Availability of the HPV Vaccine in Regional Pharmacies and Provider Perceptions Regarding HPV Vaccination in the Pharmacy Setting.

There is increasing support for HPV vaccination in the pharmacy setting, but the availability of the HPV vaccine is not well known. Additionally, little is known about perceptions of medical providers regarding referring patients to community pharmacies for HPV vaccination. The purpose of this study was to determine HPV vaccine availability in community pharmacies and to understand, among family medicine and obstetrics-gynecology providers, the willingness of and perceived barriers to referring patients for HPV vaccination in a pharmacy setting. HPV vaccine availability data were collected from pharmacies in a southern region of the United States. Family medicine and obstetrics-gynecology providers were surveyed regarding vaccine referral practices and perceived barriers to HPV vaccination in a community pharmacy. Results indicated the HPV vaccine was available in most pharmacies. Providers were willing to refer patients to a community pharmacy for HPV vaccination, despite this not being a common practice, likely due to numerous barriers reported. Pharmacist-administered HPV vaccination continues to be a commonly reported strategy for increasing HPV vaccination coverage. However, coordinated efforts to increase collaboration among vaccinators in different settings and to overcome systematic and legislative barriers to increasing HPV vaccination rates are still needed.

Pharmacists' Perceived Barriers to Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination: A Systematic Literature Review.

About 45:000 cancers are linked to HPV each year in the United States alone. The HPV vaccine prevents cancer and is highly effective, yet vaccination coverage remains low. Pharmacies can play a meaningful role in increasing HPV vaccination access due to their availability and convenience. However, little is known about pharmacists' perceived barriers to HPV vaccination. The objective of this systematic review was to summarize existing literature on perceived barriers to administering HPV vaccination reported by pharmacists. Barriers identified from selected studies were synthesized and further grouped into patient, parental, (pharmacist's) personal, and system/organization barrier groups. Six studies were included in this review. The cost of the HPV vaccine, insurance coverage and reimbursement were commonly reported perceived barriers. Adolescent HPV vaccination barriers related to parental concerns, beliefs, and inadequate knowledge about the HPV vaccine. Perceived (pharmacist's) personal barriers were related to lack of information and knowledge about HPV vaccine and recommendations. At the system/organization level, barriers reported included lack of time/staff/space; difficulty in series completion; tracking and recall of patient; perceived competition with providers; and other responsibilities/vaccines taking precedence. Future strategies involving pharmacy settings in HPV-related cancer prevention efforts should consider research on multilevel pharmacy-driven interventions addressing barriers.

Water only fasting and its effect on chemotherapy administration in gynecologic malignancies.

OBJECTIVE: As a protective response, during starvation organisms withdraw energy from growth and reproduction to focus on cellular maintenance. Cancer cells cannot undergo this differential response which has been theorized as an adjunct to improve both the effect of chemotherapy treatment and reduce treatment side effects. We sought to investigate the feasibility and effect of short-term fasting in patients receiving chemotherapy for gynecologic malignancy. METHODS: A randomized control trial was conducted of women with gynecologic malignancies receiving at least 6 planned chemotherapy cycles. Fasting patients maintaining a water-only fast for 24 h before and 24 h following each chemotherapy cycle were compared to nonfasting patients. Treatment related side effects and quality of life (QOL) was assessed using NCCN-FACT FOSI-18 questionnaire. RESULTS: Analysis included data from 120 cycles of chemotherapy. The majority of patients had stage 3 and 4 malignancy requiring multi-agent chemotherapy. Eleven patients had ovarian, 8 had uterine, and 1 had cervical cancer. Ninety percent received taxane and platinum-based doublet therapy. Weight loss and unanticipated hospitalizations were similar between treatment groups. Fewer dose reductions or delays were seen in the fasting group. There was no significant difference in mean QOL scores, but fasting group QOL scores improved over the course of treatment to a level that reached the minimal clinically important difference. CONCLUSION: A 48-h fast is well tolerated without increasing weight loss, hospital admissions, or chemotherapy dose reduction/delays. Fasting resulted in fewer treatment modifications and improved quality of life scores over the course of treatment.

Combination therapy with paclitaxel, carboplatin and megestrol acetate for the management of advanced stage or recurrent carcinoma of the endometrium: a phase II study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine overall survival (OS), progression-free interval (PFI), and toxicity in patients with advanced stage or recurrent endometrial cancer (EMCA) treated with combination paclitaxel, carboplatin and megestrol acetate. STUDY DESIGN: Patients with stage III/IV or recurrent EMCA were enrolled between October 2004 and April 2008 and received paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC 6) every 21 days for 6 cycles and megestrol acetate 40 mg orally 4 times daily for up to 5 years. Dose reductions were based on grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity. Survival was calculated from time of study enrollment. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients were evaluable: 21 (75%) patients with stage III/IV disease and 7 (25%) with recurrent disease. Three patients with recurrence received prior radiation. Mean PFI was 40.2 months (29.7-50.6). Mean OS was 50.1 months (41.5-58.7). After a median 40.4 months (range, 5.6-68.4) of follow-up, 13 patients (46%) had no evidence of disease, 4 were alive with disease, and 10 were dead of disease. One patient died without evidence of disease. Twenty-three patients (82%) completed 6 cycles of chemotherapy. Ten patients experienced a dose reduction. Myelosuppression was common, with 22 patients (78%) experiencing grade 3/4 neutropenia and 6 patients (21%) experiencing grade 3/4 anemia. Three patients had a deep vein thrombosis. One patient experienced a pulmonary thromboembolus. CONCLUSION: Combination therapy with paclitaxel, carboplatin and megestrol acetate demonstrates activity. Myelosuppression is common but can be managed with colony-stimulating factors. The addition of hormonal therapy to cytotoxic chemotherapy may improve survival.

High grade primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the uterus: A case report.

•Primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the uterus is extremely rare.•Diagnosis requires timely evaluation with molecular analysis.•Different combinations of adjuvant chemotherapy have been reported.

Prognostic significance of the relative dose intensity of chemotherapy in primary treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Relative dose intensity (RDI) is the ratio of delivered dose intensity of chemotherapy to standard dose intensity. In this study, we sought to determine the prognostic significance of RDI in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of chemotherapy naïve patients treated between 2001 and 2008 with intravenous taxane and platinum was performed. RDI was calculated as the delivered dose intensity (total dose delivered/total time of therapy) divided by standard dose intensity calculated for each regimen and compared to progression-free survival (PFS). Multivariate recursive partitioning survival analysis was utilized. RESULTS: 138 EOC patients completed initial taxane/platinum-based chemotherapy following surgical cytoreduction. The most common reasons for dose delays and reductions were thrombocytopenia (38%) and neutropenia (31%). 24% of treatment delays were due to social reasons such as transportation constraints or scheduling conflicts. The average RDI was 90% (range, 24-126%). The mean PFS was 31 months (range, 3-117). Patients that achieved an RDI between 70% and 110% had a mean PFS of 32 months compared to 20 months in patients with an RDI of <70% or >110% (p=0.046). 14 patients (10%) had a RDI of <70%. CONCLUSIONS: RDI is a significant predictor of survival in patients with EOC. Effort should be made to achieve an RDI of at least 70%. Dose reductions and treatment delays could be minimized by utilizing prophylactic colony stimulating factors and educating patients about the importance of adhering to their treatment schedule.

A cohort study evaluating robotic versus laparotomy surgical outcomes of obese women with endometrial carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Minimally invasive surgery offers advantages for management of obese patients, but technical difficulty often deters its utilization. Compared to laparotomy, robotic surgery should allow comparable staging and improved surgical outcomes. Therefore, we evaluated outcomes in robotic and laparotomy cohorts of obese women with endometrial cancer at our institution. METHODS: Retrospective robotic and laparotomy cohorts of obese women (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m(2)) undergoing surgical management of primary endometrial cancer from March 2006 to March 2009 were formulated utilizing a computerized database. Patient demographics, operative statistics, peri-operative complications, and pathologic details were collected in an intent to treat analysis. Chi-square or Fisher's exact test and t-test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: 73 women underwent robotic surgical management, 11% converted to laparotomy. Mean BMI (39.8 vs. 41.9, p=0.152), number of co-morbidities (2.49 vs. 2.62, p=0.690), number of previous surgeries (0.97 vs. 0.94, p=0.841), and lymphadenectomies performed (65.8% vs. 56.7%, p=0.227) were similar between cohorts. Total lymph nodes obtained were not statistically different between cohorts (8.01 vs. 7.24, p=0.505). Total operative time and room time was significantly longer for robotic surgery; however, estimated blood loss, the percentage of patients receiving transfusion, hospital length of stay, wound complications (4.1% vs. 20.2%, p=0.002) and other complications (9.6% vs. 29.8%, p=0.001) were improved for the robotic cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic management of obese women with endometrial cancer yields acceptable staging results and improved surgical outcomes. Although operating time is longer, hospital time is shorter. Robotic surgery may be an ideal approach for these patients.

Assessment of risk factors for 30-day hospital readmission after surgical cytoreduction in epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate factors that place epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients at increased risk for hospital readmission. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients diagnosed with EOC undergoing surgical cytoreduction at the University of Alabama at Birmingham from 2001 to 2008 was performed. Patients who required readmission were identified. Demographic data, comorbidities, surgical data including bowel resections, and hospital length of stay were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 207 patients were identified. The mean age at diagnosis was 64 years (range, 32-89 years), 58% had optimal debulking (n=120), and the mean number of comorbidities was 1.3 (range, 0-6). Readmission within 30 days of discharge occurred in 33 (16%) of 207 patients. The readmission group had a statistically higher number of comorbidities (1.75 vs 1.01, P=0.025). The most common reasons for readmission were small bowel obstruction/ileus, wound complications, and thromboembolic events. CONCLUSIONS: The most common reason for readmission after cytoreductive surgery for EOC is small bowel obstruction/ileus. Studies assessing postoperative disease management programs including nursing telephone follow-up, administration of outpatient intravenous fluids, and continuation of antithrombotic agents may offer opportunities to reduce readmissions.

Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology fellowship programs in the USA: a survey of fellows and fellowship directors.

BACKGROUND: In order to understand how robotic surgery impacts gynecologic oncology fellowship training and surgical practices, a survey of fellows and fellowship directors was conducted. METHODS: Questionnaires designed to determine the prevalence, application, and acceptance of robotics were sent to fellows and fellowship directors in approved U.S. programs. RESULTS: Of the respondents, 95% have a robot at their institution and 95% utilize it. Most responding fellowship directors (70%) reported that fellow education is enhanced by robotic surgery. Most fellows (65%) who responded feel comfortable using the robot, and 94% plan on performing robotic surgery upon completion of fellowship training. CONCLUSIONS: This survey demonstrates that robotic surgery is utilized in the majority of responding gynecologic oncology fellowship programs for a wide array of indications. Fellowship directors and fellows-in-training generally have a favorable view of this evolving technology. Based on these responses, robotic surgery will play an increasingly important role in the future.

Fixed-dose rate gemcitabine plus carboplatin in relapsed, platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer patients: results of a three-arm Phase I study.

OBJECTIVES: Standard infusion of gemcitabine plus carboplatin showed improved efficacy compared to carboplatin alone in patients with platinum-sensitive (Pt-S) ovarian cancer (OC). Fixed-dose rate (FDR) administration of gemcitabine produces more efficient intracellular phosphorylation of gemcitabine to its active form. This study was designed to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity profile, and response rate of FDR gemcitabine plus carboplatin in Pt-S OC. METHODS: Patients with measurable OC relapsing > or =6 months after exposure to platinum (N=60) were assigned to one of three treatment cohorts, each with a different delivery schedule and escalating doses of both FDR gemcitabine (10 mg/m(2)/min) and standard infusion carboplatin (60 min). MTDs were determined using dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Measurable disease was assessed using modified RECIST criteria. CA-125 levels were evaluated using Rustin criteria. Toxicities were assessed using NCI Common Toxicity Criteria, version 2.0. RESULTS: The MTD of Arm 1 was FDR gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 plus carboplatin AUC 5 on day 1, every 21 days. The MTD of Arm 2 was FDR gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 plus carboplatin AUC 2.5+AUC 2.5 on days 1 and 8, every 21 days. Patient accrual on Arm 3 consisting of bi-weekly FDR gemcitabine plus carboplatin was terminated because dose level 1 exceeded the MTD. Overall response rates were 38.1% (Arm 1), 58.8% (Arm 2), and 44.4% (Arm 3). CONCLUSIONS: FDR gemcitabine+carboplatin on a 21-day schedule was active and produced no unusual safety signals in patients with Pt-S OC.

The safety and efficacy of day 1 versus day 2 administration of pegfilgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy for gynecologic malignancies.

OBJECTIVE: Pegfilgrastim is indicated to decrease the incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients with gynecologic malignancies who are receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. We sought to compare the safety and efficacy of day 1 pegfilgrastim administration to day 2 administration in patients with gynecologic malignancies. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients receiving both chemotherapy and pegfilgrastim from June 1, 2006 to August 31, 2007 for a gynecologic malignancy. Abstracted data included patient demographics, pathology, blood counts, toxicity, and chemotherapy. After administration of chemotherapy, all patients either received 6 mg of pegfilgrastim subcutaneously on day 1 or day 2. RESULTS: 1226 administrations of pegfilgrastim in 230 patients were identified. 490 administrations of pegfilgrastim were given on day 1 compared to 736 on day 2. 70% of patients had ovarian cancer with a median age of 64 years (range 15-88). 79% of patients had stage III, IV, or recurrent disease and 67% were undergoing primary chemotherapy. The most common chemotherapy was docetaxel/carboplatin (53%) followed by paclitaxel/carboplatin (19%). The mean absolute neutrophil count (ANC) nadir was 4810/mm(3) in the day 1 cohort compared to 4212/mm(3) in the day 2 cohort (p=.004). The incidence of Grade 3/4 neutropenia was similar in both groups (4.9% in day 1 vs. 5.7% in day 2; p=.63). Grade 3/4 febrile neutropenia was uncommon in both cohorts (0 episodes vs. 3 episodes; p=.41). Treatment delays were similar in both cohorts (5.9% vs. 7.5%; p=.35). Dose modifications were also similar in both cohorts (2.8% vs. 5.3%; p=.06). CONCLUSION: Day 1 administration of pegfilgrastim is as effective as day 2 administration in the prevention of neutropenia in patients with gynecologic malignancies. Treatment delays and dose modifications were not increased after day 1 administration of pegfilgrastim. Administering pegfilgrastim on day 1 appears to be safe, effective, and convenient in selected patients receiving myelopsuppressive chemotherapy for gynecologic malignancies.

A prospective evaluation of a simulator-based laparoscopic training program for gynecology residents.

BACKGROUND: To determine prospectively if simulator-based laparoscopic training could improve laparoscopic skills of gynecology residents. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty-six gynecology residents were enrolled in a laparoscopy training curriculum involving didactics, self-paced learning modules, and graded simulator-based laparoscopic training modules. Six simulator tasks were developed to introduce incremental levels of difficulty. Residents were tested on bead/peg manipulation, passing of a specially designed "key," cutting of lines and circles on a two-layer latex glove, and laparoscopic suturing followed by both intra- and extracorporeal knot tying. Times for each task and penalties for errors were assessed at baseline and after 3 months of training. RESULTS: Twenty-six residents completed initial baseline and 3-month evaluations. Average summary time (including 30-seconds penalties for each error) at baseline was 64 minutes and 36 minutes at 3-month evaluation (p < 0.001). For PGY1 baseline summary times averaged 83 minutes compared with 50 minutes at 3 months (p = 0.006). For PGY4 baseline summary times averaged 49 minutes compared with 28 minutes at 3 months (p = 0.05). All individual tasks demonstrated substantial improvement (p < 0.001) from baseline to 3-month evaluation. Baseline summary scores demonstrated correlation between PGY training year and overall score (p < 0.001) consistent with earlier ability and training. Three-month scores demonstrated equalization of skill level across PGY2 through PGY4. CONCLUSIONS: A dedicated simulator-based laparoscopic training curriculum has the ability to improve basic laparoscopic skills in a gynecologic residency, as measured by timed and scored simulator tasks. Construct validity was demonstrated by measuring substantial improvement in performance with increasing residency training, and with practice.

Phase III trial of ifosfamide with or without paclitaxel in advanced uterine carcinosarcoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

PURPOSE: To determine if paclitaxel added to ifosfamide as first-line treatment for advanced uterine carcinosarcoma (CS) improves overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), response, and toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had measurable stage III or IV, persistent, or recurrent uterine CS. Random assignment to treatment was between ifosfamide 2.0 g/m2 intravenously (IV) daily for 3 days (arm 1) or ifosfamide 1.6 g/m2 IV daily for 3 days plus paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 by 3-hour infusion day 1 (arm 2). Mesna was administered similarly (both arms); filgrastim began on day 4 (arm 2). Cycles were repeated every 21 days up to eight cycles. RESULTS: Of 214 patients enrolled, 179 were eligible (arm 1, 91 patients; arm 2, 88 patients). Arm 2 patients experienced more frequent and severe sensory neuropathy (grade 1 to 4; 8% v 30%). The crude response rate was 29% (arm 1) and 45% (arm 2). The odds of response stratified by performance status were 2.21 greater in arm 2 (P = .017). Median PFS and OS, respectively, for arm 1 compared with arm 2 were 3.6 v 5.8 months and 8.4 v 13.5 months, respectively. There was a 31% decrease in the hazard of death (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.97; P = .03) and a 29% decrease in the hazard of progression (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.97; P = .03) relative to arm 1 when stratifying by performance status. CONCLUSION: OS was significantly improved in arm 2, and toxicities were as expected and manageable. However, the need for active new agents persists, given that OS remains relatively poor in this disease.

A phase II trial of weekly topotecan for patients with secondary platinum-resistant recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma following the failure of second-line therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the response rate, progression-free survival and toxicity associated with weekly topotecan administered to patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian (EOC) in the third-line setting. METHODS: Patients with measurable platinum-sensitive EOC following failure of second-line chemotherapy were eligible for this phase II study. All patients were initially treated with cytoreductive surgery and platinum/paclitaxel-based chemotherapy. Continuous, weekly topotecan was administered at a starting dose of 4 mg/m(2). Toxicity and efficacy were assessed at various time points after initiation of therapy. RESULTS: Twenty nine patients were enrolled in this prospective study. Toxicity was acceptable with grade 1/2 nausea being the most commonly experienced side effect (52%). Nine patients (31%) had grade 3/4 leukopenia; however, only 3 patients had febrile neutropenia. Thirteen patients had a treatment delay and six required dose reductions. Twenty two patients were evaluable for efficacy. The overall response rate for weekly topotecan was 13.6% [95% CI; -0.7-27.9%] with 1 complete response, and 2 partial responses. Twelve patients (54.5%), including 2 with minor responses, had stable disease for a median duration of 18 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly topotecan at the current schedule in the third-line setting in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent EOC has modest clinical activity. Toxicity associated with this regimen is acceptable but growth factor support, dose reductions, or schedule alterations may need to be considered in many of these patients.

Fertility sparing therapy in a patient with placental site trophoblastic tumor: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Placental site trophoblastic tumor (PSTT) is a rare form of gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD) that is generally resistant to conventional chemotherapeutic treatment. Patients with localized disease are usually managed with hysterectomy. CASE: A 29-year-old female presented with vaginal bleeding and an elevated serum human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG). After initial observation, the patient experienced continued vaginal bleeding and a persistently elevated HCG. Therefore, she underwent a dilation and curettage and final pathology revealed PSTT. Since the patient desired future fertility, the patient received combination chemotherapy with etoposide, methotrexate, actinomycin-D followed by etoposide and cisplatin (EMA-EP). The patient had a complete response to chemotherapy and subsequently delivered a term infant 2 years after completion of therapy. CONCLUSION: PSTT is thought to be a chemoresistant disease and the preferred method of treatment is hysterectomy or local uterine resection. However, combination chemotherapy is a reasonable option in a properly counseled patient who strongly desires future fertility.

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin consolidation therapy after platinum/paclitaxel-based chemotherapy for suboptimally debulked, advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of using pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) as a consolidation therapy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer who have attained a clinically defined complete response to initial platinum/paclitaxel-based chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with suboptimally debulked stage IIIC/IV epithelial ovarian cancer who attained a clinically defined complete response at the completion of platinum/paclitaxel-based chemotherapy were eligible for this protocol. Patients were treated with PLD at a dose of 40 mg/m(2) every 28 days for four cycles. A survival analysis was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Of the 30 patients enrolled, 29 were evaluable. Twenty-three patients (79%) completed all four cycles of consolidation therapy. Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia was the most common toxicity. Six patients remained clinically without evidence of disease with a median follow-up of 35 months from the completion of primary chemotherapy. The median progression-free interval was 15 months, and median overall survival time was 31 months, with 47% of patients achieving a 4-year survival. CONCLUSIONS: Consolidation therapy with PLD chemotherapy administered to women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after initial chemotherapy appears feasible based on its toxicity profile. Considering the tolerability of this agent, further investigation is needed to depict the optimal dose and schedule needed for consolidation therapy.

Surgical staging in endometrial cancer.

Early presentation of endometrial cancer permits effective management with excellent clinical outcome. The addition of hysteroscopy to dilatation and curettage (D&C) in the evaluation of postmenopausal bleeding adds little to the detection of malignancy. Imaging studies such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron-emission tomography may be of use in determining the presence of extrauterine disease in patients medically unfit for surgical staging. However, these studies are not sufficiently sensitive to replace surgical staging and have little role in routine preoperative evaluation. Clinical staging alone is clearly inadequate, as 23% of preoperative clinical stage I/II patients are upstaged with comprehensive surgical staging. Preoperative tumor grade from D&C or office biopsy may be inaccurate and lead to an underestimate of tumor progression if used to determine which patients should be surgically staged. Clinical estimation of depth of invasion, with or without frozen section, is inaccurate and may lead to underestimation of disease status when surgical staging is not performed. The practice of resecting only clinically suspicious nodes should be discouraged as it is no substitute for comprehensive surgical staging. Comprehensive surgical staging provides proper guidance for postoperative adjuvant therapy, avoiding needless radiation in 85% of clinical stage I/II patients. Finally, resection of occult metastasis with surgical staging may improve survival.

Effectiveness of darbepoetin alfa versus epoetin alfa for the treatment of chemotherapy induced anemia in patients with gynecologic malignancies.

OBJECTIVE: Chemotherapy induced anemia (CIA) commonly occurs in gynecologic oncology patients. This often leads to treatment with erythropoietic stimulating agents in order to prevent chemotherapy delays, dose modifications and transfusion of red blood cells. Our objective was to determine the subsequent transfusion rates following administration of either darbepoetin alfa or epoetin alfa. METHODS: A single institution retrospective chart review was performed utilizing patients from January 2003 to September 2004 who received either darbepoetin alfa or epoetin alfa for CIA (Hgb < or = 10.0). Data collection variables included patient demographics, cancer diagnosis, chemotherapy treatment(s), laboratory data, erythropoeisis stimulation data, and transfusions. Sample size calculations were set to detect a 20% transfusion rate difference between the two groups. Chi-square, Fisher exact test and student t tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: 123 patients were eligible for analysis (60 darbepoetin alfa; 62 epoetin alfa). 93% of darbepoetin alfa patients received 200 mg every other week, while 86% of epoetin alfa patients received 40,000 U weekly. The darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa groups were similar in respect to age, race, tumor type, histology, previous chemotherapy, number of chemotherapy agents, weeks of erythropoietic stimulation, and baseline serum levels of creatinine and hemoglobin. The mean baseline Hgb and change in Hgb was similar for each group (darbepoetin alfa = 11.2, 2.5 and epoetin alfa = 11.3, 2.3). Twenty one (35%) of the darbepoetin alfa patients received a transfusion of packed red blood cells compared to 12 (19%) of epoetin alfa patients (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective analysis powered to detect differences in transfusion rates revealed a statistically significant difference in transfusion rates between darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa for the treatment of CIA. These data warrant a randomized prospective trial in gynecologic oncology patients with careful attention to the timing of initiation of treatment, dosing regimens, and titration of growth factor.

The use of adjuvant radiation therapy in patients with intermediate-risk Stages IC and II uterine corpus cancer: a patient care evaluation study from the American College of Surgeons National Cancer Data Base.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the outcomes of patients with intermediate-risk Stages IC and II uterine corpus cancer treated with surgery alone or surgery followed by radiation therapy. METHODS: Patients with uterine corpus cancer diagnosed in 1995 were identified from hospitals in the United States with tumor registry databases. Data were collected on histology, surgical treatment, radiation therapy, recurrence, and survival. Survival analysis was performed using life-table computational method. RESULTS: 713 hospitals submitted data on 10,726 patients with uterine corpus cancer. 9977 patients (93.0%) underwent surgery, and 2624 patients (26.3%) received radiation therapy. Patients with clinical Stages IC and IIA disease who underwent surgery followed by radiation therapy compared to surgery alone had a trend toward improved 5-year relative survival (RS) (81.2% vs. 92.5%; 74.3% vs. 96.0%, respectively). The 5-year RS of patients with surgical Stage IC disease was not statistically different between the surgery alone group and the radiation group (93.9% vs. 91.7%). Patients with surgical Stage IIA and IIB disease did not benefit from radiation therapy compared to surgery alone (5-year RS; 83.7% vs. 98.0% and 82.3% vs. 81.8%, respectively). CONCLUSION: There is a trend toward improved survival in patients with clinical Stages IC and IIA uterine corpus cancer when radiation therapy is utilized following surgery. The survival of patients with surgical Stages IC and II uterine corpus cancer is not improved with adjuvant radiation therapy.

Management strategies for stage IB2 cervical cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the potential effectiveness and medical costs of three common strategies to manage Stage IB2 squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix (CXCA). METHODS: A decision analysis model compared three strategies to manage Stage IB2 CXCA: (1) radical hysterectomy with pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy followed by tailored chemoradiation therapy for high-risk patients (RHYST); (2) primary chemoradiation therapy for all patients (CTRT); and (3) neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy and tailored chemoradiation therapy for high-risk patients (NAC). RESULTS: RHYST was the least expensive strategy with a cost of 284 Million (M) per 10,000 women and a 5-year disease free survival (5-DFS) of 69%. Both NAC and CTRT had similar 5-DFS (69.3% and 70%, respectively); however, both NAC and CTRT were more expensive than RHYST at 299 M and 508 M, respectively. This translated into a higher cost-effectiveness ratio for NAC and CTRT ($43,197 and $72,613, respectively) when compared to RHYST ($41,212). NAC yielded 30 additional survivors compared to RHYST but at a cost of $499,783 per survivor. CTRT was more effective than RHYST with 100 additional survivors but at a substantial cost of $2,240,000 per survivor. CONCLUSIONS: RHYST is the most cost-effective strategy to manage Stage IB2 CXCA and would be favored in settings where resources are limited. Although NAC and CTRT are reasonable treatment strategies, policymakers must be willing to spend approximately $500,000 per additional survivor (NAC) or $2.2 M per additional survivor (CTRT).