Initiating chemotherapy in joint arthroplasty patients increases the risk of periprosthetic joint infections.

BACKGROUND: Total Joint Arthroplasties (TJAs) are becoming more popular, resulting in a growing economic burden due to potential postoperative complications, with periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) playing a significant role. The effect of immunosuppression on PJI risk, particularly in cancer patients following chemotherapy, is unknown. The hypothesis of this study investigated whether chemotherapy increases PJI rates in patients who received post-arthroplasty chemotherapy within one year of surgery. METHODS: Data from the M161Ortho dataset of PearlDiver patient records database were utilized using ICD-9, ICD-10, and CPT codes. The cohort includes Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA), Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA), and Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (TSA) patients who underwent post-arthroplasty chemotherapy within one year after surgery between 2010 and 2022. Patients in the matched control group did not receive post-arthroplasty chemotherapy. Pre-arthroplasty chemotherapy recipients, PJI, and post-op first year revisions were excluded. Analyses including the linear logistic regression were performed via R statistical software. RESULTS: Totally, 17,026 patients (8,558 TKAs, 6,707 THAs, and 1,761 TSAs) were included. At two (OR = 1.59, p = 0.034), three (OR = 1.57, p = 0.009), and four (OR = 1.40, p = 0.032) years for TKA, and two (OR = 2.27, p = 0.008), three (OR = 2.32, p < 0.001), and four (OR = 2.25, p0.001) years for THA, PJI rates were significantly higher in the chemotherapy group. TSA patients had a significant rise in PJI after four years (OR = 2.20, p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals a possible relationship between postoperative chemotherapy and an increased incidence of PJI in patients with arthroplasty. Chemotherapy suppresses the immune system, rendering patients more vulnerable to infections. Additional research is required to confirm these findings.

Increasing Burden of Lower-Extremity Fractures in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA): A 30-Year Epidemiological Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Lower-extremity fractures (LEFs) account for >30% of all skeletal injuries, contributing to the global health and economic burden. Fracture epidemiology in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region has been studied little. Health factors and disease epidemiology differ greatly among populations in MENA despite cultural, political, and economic similarities among the region's countries. This study examined the epidemiology of LEFs and the need for rehabilitation in MENA from 1990 to 2019. METHODS: We examined the epidemiology of fractures of the pelvis, hip, femur, patella, tibia, fibula, ankle, and foot bones using Global Burden of Disease (GBD) data. Fracture incidence, counts, and rates were measured for males and females across age groups in the 21 MENA countries as identified by the GBD data set. Associations between years of healthy life lost due to disability (YLD) resulting from fracture and the Socio-demographic Index (SDI) were analyzed. RESULTS: In contrast to the global trend, the age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) of LEFs in the MENA region increased by 4.57% from 1990 to 2019. In 2019, the highest ASIR among fractures was attributed to fractures of the patella, fibula, tibia, or ankle (434.36 per 100,000), most frequently occurring among those 20 to 24 years of age. In 2019, the highest ASIR of all fractures was noted in Saudi Arabia (2,010.56 per 100,000) and the lowest, in Sudan (523.29 per 100,000). The greatest increases from 1990 to 2019 in the ASIR of LEFs were noted in Yemen (132.39%), Syria (107.27%), and Afghanistan (94.47%), while the largest decreases were found in Kuwait (-62.72%), Sudan (-48.72%), and Iran (-45.37%). In 2019, the YLD rate of LEFs had increased to 277.65 per 100,000, up from 235.55 per 100,000 in 1990. CONCLUSIONS: Between 1990 and 2019, LEFs increased in the MENA region. Violence, war, and road traffic accidents increased, leading to a high rate of fractures, especially among youth. Low bone-mineral density related to vitamin D deficiency has also been reported as a risk factor for fracture in the region. Regional health authorities should be informed of fracture patterns by this study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Increasing Burden of Upper-Extremity Fractures in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA): A 30-Year Analysis of the Epidemiology and Causes of Injuries.

BACKGROUND: Upper-extremity fractures (UEFs) account for a large proportion of bone fractures and are costly to both health and the economy. The fracture burden in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) is influenced by the region's diverse cultural, economic, and political status. This study examined UEF epidemiology and causes across the MENA region and within the 21 MENA countries as categorized by the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) data set. METHODS: On the basis of GBD data, this study evaluated the epidemiology of UEFs from 1990 to 2019. The causes of injuries, incidence, number of years of healthy life lost due to disability (YLD), and their association with the Socio-demographic Index (SDI) were obtained and calculated for males and females in all age groups. RESULTS: From 1990 to 2019, the age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) of UEFs in the MENA region increased by 2.33%, to 1,086.39 per 100,000 people, and the YLD rate increased 15.69%, to 9.17 per 100,000, opposing the global decreasing trends. Fractures of the radius and/or ulna had the highest ASIR (505.32 per 100,000) of all UEF types in 2019. The clavicle, scapula, and humerus had the highest increasing trend among the fracture sites. In 2019, Saudi Arabia had the highest ASIR of UEFs (2,296.93 per 100,000). Afghanistan had the highest age-standardized YLD rate due to UEFs (19.6 per 100,000) in 2019, with Syria (153.32%) and Iran (37.04%) experiencing the greatest increase and decrease, respectively, from 1990 to 2019. Falling was the leading cause of UEFs, accounting for 45.05% of incidence and 41.19% of YLD overall. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to global trends, UEFs increased in the MENA region during the study period. Countries with higher fracture incidence and YLD should consider preventive and rehabilitation strategies.

Occurrence of proliferative myositis after COVID-19 vaccination: A case report.

Proliferative myositis (PM) is a benign intramuscular tumor that might mimic a malignant one due to its unusual pseudosarcomatous inflammatory nature. In this report, we describe a patient who developed PM after vaccination with Sinopharm coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccine. A 73 years old man was admitted due to rapidly-growing painful mass in his left thigh from a few days ago, curtailing his walking. He received a recent COVID-19 vaccination (Sinopharm COVID-19 vaccine) about 5 days before the beginning of symptoms. No history of trauma was present. On physical exam, a round firm mass was found in lateral side of mid portion of left thigh within the muscle with tenderness on palpation. An oval-shaped well-defined intramuscular mass measured 15 × 41 mm was noted in vastus lateralis muscle in ultrasonography. Left thigh magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a well-defined intramuscular mass with a definite margin of 19 × 39 mm. Finally, ultrasound (US)-guided core needle biopsy showed muscular tissue with a loose mass composed of plump fibroblasts and myofibroblasts and large ganglion-like cell with abundant amphophilic to basophilic cytoplasm, vesicular nuclei and prominent nucleoli. Pathology report showed a very rare case identified as proliferative myositis. It should be noted that we cannot make a direct link between these 2 events. PM is an extremely rare entity; however, its relation with COVID-19 vaccination might be a coincidence.

Burden of knee osteoarthritis in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA): an epidemiological analysis from 1990 to 2019.

BACKGROUND: Knee is the most affected joint in osteoarthritis (OA) and accounts for almost four-fifths of the burden of OA globally. We aimed to explore the prevalence, incidence, trends, and burden of knee OA during 1990-2019 in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, using the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study data. METHODS: This is an epidemiological study based on the GBD data from 1990 to 2019 on knee OA in MENA countries. The prevalence, incidence, and years lived with disability (YLD) numbers of knee OA were obtained for both genders. Similarly, age-standardized rates of these indexes per 100,000 people and the proportion of total YLD caused by knee OA in each country and for the MENA region were evaluated. RESULTS: The prevalence of knee osteoarthritis in the MENA region increased 2.88-fold, from 6.16 million cases to 17.75 million, between 1990 and 2019. Furthermore, in 2019, knee osteoarthritis accounted for approximately 1.69 million (95% UI 1.46-1.95) incident cases in MENA. The age-standardized prevalence was higher in women between 1990 (3.94% [95% UI 3.39-4.55] in women and 3.24% [95% UI 2.79-3.72] in men) and 2019 (4.44% [95% UI 3.83-5.10] in women and 3.66% [3.14-4.21] in men). Total YLDs due to knee osteoarthritis increased by more than 2.88-fold, rising from 196.29 thousand [95% UI 97.17-399.29] in 1990 to 564.66 thousand [95% UI 275.06-1,150.68] in 2019. In the year 2019, Kuwait, Turkey, and Oman had the highest age-standardized prevalence (4.42% [95% UI 3.79-5.08]), YLD (132.41 [95% UI 65.79-267.56] per 100 000), and increase (21.17%) in YLD compared with 1990 in MENA region, respectively. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of and YLDs due to knee OA in MENA has escalated over the last three decades. Considering the expanding burden of knee OA in MENA, policymakers should be more concerned to implement preventive strategies.

Giant pedunculated hepatoblastoma mimicking neuroblastoma in a 4-month-old infant: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Hepatoblastoma is the most common primary malignancy of hepatic origin in children, with an estimated incidence of 0.5-1.5 per million children. Hepatoblastoma classically has an intraparenchymal location, and pedunculated hepatoblastoma is a relatively rare entity. Accurate diagnosis can be challenging due to its extrahepatic location and possibly its thin peduncle, which is not easily identified in imaging. CASE PRESENTATION: Here, we report a case of asymptomatic giant palpable hepatoblastoma in the LUQ of a four-month-old male infant, initially suspected of neuroblastoma based on abdominal ultrasound findings. The final diagnosis of giant pedunculated hepatoblastoma was made based on the abdominal CT scan and the diagnosis was confirmed by percutaneous biopsy. Due to the size of the tumor, complete removal of the tumor was not initially possible. Therefore, the patient was treated with several courses of chemotherapy. The tumor was shrunk and then completely removed. The patient was treated, and no complications were found in the 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: Pedunculated hepatoblastoma is rare but should be considered as a possibility in the case of a perihepatic mass in a pediatric patient that can be confused with other upper abdominal masses such as an adrenal mass. Therefore, in such cases, we must look for the vascular pedicle in the imaging and keep the AFP check in mind.

Burden of Hand Osteoarthritis in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA): An Epidemiological Analysis From 1990 to 2019.

PURPOSE: Hand osteoarthritis (OA) is a common cause of disability in older people. Although often underemphasized, it may affect quality of life and imposes a considerable burden on the health system. This study evaluated the epidemiology of hand OA in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. METHODS: This epidemiological study was performed based on the Global Burden of Disease study from 1990 to 2019. The incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability (YLD) in all 21 MENA countries during the study period were reported in rate, age-standardized, and percentage. RESULTS: Hand osteoarthritis in MENA increased 2.7-fold, from 1.6 million cases to 4.3 million from 1990 to 2019 with an age-standardized incidence rate of 50.2 (95% CI, 38.2-66.4) per 100,000 people in 2019. Saudi Arabia had the highest age-standardized prevalence in both 1990 (2.3%) and 2019 (2.3%), whereas Turkey had the lowest (0.3%) in both years. Total YLDs due to hand osteoarthritis increased by more than 2.7-fold, from 50,335 to 135,336 during the study period. The highest rate of increase in YLD rate from 1990 to 2019 was in Iran (3.3) and the largest decrease was in Qatar (-11.5). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to the global trend, MENA hand OA prevalence and YLDs did not decrease between 1990 and 2019 and remained constant over time. Aging and increasing obesity rates, particularly among women, might be the contributing factors. Hand OA epidemiology varies by country, possibly due to genetic, ethnic, and environmental factors. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic II.

Increasing burden of hip osteoarthritis in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA): an epidemiological analysis from 1990 to 2019.

INTRODUCTION: The hip is the second most affected joint in osteoarthritis (OA), diagnosed annually worldwide. This is the first study presenting the epidemiology of hip OA in the Middle Eastern and North African countries from 1990 to 2019. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was performed based on the analysis of global burden of disease (GBD) study data. Epidemiological indices including prevalence, incidence, and years lived with disability (YLD) were compared in all 21 countries located in Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region during 1990 to 2019. RESULTS: The prevalence of patients with hip OA in MENA increased 3.1-fold, from 0.40 to 1.28 million during the study period. Hip OA accounted for about 74.46 thousand (95% UI 56.64-94.92) incident cases in MENA at 2019. It was found that Qatar had the highest age-standardized prevalence in both 1990 (0.33% [0.25-42]), and 2019 (0.40% [0.30-0.50]) in MENA. Oman showed the greatest relative increase (around 50.10%) in age-standardized prevalence of hip OA, whereas Iraq showed the lowest relative increase (around 9.94%) compared with other MENA countries. CONCLUSIONS: Hip OA prevalence and YLD have both increased in MENA over the last three decades. The region's rapidly increasing burden of hip OA emphasizes the need to focus on OA prevention strategies especially in Qatar, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and UAE.

Primary intradural extramedullary Ewing sarcoma in the lumbar area: A case report.

Primary intradural extramedullary Ewing sarcoma (IEES) is the rarest type of Ewing sarcoma. Extreme caution is required for the diagnosis of IEES because benign intradural spinal tumors can be mistaken for IEES in the early stages of imaging and clinical evaluation. IEES tumors have no standardized treatment guidelines because of the lack of research on the therapeutic aspects of these tumors. Herein, we present a case of primary IEES in a male adolescent with a fast progression of the disease. Diagnosis of IEES was suspected with imaging (computed tomography scan and lumbosacral magnetic resonance imaging) and was confirmed with histology and immunohistochemistry (positive reactivity for CD99 and FLI1). He was successfully treated with surgical intervention with no radiotherapy or chemotherapy. Imaging studies are helpful in making the initial diagnosis of intradural extramedullary Ewing sarcoma. Surgery is considered to be a successful method of treatment for this condition.

Conceptualization and development of a questionnaire to determine physical activity barriers.

PURPOSE: Considering the role of physical activity on public health and the high prevalence of physical inactivity worldwide, determining physical activity barriers is critical and will be a road map for future planning. This study aimed to develop a comprehensive questionnaire to determine physical activity barriers. METHODS: By reviewing previous studies, the main domains of the questionnaire were established. A physical activity expert interviewed 20 individuals aged 18 to 65 years. The results were evaluated by an expert panel for a content validity index. Face validity, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency were established on 204 individuals. RESULTS: The content validity index in all items was within the acceptable range (>0.85). Face validity was appropriate, and the misunderstanding index was < 20% in all items. Test-retest reliability in the final questionnaire in all items based on Cohen's kappa was > 0.20, indicating fair agreement. Internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha of 0.63 was within the acceptable range. CONCLUSION: The study revealed that the newly designed survey is valid, accurate, and reliable. The use of this comprehensive tool by policymakers would help them properly identify the perceived barriers, and thus perform better physical activity interventions as promotional health programs.