Design, molecular modeling and anticancer evaluation of thieno[2,3-d]pyrimidine derivatives as inhibitors of topoisomerase II.

Synthesis of 4-(3,5-dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrobenzo[4,5]thieno[2,3-d]pyrimidine 1 and its functionalized reactions as nucleophile with various electrophilic reagents were performed through facile methods to yield different cyclic and acyclic derivatives (2-17). The structures of the newly synthesized compounds were established by their elemental analysis and spectral data. Derivatives 4, 14, 16, and 17 in addition to the parent compound 1 had IC50 at ~4-10 µM against HepG2 and MCF7 and were selected for further investigations. All derivatives had high IC50 values (>60 µM) against normal fibroblasts WI38 indicating selectivity against cancer cell lines. Derivatives 4, 14, and 17 up-regulated the expression of p53 by ~3-4 folds. All derivatives caused a significant ~3-fold increase in the expression of executive caspase 3 and significant elevation in cleaved caspase 3 activity. The elevation in the expression of caspase 3 by compound 1 and derivative 16 was not accompanied by an increase in p53 expression or cleaved caspase 3 activity. These two thienopyrimidines may act directly on caspase 3. Derivative 17 was unique in reducing the expression of Topo II by ~60%. The molecular docking showed that derivatives 4 and 17 with high binding energies could bind and inhibit Topoisomerase II (Topo II). In accordance with the docking modelling, derivatives 4 and 17 reduced the Topo II concentration by 82 and 90%, respectively, compared to the untreated cells. However, the parent compound 1 also caused a significant 34% reduction in the enzyme concentration although it was not predicted as a ligand for the enzyme in the docking study. Taken together, derivatives 4, 14 and 17 showed selective cytotoxicity, could arrest cell cycle, and induce apoptosis. Furthermore, they could serve as cytostatic agents by inhibiting/reducing Topo II.

Novel Tetrahydrobenzo [b] Thiophene Compounds Exhibit Anticancer Activity through Enhancing Apoptosis and Inhibiting Tyrosine Kinase.

BACKGROUND: Developing new chemotherapeutic agents with molecular targets, larger margin of safety against normal cells and low cost is the target many scientists try to achieve. OBJECTIVE: The present study was undertaken to investigate the anticancer activity of a novel series of thiophene compounds and the molecular mechanisms associated. METHOD: A series of novel heterocyclic compounds including pyrimidine derivatives (2, 3, 4, 5 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15), thiophene derivatives (6, 7, and 10) and oxoisothiazolidine derivative (9) was synthesized from 4,5,6,7- tetrahydrobenzo[b] thiophene (1). The newly synthesized derivatives along with the parent compound were evaluated for their anticancer activity against human HepG2, MCF7 and HCT116 cell lines and compared to doxorubicin as a reference drug. RESULTS: Compound 7 was very selective in targeting only the colon cells. Compounds 1, 5, and 12 showed strong cytotoxic activities against the 3 cell lines at 6-16 µM without any apparent toxicity to the normal fibroblasts WI-38. They had DNA affinity at 29-36 µM. The three compounds enhanced apoptosis to varying degrees elevating the expression of Bax, caspase 9 and caspase 3 in HepG2. Compound 5 was the most potent analogue and was superior to the standard drug used in upregulating the apoptotic genes and inhibiting tyrosine kinase at 1 µM. The IC50 value for compound 5 against TK was 296 nM. CONCLUSION: Taken together, this study presents some thiophene scaffolds as auspicious hits for further optimization as specific antiproliferative agents against cancer cells and promising tyrosine kinase inhibitors at nanomolar concentrations.

Eco-friendly Synthesis of Pyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidine Analogs and Their Anticancer and Tyrosine Kinase Inhibition Activities.

BACKGROUND: One of the promising scaffolds in drug discovery is the fused pyrimidine derivatives. OBJECTIVE AND METHOD: Efficient synthesis of a novel series of 18 new 1,8-naphthyridine-3-carbonitrile, 2-amino pyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidine derivatives via multi-component reactions of aromatic aldehydes, active methylene, and an aromatic amine under microwave irradiation and evaluation of their anticancer activity and possible mechanisms. RESULTS: Only compounds 5 (a-c) had a significant antiproliferative activity in hepatic HepG2 cells at submicromolar concentration (7.5-10 µM). Similarly, only compound 11 (a-c) had a significant activity in breast MCF7 cells at (4-7 µM). Derivatives with one methoxyphenyl substitution (5a and 11a) were not different from derivatives having dimethoxyphenyl substitution (5b and 11b). However, thiophene substitution (5c and 11c) enhanced the anticancer activity in both cells lines examined by 25% in HepG2 and by ~45% in MCF7 cells compared to a and b derivatives. All compounds were safe to both normal human lung cells (WI-38) and RBCs at concentrations up to 40 mM. The antiproliferative activity of compounds 5 (a-c) in HepG2 could be attributed to an induction of intrinsic apoptotic pathway as evidenced from the induction of initiator caspase 9 by ~ 4 folds. While, the activity of compounds 11 (a-c) could be attributed to their potential to inhibit tyrosine kinases (TK) by up to 85%. The IC50 of derivative 11c against TK was at 173 nM. CONCLUSION: The present study reported that derivatives 5 and 11 have merit for further investigation as anticancer and TK inhibitors.

Re-transplants compared to primary kidney transplants recipients: a mate kidney paired analysis of the OPTN/UNOS database.

Outcomes of kidney re-transplant recipients (RTR) were compared to primary recipients (FTR) from paired donor kidneys. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) database was used to identify deceased donors (n = 6266) who donated one kidney to an RTR and the mate kidney to an FTR between January 2000 to December 2010. As compared to FTR, RTR were younger (45 vs. 52 yr, p < 0.001) and had higher proportion of plasma reactive antibody >80 (25% vs 7%, p < 0.001). There were higher 0 mismatches in RTR (19% vs. 16%, p < 0.001). There were more pre-emptive transplants in RTR (24% vs. 21%, p = 0.002). Delayed graft function (28% vs. 25%, p = 0.007) was higher in RTR. Patient survival was similar in FTR and RTR groups at one, three, and five yr (95.7%, 90.2%, and 82.5% vs. 95.2%, 89.8% and 82.7%). Allograft survival rates were higher in FTR group compared to RTR group at one, three, and five yr (91.1%, 82.4%, and 70.9% vs. 87.8%, 77.4%, and 66.1% p < 0.001). Death-censored allograft survival rates were higher in FTR group at one, three, and five yr (91.3%, 82.7% and 71.4% vs. 88%, 77.7% and 66.5% p < 0.001). In today's era of modern immunosuppression, graft survival in RTR has improved but remains inferior to FTR when controlling for donor factors.