Lengthening adalimumab dosing interval in quiescent Crohn's disease patients: protocol for the pragmatic randomised non-inferiority LADI study.

INTRODUCTION: Adalimumab is effective for maintenance of remission in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) at a dose of 40 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks. However, adalimumab is associated with (long-term) adverse events and is costly. The aim of this study is to demonstrate non-inferiority and cost-effectiveness of disease activity guided adalimumab interval lengthening compared to standard dosing of every other week (EOW). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Lengthening Adalimumab Dosing Interval (LADI) study is a pragmatic, multicentre, open label, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. Non-inferiority is reached if the difference in cumulative incidence of persistent (>8 weeks) flares does not exceed the non-inferiority margin of 15%. 174 CD patients on adalimumab maintenance therapy in long-term (>9 months) clinical and biochemical remission will be included (C-reactive protein (CRP) <10 mg/L, faecal calprotectin (FC) <150 µg/g, Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI) <5). Patients will be randomised 2:1 into the intervention (adalimumab interval lengthening) or control group (adalimumab EOW). The intervention group will lengthen the adalimumab administration interval to every 3 weeks, and after 24 weeks to every 4 weeks. Clinical and biochemical disease activity will be monitored every 12 weeks by physician global assessment, HBI, CRP and FC. In case of disease flare, dosing will be increased. A flare is defined as two of three of the following criteria; FC>250 µg/g, CRP≥10 mg/l, HBI≥5. Secondary outcomes include cumulative incidence of transient flares, adverse events, predictors for successful dose reduction and cost-effectiveness. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is approved by the Medical Ethics Committee Arnhem-Nijmegen, the Netherlands (registration number NL58948.091.16). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: EudraCT registry (2016-003321-42); Clinicaltrials.gov registry (NCT03172377); Dutch trial registry (NTRID6417).

Cost-effectiveness of five different anti-tumour necrosis factor tapering strategies in rheumatoid arthritis: a modelling study.

Objective: To investigate the cost-effectiveness of five different tumour necrosis factor inhibitor tapering strategies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and stable low disease activity, using a modelling design.Method: Using Markov models based on data from the DRESS and STRASS randomized controlled trials, and the Nijmegen RA cohort, five tapering strategies for etanercept and adalimumab were tested against continuation: 1, four-step tapering (DRESS strategy); 2, five-step tapering; 3, tapering without withdrawal; 4, use of a stricter flare criterion; and 5, use of a theoretical predictor for successful tapering. We also examined how well a biomarker should be able to predict in order for strategy 5 to become cost-effective compared to the other strategies.Results: All examined tapering strategies were cost saving (range: EUR 5128 to 7873) but yielded more short-lived flares compared to continuation. The change in utilities compared to continuation was minimal and not clinically relevant (range: -0.005 to 0.007 quality-adjusted life-years). Strategy 1 was cost-effective compared to all other strategies [highest incremental net monetary benefit (iNMB)]. However, there was a large overlap in credible intervals, especially between strategies 1 and 2. Scenario analyses showed that 50% reduction of drug prices would result in the highest iNMB for strategy 2. A biomarker only becomes cost-effective when it is inexpensive and has a sensitivity and specificity of at least 84%.Conclusion: Because our study showed a comparable iNMB for tapering in four or five steps (including discontinuation), we recommend a choice between these strategies, based on shared decision making.

Somatostatin analogues improve health-related quality of life in polycystic liver disease: a pooled analysis of two randomised, placebo-controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Polycystic liver disease is associated with impaired health-related quality of life (HRQL). Somatostatin analogues reduce hepatomegaly in polycystic liver disease. AIM: To determine whether somatostatin analogues improve HRQL and to identify factors associated with change in HRQL in polycystic liver disease. METHODS: We pooled data from two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials that evaluated HRQL using the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) in 96 polycystic liver disease patients treated 6-12 months with somatostatin analogues or placebo. The SF-36 contains a summarizing physical and mental component score and was administered at baseline and at the end of treatment. We used random effect models to delineate the effect of somatostatin analogues on HRQL. We determined the effect of demographics, height-adjusted liver volume, change in liver volume, somatostatin analogue-associated side effects with change in HRQL. In patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease, we estimated the effect of height-adjusted kidney volume and change in kidney volume in relation to HRQL. RESULTS: Physical component scores improved with somatostatin analogues, but remained unchanged with placebo (3.41 ± 1.29 vs. -0.71 ± 1.54, P = 0.044). Treatment had no impact on the mental component score. Large liver volume was independently associated with larger HRQL decline during follow up (-4.04 ± 2.02 points per logarithm liver volume, P = 0.049). In autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease, patients with large liver and kidney volumes had larger decline in HRQL (5.36 ± 2.54 points per logarithm liver volume; P = 0.040 and -4.00 ± 1.88 per logarithm kidney volume; P = 0.039). CONCLUSION: Somatostatin analogues improve HRQL in symptomatic polycystic liver disease. Halting the progressive nature of polycystic liver disease is necessary to prevent further decline of HRQL in severe hepatomegaly.

An increased risk of non-melanoma skin cancer during TNF-inhibitor treatment in psoriasis patients compared to rheumatoid arthritis patients probably relates to disease-related factors.

BACKGROUND: Concerns exist about a risk of non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) in psoriasis patients and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with TNF-inhibitors. However, current data also show that in some psoriasis patients, NMSC is diagnosed relatively short after the start of TNF-inhibitors, which suggests that these NMSC can be explained by previous therapies instead of by TNF-inhibitor therapy. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether there was a difference in time until first NMSC and the rate of NMSC between psoriasis and RA patients on TNF-inhibitors. METHODS: Time until first NMSC and the rate of NMSC were compared between psoriasis and RA patients from the same region treated with TNF-inhibitors and followed up for at least one year in prospective cohort studies, by using Cox regression and Poisson regression. Both analyses were corrected for confounders (age, gender, disease duration, prior NMSC, duration of anti-TNF and other systemic therapies). RESULTS: The NMSC risk was significantly higher in the psoriasis group [fully adjusted HR 6.0 (1.6-22.4 95%CI)] with a shorter time until first NMSC in psoriasis compared to RA. By Poisson regression, psoriasis patients had a 5.5 (2.2-13.4 95%CI) higher rate of NMSC. CONCLUSION: The time until first NMSC was significantly shorter and the rate of NMSC was significantly higher in psoriasis compared with RA. This indicates that disease-related factors like phototherapy may be important contributing factors to NMSC diagnosed in psoriasis patients treated with TNF-inhibitors.

Comparing treatment goals for psoriasis with treatment decisions in daily practice: results from a prospective cohort of patients with psoriasis treated with biologics: BioCAPTURE.

BACKGROUND: Treatment goals have been developed to optimize daily clinical practice psoriasis care, but have not yet been studied in real life. OBJECTIVES: To investigate to what extent treatment decisions made by dermatologists in daily clinical practice for patients with psoriasis on biologics are already in accordance with treatment goals without the active application of the treatment goals algorithm. METHODS: Data were extracted from a prospective daily practice cohort of patients with psoriasis on biologics. Analysis was done on effectiveness (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score) and quality of life (Dermatology Life Quality Index questionnaire). Treatment decisions such as dosage adjustments, combination treatments, or switching therapy were compared with the treatment goals algorithm. RESULTS: In 64% (253 of 395) of visits, physicians followed the treatment goals algorithm. There were 162 (41%) visits in which there should have been a treatment modification according to treatment goals (group Modify) and a modification was indeed made in 59 of these 162 visits (36%). In 233 (59%) visits no treatment modification was necessary (group Continue) and therapy was indeed not modified in 194 of 233 visits (83%). CONCLUSIONS: Physicians acted in accordance with treatment goals in the majority of patient visits. In the patient group not achieving these goals, physicians should have modified therapy according to treatment goals but continued the same therapeutic regimen in the majority of visits. Optimizing therapy and defining barriers in the latter group might increase treatment results in daily practice psoriasis care.

'Happy' drug survival of adalimumab, etanercept and ustekinumab in psoriasis in daily practice care: results from the BioCAPTURE network.

BACKGROUND: Drug survival is a marker for treatment success. To date, no analyses relating dermatological quality-of-life measures to drug survival have been published. OBJECTIVES: (i) To describe 1-year drug survival for adalimumab, etanercept and ustekinumab in a daily practice psoriasis cohort, and (ii) to introduce the concept of 'happy' drug survival, defined as Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) ≤ 5 combined with being 'on drug' at a specific time point. METHODS: Data were extracted from a prospective registry. Drug survival was analysed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. 'Happy' drug survival was calculated, with data split into 'happy' (DLQI ≤ 5) vs. 'unhappy' (DLQI > 5) at baseline and months 3, 6, 9 and 12. RESULTS: 249 treatment episodes were included (101 adalimumab, 82 etanercept, 66 ustekinumab). The 1-year drug survival rates for ustekinumab, adalimumab and etanercept were 85%, 74% and 68%, respectively. Ustekinumab showed a better confounder-corrected drug survival vs. etanercept [hazard ratio (HR) 3·8, P = 0·02] and a trend towards better survival vs. adalimumab (HR 2·3, P = 0·1). At baseline, the majority (n = 115, 73%) was considered 'unhappy' and a minority 'happy' (n = 42, 27%) (ratio 'happy':'unhappy' was 1 : 2.7). The percentage of treatment episodes with 'happy' on-drug patients increased to 79% after 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Ustekinumab showed a better overall drug survival than etanercept, and a trend towards a better overall drug survival than adalimumab. After 1 year, patients reported to be 'happy' in 79% of episodes and 'unhappy' in 21%. We introduced the new concept of 'happy' drug survival because the proportion of on-drug patients with good quality of life is an important indicator for treatment success.

Determinants of drug survival for etanercept in a long-term daily practice cohort of patients with psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Long-term data of etanercept drug survival in patients with psoriasis in daily practice are scarce. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to describe drug survival for etanercept in a long-term daily practice cohort of patients with psoriasis. The secondary objective was to identify determinants of drug survival for etanercept in general and separately for discontinuation due to adverse events or ineffectiveness of therapy. METHODS: Data were extracted from a prospective daily practice cohort of patients treated with biologics for psoriasis. Drug survival was analysed by Kaplan-Meier survival curves and split for two reasons for discontinuation: adverse events and ineffectiveness. Determinants of drug survival were analysed using univariate Cox regression analysis and multivariate Cox regression analysis with backward selection. RESULTS: We included 193 patients (512 patient-years treated) with a maximum treatment duration of 7·5 years. The overall drug survival rates were 77%, 41% and 30% after 1, 4 and 7·5 years, respectively. The mean survival duration was 3·8 years (95% confidence interval 3·4-4·3). Reasons for discontinuation were ineffectiveness (33·7%), adverse events (11·9%), both ineffectiveness and adverse events (4·7%) or other reasons (e.g. pregnancy planned) (5·7%). Determinants related to longer general drug survival were male sex [hazard ratio (HR) 0·55], prior anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α use (HR 0·57) and lower etanercept dose (HR 0·65). Younger age (HR 0·83), lower body mass index (HR 0·63) and lower etanercept dose (HR 0·71) were related to a decreased risk of discontinuation due to side-effects. A lower mean weekly dose of etanercept (HR 0·63) was related to a decreased risk of discontinuation due to ineffectiveness of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: We present the longest analysis of drug survival for etanercept in psoriasis to date. Determinants of longer overall etanercept drug survival were male sex, prior anti-TNF therapy and lower etanercept dose. The determinants of longer drug survival depended on the reason for discontinuation of etanercept.

Long-term follow-up of the cervical spine with conventional radiographs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the prevalence of cervical spine damage due to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the long term and to investigate which disease-specific factors are related to this damage. METHOD: Patients with early RA from the Nijmegen inception cohort with 6 to 12 years of follow-up were included. Conventional radiographs of the cervical spine were obtained at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 years and scored for erosions of C1 and C2, anterior atlantoaxial subluxation (AAS) and atlantoaxial impaction (AAI). Disease-specific factors, such as disease activity, functionality, and peripheral joint damage, at baseline, 3, 6, and 9 years, were compared between patients with and without cervical spine damage at 9 years. RESULTS: A total of 196 patients were included, of whom 134 had radiographs at 9 years. Cervical spine damage was present in 16% (22/134) of the patients at 9 years. During the total 12 years of follow-up, AAS and erosions of C2 were observed most frequently. Erosions of C1 and AAI were very rare. Patients with cervical spine damage at 9 years had a higher number of erosions of the peripheral joints and failed more disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) at 3, 6, and 9 years. Patients without peripheral erosive disease at 3 years were unlikely to develop cervical spine damage within 9 years of disease duration. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of cervical spine damage due to RA was 16% at 9 years. Patients without peripheral erosive disease at 3 years were unlikely to develop cervical spine damage at 9 years.

Frequency and effectiveness of dose increase of adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab in daily clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the frequency and effectiveness of dose increase of adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in daily clinical practice. METHODS: All RA patients with a dose increase of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-blocking therapy between January 1997 and January 2008 were selected from a register including data from RA patients starting a first TNF-blocking agent (the Dutch Rheumatoid Arthritis Monitoring registry). The primary outcome was change in Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) at 3 months after dose increase. Secondary outcomes were the change in DAS28 at 6 months after dose increase, the European League Against Rheumatism response rates, and the percentages of patients reaching a DAS28 of ≤3.2 at 3 and at 6 months after dose increase. Furthermore, the effectiveness of dose increase was assessed for the different reasons for dose increase: nonresponse, loss of response, and partial response. RESULTS: During the study period, the dose was increased in 44 (12%) of the 368 adalimumab patients, 32 (8%) of the 420 etanercept patients, and 115 (36%) of the 323 infliximab patients. The change in DAS28 at 3 months and 6 months after dose increase was limited and only significant in etanercept patients at 3 months (-0.51; P = 0.035). Disease activity decreased significantly at 3 months from dose increase in the nonresponders and patients with loss of response (-0.66 and -0.99, respectively; both P = 0.001), but not in the partial responders. CONCLUSION: Although dose increase was applied in all 3 TNF-blocking agents in daily clinical practice, these results suggest that the effectiveness of dose increase is limited.

Evaluating guidelines on continuation of anti-tumour necrosis factor treatment after 3 months: clinical effectiveness and costs of observed care and different alternative strategies.

OBJECTIVE: To study the adherence of rheumatologists to the Dutch guidelines for anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) treatment. The secondary objective was to evaluate alternatives to the present guidelines with regard to the percentage of responders and costs. METHODS: The response (>1.2 DAS28 decrease) in patients who started on anti-TNF-alpha treatment for the first time was evaluated at 3 and 6 months after initiation. How many patients continued or discontinued their initial anti-TNF-alpha treatment was evaluated. Possible alternative guidelines were evaluated by means of a decision tree, with regard to the expected percentage of successfully (responders) and unsuccessfully treated patients and expected costs. RESULTS: At 3 months 56% (N = 306) and 44% (N = 233) of all 539 evaluable patients were classified as responders or non-responders, respectively. Despite the guidelines, most (81%) (N = 189) of the non-responders continued treatment. 37% of the non-responders who continued anti-TNF-alpha treatment were eventually classified as responders at 6 months. Decision analytical modelling showed that with equal expected costs all alternative strategies would result in more responders than according to theoretical full adherence with the guidelines. "Continuation in case of partial response" had the best trade-off between successfully treated patients (64%) and unsuccessfully treated patients (17%). CONCLUSION: There was suboptimal adherence to the Dutch guidelines for treatment with anti-TNF-alpha for rheumatoid arthritis patients. This seemed to be justified by the fact that a delayed response up to 6 months was shown. If treatment is continued despite a non-response at 3 months, this is only recommended in patients with at least a partial response (at least 0.6 DAS28 improvement).

Influence of age on the outcome of antitumour necrosis factor alpha therapy in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of age on the effectiveness and tolerance of antitumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) therapy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: 730 patients of the Dutch Rheumatoid Arthritis Monitoring (DREAM) register were categorised into three groups according to their age at initiation of anti-TNFalpha therapy (<45, 45-65 and >65 years). Effectiveness of anti-TNFalpha therapy was primarily assessed by longitudinal analysis of the DAS28 during the first 12 months of treatment. RESULTS: Improvement in disease activity and physical functioning was significantly less in elderly patients, correcting for relevant confounders. Elderly patients reached the EULAR categories of good responders and remission less often than younger patients. Drug survival, co-medication use and tolerance were comparable between the three age groups. CONCLUSION: Anti-TNFalpha therapy significantly reduced disease activity in all age groups of patients; however, it appeared less effective in elderly compared with younger RA patients.

The tumour necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 1b 676T>G polymorphism in relation to response to infliximab and adalimumab treatment and disease severity in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of a functional polymorphism (676T>G, M196R) in the tumour necrosis factor receptor super family 1b (TNFSF1b) gene on disease activity, radiological joint damage and response to infliximab and adalimumab treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Two cohorts of patients with RA were genotyped for the 676T>G polymorphism (rs1061622) in exon 6 of the TNFSF1b gene by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. One cohort (n = 234) included patients from the Dutch Rheumatoid Arthritis Monitoring register with detailed information on their response to anti-TNF therapy (infliximab and adalimumab), the other cohort comprised patients from a long-term observational early inception cohort at our centre (n = 248). RESULTS: The 676T>G polymorphism was not associated with anti-TNF response after 3 or 6 months of treatment. Linear regression analysis showed no significant difference in the progression of radiological joint damage during the first 3 and 6 years of disease between the three genotype groups (TT, TG and GG). Additionally, no difference in mean disease activity between genotypes was seen after 3 and 6 years of disease. CONCLUSION: Despite its demonstrated functionality, the 676T>G polymorphism in the TNFSF1b gene does not have a major role in either the response to anti-TNF therapy or in the disease severity or radiological progression in RA.

The effectiveness and medication costs of three anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis from prospective clinical practice data.

AIM: to evaluate the effects of adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab on disease activity, functional ability and quality of life and the medication costs in a naturalistic design. METHODS: All patients from the Dutch Rheumatoid Arthritis Monitoring (DREAM) register starting on tumour necrosis factor (TNF)alpha-blocking agents for the first time were monitored and assessed by trained research nurses every 3 months. The primary outcome was the Disease Activity Score (DAS28) course over the 12 months follow-up, analysed by linear mixed models. Secondary outcomes were the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), EuroQol five dimensions (EQ-5D) and the Short-Form 36 items (SF36) scores, and medication-related total costs. RESULTS: The DAS28 and SF-36 physical component scale decreased in all three medication groups over 12 months, but the decrease was larger for adalimumab and etanercept in comparison to infliximab (p<0.001). The analyses of the HAQ and the EQ-5D scores showed the same (non-significant) trend, namely that at 12 months, the functionality and quality of life was better for adalimumab and etanercept patients. With regard to the medication costs, infliximab treatment resulted in significantly higher costs over the follow-up period than treatments with either adalimumab or etanercept. The comparison between adalimumab and etanercept showed a significant difference in the 12-month DAS28 course (p = 0.031). There were no additional indications for differences in effectiveness or costs between adalimumab and etanercept. CONCLUSION: The evaluation of the effectiveness and costs showed that adalimumab and etanercept are more or less equal and favourable compared to infliximab in the first year of treatment.

The efficacy of anti-TNF in rheumatoid arthritis, a comparison between randomised controlled trials and clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of antagonists to tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) showed high response percentages in the groups treated with active drugs. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of anti-TNF treatments for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in RCTs and in daily clinical practice, with an emphasis on the efficacy for patients eligible and not eligible for RCTs of anti-TNF treatments. METHODS: First, randomised placebo-controlled trials written in English for etanercept, infliximab and adalimumab for patients with RA were selected by a systematic review. Second, the DREAM (Dutch Rheumatoid Arthritis Monitoring) register with patients starting for the first time on one of the TNF-blocking agents was used. Patient characteristics, doses of medication and co-medication as well as the ACR20 response percentages were compared between RCTs and DREAM data, stratified for trial eligibility. RESULTS: In 10 of 11 comparisons, the ACR20 response percentages were lower in daily clinical practice than in the RCT active drug group, which was significant in five of 11 comparisons. Only 34-79% of DREAM patients fulfilled the selection criteria for disease activity in the several RCTs examined. DREAM patients eligible for RCTs had higher response percentages than ineligible DREAM patients. ACR20 response percentages of eligible DREAM patients were comparable with the ACR20 response percentages of the RCT active drug group in 10 of 11 comparisons. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of TNF-blocking agents in RCTs exceeded the efficacy of these drugs in clinical practice. However, in clinical practice more patients with lower disease activity were treated with TNF-blocking agents compared with those treated in RCTs. For daily practice patients who were eligible for RCTs, responses were more similar to responses reached in RCTs.

Cost-effectiveness of new guidelines for adjuvant systemic therapy for patients with primary breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: In this study, the potential impact of a new national guideline for adjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer (introduced in The Netherlands in 1998) was assessed, as well as the modifications of this guideline, issued in 2001. Both the change in total number of patients eligible for adjuvant therapy, as well as the cost-effectiveness of the changed clinical management of these patients were analysed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Percentages of patients who would be eligible for adjuvant therapy in 1994, 1998 and 2001 were estimated, based on clinical data from 127 patients, who were operated on in 1994. Ten-year overall survival rates were used as a measure of effectiveness, based on the two most recent EBCTCG meta-analyses. Actual resource costs were calculated. With a decision analytic model, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (1998 versus 1994, and 2001 versus 1998) were calculated. RESULTS: The introduction of the 1998 guideline resulted in a relative increase of 80% in the total number of patients eligible for adjuvant therapy, compared with 1994 (from 40% to 72% of all patients with primary breast cancer). With an estimated absolute increase of 10-year overall survival of 2%, the 1998 guideline was found to have an expected incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of about 4837 per life-year gained. CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of the new guideline considerably affected the number of patients eligible for adjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer. The associated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is well within the range of values that are generally considered acceptable.

[More hereditary intestinal cancer can be detected if patients with colorectal carcinoma that are selected by the pathologist are examined for microsatellite instability]. / Meer opsporing van erfelijke darmkanker met onderzoek op microsatellietinstabiliteit bij door de patholoog geselecteerde patiënten met een colon-rectumcarcinoom.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether an investigation of microsatellite instability (MSI) in patients with colorectal carcinoma that have been selected by the pathologist could increase the number of detected families with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal carcinoma (HNPCC). DESIGN: Prospective inventory. METHOD: Pathologists selected patients with a newly diagnosed colorectal carcinoma for MSI analysis of their tumour tissue if they met one of the following four criteria: (a) colorectal carcinoma diagnosed below 50 years of age; (b) a second colorectal carcinoma; (c) a combination of colorectal carcinoma and another HNPCC-related cancer; (d) colorectal adenoma with high-grade dysplasia diagnosed below 40 years of age. Patients with a positive MSI-test were referred to a clinical geneticist. The new strategy was introduced and explored in 5 hospitals for a period of to months. RESULTS: The new strategy was adopted and implemented successfully by pathologists and surgeons and accepted with satisfaction by the patients. Of the 55 patients included, 10 had a positive MSI-test. In 8/10 patients, DNA-mutation analysis was started by the clinical geneticist and 3 germline mutations in the MSH2-gene were detected. In 2 of 3 families with a pathogenic mutation, the family history alone did not fulfil the clinical criteria for HNPCC. CONCLUSION: Selection by the pathologist for MSI investigation was feasible in daily practice and identified more HNPCC patients than selection based on family history alone.

Cost effectiveness of a new strategy to identify HNPCC patients.

BACKGROUND: Distinguishing hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) from non-hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC) can increase the life expectancy of HNPCC patients and their close relatives. AIM: To determine the effectiveness, efficiency, and feasibility of a new strategy for the detection of HNPCC, using simple criteria for microsatellite instability (MSI) analysis of newly detected tumours that can be applied by pathologists. Criteria for MSI analysis are: (1) CRC before age 50 years; (2) second CRC; (3) CRC and HNPCC associated cancer; or (4) adenoma before age 40 years. METHODS: The efficacy and cost effectiveness of the new strategy was evaluated against current practice. Decision analytic models were constructed to estimate the number of extra HNPCC mutation carriers and the costs of this strategy. The incremental costs and gain in life expectancy for a HNPCC mutation carrier were evaluated by Markov modelling. Feasibility was explored in five hospitals. RESULTS: Using the new strategy, 2.2 times more HNPCC patients can be identified among a CRC population compared with current practice. This new strategy was found to be cost effective with an expected cost effectiveness ratio of 3801 per life year gained. When including the group of siblings and children, the cost effectiveness ratio became 2184 per life year gained. Sensitivity analysis showed these findings to be robust. CONCLUSIONS: MSI testing in a selection of newly diagnosed CRC patients was shown to be cost effective and a feasible method to identify patients at risk for HNPCC who are not recognised by family history.

Current clinical selection strategies for identification of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer families are inadequate: a meta-analysis.

Present guidelines to identify hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) families are criticized for limitations in accuracy. The Amsterdam criteria I and II (AC I and AC II) are used to predict a germline mutation in one of the mismatch repair genes. In families not fulfilling the AC I and AC II criteria, individual indications to test cancer specimens for microsatellite instability (MSI) are guided by the Bethesda Guidelines (BG). Germline mutation testing is then performed in patients who conform to the BG and show MSI. We investigated the sensitivity and specificity of AC I, AC II, and BG. A meta-analysis of studies on the value of the AC I and AC II criteria for predicting germline mutation, as well as a meta-analysis of BG for the detection of MSI was performed. For the AC I, sensitivity varied from 54 to 91% and specificity varied from 62 to 84%. For the AC II, the pooled sensitivity was 78% and specificity ranged between 46 and 68%. Post-test probabilities of a positive test result were 0.61 and 0.46 for the AC I and AC II, respectively. Post-test probabilities of a negative test result were 0.17 and 0.21 for the AC I and AC II, respectively. For the BG, the pooled sensitivity was 89% and pooled specificity was 53%. Post-test probability of a positive test result was 41%, and post-test probability of a negative test result was 9%. The sensitivity and specificity of the Amsterdam criteria for predicting a germline mutation that causes HNPCC is not sufficient. The BG are useful for the detection of MSI in a group of patients suspected of having familial colorectal cancer (CRC), but sensitivity is very low in the total group of newly diagnosed CRC patients. Therefore, a new strategy is needed for the identification of HNPCC.