Mesh-wrapping for the treatment of fractured liver-A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Major liver trauma is a potentially fatal injury. Management of liver injuries has considerably changed over the past decades with a trend towards a multidisciplinary approach. Most liver injuries can be managed conservatively; however, some cases need operative management. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We present a case of a 73year old female who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy that was complicated by a life-threatening liver fracture and was successfully managed by staged laparotomies and liver mesh-wrapping. DISCUSSION: Mesh wrapping is an effective approach for achieving hemostasis by a temponading effect. An alternative to liver packing would be the resection of the affected segmented, however this should be assessed based on the extent of the injury as well as on the hemodynamic stability of the patient who, in majority, are hemodynamically compromised. The advantage however of liver wrapping is that there is no need for reoperation to remove the mesh, the hazard of re-bleeding is diminished because the mesh is left in place, and the incidence of septic complications is low. In this case, the mesh was sutured to the diaphragmatic crus as well as to the falciform ligament to secure the mesh on two anchoring points. CONCLUSION: Using an absorbable mesh on a traumatized and fragmented liver appears to be a safe and effective approach to high grade liver injury. The judicious use of cauterization, beaming or suturing to the liver bed to control oozing or bleeding should be advocated in order to avoid this highly morbid complication.

Laparoscopic approach to symptomatic meckel diverticulum in adults.

BACKGROUND: Meckel diverticulum (MD) is the most common congenital gastrointestinal malformation found in approximately 2% of the general population. MD manifests in adults as gastrointestinal bleeding, bowel obstruction, intussusception, or perforation in <5% of cases. There is no consensus on the ideal management strategy in symptomatic MD. Therefore, we searched the literature to highlight the role of laparoscopy in diagnosing and treating symptomatic MD. METHOD: We used PubMed, Medline, Google Scholar, Ovid, and Cochrane data search engines looking for articles containing terms such as Meckel diverticulum, ectopic gastric mucosa, laparoscopic, technetium 99m pertechnetate, and acute management. We included articles reporting on case series in the English language on adult patients only and reporting on laparoscopic approach in the management of symptomatic MD. RESULTS: A total of 5 articles reporting on 35 cases were found. We report on the pooled data from these series with emphasis on number of patients, age, male to female ratio, length of stay, conversion to open procedure, method of resection, complications, first presentation, and confirmation of diagnosis preoperatively. We also compare the results of laparoscopic versus open approaches mentioned in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopic approach was found to be effective as a diagnostic and therapeutic modality in patients with symptomatic MD; however, its adoption as the gold standard still needs further studies with larger patient numbers.