The effect of AMP kinase activation on differentiation and maturation of osteoblast cultured on titanium plate.

Background/purpose: 5' Adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is known as an enzyme that maintains intracellular homeostasis and has various biological activity. The purpose of this study is evaluation effect of AMPK activation on implant prognosis. Materials & methods: MC3T3-E1 osteoblast-like cells were cultured on titanium using a 24-well plate. The experimental group was divided into the following 3 groups: (1) the normal culture group (control group), (2) the osteogenic induction group, and (3) the osteogenic induction + AMPK activation group. The cell counts were measured; real-time PCR was used to assess the expression of ALP and Osterix as osteogenic related genes at Day 0,7,14 and 21 after experiments. Additionally, ALP activity and calcification were assessed. Results: The results of the real-time PCR assessments revealed that the expression of ALP, which is a marker for the initial stages of calcification, was significantly increased by AMPK activation compared to the normal culture or osteogenic induction. A significant increase was also observed in the expression of Osterix, which is a marker for the later stages of calcification. Because significant increases were observed in ALP activity and calcification potential, this suggested that AMPK activation could elicit an increase in osteoblast calcification potential. Conclusion: AMPK activation promotes implant peripheral osteoblast differentiation and maturation and enhances calcification. Our results suggest that AMPK activation may help to maintain implant stability.

Three-dimensional spheroids of dedifferentiated fat cells enhance bone regeneration.

INTRODUCTION: Mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSCs) are multipotent, self-renewing cells that are extensively used in tissue engineering. Dedifferentiated fat (DFAT) cells are derived from adipose tissues and are similar to MSCs. Three-dimensional (3D) spheroid cultures comprising MSCs mimic the biological microenvironment more accurately than two-dimensional cultures; however, it remains unclear whether DFAT cells in 3D spheroids possess high osteogenerative ability. Furthermore, it is unclear whether DFAT cells from 3D spheroids transplanted into calvarial bone defects are as effective as those from two-dimensional (2D) monolayers in promoting bone regeneration. METHODS: We compared the in vitro osteogenic potential of rat DFAT cells cultured under osteogenic conditions in 3D spheroids with that in 2D monolayers. Furthermore, to elucidate the ability of 3D spheroid DFAT cells to promote bone healing, we examined the in vivo osteogenic potential of transplanting DFAT cells from 3D spheroids or 2D monolayers into a rat calvarial defect model. RESULTS: Osteoblast differentiation stimulated by bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) or osteogenesis-inducing medium upregulated osteogenesis-related molecules in 3D spheroid DFAT cells compared with 2D monolayer DFAT cells. BMP-2 activated phosphorylation in the canonical Smad 1/5 pathways in 3D spheroid DFAT cells but phosphorylated ERK1/2 and Smad2 in 2D monolayer DFAT cells. Regardless of osteogenic stimulation, the transplantation of 3D DFAT spheroid cells into rat calvarial defects promoted new bone formation at a greater extent than that of 2D DFAT cells. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with 2D DFAT cells, 3D DFAT spheroid cells promote osteoblast differentiation and new bone formation via canonical Smad 1/5 signaling pathways. These results indicate that transplantation of DFAT cells from 3D spheroids, but not 2D monolayers, accelerates bone healing.

Enhancement of jaw bone regeneration via ERK1/2 activation using dedifferentiated fat cells.

BACKGROUND AIMS: Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) are multipotent and self-renewing cells that are extensively used in tissue engineering. Adipose tissues are known to be the source of two types of MSCs; namely, adipose tissue-derived MSCs (ASCs) and dedifferentiated fat (DFAT) cells. Although ASCs are sometimes transplanted for clinical cytotherapy, the effects of DFAT cell transplantation on mandibular bone healing remain unclear. METHODS: The authors assessed whether DFAT cells have osteogenerative potential compared with ASCs in rats in vitro. In addition, to elucidate the ability of DFAT cells to regenerate the jaw bone, the authors examined the effects of DFAT cells on new bone formation in a mandibular defect model in (i) 30-week-old rats and (ii) ovariectomy-induced osteoporotic rats in vivo. RESULTS: Osteoblast differentiation with bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) or osteogenesis-induced medium upregulated the osteogenesis-related molecules in DFAT cells compared with those in ASCs. BMP-2 activated the phosphorylation signaling pathways of ERK1/2 and Smad2 in DFAT cells, but minor Smad1/5/9 activation was noted in ASCs. The transplantation of DFAT cells into normal or ovariectomy-induced osteoporotic rats with mandibular defects promoted new bone formation compared with that seen with ASCs. CONCLUSIONS: DFAT cells promoted osteoblast differentiation and new bone formation through ERK1/2 and Smad2 signaling pathways in vitro. The transplantation of DFAT cells promoted new mandibular bone formation in vivo compared with that seen with ASCs. These results suggest that transplantation of ERK1/2-activated DFAT cells shorten the mandibular bone healing process in cytotherapy.

Intramedullary injury combined with osteoporosis therapeutics regulates targeted local osteogenesis.

Bone marrow ablation prompts transient bone formation in nearly the entire medullary cavity before marrow regeneration occurs. Here, we establish a procedure to direct bone formation in a desired particular site within the medullary cavity for support of biomedical devices. Local intramedullary injury was performed in the tibiae of rats and parathyroid hormone (PTH), alendronate, or saline was administered. Newly generated bone in the medulla was assessed by micro-CT and histology. To evaluate the function of newly generated bone, animals received intramedullary injury in tibiae followed by daily PTH. At day-14, implants were placed in the endocortical bone and the bone response to the implants was assessed. The fate of newly generated bone was compared with and without implants. We found that neither intramedullary injury nor medication alone resulted in bone formation. However, when combined, substantial bone was generated locally inside the diaphyseal medulla. Newly formed bone disappeared without implant placement but was retained with implants. Bone was especially retained around and between the implants. This study found that local bone marrow disruption followed by PTH or alendronate generated substantial cancellous bone locally in the diaphyseal medulla. This approach offers promise as a tissue engineering tool in medicine and dentistry.

Mesenchymal stem cell spheroids exhibit enhanced in-vitro and in-vivo osteoregenerative potential.

BACKGROUND: Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are a favored cell source for regenerative medicine because of their multilinage potential. However, the conventional monolayer technique used to culture MSCs, inadequately overcomes their low differentiation capacity. Culture of MSCs in multicellular spheroids, more accurately mimics the in-vivo microenvironment; thus, resolving this problem. In this study, we assessed whether the osteoregenerative potential of MSC spheroids is greater than that of monolayer MSCs. RESULTS: MSC spheroids were generated from rat MSCs (rMSCs) using low-binding plates. Real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and immunocytochemical analysis indicated that osteogenic properties were accelerated in MSC spheroids compared with monolayer rMSCs when treated with an osteoblast-inducer reagent for 7 days. Moreover, increased calcium deposition was visualized in MSC spheroids using Alizarin red staining. In a rat calvarial defect model, micro-computed tomography and histological assays showed that MSC spheroid-engrafted defects experienced enhanced bone regeneration. CONCLUSIONS: Our in-vitro and in-vivo results reveal that MSCs in the spheroid culture exhibit enhanced osteoregenerative efficiency compared with monolayer MSCs.

Evaluation of bone formation guided by DNA/protamine complex with FGF-2 in an adult rat calvarial defect model.

DNA/protamine complex paste (D/P) and D/P complex paste with Fibroblast Growth Factor-2 (FGF-2) (D/P-FGF) were prepared to investigate their new bone formation abilities using an ∼40-week-old rat calvarial defect model. It was found that D/P could release FGF-2 proportionally in an in vitro experiment with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. It was also found that aging adversely affected self-bone healing of rats by comparison with the results in a previous study using 10-week-old rats. Microcomputed tomography and histopathological examinations showed that new bone formation abilities of D/P and D/P-FGF were superior to that of the control (sham operation). Control, D/P and D/P-FGF showed newly formed bone areas of 6.7, 58.3, and 67.0%, respectively, 3 months after the operation. Moreover, it was found that FGF-2 could support the osteoanagenesis ability of D/P. It was considered that FGF-2 could play an important role in new bone formation at early stages because it induced the genes such as collagen I, CBFA, OSX, and OPN, which are initiated first in the process of osteogenesis. Therefore, D/P-FGF will be a useful injectable biomaterial with biodegradable properties for the repair of bone defects in the elderly.

Peri-implant bone density in senile osteoporosis-changes from implant placement to osseointegration.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine healing over time after implant body placement in a senile osteoporosis model and a control group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, 16-week-old male mice were used. The senile osteoporosis model consisted of senescence-accelerated prone 6 mice and the control group consisted of senescence-accelerated resistant 1 mice. Titanium-coated plastic implants were used as experimental implants whose dimensions were 3.0 mm in length, 1.1 mm in apical diameter, and 1.2 mm in coronal diameter. Bone samples were collected at 5, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after implant placement. A micro-quantitative computed tomography (QCT) system was used to scan these samples and a phantom in order to quantitate bone mineral measurements. Bone mineral density (BMD) of each sample was measured. Each sample was also examined by light microscopy after QCT imaging. At 14 and 28 days after implant placement, the bone-implant contact (BIC) ratios were calculated from light microscopy images and were divided into cortical bone and bone marrow regions. RESULTS: When BMD was compared between the osteoporosis and control groups using micro-QCT, the osteoporosis group had a significantly lower BMD in the region 0-20 µm from the implant surface in the bone marrow region at 14 days onward after implant placement. Compared with the control group, the osteoporosis model also had significantly lower BMD in all regions 0-100 µm from the implant surface in the bone marrow region at 14 days after placement. However, in the cortical bone region, no statistically significant difference was observed in the regions at the bone-implant interface. Light microscopy revealed osseointegration for all implants 28 days after implant placement. The osteoporosis model tended to have lower BICs compared with that of the control group, although this did not reach statistical significance. DISCUSSION: Our results showed that osseointegration was achieved in the osteoporosis model. However, the BMD was 30-40% lower than that of the control group in the region closest to the implant surface in bone marrow region. Peri-implant BMD was lower in a relatively large area in the osteoporosis model during an important time for osseointegration. Therefore, this result suggests that osteoporosis might be considered as a risk factor in implant therapy. CONCLUSION: The osteoporosis model had a lower BMD than the control group in the region closest to the implant during an important time for osseointegration. This result suggests that senile osteoporosis might be a risk factor in implant therapy. However, the osteoporosis model and the control group had no difference in peri-implant BMD in the cortical bone region. This suggests that risk might be avoided by implant placement that effectively uses the cortical bone.

Chronological changes in the ultrastructure of titanium-bone interfaces: analysis by light microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and micro-computed tomography.

PURPOSES: The objectives of this study were to chronologically examine the titanium-bone interfaces and to clarify the process of osseointegration using light microscopy, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and micro-computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experimental implants (Ti-coating plastic implants) were placed into tibiae of 8-week-old rats. Animals were sacrificed at 1 to 28 days after implant placement and prepared tissue specimens for a light microscope, a TEM, and micro-CT. RESULTS: New bone formation began 5 days after implant placement, and osseointegration was obtained by 14 days after implant placement. Osseointegration was well developed by 28 days after implant placement. DISCUSSION: TEM and quantitative computer tomography (QCT) results indicated that bone formation in osseointegration of titanium implants did not occur from the surfaces of the implant or preexisting bone, but it was likely that bone formation progressed at a site a small distance away from the surface. The bone formation took place in a scattered manner. Small bone fragments adhered to each other and transformed into reticular-shaped bone, and finally these bones became lamellar bone. CONCLUSION: Comparative analysis of the titanium-bone interfaces using light microscopy, TEM, and QCT by micro-CT revealed the precise process of osseointegration.

Ultrastructure of the interface between titanium and surrounding tissue in rat tibiae--a comparison study on titanium-coated and -uncoated plastic implants.

PURPOSES: The purposes of this study were to prepare experimental titanium-coated plastic implants suitable for electron microscopy examination of the titanium-bone interface and the response of tissue surrounding titanium, and to histologically compare surrounding tissue responses in coated and uncoated implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experimental plastic implants were prepared from a plastic rod coated with a thin film of titanium. Plastic implants without coatings were used as controls. The implants were placed into tibiae of 10-week-old male rats. The specimens with implants were harvested 4 weeks after placement and observed under a light microscope, a transmission electron microscope, and a scanning electron microscope. RESULTS: In the transmission electron microscopy, the titanium layer of the experimental implant was a uniform layer that was approximately 150- to 250-nm wide. The new bone formation was observed around both titanium-coated implants and plastic implants. However, there was no direct bone contact with the plastic implant. DISCUSSION: The responses of tissue surrounding the experimental implants varied. Under an electron microscope, the following areas were observed: (1) an area with a direct contact between the titanium and bone, (2) an area at the interface where an amorphous layer was observed, (3) an area with progressing calcification in the surrounding tissue where the cells were adjacent to the titanium surface, and (4) an area in which bone resorption and apposition were observed and remodeling was thought to be occurring. CONCLUSION: The experimental titanium was homogenous and was considered to be highly useful in observing the responses of the surrounding tissue to the titanium surface.