Mammographic density assessment: comparison of radiologists, automated volumetric measurement, and artificial intelligence-based computer-assisted diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence-based computer-assisted diagnosis (AI-CAD) is increasingly used for mammographic exams, and its role in mammographic density assessment should be evaluated. PURPOSE: To assess the inter-modality agreement between radiologists, automated volumetric density measurement program (Volpara), and AI-CAD system in breast density categorization using the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) density categories. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on 1015 screening digital mammograms that were performed in Asian female patients (mean age = 56 years ± 10 years) in our health examination center between December 2022 and January 2023. Four radiologists with two different levels of experience (expert and general radiologists) performed density assessments. Agreement between the radiologists, Volpara, and AI-CAD (Lunit INSIGHT MMG) was evaluated using weighted kappa statistics and matched rates. RESULTS: Inter-reader agreement between expert and general radiologists was substantial (k = 0.65) with a matched rate of 72.8%. The agreement was substantial between expert or general radiologists and Volpara (k = 0.64-0.67) with a matched rate of 72.0% but moderate between expert or general radiologists and AI-CAD (k = 0.45-0.58) with matched rates of 56.7%-67.0%. The agreement between Volpara and AI-CAD was moderate (k = 0.53) with a matched rate of 60.8%. CONCLUSION: The agreement in breast density categorization between radiologists and automated volumetric density measurement program (Volpara) was higher than the agreement between radiologists and AI-CAD (Lunit INSIGHT MMG).

A predictive model using MRI and clinicopathologic features for breast cancer recurrence in young women treated with upfront surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To identify preoperative breast MR imaging and clinicopathological variables related to recurrence and develop a risk prediction model for recurrence in young women with breast cancer treated with upfront surgery. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 438 consecutive women with breast cancer aged 35 years or younger between January 2007 and December 2016. Breast MR images before surgery were independently reviewed by breast radiologists blinded to patient outcomes. The clinicopathological data including patient demographics, clinical features, and tumor characteristics were reviewed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify the independent factors associated with recurrence. The risk prediction model for recurrence was developed, and the discrimination and calibration abilities were assessed. RESULTS: Of 438 patients, 95 (21.7%) developed recurrence after a median follow-up of 65 months. Tumor size at MR imaging (HR = 1.158, p = 0.006), multifocal or multicentric disease (HR = 1.676, p = 0.017), and peritumoral edema on T2WI (HR = 2.166, p = 0.001) were identified as independent predictors of recurrence, while adjuvant endocrine therapy (HR = 0.624, p = 0.035) was inversely associated with recurrence. The prediction model showed good discrimination ability in predicting 5-year recurrence (C index, 0.707 in the development cohort; 0.686 in the validation cohort) and overall recurrence (C index, 0.699 in the development cohort; 0.678 in the validation cohort). The calibration plot demonstrated an excellent correlation (concordance correlation coefficient, 0.903). CONCLUSION: A prediction model based on breast MR imaging and clinicopathological features showed good discrimination to predict recurrence in young women with breast cancer treated with upfront surgery, which could contribute to individualized risk stratification. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Our prediction model, incorporating preoperative breast MR imaging and clinicopathological features, predicts recurrence in young women with breast cancer undergoing upfront surgery, facilitating personalized risk stratification and informing tailored management strategies. KEY POINTS: Younger women with breast cancer have worse outcomes than those diagnosed at more typical ages. The described prediction model showed good discrimination performance in predicting 5-year and overall recurrence. Incorporating better risk stratification tools in this population may help improve outcomes.

Use of a commercial artificial intelligence-based mammography analysis software for improving breast ultrasound interpretations.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use of a commercial artificial intelligence (AI)-based mammography analysis software for improving the interpretations of breast ultrasound (US)-detected lesions. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 1109 breasts that underwent both mammography and US-guided breast biopsy. The AI software processed mammograms and provided an AI score ranging from 0 to 100 for each breast, indicating the likelihood of malignancy. The performance of the AI score in differentiating mammograms with benign outcomes from those revealing cancers following US-guided breast biopsy was evaluated. In addition, prediction models for benign outcomes were constructed based on clinical and imaging characteristics with and without AI scores, using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The AI software had an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.79-0.82) in differentiating between benign and cancer cases. The prediction models that did not include AI scores (non-AI model), only used AI scores (AI-only model), and included AI scores (integrated model) had AUROCs of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.75-0.83), 0.78 (95% CI, 0.74-0.82), and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.81-0.88) in the development cohort, and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.68-0.81), 0.82 (95% CI, 0.76-0.88), and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.79-0.90) in the validation cohort, respectively. The integrated model outperformed the non-AI model in the development and validation cohorts (p < 0.001 for both). CONCLUSION: The commercial AI-based mammography analysis software could be a valuable adjunct to clinical decision-making for managing US-detected breast lesions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The commercial AI-based mammography analysis software could potentially reduce unnecessary biopsies and improve patient outcomes. KEY POINTS: • Breast US has high rates of false-positive interpretations. • A commercial AI-based mammography analysis software could distinguish mammograms having benign outcomes from those revealing cancers after US-guided breast biopsy. • A commercial AI-based mammography analysis software may improve interpretations for breast US-detected lesions.

High-resolution diffusion-weighted MRI plus mammography for detecting clinically occult breast cancers in women with dense breasts.

PURPOSE: To compare the performance of mammography, high-resolution DW-MRI, DCE-MRI, and their combinations in detecting clinically occult breast cancer in women with dense breasts. METHOD: 544 breasts from 281 consecutive asymptomatic women with dense breasts were retrospectively identified. They underwent breast MRI for preoperative evaluation of breast cancers (n = 214) or as supplemental screening (n = 67) including DCE-MRI and DW-MRI (b values, 0 and 1000 sec/mm2; in-plane resolution, 1.1 × 1.1 mm2 and 1.3 × 1.3 mm2; section thickness, 3 mm), in addition to mammography. Three readers independently reviewed each examination on a per-breast basis. Histopathology and at least two year of imaging follow-up served as the gold standard. The sensitivities and specificities of different imaging modalities were compared using McNemar test. RESULTS: 230 of 544 breasts (42 %) had malignant lesions. The sensitivity of DW-MRI was higher than that of mammography (77.0 % vs 57.9 %; adjusted p < 0.001), but lower than that of DCE-MRI (84.8 %; adjusted p = 0.014). The specificity of DW-MRI was comparable to those of mammography (98.1 % vs 99.1 %; adjusted p > 0.999) and DCE-MRI (97.1 %; adjusted p > 0.999). DW-MRI plus mammography had a comparable sensitivity and specificity to those of DCE-MRI plus mammography (88.6 % vs 90.9 % and 97.1 % vs 96.2 %; adjusted p > 0.999 for both). CONCLUSIONS: High-resolution DW-MRI had a sensitivity higher than mammography and lower than DCE-MRI. Nevertheless, DW-MRI plus mammography showed a comparable sensitivity and specificity to DCE-MRI plus mammography for detecting clinically occult cancers in women with dense breasts.

Prediction of the MammaPrint Risk Group Using MRI Features in Women With Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative, and 1 to 3 Node-Positive Invasive Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: MammaPrint assigns chemotherapeutic benefits to patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, and 1 to 3 node-positive invasive breast cancer. However, its cost and time-consuming nature limit its use in certain clinical settings. We aimed to develop and validate the prediction models for the low MammaPrint risk group using clinicopathologic and MRI features. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Overall, 352 women with ER-positive, HER2-negative, and 1 to 3 node-positive invasive breast cancer were retrospectively reviewed and assigned to development (n = 235) and validation sets (n = 117). Univariate and multivariate analyses identified features associated with the low MammaPrint risk group. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) of models based on clinicopathologic, MRI, and combined features were evaluated. RESULTS: Development set multivariate analysis showed that clinicopathologic features including low histologic grade (odds ratio [OR], 5.29; P = .02), progesterone receptor-positivity (OR, 3.23; P = .01), and low Ki-67 (OR, 6.05; P < .001) and MRI features, including peritumoral edema absence (OR, 2.24; P = .04) and a high proportion of persistent components (OR, 1.15; P = .004) were significantly associated with the low MammaPrint risk group. The AUROCs of models based on clinicopathologic, MRI, and combined features were 0.77, 0.64, and 0.80 in the development and 0.66, 0.60, and 0.70 in the validation sets, respectively. CONCLUSION: The combined model incorporating clinicopathologic and MRI features showed potential in predicting the low MammaPrint risk group, and may support decision-making in clinical settings with limited access to MammaPrint.

Assessing internal mammary lymph node metastasis by breast magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer.

The internal mammary lymph nodes (IMLNs) are a main pathway of metastasis in breast cancer, and breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays an important role in staging that disease. We investigated the MRI parameters that can predict metastatic IMLNs and evaluated their diagnostic performance by comparing the breast MRI findings for metastatic and benign IMLNs. From January 2016 to December 2020, 474 cases of enlarged IMLNs on breast MRI were identified. By cytopathology or integrated positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), 168 IMLNs were confirmed as metastatic, and 81 were confirmed as benign. Breast MRIs were reviewed by 2 radiologists, and various parameters (node axes, fatty hilum, necrosis, margin characteristics, restricted diffusion, and involved levels; primary tumor location and skin involvement) were assessed. Independent t-tests, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses, chi-square tests, and Fisher exact tests were performed to compare and evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the imaging findings. Significant differences in the breast MRI findings for the short and long axes, fatty hilum, necrosis, margin characteristics, diffusion restriction, and tumor location were observed between benign and metastatic IMLNs. Compared with the long axis and the ratio of the axes, the short axis had the best diagnostic value (higher area under the ROC curve) for predicting metastatic IMLNs. In conclusion, breast MRI parameters such as short axis, presence of fatty hilum, necrosis, margin characteristics, and diffusion restriction can be used to evaluate and differentiate benign from metastatic IMLNs, offering valuable insights to improve diagnosis and treatment planning in breast cancer.

Improving mammography interpretation for both novice and experienced readers: a comparative study of two commercial artificial intelligence software.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the improvement of mammography interpretation for novice and experienced radiologists assisted by two commercial AI software. METHODS: We compared the performance of two AI software (AI-1 and AI-2) in two experienced and two novice readers for 200 mammographic examinations (80 cancer cases). Two reading sessions were conducted within 4 weeks. The readers rated the likelihood of malignancy (range, 1-7) and the percentage probability of malignancy (range, 0-100%), with and without AI assistance. Differences in AUROC, sensitivity, and specificity were analyzed. RESULTS: Mean AUROC increased in both novice (0.86 to 0.90 with AI-1 [p = 0.005]; 0.91 with AI-2 [p < 0.001]) and experienced readers (0.87 to 0.92 with AI-1 [p < 0.001]; 0.90 with AI-2 [p = 0.004]). Sensitivities increased from 81.3 to 88.8% with AI-1 (p = 0.027) and to 91.3% with AI-2 (p = 0.005) in novice readers, and from 81.9 to 90.6% with AI-1 (p = 0.001) and to 87.5% with AI-2 (p = 0.016) in experienced readers. Specificity did not decrease significantly in both novice (p > 0.999, both) and experienced readers (p > 0.999 with AI-1 and 0.282 with AI-2). There was no significant difference in the performance change depending on the type of AI software (p > 0.999). CONCLUSION: Commercial AI software improved the diagnostic performance of both novice and experienced readers. The type of AI software used did not significantly impact performance changes. Further validation with a larger number of cases and readers is needed. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Commercial AI software effectively aided mammography interpretation irrespective of the experience level of human readers. KEY POINTS: • Mammography interpretation remains challenging and is subject to a wide range of interobserver variability. • In this multi-reader study, two commercial AI software improved the sensitivity of mammography interpretation by both novice and experienced readers. The type of AI software used did not significantly impact performance changes. • Commercial AI software may effectively support mammography interpretation irrespective of the experience level of human readers.

Prognostic implications of HER2 changes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with HER2-zero and HER2-low breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The transition of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in HER2-low breast cancer has not been thoroughly evaluated. Here, we evaluated the HER2 transition among HER2-zero and HER2-low breast cancer cases post-NAC and its impact on clinical outcomes. METHODS: We included 1288 patients with HER2-low or zero breast cancer who underwent NAC and surgery between 2014 and 2018 and had paired pre- and post-therapeutic HER2 status results. RESULTS: Among patients who were HER2-zero pre-NAC (n = 650), 68% and 29% were HER2-zero and HER2-low, respectively, post-NAC. Among patients who were HER2-low pre-NAC (n = 638), 32% of patients showed HER2 changes (low to zero), and 59% of patients had a constant HER2-low status post-NAC. Patients with constant HER2-low or transitions from HER2-low to zero had a higher proportion of hormone receptor positivity (84% and 79%) than those with changes from HER2-zero to low (77%) or with constant HER2-zero (56%), respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that patients with oestrogen receptor positivity had a higher probability of gaining HER2-low expression than those with oestrogen receptor negativity (odds ratio 2.48). No significant differences were observed in terms of overall survival or disease-free survival between patients with and without HER2-changes according to their hormone receptor status, except in the post-therapeutic HER2-low, hormone receptor-negativity subset. CONCLUSION: Temporal heterogeneity of HER2-low expression is observed in substantial numbers of post-NAC breast cancer patients. Clinical outcomes show no significant associations, except in the post-therapeutic HER2-low, hormone receptor negativity subset. The prognostic implications of HER2 transition in HER2-low breast cancer require further investigation.

Correlation of shear-wave elastography parameters with the molecular subtype and axillary lymph node status in breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To examine correlations between shear-wave elastography (SWE) parameters with molecular subtype and axillary lymph node (LN) status of breast cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 545 consecutive women (mean age, 52.7 ± 10.7 years; range, 26-83) with breast cancer who underwent preoperative breast ultrasound with SWE between December 2019 and January 2021. SWE parameters (Emax, Emean, and Eratio) and the histopathologic information from surgical specimens including histologic type, histologic grade, size of invasive cancer, hormone receptor and HER2 status, Ki-67 proliferation index, and axillary LN status were analyzed. The relationships between SWE parameters and histopathologic findings were analyzed using an independent sample t-test, one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's post hoc test, and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Higher stiffness values of SWE were associated with larger lesion size (>20 mm) on ultrasound, high histologic grade, larger invasive cancer size (>20 mm), high Ki-67, and axillary LN metastasis. Emax and Emean were the lowest in the luminal A-like subtype, and all three parameters were the highest in the triple-negative subtype. Lower value of Emax was independently associated with the luminal A-like subtype (P = 0.04). Higher value of Emean was independently associated with axillary LN metastasis for tumors ≤ 20 mm (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Increases in the tumor stiffness values on SWE were significantly associated with aggressive histopathologic features of breast cancer. Lower stiffness values were associated with the luminal A-like subtype, and tumors with higher stiffness values were associated with axillary LN metastasis in small breast cancers.

Randomized phase III trial of a neoadjuvant regimen of four cycles of adriamycin plus cyclophosphamide followed by four cycles of docetaxel (AC4-D4) versus a shorter treatment of three cycles of FEC followed by three cycles of docetaxel (FEC3-D3) in node-positive breast cancer (Neo-shorter; NCT02001506).

PURPOSE: To determine whether six cycles of FEC3-D3 has a comparable efficacy to eight of AC4-D4. METHODS: The enrolled patients (pts) were clinically diagnosed with stage II or III breast cancer. The primary endpoint was a pathologic complete response (pCR), and the secondary endpoints were 3 year disease-free survival (3Y DFS), toxicities, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We calculated that 252 pts were needed in each treatment group to enable the detection of non-inferiority (non-inferiority margin of 10%). RESULTS: In terms of ITT analysis, 248 pts were finally enrolled. The 218 pts who completed the surgery were included in the current analysis. The baseline characteristics of these subjects were well balanced between the two arms. By ITT analysis, pCR was achieved in 15/121 (12.4%) pts in the FEC3-D3 arm and 18/126 (14.3%) in the AC4-D4 arm. With a median follow up of 64.1 months, the 3Y DFS was comparable between the two arms (75.8% in FEC3-D3 vs. 75.6% in AC4-D4). The most common adverse event (AE) was Grade 3/4 neutropenia, which arose in 27/126 (21.4%) AC4-D4 arm pts vs 23/121 (19.0%) FEC3-D3 arm cases. The primary HRQoL domains were similar between the two groups (FACT-B scores at baseline, P = 0.35; at the midpoint of NACT, P = 0.20; at the completion of NACT, P = 0.44). CONCLUSION: Six cycles of FEC3-D3 could be an alternative to eight of AC4-D4. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02001506. Registered December 5,2013. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02001506.

[Mammography-Guided Interventional Procedure]. / ìœ ë°©ì´¬ì˜ìˆ ìœ ë„í•˜ 중재 ì‹œìˆ .

Mammography has been the standard screening method for breast cancer. In women with suspicious calcifications and architectural distortion identified on mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis only without detected on breast US, stereotactic biopsy and mammography-guided preoperative localization is one of the method for pathologic diagnosis. This review aims to describe the indication, contraindication, technique of stereotactic biopsy, clip placement after stereotactic biopsy, and digital breast tomosynthesis-guided stereotactic biopsy. In addition, this article reviews mammography-guided preoperative localization using a wire or non-wire device.

Effects of Preoperative Breast MRI on Breast Cancer Survival Outcomes in Women Aged 35 Years and Younger.

Background The impact of preoperative breast MRI on the long-term outcomes in patients with breast cancer who are 35 years and younger has not been established. Purpose To evaluate the impact of preoperative breast MRI on recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in women with breast cancer who are 35 years and younger by using propensity score matching. Materials and Methods A total of 708 women who were 35 years and younger (mean age, 32 years ± 3 [SD]) and diagnosed with breast cancer from 2007 to 2016 were retrospectively identified. Patients who underwent preoperative MRI (MRI group) were matched with those who did not (no MRI group) according to 23 patient and tumor characteristics. RFS and OS were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs). Results Of 708 women, 125 patient pairs were matched. In the MRI group versus the no MRI group, the mean follow-up time was 82 months ± 32 versus 106 months ± 42, and the rates of total recurrence and death were 22% (104 of 478 patients) versus 29% (66 of 230 patients) and 5% (25 of 478 patients) versus 12% (28 of 230 patients), respectively. The time to recurrence was 44 months ± 33 in the MRI group and 56 months ± 42 in the no MRI group. After propensity score matching, the MRI and no MRI groups did not show significant differences in total recurrence (HR, 1.0; P = .99), local-regional recurrence (HR, 1.3; P = .42), contralateral breast recurrence (HR, 0.7; P = .39), or distant recurrence (HR, 0.9; P = .79). The MRI group showed a tendency toward better OS, but this was not statistically significant (HR, 0.47; P = .07). In the entire unmatched cohort, MRI was not an independent significant factor for predicting RFS or OS. Conclusion Preoperative breast MRI was not a significant prognostic factor for recurrence-free survival in women 35 years and younger with breast cancer. A tendency toward better overall survival was observed in the MRI group, but this was not significant. © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Kim and Moy in this issue.

Outcomes and imaging features of microinvasive carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ: Matched cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to investigate the differences in clinical outcomes between microinvasive carcinoma (mIC) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and compare the imaging features of both using mammography, US and MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by our institutional review board. Between January 2011 and December 2013, 516 women with mIC or DCIS confirmed by surgery were included. Patients were matched with propensity score matching to compare recurrence-free survival (RFS). RFS was compared using a Cox proportional hazards model. Imaging features were also compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Among 516 women, 219 mIC and 297 DCIS tumors were identified. After matching, 132 women were allocated to each group. The mean follow-up duration was 80.2 months. In the matched cohort, no statistically significant association was observed between the DCIS and mIC groups in terms of total recurrence (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.8-4.0; P = 0.19), local-regional recurrence (HR: 3.4; 95% CI: 0.9-12.3, P = 0.07), or contralateral recurrence (HR: 0.9; 95% CI: 0.3-2.8, P = 0.89). Non-mass lesions at US (P = 0.004), moderate or marked background parenchymal enhancement (P = 0.04), and higher peak enhancement (P = 0.02) at MRI were more commonly seen in the mIC group than in the DCIS group. CONCLUSION: Microinvasive carcinomas are distinct from DCIS in terms of imaging features, but no statistically significant association in recurrence survival.

The Accuracy of Mammography, Ultrasound, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging For the Measurement of Invasive Breast Cancer With Extensive Intraductal Components.

BACKGROUND: The precise preoperative evaluation of radiologic tumor size with extensive intraductal component (EIC) is important. This study compared the accuracy of mammography, ultrasound (US), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to measure invasive breast cancer with EIC. METHODS: Between 2007 and 2012, we collected data from 6816 patients who underwent surgery for invasive breast cancer at our institution. We reviewed the postoperative surgical reports of the tumors, in which the invasive tumor size and EIC were measured separately. Finally, we included 370 women who underwent preoperative mammography, US, and MRI. Each modality was retrospectively reviewed to measure the size of invasive breast cancer with EIC. The reference standard was surgical pathologic size and the accuracies of the image were evaluated. RESULTS: Spearman's correlation coefficient for the size of invasive cancer with EIC was good between MRI (r = 0.741) and pathology, and moderate between mammography (r = 0.661) or US (r = 0.514) and pathology. Both mass and nonmass lesions showed good correlations (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.672 and 0.612, respectively) in MRI. Furthermore, the subgroup of tumors without microcalcifications showed a higher correlation with MRI (ICC = 0.796) than with mammography (ICC = 0.620). However, the subgroup with microcalcifications showed a good correlation with mammography (ICC = 0.702) compared to MRI (ICC = 0.680) and US (ICC = 0.532). CONCLUSION: The lesion on mammography, US, and MRI reflected preoperative size of invasive cancer with EIC. MRI shows a higher correlation than mammography and US. However, cancer with calcifications of mammography shows a more accurate size than MRI or US.

[Patterns in the Use and Perception of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A Survey of Korean Breast Radiologists]. / 디지털 ìœ ë°© í† ëª¨ì‹ í Œì‹œìŠ¤ì— 대한 국내 사용 현황과 인식에 관한 설문조사 연구.

Purpose: To evaluate the pattern of use and the perception of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) among Korean breast radiologists. Materials and Methods: From March 22 to 29, 2021, an online survey comprising 27 questions was sent to members of the Korean Society of Breast Imaging. Questions related to practice characteristics, utilization and perception of DBT, and research interests. Results were analyzed based on factors using logistic regression. Results: Overall, 120 of 257 members responded to the survey (response rate, 46.7%), 67 (55.8%) of whom reported using DBT. The overall satisfaction with DBT was 3.31 (1-5 scale). The most-cited DBT advantages were decreased recall rate (55.8%), increased lesion conspicuity (48.3%), and increased cancer detection (45.8%). The most-cited DBT disadvantages were extra cost for patients (46.7%), insufficient calcification characterization (43.3%), insufficient improvement in diagnostic performance (39.2%), and radiation dose (35.8%). Radiologists reported increased storage requirements and interpretation time for barriers to implementing DBT. Conclusion: Further improvement of DBT techniques reflecting feedback from the user's perspective will help increase the acceptance of DBT in Korea.

Radiation Dose Reduction in Digital Mammography by Deep-Learning Algorithm Image Reconstruction: A Preliminary Study.

Purpose: To develop a denoising convolutional neural network-based image processing technique and investigate its efficacy in diagnosing breast cancer using low-dose mammography imaging. Materials and Methods: A total of 6 breast radiologists were included in this prospective study. All radiologists independently evaluated low-dose images for lesion detection and rated them for diagnostic quality using a qualitative scale. After application of the denoising network, the same radiologists evaluated lesion detectability and image quality. For clinical application, a consensus on lesion type and localization on preoperative mammographic examinations of breast cancer patients was reached after discussion. Thereafter, coded low-dose, reconstructed full-dose, and full-dose images were presented and assessed in a random order. Results: Lesions on 40% reconstructed full-dose images were better perceived when compared with low-dose images of mastectomy specimens as a reference. In clinical application, as compared to 40% reconstructed images, higher values were given on full-dose images for resolution (p < 0.001); diagnostic quality for calcifications (p < 0.001); and for masses, asymmetry, or architectural distortion (p = 0.037). The 40% reconstructed images showed comparable values to 100% full-dose images for overall quality (p = 0.547), lesion visibility (p = 0.120), and contrast (p = 0.083), without significant differences. Conclusion: Effective denoising and image reconstruction processing techniques can enable breast cancer diagnosis with substantial radiation dose reduction.

Breast Cancer Recurrence after Smooth versus Textured Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Matched Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of reports on breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma have recently raised concerns about the potential influence of breast implants on carcinogenicity, particularly implants with a textured surface. The authors compared the recurrence outcomes between smooth and textured implant reconstructions for breast cancer. METHODS: All patients who underwent immediate direct-to-implant-based breast reconstruction for primary breast cancer between January of 2010 and December of 2016 were reviewed. A total of 590 patients were included. After propensity score 1:2 matching, 138 patients were included in the smooth implant group and 276 patients in the textured implant group. Locoregional recurrence-free survival, disease-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival rates were compared between the groups. RESULTS: After matching, the median follow-up periods were 62 months and 66 months for the smooth and textured groups, respectively. The authors observed no significant differences between the smooth and textured implant groups in terms of locoregional recurrence (10.9 percent versus 11.6 percent; p = 0.827), distant metastasis (3.6 percent versus 4.0 percent; p = 0.547), or first recurrence (12.3 percent versus 13.4 percent; p = 0.757) rates. No significant differences were observed between the groups in 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival (89.5 percent versus 89.4 percent; p = 0.840), disease-free survival (87.7 percent versus 88.1 percent; p = 0.794), or distant metastasis-free survival (98.8 percent versus 96.8 percent; p = 0.741) rates. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were observed between the smooth and textured implant groups in this matched cohort analysis of recurrence outcomes in patients with primary breast cancer who underwent immediate direct-to-implant reconstruction. Further larger scale investigations are necessary to validate the authors' results. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Features of breast cancer initially assessed as probably benign on ultrasound: A retrospective study.

We evaluated the features of breast cancers initially assessed as probably benign at ultrasound (US). Of the 7098 patients who underwent breast cancer surgery at our institution between 2014 and 2016, 179 lesions in 178 patients who had both a prior US with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 3 assessment and a recent US with a diagnosis of breast cancer were enrolled. Prior and recent US findings and category were retrospectively reassessed in line with the BI-RADS Atlas and analyzed. Of the 179 BI-RADS 3 lesions, 105 (59%) were retrospectively reassessed to category 4 and 74 (41%) retained category 3. Noncircumscribed margin, irregular shape, posterior enhancement, and nonparallel orientation were more frequently observed in the reassessment category 4 group than in the reassessment category 3 group (94% vs 43%, 81% vs 19%, 16% vs 4%, 14% vs 0%, respectively). The recent US revealed that 150 of the 179 lesions (84%) had > 20% size increase, and 121 (68%) showed morphologic changes. Margin was the most frequently observed morphologic feature to change (41%, 73/179). Care should be taken to look for subtle but suspicious US features and changes in mass, especially of margin, for early diagnosis of breast cancer.

Impact of Local Breast Cancer Recurrence on Reconstructed Breast in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Reconstruction.

The impact of locally recurrent breast cancer on reconstructed breasts remains largely unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the incidence of reconstruction loss due to local recurrence in patients who underwent nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction for breast cancer and to identify potential recurrence-associated risk factors for loss of index reconstruction. The records of 1,696 patients who underwent nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction between March 2003 and December 2016 at a single institution were reviewed. Among them, 128 patients with local breast cancer recurrence as the first event were analyzed. The primary outcome was loss of reconstruction due to local breast cancer recurrence. Reconstruction loss was classified as partial flap loss with breast distortion, complete flap loss, or implant loss during salvage treatment of local recurrence. Reconstruction loss occurred in 21 of the 128 patients (16%). Reconstruction loss rates were 20% for autologous and 9.5% for implant-based reconstruction (P = 0.204). Multivariate analysis showed that recurrent tumor size > 2.0 cm and multifocal recurrence were independent factors associated with an increased risk of reconstruction loss. Moreover, age ≥ 50 years at the time of recurrence diagnosis, recurrent tumor size > 2.0 cm, and multifocal recurrence were independently associated with complete flap/implant loss in the multivariate analysis. The incidence of reconstruction loss due to local breast cancer recurrence after nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction was low in this study. Age ≥ 50 years at recurrence diagnosis and the extent of local recurrence independently affected reconstruction loss. To detect recurrence early, careful follow-up through regular ultrasonography or magnetic resonance imaging at the reconstruction site is important.

Corrigendum: Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Breast Cancer Screening in High-Risk Women: Design and Imaging Protocol of a Prospective Multicenter Study in Korea.

This corrects the article on p. 218 in vol. 24, PMID: 33913277.