepancies in estradiol levels in a premenopausal woman receiving abemaciclib despite ovarian function suppression and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.

Abemaciclib is approved for use in the adjuvant setting in combination with endocrine therapy for patients with high-risk, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer based on the monarchE trial. Options for endocrine therapy for premenopausal women include an aromatase inhibitor with ovarian function suppression or tamoxifen with or without ovarian suppression. We describe a unique case of a premenopausal woman with early-stage breast cancer receiving adjuvant abemaciclib and an aromatase inhibitor with elevated estradiol levels as measured by the Abbott Alinity chemiluminescent immunoassay despite chemical and surgical ovarian function suppression. Given low estradiol levels using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry testing following a bilateral salpingo-oopherectomy, our case report suggests an interference of abemaciclib with the Abbott Alinity immunoassay. This possible interference has significant impacts on clinical care as false elevations in estradiol levels measured by immunoassays can lead to unnecessary treatment changes, including surgery.

Anti-TIF-1α/γ Antibody-Positive Dermatomyositis Associated With Metastatic Prostatic Adenocarcinoma.

ABSTRACT: Dermatomyositis (DM) is an autoimmune myopathy characterized by proximal muscle weakness and distinct skin findings. DM is associated with an increased risk of malignancy in adults. We describe a case of dermatomyositis with unusually severe oropharyngeal dysphagia and respiratory muscle weakness on presentation, who was found to have underlying metastatic prostate cancer. Prostate cancer is uncommonly associated with DM. The patient tested positive for antitranscription intermediate family-1 (anti-TIF-1, also known as anti-p155/410) antibodies, which are linked to malignancy-associated DM in adults and are associated with dysphagia and more severe cutaneous findings.

Care disruptions among patients with lung cancer: A COVID-19 and cancer outcomes study.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with lung cancer (LC) are susceptible to severe outcomes from COVID-19. This study evaluated disruption to care of patients with LC during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: The COVID-19 and Cancer Outcomes Study (CCOS) is a prospective cohort study comprised of patients with a current or past history of hematological or solid malignancies with outpatient visits between March 2 and March 6, 2020, at two academic cancer centers in the Northeastern United States (US). Data was collected for the three months prior to the index week (baseline period) and the following three months (pandemic period). RESULTS: 313 of 2365 patients had LC, 1578 had other solid tumors, and 474 had hematological malignancies. Patients with LC were not at increased risk of COVID-19 diagnosis compared to patients with other solid or hematological malignancies. When comparing data from the pandemic period to the baseline period, patients with LC were more likely to have a decrease in in-person visits compared to patients with other solid tumors (aOR 1.94; 95% CI, 1.46-2.58), but without an increase in telehealth visits (aOR 1.13; 95% CI 0.85-1.50). Patients with LC were more likely to experience pandemic-related treatment delays than patients with other solid tumors (aOR 1.80; 95% CI 1.13-2.80) and were more likely to experience imaging/diagnostic procedure delays than patients with other solid tumors (aOR 2.59; 95% CI, 1.46-4.47) and hematological malignancies (aOR 2.01; 95% CI, 1.02-3.93). Among patients on systemic therapy, patients with LC were also at increased risk for decreased in-person visits and increased treatment delays compared to those with other solid tumors. DISCUSSION: Patients with LC experienced increased cancer care disruption compared to patients with other malignancies during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Focused efforts to ensure continuity of care for this patient population are warranted.

Optimism and coping: do they influence health outcomes in women with breast cancer? A systemic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Optimism, coping, and resilience may be independent predictors of anxiety, distress, depression, or health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in women with breast cancer. METHODS: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) searches of PubMed, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar databases from January 1, 1990, to April 30, 2018, for articles (i.e., studies) determining the impact of optimism, coping, or resilience on anxiety, distress, depression, or HRQOL in women with breast cancer. Articles included only those that measured optimism by the life orientation test (LOT) or LOT-revised (R), coping by the COPE, brief (B)-COPE, or religious (R)-COPE, and resilience by the CD-Resilience Scale (CD-RIS). RESULTS: Forty-one out of 52 (79%) studies showed that optimism is a statistically significant predictor of study-specific aspects of anxiety, distress, depression, or HRQOL. In a meta-analysis focused on depression, optimism was a statistically significant predictor of depression. Coping style is a statistically significant predictor for study-specific aspects of anxiety, distress, depression, or HRQOL in 41/43 (95%) studies. The coping studies were too heterogeneous in their outcome variables to perform meta-analyses. There were too few studies (n = 6) on resilience to draw any conclusions. CONCLUSIONS: Despite many limitations of this literature, including the heterogeneity of study designs, differing sample sizes, across different countries, cultures, ethnicities, and races, most studies support that optimism and coping are predictors of anxiety, distress, depression, or HRQOL. Awareness of these psychological constructs and their potential impact on anxiety, depression, and HRQOL are a high priority.

A Rare Presentation of HIV-Negative Plasmablastic Lymphoma: A Diagnostic Dilemma.

Plasmablastic lymphoma (PBL) and plasmablastic plasma cell myeloma (PCM) have many overlapping characteristics. Clinical correlation can help make the distinction between the two entities. Human immunodeficiency virus- (HIV-) negative PBL is a rare disease, making the diagnosis more challenging. While there is no standard of care for PBL, current recommendations include dose-adjusted EPOCH (etoposide, vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone), with or without bortezomib. We report an aggressive case of HIV-negative plasmablastic lymphoma and discuss the challenge in establishing a diagnosis. We review the literature regarding this disease and current recommendations for treatment.