Predictive value of FDG-PET imaging for relapse in metastatic melanoma patients treated with immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Anti-PD1 immunotherapy has shown a sustainable clinical activity in patients with metastatic melanoma. However, strong predictive factors of the long-term response or risk of relapse remain to be identified. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether FDG-PET imaging could be superior to CT scan in distinguishing residual tumours versus the absence of tumour in patients with a partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) and whether a complete metabolic response (CMR) was associated with better outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective study conducted in all patients with metastatic melanoma treated with anti-PD1 immunotherapy between October 2014 and October 2017 considered to be in complete remission. The primary outcome was the occurrence of a relapse during the follow-up. CT scan and FDG-PET scan had to be performed within a maximum of 2 months of treatment discontinuation. For CT imaging, the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) 1.1 were used and included progressive disease (PD), SD, PR and complete response (CR). For FDG-PET imaging, the metabolic responses were classified as progressive metabolic disease, stable metabolic disease, residual FDG avidity (RFA) and CMR. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were in complete remission after collegial decision. Two patients had a SD on CT scan and a CMR on FDG-PET scan, and none of them relapsed. Ten patients had a PR on CT scan and a CMR on FDG-PET scan, and none of them relapsed. The mean treatment duration to achieve a complete remission was 7 months (3-23). A univariate analysis showed that a RFA assessed on the FDG-PET scan was significantly associated with a relapse (P = 0.00231). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with a PR on the CT scan and a CMR on the FDG-PET scan should be considered with a CR. Our study showed that FDG-PET imaging could play a crucial role in predicting the long-term outcome and help to decide whether treatment should be discontinued.

Expression of Three Adipokines (Adiponectin, Leptin and Resistin) in Normal Canine Skin: a Pilot Study.

Adipokines are biologically active cytokines that are mainly produced in adipose tissue. There is evidence, in man and mice, that some adipokines may be secreted in other tissues including the vascular endothelium, epithelia and sebaceous glands. Moreover, modified serum levels of adipokines have been detected in people with acne vulgaris or psoriasis; it is suspected that adipokines could contribute to local and systemic inflammatory conditions. We aimed to evaluate the expression of three adipokines (i.e. leptin, adiponectin and resistin) in normal canine skin. Formalin-fixed, paraffin wax-embedded punch biopsy samples were obtained from the sparsely-haired skin of the caudal ventral abdomen of a single clinically healthy dog with no history of skin disease. Immunohistochemistry was applied, using rabbit polyclonal primary antibodies specific for leptin, adiponectin and resistin. Adipokines were not expressed in normal canine dermis or hypodermis. In contrast, they were detected in the keratinocytes of all epidermal layers and hair follicle segments, sebocytes, apocrine gland cells and in the vascular endothelium. This is the first report on the expression of adipokines in normal canine skin, a first step in studying their role in the skin physiology and inflammatory skin diseases of dogs.

Atrophic scar formation in patients with acne involves long-acting immune responses with plasma cells and alteration of sebaceous glands.

BACKGROUND: Possible outcomes of acne lesions are atrophic scars, which may cause serious psychological distress. Current treatments for postacne scarring often require invasive procedures. Pathophysiological studies on acne scarring have only investigated the first week of papule life. OBJECTIVES: To study the pathophysiology of atrophic scar formation to identify molecular and cellular pathways that can lead to new therapies for the prevention of acne scarring. METHODS: Large-scale gene expression profiling and immunohistochemistry analysis were performed on uninvolved skin and papules in both scar-prone (SP) and non-scar-prone (NSP) patients with acne, at different time points. RESULTS: Gene expression and immunohistochemistry analyses showed a very similar immune response in 48-h-old papules in SP and NSP populations, characterized by elevated numbers of T cells, neutrophils and macrophages. However, the immune response only persisted in SP patients in 3-week-old papules, and was characterized by an important B-cell infiltrate. Transient downmodulation of sebaceous gland markers related to lipid metabolism was observed in 48-h-old papules in NSP patients, followed by normalization after 3 weeks. In contrast, in SP patients a drastic reduction of these markers persisted in 3-week-old papules, suggesting an irreversible destruction of sebaceous gland structures after inflammatory remodelling in SP patients with acne. CONCLUSIONS: Long-lived acne papules are characterized by a B-cell infiltrate. A relationship exists between the duration and severity of inflammation and the alteration of sebaceous gland structures, leading to atrophic scar formation in acne.

TOXICAN: a guide for grading dermatological adverse events of cancer treatments.

PURPOSE: The dermatological toxicity of cancer treatments is frequent and sometimes debilitating. Its reference classification, the NCI-CTCAE (National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events), is sometimes difficult to use and does not include yet the newest toxicities. Our objective was to create a guide, TOXICAN, based on the CTCAE, which is easy to use in everyday practice and which facilitates the recognition and grading of these dermatological toxicities. METHODS: This guide was developed by a working group ("GESTIM") comprising oncodermatologists, allergists, pathologists, and researchers from Nantes University Hospital. It was based on the dermatological toxicities found in the CTCAE and adapted to daily practice. These toxicities were grouped into categories and associated with photographs of typical cases to aid recognition. A simplified grading scale derived from the CTCAE was also created. This booklet was validated by means of user evaluation, and then the Delphi consensus method. RESULTS: We selected 32 dermatological toxicities, including 12 created by our group, sorted into 7 categories: skin rash, dry skin/pruritus, hyperkeratotic papules, palmoplantar changes, hair and nail changes, mucosal changes, and others. Our simplified grading scale only differed from the CTCAE for one item, urticaria. Three items were modified after evaluation by the user group and 11 after application of the Delphi method. CONCLUSION: The objective of our practical guide is to facilitate the use of the CTCAE for recognizing and grading dermatological toxicity of cancer treatments in order to provide optimal guidance for therapeutic adaptations. Its impact on clinical practice remains to be evaluated.

Predictors of responses to immune checkpoint blockade in advanced melanoma.

Immune checkpoint blockers (ICB) have become pivotal therapies in the clinical armamentarium against metastatic melanoma (MMel). Given the frequency of immune related adverse events and increasing use of ICB, predictors of response to CTLA-4 and/or PD-1 blockade represent unmet clinical needs. Using a systems biology-based approach to an assessment of 779 paired blood and tumor markers in 37 stage III MMel patients, we analyzed association between blood immune parameters and the functional immune reactivity of tumor-infiltrating cells after ex vivo exposure to ICB. Based on this assay, we retrospectively observed, in eight cohorts enrolling 190 MMel patients treated with ipilimumab, that PD-L1 expression on peripheral T cells was prognostic on overall and progression-free survival. Moreover, detectable CD137 on circulating CD8+ T cells was associated with the disease-free status of resected stage III MMel patients after adjuvant ipilimumab + nivolumab (but not nivolumab alone). These biomarkers should be validated in prospective trials in MMel.The clinical management of metastatic melanoma requires predictors of the response to checkpoint blockade. Here, the authors use immunological assays to identify potential prognostic/predictive biomarkers in circulating blood cells and in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes from patients with resected stage III melanoma.

PD-1 expression conditions T cell avidity within an antigen-specific repertoire.

Despite its negative regulatory role on tumor-specific T cells, Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) is also a marker of activated tumor-infiltrating T cells. In cancer, PD-1 blockade partially reverses T cell dysfunction allowing the amplification of tumor reactive T cells. Here, we investigated the role of PD-1 signaling on effector/memory human T cells specific for shared melanoma antigens, derived from blood. We documented for the first time the existence of melanoma-specific T cell clones unable to express PD-1. This stable feature was due to the persistent methylation of the PDCD1 promoter. These PD-1neg clones were of lower avidity than their PD-1pos counterparts, suggesting that high-affinity-specific T cell clones unable to express PD-1 are not or rarely present in peripheral blood, as they are probably eliminated by negative selection, due to their high reactivity. We also documented the existence of such PD-1neg T cell clones in melanoma tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), which also exhibited a lower functional avidity than PD-1pos TIL clones. This clearly shows that PD-1 expression identifies antigen-specific T cell clonotypes of high functional avidity. Finally, we demonstrated that PD-1 blockade during the in vitro selection process of Melan-A-specific T cells favored the amplification of higher avidity T cell clonotypes. This preferential amplification of high-avidity memory T cells upon PD-1 blockade resonates with the expansion of reactive T cells, including neo-antigen-specific T cells observed in anti-PD-1-treated patients. This feature should also be a useful biomarker of clinical efficiency, while providing new insights for adoptive transfer treatments.

Profile of vemurafenib-induced severe skin toxicities.

BACKGROUND: Vemurafenib, a BRAF inhibitor, is commonly associated with skin toxicity. The impact of severe forms is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of permanent vemurafenib discontinuation due to grade 3-4 skin toxicity, features of these toxicities, their recurrence rate after a switch to dabrafenib and their impact on overall survival. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 131 patients treated with vemurafenib for melanoma between November 2010 and December 2014. Data on skin toxicities, the need for vemurafenib adjustment and the impact of switching to dabrafenib were collected. Regarding survival analysis, a conditional landmark analysis was performed to correct lead-time bias. RESULTS: Among the 131 vemurafenib-treated patients, 26% developed grade 3-4 skin toxicity. Forty-four percent of them permanently discontinued their treatment, mainly due to rash and classic skin adverse reactions (Steven-Johnson syndrome, Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms). Conversely, photosensitivity and carcinomas rarely required treatment adjustment. Grade 3-4 rashes were associated with clinical or biological abnormalities in 94% of patients. Among the 10 patients who subsequently switched to dabrafenib, skin toxicity recurred only in one patient. Overall survival was significantly prolonged in case of severe skin toxicity emerging within the first 4 (P = 0.014) and 8 weeks (P = 0.038) on vemurafenib, with only a trend at 12 weeks (P = 0.052). Median overall survival was also prolonged in case of severe rash. CONCLUSION: In this study, vemurafenib was continued in 56% of patients with grade 3-4 skin toxicity, which was associated with prolonged overall survival when emerging within the first 4 and 8 weeks of treatment. While developing severe skin adverse reactions permanently contraindicates vemurafenib use, other rashes should lead to retreatment attempts with dose reduction. In case of recurrence, dabrafenib seems to be an interesting option. For other skin toxicities, including photosensitivity and cutaneous carcinoma, treatment adjustment is usually not needed.

Development of brain metastases in patients with metastatic melanoma while receiving ipilimumab.

UNLABELLED: Ipilimumab is a monoclonal antibody blocking the inhibitory molecule CTLA4 expressed by activated T lympocytes, used for the treatment of metastatic melanoma. Recent studies have shown its potential efficacy on brain metastases. OBJECTIVES: To assess the development of brain metastases under ipilimumab and identify clinical, histological or evolving criteria related to the appearance of these metastases. A retrospective study was conducted in 52 patients treated with 4 cycles of ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks for unresectable stage III or stage IV melanoma between January 2011 and July 2013 in a Department of Dermato-Oncology. As no data has been find in the literature, the results were compared to our other cohort of patients treated with vemurafenib during the same period. Ten patients (21.7 %) developed brain metastases under ipilimumab in a median time of 6.58 months after treatment initiation. The multivariate analysis showed a lower rate of brain metastases in patients with acral lentiginous melanoma and melanoma of unknown primary site. The median survival after diagnosis of brain metastases was of 2.5 months. There was no significant difference with vemurafenib-treated patients in terms of incidence rate of brain metastasis, time of development and survival after diagnosis of cerebral metastases. This was the first study focused on the development of brain metastases under treatment with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg. Although ipilimumab is used for the treatment of brain metastases, it paradoxically did not seem to reduce the risk of developing brain metastases.

Development of squamous cell carcinoma into basal cell carcinoma under treatment with Vismodegib.

BACKGROUND: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common cancer in humans. Vismodegib, a Hedgehog pathway inhibitor, has proved its effectiveness in treating non-resectable advanced BCC. AIM: However, its action on squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is unknown. We present three SCC cases developed into BCC in vismodegib-treated patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We have described three cases of patients developing SCC during treatment by vismodegib for BCC. RESULTS: Patient 1 was treated with vismodegib for five facial BCC. Due to the progression of one of the lesions at month 3 (M3), a biopsy was performed and showed SCC. Patient 2 was treated with vismodegib for a large facial BCC. A biopsy was performed at M2 on a BCC area not responding to treatment and showed SCC. Patient 3 was treated with vismodegib for a BCC on the nose. Due to vismodegib ineffectiveness, a biopsy was performed and showed SCC. DISCUSSION: Two similar cases have been described in the literature. This could be due to the appearance of the squamous contingent of a metatypical BCC or to the squamous differentiation of stem cells through inhibition of the hedgehog pathway. CONCLUSION: In practice, any dissociated response of a BCC to vismodegib should be biopsied.

Incidence and characteristics of melanoma brain metastases developing during treatment with vemurafenib.

Vemurafenib is indicated for the treatment of patients with BRAF (V600)-mutant metastatic melanoma. We studied for the first time the characteristics of brain metastases developed during treatment with vemurafenib in real-life conditions. We included all patients treated over 3 years with vemurafenib in our department for metastatic melanoma without initial brain involvement. Our primary endpoint was to assess the incidence of brain metastases in these patients. Our secondary endpoints were to identify the risk factors for metastases occurrence and their characteristics and course. In our retrospective cohort of 86 patients, 20% had developed brain metastases on average 5.3 months after vemurafenib initiation. The median follow-up was 9 months (1-26 months). Radiological examinations revealed multiple brain metastases in 41% of patients. The only risk factor for metastasis occurrence identified was a high number of metastatic sites when initiating vemurafenib (p = 0.045). Metastasis development was associated with a trend toward a decrease in overall survival from 12.8 to 8.5 months (p = 0.07) and a significant decrease in progression-free survival from 7 to 5 months (p = 0.04). Among the patients who developed brain metastases, 82% died, of whom 64% within 3 months, versus 58% of patients without brain metastases over the same period. The extra-cerebral disease was well controlled in 59% of patients during brain progression. In vemurafenib-treated melanoma patients, brain metastases are frequent and associated with a particularly poor prognosis. Because of their high frequency in patients with controlled extra-cerebral disease, brain explorations should be systematically performed during treatment.

A full GMP process to select and amplify epitope-specific T lymphocytes for adoptive immunotherapy of metastatic melanoma.

A number of trials of adoptive transfer of tumor-specific T lymphocytes have been performed in the last 20 years in metastatic melanoma, with increasingly encouraging results as the relevant melanoma antigens were identified and the purity/specificity of injected T cells improved. We have previously described a sorting method of epitope-specific T lymphocytes that uses magnetic beads coated with HLA/peptide complexes and we suggested that this method could be applied to a clinical setting. In the present work, we provide a detailed description of the whole GMP process of sorting and amplification of clinical grade T cells specific for the melanoma antigens Melan-A and MELOE-1. All the reagents used in this process including the sorting reagent were produced in GMP conditions and we document the optimization of the different steps of the process such as peptide stimulation, sorting, and amplification. The optimized procedure, validated in 3 blank runs in a clinical setting, allowed the production of at least 108 pure (>90%) Melan-A- and MELOE-1-specific T cells within 28 days starting with 100 mL of blood from metastatic melanoma patients. This GMP process is thus ready to be used in an upcoming phase I/II clinical trial on metastatic melanoma patients.

Is primary melanoma ulceration a factor of good response to adoptive immunotherapy?

BACKGROUND: Primary melanoma ulceration is a factor of poor prognosis at the local and regional stage. The physiopathological mechanisms which explain its prognostic impact are still little known. However, two recent studies suggest that it could be a predictive factor of good response to a non-specific immunotherapy (interferon-alpha) and to an active immunotherapy (vaccine). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether ulceration could be a factor of good prognosis in the context of an adoptive immunotherapy with tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) in stage III regional lymph node metastatic melanoma (sixth American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system) and whether it was associated with an improvement in the effectiveness of this treatment compared with the control group. METHODS: We have included all the patients treated in open prospective randomized TIL vs. control protocols in our unit from 1997 to 2009. Clinical data were derived retrospectively from patient files. Statistical analysis was performed using log-rank tests, Cox models and tests for interaction. RESULTS: A total of 144 patients were included. In the group of 80 patients treated with TIL, primary melanoma ulceration remained a pejorative factor for relapse-free and overall survival in univariate and multivariate analysis. The presence of ulceration did not change the effectiveness of TIL treatment in comparison with the control group with regards to relapse-free and overall survival. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that primary melanoma ulceration does not have any impact on the response to TIL adoptive immunotherapy and thus does not confirm its positive prognostic value suggested by two other immunotherapy approaches.

Evolution of clinical and molecular responses to bexarotene treatment in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: The mechanisms of action of bexarotene are not well understood. METHODS: A retrospective study on patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) treated with bexarotene was performed to see if bexarotene could act on the dominant T-cell clones. Thirty-five patients were included. Twenty-three were treated with bexarotene for more than 3 months (300 mg/m(2)). In 7 patients, phototherapy was given with bexarotene. RESULTS: Dominant T-cell clones were observed in 11 patients in peripheral blood and in 19 patients in skin. Our results demonstrate no significant evolution of T-cell clones either in skin or peripheral blood. Furthermore, the detection of T-cell clones in peripheral blood before starting bexarotene was significantly associated with the progression of the disease. UV therapy given with bexarotene significantly improved therapeutic response without any correlation with T-cell clones. CONCLUSION: This is the first study on the evolution of the T-cell clone in blood and skin in CTCL patients during bexarotene therapy.

Management and outcome of metastatic melanoma during pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Although metastatic melanoma occurrence during pregnancy challenges the physician in several ways, only a few studies have been published. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to investigate therapeutic management together with maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant women with advanced melanoma. METHODS: A French national retrospective study was conducted in 34 departments of Dermatology or Oncology. All patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage III/IV melanoma diagnosed during pregnancy were included. Data regarding melanoma history, pregnancy, treatment, delivery, maternal and infant outcomes were collected. RESULTS: Twenty-two women were included: 10 AJCC stage III and 12 stage IV. Abortion was performed in three patients. Therapeutic abstention during pregnancy was observed in three cases, 14 patients underwent surgery, four patients received chemotherapy and one patient was treated with brain radiotherapy alone. The median gestational age was 36 weeks amenorrhoea. Neither neonatal metastases nor deformities were observed. Placenta metastases were found in one case. Among 18 newborns, 17 are currently alive (median follow up, 17 months); one died of sudden infant death. The 2-year maternal survival rates were 56% (stage III) and 17% (stage IV). CONCLUSIONS: Faced with metastatic melanoma, a majority of women chose to continue with pregnancy, giving birth, based on our samples, to healthy, frequently premature infants. Except during the first trimester of pregnancy, conventional melanoma treatment was applied. No serious side effect was reported, except one case of miscarriage after surgery. Mortality rates do not suggest a worsened prognosis due to pregnancy but larger prospective controlled studies are necessary to assess this specific point.