A comparison of outcomes between open and endovascular arteriovenous access creation for hemodialysis.

OBJECTIVE: Preliminary outcomes for percutaneous endovascular autogenous access (endoAVF) have shown promising results; however, comparisons with surgical cohorts in dialysis populations are lacking. This study compares autogenous arteriovenous access created with the EverlinQ endoAVF system with accesses created by conventional surgical technique with respect to functional and patency related outcomes. METHODS: This is a multicenter, retrospective review of autogenous arteriovenous accesses entered into a prospective database. Patients receiving radiocephalic, brachiocephalic, or endoAVF arteriovenous accesses between 2014 and 2019 were included. Autogenous access maturation, primary patency, secondary patency, steal syndrome, and reinterventions were collected and analyzed using standard statistical and survival analyses. RESULTS: A total of 369 accesses were created during the study period, including 61 endovascular accesses, 171 radiocephalic accesses, and 137 brachiocephalic accesses (median follow-up, 17 months; range, 1-71 months). Maturation failure at the end of follow-up was 27% ± 6%, 27% ± 5%, and 18% ± 4% for endovascular, radiocephalic, and brachiocephalic accesses, respectively (P = .049 for brachiocephalic vs endovascular accesses). Primary patencies at 12 and 24 months were 42% ± 5% and 32% ± 7% for endovascular accesses, 43% ± 4% and 24% ± 4% for radiocephalic accesses, and 42% ± 4% and 29% ± 4% for brachiocephalic accesses (P = .906). Secondary patencies at 12 and 24 months were 68% ± 6% and 60% ± 7% for endovascular accesses, 75% ± 3% and 67% ± 4% for radiocephalic accesses, and 91% ± 3% and 81% ± 4% for brachiocephalic accesses (P = .006 for brachiocephalic vs endovascular accesses). There were no statistically significant differences in ischemic steal syndrome (3.3%, 4.1%, and 8.0%; P = .229) or total reinterventions/year (1.0 ± 3.1, 0.9 ± 1.8, and 1.2 ± 1.8; P = .289) for endovascular, radiocephalic, or brachiocephalic arteriovenous accesses, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: EndoAVF compare favorably with respect to maturation and patency compared with surgically created accesses in a real-world cohort. Outcomes and reintervention rates are similar to conventional radiocephalic arteriovenous accesses, but are inferior with respect to patency and maturation to brachiocephalic accesses.

Cardiac MRI measurements of pericardial adipose tissue volumes in patients on in-centre nocturnal hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: Conversion from conventional hemodialysis (CHD) to in-centre nocturnal hemodialysis (INHD) is associated with left ventricular (LV) mass regression, but the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. Using cardiac MRI (CMR), we examined the effects of INHD on epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) and paracardial adipose tissue (PAT), and the relationships between EAT, PAT and LV remodeling, biomarkers of nutrition, myocardial injury, fibrosis and volume. METHODS: We conducted a prospective multicenter cohort study of 37 patients transitioned from CHD to INHD and 30 patients on CHD (control). Biochemical markers and CMR were performed at baseline and 52 weeks. CMR images were analyzed by independent readers, blinded to order and treatment group. RESULTS: Among 64 participants with complete CMR studies at baseline (mean age 54; 43% women), there were no significant differences in EAT index (60.6 ± 4.3 mL/m2 vs 64.2 ± 5.1 mL/m2, p = 0.99) or PAT index (60.0 ± 5.4 mL/m2 vs 53.2 ± 5.9 mL/m2, p = 0.42) between INHD and CHD groups. Over 52 weeks, EAT index and PAT index did not change significantly in INHD and CHD groups (p = 0.21 and 0.14, respectively), and the changes in EAT index and PAT index did not differ significantly between INHD and CHD groups (p = 0.30 and 0.16, respectively). Overall, changes in EAT index inversely correlated with changes in LV end-systolic volume index (LVESVI) but not LV end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI), LV mass index (LVMI), and LV ejection fraction (LVEF). Changes in PAT index inversely correlated with changes in LVESVI, LVMI and positively correlated with changes in LVEF. There were no correlations between changes in EAT index or PAT index with changes in albumin, LDL, triglycerides, troponin-I, FGF-23, or NT-proBNP levels over 52 weeks (all p > 0.30). CONCLUSIONS: INHD was not associated with any changes in EAT index and PAT index over 12 months. Changes in EAT index were not significantly associated with changes in markers of LV remodeling, nutrition, myocardial injury, fibrosis, volume status. In contrast, changes in PAT index, which paradoxically is expected to exert less paracrine effect on the myocardium, were correlated with changes in LVESVI, LVMI and LVEF. Larger and longer-term studies may clarify the role of PAT in cardiac remodeling with intensified hemodialysis. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT00718848.

Endovascular Proximal Forearm Arteriovenous Fistula for Hemodialysis Access: Results of the Prospective, Multicenter Novel Endovascular Access Trial (NEAT).

BACKGROUND: Hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are suboptimally used primarily due to problems with maturation, early thrombosis, and patient nonacceptance. An endovascular approach to fistula creation without open surgery offers another hemodialysis vascular access option. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, single-arm, multicenter study (Novel Endovascular Access Trial [NEAT]). SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive adult non-dialysis-dependent and dialysis-dependent patients referred for vascular access creation at 9 centers in Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. INTERVENTION: Using catheter-based endovascular technology and radiofrequency energy, an anastomosis was created between target vessels, resulting in an endovascular AVF (endoAVF). OUTCOMES: Safety, efficacy, functional usability, and patency end points. MEASUREMENTS: Safety as percentage of device-related serious adverse events; efficacy as percentage of endoAVFs physiologically suitable (brachial artery flow ≥ 500mL/min, vein diameter ≥ 4mm) for dialysis within 3 months; functional usability of endoAVFs to provide prescribed dialysis via 2-needle cannulation; primary and cumulative endoAVF patencies per standardized definitions. RESULTS: 80 patients were enrolled (20 roll-in and 60 participants in the full analysis set; the latter are reported). EndoAVFs were created in 98% of participants; 8% had a serious procedure-related adverse event (2% device related). 87% were physiologically suitable for dialysis (eg, mean brachial artery flow, 918mL/min; endoAVF vein diameter, 5.2mm [cephalic vein]). EndoAVF functional usability was 64% in participants who received dialysis. 12-month primary and cumulative patencies were 69% and 84%, respectively. LIMITATIONS: Due to the unique anatomy and vessels used to create endoAVFs, this was a single-arm study without a surgical comparator. CONCLUSIONS: An endoAVF can be reliably created using a radiofrequency magnetic catheter-based system, without open surgery and with minimal complications. The endoAVF can be successfully used for hemodialysis and demonstrated high 12-month cumulative patencies. It may be a viable alternative option for achieving AVFs for hemodialysis patients in need of vascular access.

Multi-intervention management of calciphylaxis: a report of 7 cases.

Calcific uremic arteriolopathy (calciphylaxis) is a devastating but rare complication seen predominantly in dialysis patients that often is fatal. Because of the rarity of the disease and the multifactorial nature of its cause, no clinical trials have been conducted to date to determine the best therapy for the condition. We report a case series of 7 patients at a single institution in whom a systematic multi-interventional treatment strategy was implemented, consisting of trigger-agent cessation (calcium-based phosphate binders, alphacalcidol, and warfarin), wound management, and antibiotic therapy, supplemented by intensified hemodialysis (4 hours daily for 7 days followed by 5-6 times weekly), intravenous sodium thiosulfate (12.5-25 g intravenously 3 times a week), and attempted oxygen therapy (given through a face mask or hyperbaric chamber as tolerated by patient circumstance). Treatments selected were based on literature review, consensus discussion, and attempts to address the physiologic disturbances that underlie the condition. All 7 patients identified with biopsy-proven calcific uremic arteriolopathy were treated with this regimen in 2007-2010, with 6 of 7 showing complete recovery. We suggest that consistent implementation of a multi-interventional approach may alter the course of this devastating disease. Further studies are needed to confirm and extend these findings.