Short repetition time diffusion-weighted imaging improves visualization of prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess whether short repetition time (TR) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) could improve diffusion contrast in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) compared with long TR (conventional) reference standard DWI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our Institutional Review Board approved this retrospective study and waived the need for informed consent. Twenty-five patients with suspected PCa underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) using a 3.0-T system. DWI was performed with TR of 1850 ms (short) and 6000 ms (long) with b-values of 0, 1000, and 2000s/mm2. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), visual score, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and diagnostic performance were compared between short and long TR DWI for both b-values. The statistical tests included paired t-test for SNR and CNR; Wilcoxon signed-rank test for VA; Pearson's correlation and Bland-Altman plot analysis for ADC; and McNemar test and receiver operating characteristic analysis and Delong test for diagnostic performance. RESULTS: Regarding b1000, CNR and visual score were significantly higher in short TR compared with long TR (P = .003 and P = .002, respectively), without significant difference in SNR (P = .21). Considering b2000, there was no significant difference in visual score between short and long TR (P = .07). However, SNR and CNR in long TR were higher (P = .01 and P = .04, respectively). ADC showed significant correlations, without apparent bias for ADC between short and long TR for both b-values. For diagnostic performance of DWI between short and long TR for both b-values, one out of five readers noted a significant difference, with the short TR for both b-values demonstrating superior performance. CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed that the short TR DWI1000 may provide better image quality than did the long TR DWI1000 and may improve visualization and diagnostic performance of PCa for readers.

Comparison Between Amide Proton Transfer Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using 3-Dimensional Acquisition and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Characterization of Prostate Cancer: A Preliminary Study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare diagnostic performance for tumor detection and for assessment of tumor aggressiveness in prostate cancer (PC) between amide proton transfer magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with 3-dimensional acquisition (3DAPT) and diffusion-weighted imaging. METHODS: The subjects were 23 patients with 27 pathologically proven PCs who underwent 3T multiparametric MRI. With reference to the pathology findings, 2 readers in consensus identified the location of PC on multiparametric MRI and measured APT signal intensity (APT SI [%]) and mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of the benign region and each PC lesion. RESULTS: The mean ADC showed a significant difference between benign regions and PC lesions (0.74 ± 0.15 vs 1.37 ± 0.21, P < 0.001), whereas APT SI did not ( P = 0.091). Lesion APT SI was significantly higher and lesion ADC was significantly lower in PCs with Gleason group (GG) ≥3 than in PCs with GG ≤2 (3.37 ± 1.30 vs 1.78 ± 0.67, P < 0.001, and 0.71 ± 0.18 vs 0.79 ± 0.10, P = 0.038, respectively). The APT SI was significantly higher in GG3 than in GG1, in GG3 than in GG2, and in GG4 than in GG2 ( P = 0.009, P = 0.001, and P = 0.006, respectively). The area under the curve for separating tumor lesions and benign regions was 0.601 for 3DAPT and 0.983 for ADC ( P < 0.001). The area under the curve for separating tumors with GG ≤2 from tumors with GG ≥3 was 0.912 for 3DAPT and 0.734 for ADC ( P = 0.172). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with PC, it might be preferable to use ADC to discriminate benign from malignant tissue and use APT SI for assessment of tumor aggressiveness.

Comparison of single-shot EPI and multi-shot EPI in prostate DWI at 3.0 T.

In prostate MRI, single-shot EPI (ssEPI) DWI still suffers from distortion and blurring. Multi-shot EPI (msEPI) overcomes the drawbacks of ssEPI DWI. The aim of this article was to compare the image quality and diagnostic performance for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC) between ssEPI DWI and msEPI DWI. This retrospective study included 134 patients with suspected PC who underwent 3.0 T MRI and subsequent MRI-guided biopsy. Three radiologists independently assessed anatomical distortion, prostate edge clarity, and lesion conspicuity score for pathologically confirmed csPC. Lesion apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and benign ADC were also calculated. In 17 PC patients who underwent prostatectomy, three radiologists independently assessed eight prostate regions by DWI score in PI-RADS v 2.1. Anatomical distortion and prostate edge clarity were significantly higher in msEPI DWI than in ssEPI DWI in the three readers. Lesion conspicuity score was significantly higher in msEPI DWI than in ssEPI DWI in reader 1 and reader 3. Regarding discrimination ability between PC with GS ≤ 3 + 4 and PC with GS ≥ 4 + 3 using lesion ADC, AUC was comparable between ssEPI DWI and msEPI DWI. For diagnostic performance of csPC using DWI score, AUC was comparable between msEPI DWI and ssEPI DWI in all readers. Compared with ssEPI DWI, msEPI DWI had improved image quality and similar or higher diagnostic performance.

Clinical application of single-shot echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging with compressed SENSE in prostate MRI at 3T: preliminary experience.

OBJECTIVES: Image quality (IQ) of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with single-shot echo-planar imaging (ssEPI) suffers from low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in high b-value acquisitions. Compressed SENSE (C-SENSE), which combines SENSE with compressed sensing, enables SNR to be improved by reducing noise. The aim of this study was to compare IQ and prostate cancer (PC) detectability between DWI with ssEPI using SENSE (EPIS) and using C-SENSE (EPICS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients with pathologically proven PC underwent multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging at 3T. DW images acquired with EPIS and EPICS were assessed for the following: lesion conspicuity (LC), SNR, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), mean and standard deviation (SD) of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of lesion (lADCm and lADCsd), coefficient of variation of lesion ADC (lADCcv), and mean ADC of benign prostate (bADCm). RESULTS: LC were comparable between EPIS and EPICS (p > 0.050), and SNR and CNR were significantly higher in EPICS than EPIS (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001). In both EPIS and EPICS, lADCm was significantly lower than bADCm (p < 0.001). In addition, lADCcv was significantly lower in EPICS than in EPIS (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Compared with EPIS, EPICS has improved IQ and comparable diagnostic performance in PC.

Magnetic resonance imaging findings of pure prostatic ductal adenocarcinomas: a case series.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in pure prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: From January 2009 to February 2020, seven patients who were diagnosed with pure prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma and had a referable preoperative MRI scan were included in the study. We evaluated the following MRI findings for each tumor: size, location, presence of multi-cystic component, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value. RESULTS: The median maximum diameter of the tumors was 22 mm (range 19-70 mm). Regarding transverse distribution, five tumors were located in the periurethral area and two were located peripherally apart from the urethra. Two of the seven tumors had cystic components. The median ADC value of the tumors was 0.754 × 10-3 mm2/s (range 0.570-0.963 × 10-3 mm2/s). Based on the transverse distribution and components of the tumors on MRI, ductal adenocarcinomas were classified into three types: type I as a non-cystic tumor located peripherally apart from the urethra (29%, two cases); type II as a non-cystic tumor located in the periurethral area (43%, three cases); and type III as a tumor with a multi-cystic component (29%, two cases). CONCLUSION: The non-cystic mass with periurethral distribution (type II) and multi-cystic mass (type III) may be characteristic features that differentiate pure ductal adenocarcinoma from ordinary acinar adenocarcinoma on MRI.

Clinical impact of ultra-high b-value (3000 s/mm2) diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer at 3T: comparison with b-value of 2000 s/mm2.

OBJECTIVE: High b-value diffusion-weighted imaging (hDWI) with a b-value of 2000 s/mm2 provides insufficient image contrast between benign and malignant tissues and an overlap of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) between Gleason grades (GG) in prostate cancer (PC). We compared image quality, PC detectability, and discrimination ability for PC aggressiveness between ultra-high b-value DWI (uhDWI) of 3000 s/mm2 and hDWI. METHODS: The subjects were 49 patients with PC who underwent 3T multiparametric MRI. Single-shot echo-planar DWI was acquired with b-values of 0, 2000, and 3000 s/mm2. Anatomical distortion of prostate (AD), signal intensity of benign prostate (PSI), and lesion conspicuity score (LCS) were assessed using a 4-point scale; and signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio, and mean ADC (×10-3 mm2/s) of lesion (lADC) and surrounding benign region (bADC) were measured. RESULTS: PSI was significantly lower in uhDWI than in hDWI (p < 0.001). AD, LCS, signal-to-noise ratio, and contrast-to-noise ratio were comparable between uhDWI and hDWI (all p > 0.05). In contrast, lADC was significantly lower than bADC in both uhDWI and hDWI (both p < 0.001). In comparison of lADC between tumors of ≤GG2 and those of ≥GG3, both uhDWI and hDWI showed significant difference (p = 0.007 and p = 0.021, respectively). AUC for separating tumors of ≤GG2 from those of ≥GG3 was 0.731 in hDWI and 0.699 in uhDWI (p = 0.161). CONCLUSION: uhDWI suppressed background signal better than hDWI, but did not contribute to increased diagnostic performance in PC. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Compared with hDWI, uhDWI could not contribute to increased diagnostic performance in PC.

Diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer.

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), a key component in multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), is useful for tumor detection and localization in clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). The Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System versions 2 and 2.1 (PI-RADS v2 and PI-RADS v2.1) emphasize the role of DWI in determining PIRADS Assessment Category in each of the transition and peripheral zones. In addition, several recent studies have demonstrated comparable performance of abbreviated biparametric MRI (bpMRI), which incorporates only T2-weighted imaging and DWI, compared with mpMRI with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Therefore, further optimization of DWI is essential to achieve clinical application of bpMRI for efficient detection of csPC in patients with elevated PSA levels. Although DWI acquisition is routinely performed using single-shot echo-planar imaging, this method suffers from such as susceptibility artifact and anatomic distortion, which remain to be solved. In this review article, we will outline existing problems in standard DWI using the single-shot echo-planar imaging sequence; discuss solutions that employ newly developed imaging techniques, state-of-the-art technologies, and sequences in DWI; and evaluate the current status of quantitative DWI for assessment of tumor aggressiveness in PC.

Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for assessment of tumor aggressiveness in prostate cancer at 3T.

PURPOSE: To compare diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging (DCE-MRI) for characterization of prostate cancer (PC). METHODS: 104 PC patients who underwent prostate multiparametric MRI at 3T including DWI and DCE-MRI before MRI-guided biopsy or radical prostatectomy. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) with histogram analysis (mean, 0-25th percentile, skewness, and kurtosis), intravoxel incoherent motion model including D and f; stretched exponential model including distributed diffusion coefficient (DDC) and a; and permeability parameters including Ktrans, Kep, and Ve were obtained from a region of interest placed on the dominant tumor of each patient. RESULTS: ADCmean, ADC0-25, D, DDC, and Ve were significantly lower and Kep was significantly higher in GS ≥ 3 + 4 tumors (n = 89) than in GS = 3 + 3 tumors (n = 15), and also in GS ≥ 4 + 3 tumors (n = 57) than in GS ≤ 3 + 4 tumors (n = 47) (P < 0.001 to P = 0.040). f was significantly lower in GS ≥ 4 + 3 tumors than in GS ≤ 3 + 4 tumors (P = 0.022), but there was no significant difference between GS = 3 + 3 tumors and GS ≥ 3 + 4 tumors, or between the remaining metrics in both comparisons. In metrics with area under the curve (AUC) >0.80, there was a significant difference in AUC between ADC0-25 and D, and DDC for separating GS ≤ 3 + 4 tumors from GS ≥ 4 + 3 tumors (P = 0.040 and P = 0.022, respectively). There were no significant differences between metrics with AUC > 0.80 for separating GS = 3 + 3 tumors from GS ≥ 3 + 4 tumors. ADC0-25 had the highest correlation with Gleason grade (ρ = -0.625, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: DWI and DCE-MRI showed no apparent clinical superiority of non-Gaussian models or permeability MRI over the mono-exponential model for assessment of tumor aggressiveness in PC.

Comparison of Biparametric and Multiparametric MRI for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection With PI-RADS Version 2.1.

BACKGROUND: Biparametric MRI (bpMRI) without dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) results in an elimination of adverse events, shortened examination time, and reduced costs, compared to multiparametric MRI (mpMRI). The ability of bpMRI to detect clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC) with the Prostate Imaging and Reporting Data System version 2.1 (PI-RADS v2.1) compared to standard mpMRI has not been studied extensively. PURPOSE: To compare the interobserver reliability and diagnostic performance for detecting csPC of bpMRI and mpMRI using PI-RADS v2.1. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. POPULATION: In all, 103 patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels who underwent mpMRI and subsequent MRI-ultrasonography fusion-guided prostate-targeted biopsy (MRGB) with or without prostatectomy. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCES: T2 -weighted imaging (T2 WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and DCE-MRI at 3T. ASSESSMENT: Three readers independently assessed each suspected PC lesion, assigning a score of 1-5 for T2 WI, a score of 1-5 for DWI, and positive and negative for DCE-MRI according to PI-RADS v2.1 and determined the overall PI-RADS assessment category of bpMRI (T2 WI and DWI) and mpMRI (T2 WI, DWI, and DCE-MRI). The reference standard was MRGB or prostatectomy-derived histopathology. STATISTICAL TESTING: Statistical analysis was performed using the kappa statistic and McNemar and Delong tests. RESULTS: Of the 165 suspected PC lesions in 103 patients, 81 were diagnosed with csPC and 84 with benign conditions. Interobserver variability of PI-RADS assessment category showed good agreement for bpMRI (kappa value = 0.642) and mpMRI (kappa value = 0.644). For three readers, the diagnostic sensitivity was significantly higher for mpMRI than for bpMRI (P < 0.001 to P = 0.016, respectively), whereas diagnostic specificity was significantly higher for bpMRI than for mpMRI (P < 0.001 each). For three readers, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was higher for bpMRI than for mpMRI; however, the difference was significant only for Reader 1 and Reader 3 (Reader 1: 0.823 vs. 0.785, P = 0.035; Reader 2: 0.852 vs. 0.829, P = 0.099; and Reader 3: 0.828 vs. 0.773, P = 0.002). DATA CONCLUSION: For detecting csPC using PI-RADS v2.1, the interobserver reliability and diagnostic performance of bpMRI was comparable with those of mpMRI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.

Characteristics of MR Imaging for Staging and Survival Analysis of Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Endometrium: A Multicenter Study in Japan.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to examine MRI features and staging of neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) of the endometrium and evaluate survival. METHODS: Clinical data, pathological, and preoperative pelvic MRI findings in 22 patients with histologically surgery-proven endometrial NEC were retrospectively reviewed. Tumors were pure NEC (n = 10) or mixed histotype (n = 12), with 13 large and nine small cell type. RESULTS: International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging was I, II, III, and IV in 6, 2, 12, and 2 patients, respectively. In 13 (76.4%) of 17 patients with pathological deep myometrial invasion, MRI showed abnormal diffusely infiltrative high T2 signal intensity throughout the myometrium with loss of normal uterine architecture. All tumors had restricted diffusion (apparent diffusion coefficient map low signal intensity, diffusion weighted imaging high signal intensity). Accuracy of T staging by MRI for all cases was 81.8%, with reference to pathology staging, while patient-based sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detecting metastatic pelvic lymph nodes was 60.0%, 100%, and 77.8%, respectively. Two intrapelvic peritoneal dissemination cases were detected by MRI. During follow-up (mean 30.4, range 3.3-138.4 months), 16 patients (72.7%) experienced recurrence and 12 (54.5%) died of disease. Two-year disease-free and overall survival rates for FIGO I, II, III, and IV were 66.7% and 83.3%, 50% and 100%, 10% and 33.3%, and 0% and 0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Abnormal diffusely infiltrative high T2 signal intensity throughout the myometrium with normal uterine architecture loss and obvious restricted diffusion throughout the tumor are suggestive features of endometrial NEC. Pelvic MRI is reliable for intrapelvic staging of affected patients.

VI-RADS: Multiinstitutional Multireader Diagnostic Accuracy and Interobserver Agreement Study.

BACKGROUND. The Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS), based on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), was developed to provide accurate information for the diagnosis of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the interobserver agreement and diagnostic performance of VI-RADS among readers with different levels of experience. METHODS. This retrospective study included 91 consecutive patients who underwent mpMRI before transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) from July 2010 through August 2018. After attending a training session, seven radiologists (five radiologists experienced in bladder MRI and two inexperienced radiologists) reviewed and scored all MRI examinations according to VI-RADS. The interobserver agreement was assessed by kappa statistics. ROC analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance for MIBC. AUCs were estimated. RESULTS. Among 91 patients (72 men and 19 women; mean age ± SD, 73.2 ± 10.2 years), 48 (52.7%) had MIBC and 43 (47.3%) had non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Sixty-eight patients were treated with TURBT, and 23 were treated with radical cystectomy. Interobserver agreement was moderate to substantial (κ = 0.60-0.80) among the experienced readers, substantial (κ = 0.67) between the two inexperienced readers, and moderate to substantial (κ = 0.55-0.75) between the experienced and inexperienced readers. The pooled AUC was 0.88 (range, 0.82-0.91) for experienced readers and 0.84 (range, 0.83-0.85) for inexperienced readers, and 0.87 for all readers. Using a VI-RADS score of 4 or greater as the cutoff value for MIBC, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 74.1% (range, 66.0-80.9%) and 94.1% (range, 88.6-97.7%) for experienced readers and 63.9% (range, 59.6-68.1%) and 86.4% (range, 84.1-88.6%) for inexperienced readers. Using a VI-RADS score of 3 or greater as the cutoff value, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 83.4% (range, 80.9-85.1%) and 77.3% (range, 61.4-88.6%) for experienced readers and 82.0% (range, 80.9-83.0%) and 73.9% (range, 72.7-75.0%) for inexperienced readers. CONCLUSION. We observed moderate to substantial interobserver agreement and a pooled AUC of 0.87 among radiologists of different levels of expertise using VI-RADS. CLINICAL IMPACT. VI-RADS could help determine the depth and range of excision in TURBT, decreasing the risk of complications and enhancing the accuracy of pathologic diagnosis.

Neuroendocrine carcinoma of uterine cervix findings shown by MRI for staging and survival analysis - Japan multicenter study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) of the uterine cervix cases for MRI features and staging, as well as pathological correlations and survival. RESULTS: FIGO was I in 42, II in 14, III in 1, and IV in 5 patients. T2-weighted MRI showed homogeneous slightly high signal intensity and obvious restricted diffusion (ADC map, low intensity; DWI, high intensity) throughout the tumor in most cases, and mild enhancement in two-thirds. In 50 patients who underwent a radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), intrapelvic T staging by MRI overall accuracy was 88.0% with reference to pathology staging, while patient-based sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for metastatic pelvic lymph node detection was 38.5%, 100%, and 83.3%, respectively. During a mean follow-up period of 45.6 months (range 4.3-151.0 months), 28 patients (45.2%) experienced recurrence and 24 (38.7%) died. Three-year progression-free and overall survival rates for FIGO I, II, III, and IV were 64.3% and 80.9%, 50% and 64.3%, 0% and 0%, and 0% and 0%, respectively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-two patients with histologically surgery-proven uterine cervical NEC were enrolled. Twelve received NAC. Clinical data, pathological findings, and pretreatment pelvic MRI findings were retrospectively reviewed. Thirty-two tumors were pure NEC and 30 mixed with other histotypes. The NECs were small cell type (41), large cell type (18), or a mixture of both (3). CONCLUSIONS: Homogeneous lesion texture with obvious restricted diffusion throughout the tumor are features suggestive of cervical NEC. Our findings show that MRI is reliable for T staging of cervical NEC.

Comparison of PI-RADS version 2 and PI-RADS version 2.1 for the detection of transition zone prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic performance of PI-RADS v2 and v2.1 for detecting transition zone prostate cancer (TZPC) on multiparametric prostate MRI (mpMRI). METHOD: Fifty-eight patients with elevated PSA levels underwent mpMRI at 3 T including T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and subsequent MRI-transrectal ultrasonography fusion-guided prostate-targeted biopsy (MRGB). The standard of reference was MRGB-derived histopathology. Two readers independently assessed each TZ lesion, assigning a score of 1-5 for T2WI, a score of 1-5 for DWI, and the overall PI-RADS assessment category according to PI-RADS v2 and v2.1. The diagnostic performance of the two methods was compared in terms of inter-reader agreement, diagnostic sensitivity, diagnostic specificity, and area under the ROC curve (AUC). RESULTS: Of the 58 patients, 26 were diagnosed with PC (GS = 3 + 3, n = 9; GS = 3 + 4, n = 9; GS = 3 + 5, n = 1; GS = 4 + 3, n = 4; GS = 4 + 4, n = 3) and 32 with benign lesions. Regarding inter-reader agreement of overall PI-RADS assessment category, the kappa value was 0.580 for v2 and 0.645 for v2.1. For both readers, there was no difference in diagnostic sensitivity between the versions (p ≥ 0.500). For reader 1, the diagnostic specificity was higher for v2.1 (p = 0.002), and was similar for reader 2 (p = 1.000). For both readers, AUC tended to be higher for v2.1 than for v2, but the difference was not significant (0.786 vs. 0.847 for reader 1, p = 0.052; and 0.808 vs. 0.858 for reader 2, p = 0.197). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that compared with PI-RADS v2, PI-RADS v2.1 could be preferable for evaluating TZ lesions.

Multidimensional analysis of clinicopathological characteristics of false-negative clinically significant prostate cancers on multiparametric MRI of the prostate in Japanese men.

PURPOSE: To clarify clinicopathological features of false-negative clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC) at multiparametric prostate MRI (mpMRI). METHODS: 95 patients with 139 csPC undergoing 3T mpMRI before radical prostatectomy were included. Two radiologists were independently evaluated mpMR images using PI-RADS v2. Clinicopathological findings were compared between (a) detectable and undetectable lesions using overall mpMRI criteria (o-mpMRI criteria) and (b) lesions with early enhancement effect (EEE) and lesions without EEE at DCE-MRI. RESULTS: The detection rate of csPS using cutoff value of category 3 or more in PI-RADS v2 for positive lesion was 72.1% (98/136 lesions). In 38 false-negative lesions with less than PI-RADS v2 category 3, the DCE-MRI detected 14 lesions. 17 undetectable lesions on o-mpMR criteria had lower PSA and D'amico risk classification, and higher tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) than those of 118 detectable lesions (p ≤ 0.048). 89 lesions with EEE showed higher PSA, tumor size, prostatectomy GS grade, frequency of lesions with GS ≥ 4 + 3 and lower tumor ADC than those in 38 lesions without EEE (p ≤ 0.046). CONCLUSION: Tumor detectability of csPC with PI-RADS v2 was limited compared with o-mpMRI criteria in Japanese men. Moreover, false-negative lesions on o-mpMRI criteria were characterized as small in size, low risk and low cellularity.

Incremental value of high b value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3-T for prediction of extracapsular extension in patients with prostate cancer: preliminary experience.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether high b value diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) contributes to the improvement of diagnostic ability of extracapsular extension (ECE) in prostate cancer (PC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-three patients with PC underwent multiparametric MRI including DWI (b values: 0, 2000 s/mm2) at 3-T. Two radiologists assessed the presence of ECE and the diagnostic certainty degree using conventional diagnostic method by consensus. Tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC, ×10-3 mm2/s) was also measured. Independent predictors of ECE were identified among PSA, tumor ADC, Gleason score, and conventional MRI. ECE in patients with low diagnostic certainty by conventional MRI was further reevaluated using ADC cutoff value, and the results were combined with those of patients with high diagnostic certainty by conventional MRI (MRI + ADC method). RESULTS: Tumor ADC was an independent predictor of ECE, and the ADC cutoff value was 0.72. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of conventional MRI and MRI + ADC method in the diagnosis of ECE were 44, 92, and 72%, and 78, 96, and 88%, respectively. Among MRI findings leading to the judgement of low diagnostic certainty, broad tumor contact was most common (72% of the patients). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of ADC obtained with high b value DWI at 3-T to conventional MRI improved the diagnostic ability of ECE.

Value of preoperative 3T multiparametric MRI for surgical margin status in patients with prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To examine the value of preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a predictor of surgical margin (SM) status in patients with prostate cancer (PC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Institutional Review Board approved this retrospective study; the requirement for informed consent was waived. Fifty-six male patients with histologically proven PC underwent preoperative 3T multiparametric MRI including high b value (0, 2000 s/mm(2) ) diffusion-weighted imaging. In each patient, clinical data, such as biopsy Gleason score and D'Amico clinical risk score, and multiparametric MRI findings, such as tumor location, tumor size, tumor extension in the apical or proximal region, tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and the presence or absence of MRI findings of extracapsular extension (ECE) were evaluated. Statistical evaluations included the Fisher's exact test, χ(2) test, Mann-Whitney U-test, and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: On histopathological evaluation, 15 patients (27%) were SM-positive (SMP group), and 41 (73%) were SM-negative (SMN group). The tumor ADC was significantly lower in the SMP group than in the SMN group (P = 0.001). The frequency of tumor extension in the apex or base and suspected ECE on MRI were significantly higher in the SMP group than in the SMN group (P = 0.037 and 0.011, respectively). On multivariate analysis, tumor ADC was the only predictor of SM status in PC (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: PC with positive SM was characterized by tumor extension in the apical and proximal regions, lower tumor ADC, and tumors with positive MRI findings of ECE, compared to tumors with negative SM. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;44:584-593.