RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The introduction of electronic health records (EHR) has improved the collection and storage of patient information, enhancing clinical communication and academia. However, EHRs remain limited by data quality and the time-consuming task of manual data extraction. This study aims to utilise process mapping to help identify critical data entry points within the clinical pathway for VS patients, ideal for structured data entry and automated data collection, in an effort to improve patient care and research. METHODS: A two-stage methodology was conducted at a neurosurgical unit. Process maps were developed using semi-structured interviews with stakeholders in the management of VS resection. Process maps were then retrospectively validated against EHR for patients admitted between August 2019 and December 2021, establishing critical data entry points. RESULTS: Twenty stakeholders were interviewed in the process map development. Process maps were validated against the EHR of 36 patients admitted for VS resection. Operation notes, surgical inpatient reviews (including ward rounds) and discharge summaries were present for all patients, representing critical data entry points. Areas for documentation improvement were present in the preoperative clinics (30/36, 83.3%), preoperative skull base multidisciplinary team (32/36, 88.9%), postoperative follow-up clinics (32/36, 88.9%), and the postoperative skull base multidisciplinary team meeting (29/36, 80.6%). CONCLUSION: This is a first use of a two-stage methodology for process mapping the clinical pathway for patients undergoing VS resection. Our study identified critical data entry points which can be targeted for structured data entry and for automated data collection tools, positively impacting patient care and research.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To investigate migration and other electrode-related complications in cochlear implant surgery. METHODS: Retrospective review of all patients (adult and paediatric) undergoing cochlear implantation at a tertiary referral centre in England, between April 2019 and December 2021. Split arrays and patients who did not have post-op imaging were excluded. RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety-nine cochlear implants were performed including 90% primary and 10% revision surgeries. Two hundred and forty-eight (86%) of electrodes implanted were straight arrays.Twenty-seven (9%) demonstrated suboptimal position on post-operative imaging. Three (11%) were true migration, 4 (15%) possible migration, 15 (56%) had two or less extra-cochlear electrodes, 3 (11%) expected partial insertion and 2 (7%) demonstrated tip fold-overs. Twenty (74%) of arrays within the suboptimal insertion group were in primary surgeries. Six patients required re-implantation. The most common reason for re-implantation was migration. DISCUSSION: Electrode migration after cochlear implantation may be more common than previously thought. We demonstrate rates of migration congruous with current literature; this is despite robust and varied fixation techniques. Notable in our series is that all true captured migrations were seen exclusively in straight arrays. The majority of patients in the possible and confirmed migration group had normal inner ear anatomy. CONCLUSION: Suboptimal electrode position following cochlear implant surgery is a recognized complication and can affect implant performance. Reporting may increase with more widespread use of sophisticated post-operative imaging. Use of a pre-curved electrode and routine use of appropriate fixation techniques may reduce migration rates.
RESUMO
This article aims to provide an overview of the management of facial palsy within a multidisciplinary team setting and discusses considerations used to develop patient-specific management plans. The national landscape of facial function services is also discussed including suggestions on what may enable a more equitable and sustainable service for the future.