Targeted Radionuclide Therapy Using Auger Electron Emitters: The Quest for the Right Vector and the Right Radionuclide.

Auger electron emitters (AEEs) are attractive tools in targeted radionuclide therapy to specifically irradiate tumour cells while sparing healthy tissues. However, because of their short range, AEEs need to be brought close to sensitive targets, particularly nuclear DNA, and to a lower extent, cell membrane. Therefore, radioimmunoconjugates (RIC) have been developed for specific tumour cell targeting and transportation to the nucleus. Herein, we assessed, in A-431CEA-luc and SK-OV-31B9 cancer cells that express low and high levels of HER2 receptors, two 111In-RIC consisting of the anti-HER2 antibody trastuzumab conjugated to NLS or TAT peptides for nuclear delivery. We found that NLS and TAT peptides improved the nuclear uptake of 111In-trastuzumab conjugates, but this effect was limited and non-specific. Moreover, it did not result in a drastic decrease of clonogenic survival. Indium-111 also contributed to non-specific cytotoxicity in vitro due to conversion electrons (30% of the cell killing). Comparison with [125I]I-UdR showed that the energy released in the cell nucleus by increasing the RIC's nuclear uptake or by choosing an AEE that releases more energy per decay should be 5 to 10 times higher to observe a significant therapeutic effect. Therefore, new Auger-based radiopharmaceuticals need to be developed.

A benchmarking study of Geant4 for Auger electrons emitted by medical radioisotopes.

Auger emitting radioisotopes are of great interest in targeted radiotherapy because, once internalised in the tumour cells, they can deliver dose locally to the radiation sensitive targets, while not affecting surrounding cells. Geant4 is a Monte Carlo code widely used to characterise the physics mechanism at the basis of targeted radiotherapy. In this work, we benchmarked the modelling of the emission of Auger electrons in Geant4 deriving from the decay of 123I, 124I, 125I radionuclides against existing theoretical approaches. We also compared Geant4 against reference data in the case of 131Cs, which is of interest for brachytherapy. In the case of 125I and 131Cs, the simulation results are compared to experimental measurements as well. Good agreement was found between Geant4 and the reference data. As far as we know, this is the first study aimed to benchmark against experimental measurements the emission of Auger electrons in Geant4 for radiotherapy applications.

Strand breakage by decay of DNA-bound 124I provides a basis for combined PET imaging and Auger endoradiotherapy.

Purpose DNA ligands labelled with 125I induce cytotoxic DNA double-strand breaks (DSB), suggesting a potential for Auger endoradiotherapy. Since the 60-day half-life of 125I is suboptimal for therapy, we have investigated another Auger-emitter 124I, with shorter half-life (4.18 days), and the additional feature of positron-emission, enabling positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. The purpose of this study was to compare the two radionuclides on the basis of DNA DSB per decay. Materials and methods Using a 124I- (or 125I)-labelled minor groove binding DNA ligand, we investigated DNA breakage using the plasmid DNA assay. Biodistribution of the conjugate of the labelled ligand with transferrin was investigated in nude mice bearing a K562 human lymphoma xenograft. Results The probability of DSB per decay was 0.58 and 0.85 for 124I and 125I, respectively, confirming the therapeutic potential of the former. The crystal structure of the ligand DNA complex shows the iodine atom deep within the minor groove, consistent with the high efficiency of induced damage. Biodistribution studies, including PET imaging, showed distinctive results for the conjugate, compared to the free ligand and transferrin, consistent with receptor-mediated delivery of the ligand. Conclusions Conjugation of 124I-labelled DNA ligands to tumor targeting peptides provides a feasible strategy for Auger endoradiotherapy, with the advantage of monitoring tumor targeting by PET imaging.