Five-Year Outcome of 1-Stage Cell-Based Cartilage Repair Using Recycled Autologous Chondrons and Allogenic Mesenchymal Stromal Cells: A First-in-Human Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Long-term clinical evaluation of patient outcomes can steer treatment choices and further research for cartilage repair. Using mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) as signaling cells instead of stem cells is a novel approach in the field. PURPOSE: To report the 5-year follow-up of safety, clinical efficacy, and durability after treatment of symptomatic cartilage defects in the knee with allogenic MSCs mixed with recycled autologous chondrons in first-in-human study of 1-stage cartilage repair. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: This study is an investigator-driven study aiming at the feasibility and safety of this innovative cartilage repair procedure. Between 2013 and 2014, a total of 35 patients (mean ± SD age, 36 ± 8 years) were treated with a 1-stage cartilage repair procedure called IMPACT (Instant MSC Product Accompanying Autologous Chondron Transplantation) for a symptomatic cartilage defect on the femoral condyle or trochlear groove. Subsequent follow-up after initial publication was performed annually using online patient-reported outcome measures with a mean follow-up of 61 months (range, 56-71 months). Patient-reported outcome measures included the KOOS (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score), visual analog scale for pain, and EuroQol-5 Dimensions. All clinical data and serious adverse events, including additional treatment received after IMPACT, were recorded. A failure of IMPACT was defined as a chondral defect of at least 20% of the index lesion with a need for a reintervention including a surgical procedure or an intra-articular injection. RESULTS: Using allogenic MSCs, no signs of a foreign body response or serious adverse reactions were recorded after 5 years. The majority of patients showed statistically significant and clinically relevant improvement in the KOOS and all its subscales from baseline to 60 months: overall, 57.9 ± 16.3 to 78.9 ± 17.7 (P < .001); Pain, 62.3 ± 18.9 to 79.9 ± 20.0 (P = .03); Function, 61.6 ± 16.5 to 79.4 ± 17.3 (P = .01); Activities of Daily Living, 69.0 ± 19.0 to 89.9 ± 14.9 (P < .001); Sports and Recreation, 32.3 ± 22.6 to 57.5 ± 30.0 (P = .02); and Quality of Life, 25.9 ± 12.9 to 55.8 ± 26.8 (P < .001). The visual analog scale score for pain improved significantly from baseline (45.3 ± 23.6) to 60 months (15.4 ± 13.4) (P < .001). Five cases required reintervention. CONCLUSION: This is the first study showing the midterm safety and efficacy of the proof of concept that allogenic MSCs augment 1-stage articular cartilage repair. The absence of serious adverse events and the clinical outcome support the longevity of this unique concept. These data support MSC-augmented chondron transplantation (IMPACT) as a safe 1-stage surgical solution that is considerably more cost-effective and a logistically advantageous alternative to conventional 2-stage cell-based therapy for articular chondral defects in the knee.

Knee joint distraction in regular care for treatment of knee osteoarthritis: A comparison with clinical trial data.

OBJECTIVES: Knee joint distraction (KJD) has been evaluated as a joint-preserving treatment to postpone total knee arthroplasty in knee osteoarthritis patients in three clinical trials. Since 2014 the treatment is used in regular care in some hospitals, which might lead to a deviation from the original indication and decreased treatment outcome. In this study, baseline characteristics, complications and clinical benefit are compared between patients treated in regular care and in clinical trials. METHODS: In our hospital, 84 patients were treated in regular care for 6 weeks with KJD. Surgical details, complications, and range of motion were assessed from patient hospital charts. Patient-reported outcome measures were evaluated in regular care before and one year after treatment. Trial patients (n = 62) were treated and followed as described in literature. RESULTS: Patient characteristics were not significantly different between groups, except for distraction duration (regular care 45.3±4.3; clinical trials 48.1±8.1 days; p = 0.019). Pin tract infections were the most occurring complication (70% regular care; 66% clinical trials), but there was no significant difference in treatment complications between groups (p>0.1). The range of motion was recovered within a year after treatment for both groups. WOMAC questionnaires showed statistically and clinically significant improvement for both groups (both p<0.001 and >15 points in all subscales) and no significant differences between groups (all differences p>0.05). After one year, 70% of patients were responders (regular care 61%, trial 75%; p = 0.120). Neither regular care compared to clinical trial, nor any other characteristic could predict clinical response. CONCLUSIONS: KJD as joint-preserving treatment in clinical practice, to postpone arthroplasty for end-stage knee osteoarthritis patient below the age of 65, results in an outcome similar to that thus far demonstrated in clinical trials. Longer follow-up in regular care is needed to test whether also long-term results remain beneficial and comparable to trial data.